Uncertainty analysis of carbon turnover time and sequestration potential in terrestrial ecosystems of the Conterminous USA Xuhui Zhou 1, Tao Zhou 1, Yiqi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key sources of uncertainty in forest carbon inventories Raisa Mäkipää with Mikko Peltoniemi, Suvi Monni, Taru Palosuo, Aleksi Lehtonen & Ilkka Savolainen.
Advertisements

Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis of dynamic forest models Marcel van Oijen CEH-Edinburgh.
The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Parameter identifiability, constraints, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models Dr. Yiqi Luo Botany and microbiology department University.
Showcase of a Biome-BGC workflow presentation Zoltán BARCZA Training Workshop for Ecosystem Modelling studies Budapest, May 2014.
Bayesian Deconvolution of Belowground Ecosystem Processes Kiona Ogle University of Wyoming Departments of Botany & Statistics.
Zhengxi Tan *,1,2, Shuguang Liu 2, Carol A. Johnston 1, Thomas R. Loveland 3 Jinxun Liu 4, Rachel Kurtz 3, and Larry Tieszen 3 1 South Dakota State University,
Land Carbon Sink and Nitrogen Regulation under Elevated CO 2 : Central Tendency Yiqi Luo University of Oklahoma NCEAS Working group: William Currie, Jeffrey.
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Data-model assimilation for manipulative experiments Dr. Yiqi Luo Botany and microbiology department University of Oklahoma, USA.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
Bayesian Estimation in MARK
Bayesian calibration and comparison of process-based forest models Marcel van Oijen & Ron Smith (CEH-Edinburgh) Jonathan Rougier (Durham Univ.)
Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Uncertainty in Ecosystem Production and Biomass of Amazonia Caused by Vegetation Characteristics Christopher Potter.
US Carbon Trends March 17, USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium1 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of the Contemporary Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Ridge.
Management impacts on the C balance in agricultural ecosystems Jean-François Soussana 1 Martin Wattenbach 2, Pete Smith 2 1. INRA, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Carbon sequestration in China’s ecosystems, Jingyun Fang Department of Ecology Peking University Feb. 14, 2008.
Combination of mechanisms responsible for the missing carbon sink using bottom-up approach Haifeng Qian March 29, A Carbon Cycle and Climate Past,
Carbon Cycle Basics Ranga Myneni Boston University 1/12 Egon Schiele ( ) Autumn Sun 1.
4. Testing the LAI model To accurately fit a model to a large data set, as in the case of the global-scale space-borne LAI data, there is a need for an.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Estimating Global Inventory-Based Net Carbon Exchange from Agricultural Lands for Use in the NASA Flux Pilot Study Julie Wolf, Yannick Le Page and Tris.
Application of Geostatistical Inverse Modeling for Data-driven Atmospheric Trace Gas Flux Estimation Anna M. Michalak UCAR VSP Visiting Scientist NOAA.
A Study on Vegetation OpticalDepth Parameterization and its Impact on Passive Microwave Soil Moisture Retrievals A Study on Vegetation Optical Depth Parameterization.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
WSEAS AIKED, Cambridge, Feature Importance in Bayesian Assessment of Newborn Brain Maturity from EEG Livia Jakaite, Vitaly Schetinin and Carsten.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
SOME ASPECTS OF ACCUMULATED CARBON IN FEW BRYOPHYTE- DOMINATED ECOSYSTEMS: A BRIEF MECHANISTIC OVERVIEW Mahesh Kumar SINGH Department of Botany and Plant.
Basic Business Statistics, 11e © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 Confidence Interval Estimation.
1 Institute of Engineering Mechanics Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, Austria, EU H.J. Pradlwarter and G.I. Schuëller Confidence.
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation Introduction Find several parameters Parameter follow the specific probability distribution Generate parameter.
Exam I review Understanding the meaning of the terminology we use. Quick calculations that indicate understanding of the basis of methods. Many of the.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GHANA Jawoo Koo 1, J.B. Naab 2, J.W. Jones 1, W.M. Bostick 1 and K.J. Boote 3.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Flux tower representativeness >croplands< news from the workbench Martin Wattenbach Astley Hastings Pete Smith.
Methods Model. The TECOS model is used as forward model to simulate carbon transfer among the carbon pools (Fig.1). In the model, ecosystem is simplified.
Data-Model Assimilation in Ecology History, present, and future Yiqi Luo University of Oklahoma.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
Slide 1 Marc Kennedy, Clive Anderson, Anthony O’Hagan, Mark Lomas, Ian Woodward, Andreas Heinemayer and John Paul Gosling Uncertainty in environmental.
Why it is good to be uncertain ? Martin Wattenbach, Pia Gottschalk, Markus Reichstein, Dario Papale, Jagadeesh Yeluripati, Astley Hastings, Marcel van.
Effects of Rising Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Carbon Sequestration and N losses in the Delaware River Basin Yude Pan, John Hom, Richard Birdsey, Kevin.
Application of the ORCHIDEE global vegetation model to evaluate biomass and soil carbon stocks of Qinghai-Tibetan grasslands Tan Kun.
Improving carbon cycle models with radar retrievals of forest biomass data Mathew Williams, Tim Hill and Casey Ryan School of GeoSciences, University of.
CAMELS CCDAS A Bayesian approach and Metropolis Monte Carlo method to estimate parameters and uncertainties in ecosystem models from eddy-covariance data.
