G040374-00-Z August 17, 2004 S2/S3 Calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the Calibration Team ( cast of thousands!) LIGO Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G Z S3/S4 Calibration A cast of thousands… including Peter Fritschel, Gabriela González, Corey Gray, Mike Landry, Greg Mendell, Brian O’Reilly,
Advertisements

Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
Reliability for Teachers Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1 Reliability = Consistency.
LIGO-G Z Update on the Analysis of S2 Burst Hardware Injections L. Cadonati (MIT), A. Weinstein (CIT) for the Burst group Hannover LSC meeting,
1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,
Collaboration FST-ULCO 1. Context and objective of the work  Water level : ECEF Localization of the water surface in order to get a referenced water.
Summary 1 l The Analytical Problem l Data Handling.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
LIGO-G D 1 S3 expectations, S2 calibration M. Landry LHO CW Search Group F2F Milwaukee, Jun
Investigation of Variations in the Absolute Calibration of the Laser Power Sensors for the LIGO Photon Calibrators Stephanie Erickson (Smith College) Mentor:
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Meeting – Feb 12, 2003 W. Focke 1 EM timing analysis Warren Focke February 12, 2004.
9/23/08G Z Status of the S5 calibration Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee LSC September 2008 Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Formalizing the Concepts: Simple Random Sampling.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Water | Slide 1 of 16 January 2006 Water for Pharmaceutical Use Part 4: Commissioning, Qualification and validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good.
Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly The report of the Royal Statistical Society working party on performance monitoring in the public services,
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
Report From Joint Run Planning Committee R. Passaquieti & F. Raab - LSC / VIRGO Collaboration Meeting rd July 2007 – LIGO-G Z.
Software Testing. Introduction Testing is often left to the end of the project which is generally not a good idea. Testing should be conducted throughout.
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Review. Objectives n Develop an understanding and appreciation of Statistical Inference - particularly Hypothesis testing.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
QBM117 Business Statistics Estimating the population mean , when the population variance  2, is known.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Encounter Data Validation: Review and Project Update August 25, 2015 Presenters: Amy Kearney, BA Director, Research and Analysis Team Thomas Miller, MA.
Slide 1 Estimating Performance Below the National Level Applying Simulation Methods to TIMSS Fourth Annual IES Research Conference Dan Sherman, Ph.D. American.
QA/QC and QUALIFIERS LOU ANN FISHER CITY OF STILLWATER, OK
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
VI. Evaluate Model Fit Basic questions that modelers must address are: How well does the model fit the data? Do changes to a model, such as reparameterization,
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
It follows that and Step 1: Assume system to be described as, where y is the output, u is the input and is the vector of all unknown parameters. Step 2:
Handbook on Precision Requirements and Variance Estimation for ESS Household Surveys Denisa Florescu, Eurostat European Conference on Quality in Official.
Response to ASAC Report of May 2004 Response to ASAC The Atacama Large Millimeter Array Tom Wilson and Al Wootten Science IPT.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
Eurostat Assessment of the reliability of 2011 First Estimates Agricultural Accounts and Prices Working Party 3 DECEMBER 2012 Room Document.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant.
LIGO-G E1 Reviewer Report for the S2 Time-Domain Pulsar Search Teviet Creighton, Andri Gretarsson, Fred Raab, B. Sathyaprakash, Peter Shawhan.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G E PAC9 Meeting LIGO Laboratory at Caltech 1 The LIGO I Science Run Data & Computing Group Operations Plan 9 th Meeting of the.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Sampling Design and Procedure
Appropriate use of Design Effects and Sample Weights in Complex Health Survey Data: A Review of Articles Published using Data from Add Health, MTF, and.
LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…
Chapter 1: The Nature of Analytical Chemistry
LSC Meeting, June 3, 2006 LIGO-G Z 1 Status of inspiral search reviews Alan Weinstein (LIGO Laboratory / Caltech) For the LSC Internal review.
Stats Methods at IC Lecture 3: Regression.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
ESTIMATION.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Water for Pharmaceutical Use
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Sampling Distribution
Sampling Distribution
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 15 August 2005
h(t): are you experienced?
M Ashley - LSC Meeting – LIGO Hanford, 12 Nov 2003
S2 Bilinear Couplings Study
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Compare replicates And standards.
Progress Seminar 이준녕.
Presentation transcript:

G Z August 17, 2004 S2/S3 Calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the Calibration Team ( cast of thousands!) LIGO Science Collaboration meeting, August

G Z August 17, 2004 S2 calibration Final calibration done a long time ago Comprehensive S2 error document T (to use as reference in papers) with error estimates. –Random errors in  –Fast fluctuations estimates: 10% in L1

G Z August 17, 2004 “Fast” fluctuations

G Z August 17, 2004 Fast fluctuations: new DQ flag?

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 calibration V2 (presented at June meeting) V3 (Final!) coming soon. To do list: –Alphas, betas from demodulated lines –Update models for alpha, beta consistency –Incorporate hardware measurements in LHO models –Validation (autocal, review!)

G Z August 17, 2004 Review Committee Albert Lazzarini (chair), David Shoemaker, Rai Weiss (Thanks!) Charge: The primary goal of the Calibration Review Committee is to ensure the validity of the procedures used in calibration, and also to validate the results of those procedures, starting with the S3 calibration. (With reference to S2 where it is helpful.) Issues include: DC calibration of test masses Matlab models used Data quality of measurements taken (reference functions, line amplitude, hardware measurements) comparisons with autocal results requirements for sampling time from analysis groups It would also be valuable to assess present calibration techniques and results in a wider context, in particular in terms of whether achievable calibration accuracy meets the scientific needs of the various analyses, and also what new methods might give good progress in the future. The Calibration Review Committee should also consider these issues if possible, or make recommendations about how the LSC should assess these larger questions.

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients V2 (from P. Sutton’s SenseMon) –  from SenseMon averaging input matrix –  from SenseMon’s line amp, , and G 0 (f 0 ) V3 (from Xavier Siemens’s h(t) code) –Complex  from demod (1/D 0 )*(DARM-EXC)/ASQ – Complex  from demod (-D 0 /G 0 )*ASQ/DARM –Non-zero mean of imaginary part indicates errors in reference functions D0,G0 (at cal freq), or in model. –Standard deviations of imaginary parts are error estimates in real part (and depend on sampling frequency).

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients: H1

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients: H1

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients: H1 Error: 0.3% Over all of S2:  variation: 4%  variation: 1%

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients: L1  ? ~2 o reference time

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients: L1

G Z August 17, 2004 S3 V3 ,  coefficients: L1

G Z August 17, 2004 Preliminary S3 errors Errors from reference models in S3 ~ errors in S2 (5-10%) Random variations, errors in alpha, beta (60 sec integration time):  error  S2 variation  S2 variation L10.5%15%5% H10.3%4%1% H20.7%6%2%

G Z August 17, 2004 Future (S4) Photon calibrator: good progress! DC/AC calibration: LLO/LHO consistent measurements (HEPI!) Loop parameters, data quality indicators from calibration Pre-run estimates of calibration reliability Faster estimates of (smaller?) calibration fluctuations