Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Wakefield Accelerator
Advertisements

Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Physics of a 10 GeV laser-plasma accelerator stage Eric Esarey HBEB Workshop, Nov , C. Schroeder, C. Geddes, E. Cormier-Michel,
Beam characteristics UCLA What is a “perfect” beam? It comes from the Injector. It is affected by many factors A few highlights from contributed talks…
Wakefield Acceleration in Dielectric Structures J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy The Physics and Applications of High Brightness Electron.
Plasma wakefields in the quasi- nonlinear regime J.B. Rosenzweig a, G. Andonian a, S. Barber a, M. Ferrario b, P. Muggli c, B. O’Shea a, Y. Sakai a, A.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Particle-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew wing University College.
UCLA Experiments with short single e-bunch using preformed and beam ionized plasma Retain ability to run short single bunch with pre-ionized plasma Ken.
Hollow Channel Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Spencer Gessner 5 th SAREC Review September 15 th, 2014.
Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,
Erik Adli CLIC Workshop 2015, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
The AWAKE Project at CERN and its Connections to CTF3 Edda Gschwendtner, CERN.
Drive Beam and CTF 3 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 October 22, 2010 Erik Adli, Department of Physics, University of Oslo and CERN Bernard.
Summary of AWG4: Beam Dynamics A. Latina (CERN), N. Solyak (FNAL) LCWS13 – Nov 11-15, 2013 – The University of Tokyo, Japan.
FACET and beam-driven e-/e+ collider concepts Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009 LA-UR.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C.Joshi, W.B.Mori
Beam Driven Plasma-Wakefield Linear Collider: PWFA-LC J.P Delahaye / SLAC On behalf of J.P. E. Adli, S.J. Gessner, M.J. Hogan, T.O. Raubenheimer (SLAC),
Consideration for a plasma stage in a PWFA linear collider Erik Adli University of Oslo, Norway FACET-II Science Workshop, SLAC Oct 14,
Erik Adli 1 Nordu- CLIC CLIC activities at the University of Oslo, Norway The Oslo group Erik Adli, Reidar L. Lillestøl, Kyrre N. Sjøbæk Department of.
The Concept of a Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Based Electron/Positron Collider Materials for discussion at special session of CLIC08 workshop Presented.
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
CLIC work packages CTF3-003 (TBL+) CLIC0-001 (CLIC DB injector) CLIC0-002 (photo injector option for CLIC DB injector.
1 1 Office of Science C. Schroeder, E. Esarey, C. Benedetti, C. Geddes, W. Leemans Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory FACET-II Science Opportunities.
Beam-Plasma Working Group Summary Barnes, Bruhwiler, DavidTech-X Clayton,
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Summary of XFEL uses for CALIFES Erik Adli (University of Oslo, Norway)
Prospects for generating high brightness and low energy spread electron beams through self-injection schemes Xinlu Xu*, Fei Li, Peicheng Yu, Wei Lu, Warren.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Ultra-short electron bunches by Velocity Bunching as required for Plasma Wave Acceleration Alberto Bacci (Sparc Group, infn Milano) EAAC2013, 3-7 June,
Beam quality preservation and power considerations Sergei Nagaitsev Fermilab/UChicago 14 October 2015.
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
X-band Based FEL proposal
CLIC DB injector facility, photo-injector option studies LCWS, Granada, September 26 th -30 th,2011Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  CLIC DB injector  Thermionic.
R. Corsini CLIC work-package planning meeting 2-3 November 2011 Introduction to the session.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
AWAKE Phase III preparation Assoc. Prof. Erik Adli Dep. of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway AWAKE Physics and Experiments Board CERN,
AWAKE Run 2 : 1) Interstage considerations 2) CALIFES as plasma technology test facility Erik Adli and Carl A. Lindstrøm University of Oslo, Norway AWAKE.
Jayakar Thangaraj Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011 PROTOPLASMA: Proton-driven wakefield experiment at Fermilab.
V.N. Litvinenko (SBU) C. Joshi, W. Mori (UCLA)
CALIFES A proposed electron beam test facility at CERN
Dr G Burt Lancaster University, Cockcroft Institute
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient Alexey Petrenko.
The 2nd European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop
Laboratoire d’Optique Appliquée
Ideas for medium and long term facility upgrade Roberto Corsini for the CLIC Accelerator Collaboration.
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Stefano Romeo on behalf of SPARC_LAB collaboration
WP 9: Beam-driven plasma acc.
Wakefield Accelerator
Instrumentation CALIFES ideal for tests and development that requires frequent access to test setup. CERN BI members already using CALIFES and want to.
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
Electron Source Configuration
Requests of Future HEP e+/e-Facilities
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
A very brief introduction to beam manipulation
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
Presentation transcript:

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini, Patric Muggli, Chris Clayton All PIC simulations performed with the code QuickPIC (W. An, W. Mori, UCLA) CLIC Project Meeting

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 2 Shut down planned at the end 2016 Accelerators +rich infrastructure of diagnostics and control “up for grabs” Recent years : increased interest in plasma wakefield acceleration (PWFA) Can CTF3 be converted to a plasma wakefield acceleration test facility?