Using data assimilation to improve estimates of C cycling Mathew Williams School of GeoScience, University of Edinburgh.
Estimates of Carbon Transfer coefficients Using Probabilistic Inversion for Three Forest Ecosystems in East China Li Zhang 1, Yiqi Luo 2, Guirui Yu 1,
Machine Design Under Uncertainty. Outline Uncertainty in mechanical components Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis for.
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Recursive Calibration of Ecosystem Models Using Sequential Data Assimilation Mingshi Chen¹, Shuguang Liu¹, Larry L. Tieszen², and David Y. Hollinger 3.
Eucalyptus globoidea productivity in New Zealand Dean Meason, Tobias Herrman, Christine Todoroki.
Parameter estimation of forest carbon dynamics using Kalman Filter methods –Preliminary results Chao Gao, 1 Han Wang, 2 S Lakshmivarahan, 3 Ensheng Weng,
MODELLING CARBON FLOWS IN CROP AND SOIL Krisztina R. Végh.
Ecosystem carbon storage capacity as affected by disturbance regimes: a general theoretical model Introduction Disturbances can profoundly affect ecosystem.
Forest Research, 20 February 2009 Understanding the carbon cycle of forest ecosystems: a model-data fusion approach Mathew Williams School of GeoSciences,
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Monte Carlo Sampling to Inverse Problems Wojciech Dębski Inst. Geophys. Polish Acad. Sci. 1 st Orfeus workshop: Waveform inversion.
Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2014 Meeting Do Below Ground Processes Explain Differences in Growth, Productivity and Carrying Capacity of Loblolly.
Generalization Performance of Exchange Monte Carlo Method for Normal Mixture Models Kenji Nagata, Sumio Watanabe Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Reducing Photometric Redshift Uncertainties Through Galaxy Clustering
T. E. Dyhoum1, D. Lesnic 1 and R. G. Aykroyd 2
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
Ecosystem Productivity
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
Climate Control of Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration
Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Presentation transcript:

Uncertainty analysis of carbon turnover time and sequestration potential in terrestrial ecosystems of the Conterminous USA Xuhui Zhou 1, Tao Zhou 1, Yiqi Luo 1 1 Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA 2 K ey laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P. R. China Address:  Carbon (C) turnover time and increases in NPP quantifies the capacity for C storage in plant and soil pools.  Accurate spatially distributed estimates of C turnover time over the conterminous USA is critical to the understanding of terrestrial C sequestration and prediction of climate change.  However, the spatial patterns of C turnover time have not been quantified for the conterminous USA, although NPP changes are relatively well qualified. I t is largely unknown what probabilistic densities are of C turnover time and sequestration potential.  In this study, the Bayesian probability inversion and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique were applied to a regional TECOR model to generate PDF of C turnover time. And ecosystem C turnover times and sequestration potential and their standard deviation (SD) were estimated using MLEs and SD of the parameters in the conterminous USA. Fig. 5 Spatial patterns of ecosystem carbon turnover time (a) and its standard deviation (b). CONCLUSIONS  Over half of 22 parameters were well constrained by 12 data sets. The poorly constrained parameters were attributable to either the lack of experimental data or the mismatch of timescales.  Using MLEs or means of estimated parameters, ecosystem C turnover time ranged from 16 (cropland) to 86 years (ENF) with an average of 56 years. The C turnover times have highly spatial heterogeneity and its values depend on the vegetation type and climate condition.  Along the latitude, C turnover times displayed a strong positive correlation, suggesting that temperature is the most important factor in influencing carbon turnover time change (R 2 = 0.91).  The estimated C sequestration potential of the whole conterminous USA was 0.22 Pg C yr -1 with large portion in MF, grassland, and cropland. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank US DOE (DE-FG03-99R62800) and NSF (DEB , DEB ) for financial support. IntroductionRESULTS METHODS Method: Bayesian probability inversion and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technology Fig. 3 Carbon allocation coefficients for eight biomes Model structure (Regional TECOR) for inversion analysis of carbon turnover time. ε* is maximum light use efficiency, α L, α W, and α R are allocations of NPP to leaves, wood, and roots (three layers ξ R1,ξ R2, and ξ R3 ), θ F and θ C are C partitioning coefficients of fine and coarse litter pools, η is a fraction of C exiting the coarse litter pool by mechanical breakdown, τ F,τ C, τ Ri, and τ Si are C turnover time in fine litter, coarse litter, roots and SOC in three layers. Fig. 1 Inversion results showing the histograms of estimated parameters with about 40,000 samples from M-H simulation for Evergreen Needleleaf Forest (left) and Grassland (right) 12 Data sets: NPP in leaves, stems, and roots, biomass in leaves, stems, fine litter, and roots and SOC in the three soil layers. Fig. 2 Comparisons between modeled and observed data for 12 data sets. Fig. 4 The relationship of latitude and latitude-averaged turnover time with SD Fig. 8 Ecosystem carbon sequestration and its SD (error bar) for 8 biomes (Pg C yr -1 ) Fig. 6 Ecosystem carbon turnover time and its SD (error bar) for 8 biomes Fig. 7 The potential of ecosystem carbon sequestration (a, g C m -2 yr -1 ) and its SD (b) in 50 years as NPP increase by 0.5% per year.