Categorising asynchronous discussion threads: improving the quality of student learning Dr Anthony Barnett

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing and Assessing the Paradigm Shift: From Instructor-focused Teaching to Student-Focused Learning Carrie Bartek Dr. Mary Pearce Dr. Christopher.
Advertisements

Computing Basics Understanding the components, history and impact on todays life. Krista Sweckard, Newell High School.
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Bonn, 19 March 2007 Effective Evaluation for Complex Communication Management. The Uses and Abuses.
WHO Antenatal Course Preparing the new WHO eProfessors.
Engaging Students in Online Discussion
By: Josh Bergquist and Dustin Mees. Why Blog? Blogging gives you a chance to communicate your thoughts and ideas with your classmates in an asynchronous.
SHC 22 Introduction to personal development © Laser Learning Limited under licence to Pearson Education Limited Printing and photocopying permitted.
Welcome Dana Families! Dena Hause Dana Middle School Back to School Night September 25, 2014.
Research as inquiry Models, approaches and conceptions Vicky Davies 1Based on a presentation by L Norton March 2013.
1 Virtual Neighborhoods Architecture of Online Communities Reuven Aviv Zippy Erlich Gilad Ravid
Writing Objectives General Education’s Great Expectations (GE)2 Tamara Rosier, Assistant Director of Assessment Julie Guevara, Assessment and Accreditation.
PLAN Workshop Keri E. Mathis and Laura Tetreault.
PS 4021 Introduction to critical thinking. What constitutes critical thinking? Production of an argument about an argument Construct counterarguments.
Adapted by Susan Muir Created by:DeniseTarlinton.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
LEARNING OUTCOMES AS BLUEPRINTS FOR DESIGN. WELCOME o Facilitator name Position at university Contact info.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
Now That My Marking’s Done, Now What??? Brent Galloway Lori Stuber.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Tuning in to Kids Emotionally Intelligent Parenting A programme for parents/carers of children aged (3-9 years)
DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING PARADIGMS. Paradigm? A MODEL 2for notes
Unit Concept Map Example of Course Prep LayoutMarineMammals Related Readings Handouts Related Links Assessments Lessons Overview Exercises Lecture Material.
A free-to-share educational resource designed and presented by Stephen Nalder.
HOW TO USE BULLETIN BOARDS WITH ONLINE OR ONLINE-HYBRID CLASSES TO BUILD LEARNING COMMUNITIES A WORKSHOP Maren Bradley Anderson, WOU.
MDA and Security October 12, 2006 FAU Secure Systems Group Patrick Morrison.
Focus Groups. What Are Focus Groups? “A group of individuals selected and assembled by researchers to discuss and comment on, from personal experience,
Morten Blomhøj and Paola Valero Our agenda: 1.The journal NOMAD’s mission, review policy and process 2.Two reviews of a paper 3.Frequent comments in reviews.
IT’S NOT ABOUT THE TOOLS; IT’S ABOUT USING THE TOOLS TO FACILITATE LEARNING. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Teaching Improvement Program Labs, Students, and Teaching – Oh My! January 17, 2008.
Debates Grade 11-SB13C Plants in the Natural Environment Period-75 minutes.
Wilkes County Schools Tracee McManus & Nikki Patrick.
Scaling the Pyramid: The pursuit of higher order thinking skills Presented by Nathan Groff.
Supporting Students in Science Thinking and Writing Workshop #3: Teaching Strategies & Assessment Kate McNeill & Mandy Knight Boston College.
BLACKBOARD DISCUSSION BOARD By Karen Korstad Telephone conference line: or (888) Cell phone users dial: Enter passcode:
Using The Discussion Board: Making Life Easier for the Professor Strategies to increase student participation Tips to mark discussion posts Prepared by.
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)
Questioning the Author “QtA” Barbara Fetner. Overview QtA is when students reflect on what the author is trying to say in order to construct meaning.
By Andrew McDaniel. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Remembering Understanding Applying Analyzing Evaluating Creating.
Open House 2015 Teacher’s Web Page Contains Policies, Expectations, Curriculum, Grading, Extra Help, and Contact Information for each course Homework Web.
Backwards Design: Aligning Objectives, Assignments, Assessments Marc Boots-Ebenfield, Coordinator of Instructional Design & Distance Learning Center for.
SAC Region 5 Grounding the Use of Instructional Technology in Principles Teaching Philosophy Course Goals and Disciplinary Values.
A Review of Research on Factors that Impact Aspects of Online Discussions Quality Spatariu, A., Quinn, L. F., & Hartley, K. (2007). A review of research.
2 nd Grade Language Arts World Class Outcome Create meaning strategically in: Reading Writing Speaking Listening Evaluate how authors are strategic in.
The Internet As A Tool for Communication Mark Grabe.
Developing a Metric for Evaluating Discussion Boards Dr. Robin Kay University of Ontario Institute of Technology 2 November 2004.
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Providing Effective Instructor Feedback in the Virtual Classroom: Strategies that Improve Learner Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance Jody S. Oomen,
High Fidelity Simulation in Clinical Skills Teaching and its Impact on Student Engagement: A Facilitators Perspective. Clare Martin-Jones
The Value of a Self-assessment Rubric in Online Discussion Forums Dr. Rafi Davidson Center of Educational Technology Initiatives Dr. Annette Kahan Communication.
Planning for Assessment Blooms Taxonomy. TAXONOMIES A taxonomy may be defined as a system of classification.
Blooms taxonomy With TPACK information. Blooms Taxonomy.
Assessing Student Learning Using the Blackboard Discussion Board Assessment Workshop York College CUNY April 7, 2010 Wenying Huang-Stolte, Ph.D. William.
From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side Alison King 1993 College Teaching v41 no1 p30-35 Students learn by incorporating understanding of the subject.
Panel: Beyond Exascale Computing
Student Centered Teaching and Learning
How to Succeed in Discussion Forums
Factors facilitating academic success: a student perspective
BUS 642 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Click to edit Master title style
Discussion: Discuss the concepts of quality in construction.
Multiplication of Decimals
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Swedish Workshop. Swedish Workshop Advantages Expression of variety opinions Encourages deep learning Cognitively demanding Development of social skills.
“Building reflective communities through exploring the role of teachers’ and senior managers’ voice in decision making” B.S, November 2006.
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Leveraging Technology to Increase Learning Through Student-Feedback Tools       Leveraging Technology to Increase Learning Through Student-Feedback.
Synthesis Evaluation Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge
Sue Forsythe, Cathy Smith, Charlotte Webb Mathematics Education
Writing competence based questions
Presentation transcript:

Categorising asynchronous discussion threads: improving the quality of student learning Dr Anthony Barnett

Previous approach: Worcester Journal of Teaching and Learning Issue 6, July 2011 Bloom’s digital taxonomy rubric: – Reply construction – Understanding – Evaluation Reference, clarity, argument, critique, questioning

Current approach: A qualitative adaptation of concepts from Social network analysis utilised by Jimoyiannis & Angelina (2012) e.g. Cohesion analysis Equivalence (role analysis) Power analysis (centrality)

Forestier, M et al (2012) Roles in social networks: methodologies and research issues pollinator bursty contributor debater balanced conversationalist

Categorising discussion threads The following categories were created to describe the data: –T–The passive facilitator –T–The dominant facilitator –T–The self referencing facilitator –T–The multiple facilitators discussion –T–The balanced discussion –T–The cliqued discussion –T–The formulaic discussion –T–The uninvolved discussion –T–The multiple sub-threads discussion –C–Complex models –T–Time factor models

An uninvolved discussion

Passive facilitator

Self referencing facilitator

Self referencing

The dominant facilitator discussion

Dominant facilitator

Dominant facilitator – students’ views: S1: “[As I posted the first message and therefore had the facilitator role], I believe it was my responsibility to respond to each post and assist with moving the discussion forward.” S2: “On the whole for every participant commenting on this thread I made sure I replied back and tried to include a question for them to think about and research. This way I hoped they would return with their viewpoint to carry on the discussion.”

Categories: – The passive facilitator – The dominant facilitator – The self referencing facilitator – The multiple facilitators discussion – The balanced discussion – The cliqued discussion – The formulaic discussion – The uninvolved discussion – The multiple sub-threads discussion – The evolving discussion – Direct response discussion – Complex models – Time factor models

Complex model: multiple facilitators

Complex model with multiple threads

Unresponsive star

Contact details: Anthony Barnett – BYN1005