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 3 Beam driven PWFA: Two-bunch acceleration. A drive bunch drives a plasma wake, being decelerated. A witness bunch extract the wake energy, being accelerated. PWFA has potential for: -High gradient (>10 GV/m) -High efficiency (>50%) -Low energy spread (<1%) -High charge (~nC) -Emittance preservation Above: PIC simulation based on example parameters from the PWFA-LC design study. Not discussed here: laser driven plasma wakefield acceleration.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 4 Concept for PWFA-LC layout for 1TeV. Based on earlier work from 2009 by Raubenheimer et al. J.P. Delahaye, E. Adli et al., “A beam driven Plasma Wake-Field Linear Collider”, CSS2013 and arXiv:

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 5 The total beam to beam efficiency of 50% is, together with the gradient, what makes the PWFA-LC a potentially very interesting option for a future linear collider. Shaping of the DB may reduce this number. Shaping of the WB may increase this number.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 6 High gradient (~50 GV/m) demonstrated several years ago; SLAC linac energy doubling of beam tail. Acceleration of a witness beam, with high efficiency (>30% wake to beam), high gradient (5 GV/m) and low energy spread (~1%) recently demonstrated at SLAC/FACET. M. Litos et al., Nature 515, 92 (2014) Blumenfeld, I. et al. Nature 445, 741 (2007). See CERN A&T seminar with C. Joshi, Dec 18.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 7 Much experimental work needed to fully demonstrate PWFA for applications, and especially for a LC, including studies of : - emittance preservation - beam loading and efficiency - drive bunch depletion - injection, extraction and matching - staging - plasma relaxation time Other test facilities for beam driven PWFA : - FACET: one e- bunch split (end mid-2016) - FLASH-FORWARD: one e-bunch + laser plasma injector - Plus other experiments in LAOLA - Brookhaven: one e-bunch split The above don’t have two independent beam lines - AWAKE: self-modulated p bunch + e-, but very specialized expt. - FACET II: separate witness bunch injector, not yet funded

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 8 CTF3 has two independent beam lines. Strong asset. This allows for a test-facility which is closer to a beam driven PWFA application than current projects. CTF3 is equipped with extensive beam diagnostics. Strong advantage, as precise knowledge of incoming and outgoing beam parameters is key to performing precise plasma experiments (this point has been challenging at FACET). The CTF3 parameters are far from PWFA-LC parameters (20 GeV beams, short bunches), however, physics scale with plasma density, n 0. This will not be a high-gradient facility (in the sense GV/m), however, a new test facility does not need to demonstrate high gradient in a plasma. This has already been demonstrated numerous times.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 9 The PWFA-LC is based on co-linear two-beam acceleration in a plasma cell. A test facility would include injection and matching the bunches to the plasma cell, plus extraction and diagnostics. The PWFA-LC is based on acceleration in the “blow-out regime”; DB blows out all the plasma electrons; linear focusing and uniform Ez. This requires bunch density, n b, higher than the plasma density, n 0. -> high bunch density required. Fields scales as √I peak -> high peak current required. How short bunches are required? plasma cell DB MB PWFA in the blow-out regime

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 10 On the next slides I will show a few PIC simulations where I use parameters based on the new DB injector as plasma DB, and CALIFES as plasma WB. The DB bunch length must be shortened in order to drive a clean blow- out wake; it must as least be shorter than the plasma wavelength.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 11  z {DB,WB} = {150, 300} um n 0 = 3.6 x /cm3 Initial time step. E 0 = 150 MeV DB must be shortened Electron density Longitudinal field The blow-out “bubble” will have length of size ~ p ~ 1 mm

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 12  z = {150, 150} um n 0 = 3.6 x /cm3 Initial time step.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 13  z = {150, 150} um n 0 = 3.6 x /cm3 s = 1.0 m

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 14  z = {150, 150} um n 0 = 3.6 x /cm3  zN,DB = 10 um s = 0.5 m In this scenario, the blow-out is clean until the full drive beam depletion, and excellent emittance preservation of the WB is predicted by the simulations.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 15 Conclusion: moving from CTF3 to a PWFA test facility requires some degree of bunch compression, and ideally single drive bunches. Is the level of bunch compression required possible to perform in the CTF3 complex, with added beamlines? Is there a way to extract single bunches from drive beam? Fast kickers, deflecting cavities? However, it is clear that a DC gun is far from ideal as DB source; an RF gun is the natural solution. Synergies with an XFEL test-facility?

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 16 Requirement: plasmas source of 1-2 m, with relatively uniform plasma density of n 0 = /cm 3 – /cm 3. Requirements on the source are less stringent than the sources for FACET and AWAKE. Sources based on gas discharge, not requiring expensive ionization laser, can be considered. The source would in this case not be a significant cost driver.

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 17 Experimental steps towards verifying PWFA for applications : 1) external injection of e- beam verification of few um emittance preservation of a matched WB in the blow out regime. The matched beta function is ~ 10 cm, which can be achieved. (Matching can not be achieved in FACET) “pump depletion” of drive bunch – limits? Basically a TBL experiment in plasma. phase stability and reproducibility of PWFA acceleration 2) plasma relaxation time – drive bunch trains at 1 GHz, combined with arbitrary timed witness bunch injection. This experiment is important in particular because the PWFA-LC plans few 10 kHz rep rate] 3) Multiple stages with interstage optics 4) Can e+ be revived?

Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 18 In order to demonstrate the feasibility of plasma for accelerator applications, there is need for additional test facilities CTF3 has good potential to perform interesting plasma experiments Bunches would need to be compressed by a significant factor Single bunch capabilities for the DB is a strongly desired If interest from the CERN/CLIC side I would be interested in working together to further develop the ideas presented here