Border Technology Update BORDER INFORMATION FLOW ARCHITECTURE WORKING GROUP Presented to Transportation Border Working Group (TBWG) 29 April 03 Washington,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Advertisements

Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Action Plan Tool for Implementation of County CAADP Policy Plan Concept and Building Blocks for Strengthening Policy Systems and Ensuring Effective Implementation.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: Portland, Oregon Pilot Project Jon Makler City of Portland & Metro (MPO) Talking Technology & Transportation.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
1. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholder Dialogue Session January 17, 2014 Transport Canada John Hnatyshyn Department.
Meeting with IESBA CPAB Update Glenn Fagan and Kam Grewal April 7, 2014.
TBWG – The Ottawa Update Canada Border Services Agency Montreal, Québec October 23, 2013 Jay LaFrance, Canada-US Relations.
Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Status Mike Freitas ICM Initiative Coordinator U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office.
1 Executive Office of Public Safety. 2 National Incident Management System.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
Improving Planning along the U.S. Land Borders Jill Hochman, FHWA Jim King, GSA Transportation Border Working Group Burlington, Vermont June 10, 2003.
Passenger Rail Discussion Group April 17, 2012 Seattle, Washington Cross Border Passenger Rail: A Canadian Perspective.
The SMARTFREIGHT project Hans Westerheim SINTEF ICT.
Border Architecture US/Mexico Presented to Border Partnership Working Group 11 January 2006.
Urban landbuilding facilitiestransportation networkssystems technology National and Regional ITS Architectures Bart Cima, IBI Group February 26, 2007.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
1 Day: Thursday 10 th November Session: 9.00am am Speaker: Grahame Searle Topic:Western Australia.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP)
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council January 30, 2012 Washington D.C
Canadian Freight Issues Canadian Freight Issues ITS America CVFM Summer Meeting Intermodal Freight Special Interest Group August 31, 2005.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
TBWG April US CBP-CBSA Beyond the Border Action Plan Single Window Initiative Transportation Border Working Group Seattle, WA April 18, 2012 US.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Border Information Flow Architecture Pilot Project Funding Program Transportation Border Working Group, Québec October 27, 2010.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
United Nations Cartographic Section UN Geographic Information Working Group and UN Geographic Database.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
TBWG – The Ottawa Update Canada Border Services Agency Buffalo, New York April 9, 2014 Jay LaFrance.
___________________________________________________________________________ 2008/TPTWG30/IEG/01 Agenda Item: 7.0 Action Plan for the Intermodal & ITS Experts.
Cross-Border Coordination FHWA’s Role in Border Planning Lisa M. Dye International Transportation Program Engineer Federal Highway Administration Border.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Wayne Turnberg PNWBHA Team W 2 PNWBHA Overview: Who we are What we do Consultation - Collaboration - Cooperation.
Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) July 2012 Symposium on Practical Experience of Implementing Trade Facilitation Reforms, Including Their Costs and.
Beyond the Border Canada – United States Transportation Border Working Group Buffalo, New York April 8-9, 2014.
Border Information Flow Architecture (BIFA) Presented to TBWG November 8-9, 2005 Toronto Fleet and Freight Management Commercial Vehicle Administration.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Federal Geographic Data Committee, Coordination Group Meeting Washington, DC 7 June 2005 Study Results Geospatial Interoperability Standards: A Return-on-Investment.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Regional cooperation in the SEETO Comprehensive Network development Nenad Nikolic, SEETO General Manager 11 th SEEIC meeting Sarajevo,
Implementation: Results from the Using Your Regional ITS Architecture Peer Exchange Network Workshop Mac Lister FHWA Resource Center ITS America Annual.
National ITS Architecture Update ITS Joint Program Office Professional Capacity Building Program Talking Technology and Transportation (T3) Presentation.
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council TBWG Fall Plenary November,
September 18, 2014 Jim West :: Co-Chair, RTF Policy Advisory Committee RTF Policy Advisory Committee Background.
ITS Architecture Development in a Regional Planning Context Central Ohio Case Study Erika Witzke Principal Engineer Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission.
EBTC WORKSHOP ON BORDER PROJECTS: AVOIDING THE POTHOLES – PAVING THE WAY TBWG, Niagara Falls October 24, 2006 EBTC WORKSHOP ON BORDER PROJECTS: AVOIDING.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
Working Together for Better Results Freight: Coordination at our Borders Jill L. Hochman Federal Highway Administration Director, Office of Interstate.
Technology Subcommittee November Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities.
Standards Development Proposal A Suite of Framework Standards FGDC Coordination Group October 2, 2001 John Moeller.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
1 Item #10 Progress Report on Actions to Improve Regional Transportation Communication and Coordination During Incidents John M. Contestabile Director,
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
Federal Regional ITS Architecture Requirements 1 T3 Session Federal Requirements for Regional ITS Architectures.
The TBWG/Bi-National Planning: A TC Perspective Jacques Rochon, Director, Highway Policy Transport Canada, December 4, 2002.
CT Geospatial Information Systems Council Connecticut Geospatial Information Systems Council.
Presented by Cary Bloyd, U.S. Department of Energy Report to the EWG/EGEEC February
ITS Session TBWG, Boston, April 13-14, 2010
Multi-state Corridor Pooled Fund Program
Cross-Border-Cooperation in
What does the State GIS Coordinator do?
Regional Architecture Development for Intelligent Transportation
BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP Technology Evaluation and Deployment
Beyond the Border Action Plan
Central Ohio Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Committee
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Border Technology Update BORDER INFORMATION FLOW ARCHITECTURE WORKING GROUP Presented to Transportation Border Working Group (TBWG) 29 April 03 Washington, DC

FOCUS OF INITIATIVE –Identify technologies and agencies that use technologies at or near the border; –Identify priorities of these various agencies –Promote interoperability of technologies –Reduce technology investment cost –Enhance information exchange, coordination and communication

BORDER IFORMATION FLOW ARCHITECTURE A framework for ensuring institutional agreement and technical integration for the implementation of ITS projects or other technology solutions at major land border crossings Engages border stakeholders to identify opportunities for coordination and information sharing to improve security and efficiency at ports of entry

BORDER INFORMATION FLOW ARCHITECTURE Various stakeholders are making independent investments in technology to support operations Border Information Flow Architecture facilitates a coordinated approach that would increase value through reduced costs of deployment, and access to higher-order benefits.

STATUS Committee developed within the TBWG for the development of a border information architecture (focuses on ITS) Transport Canada and US Department of Transportation (FHWA) leading the effort Work will follow a methodology based on US/Canada Intelligent Transportation System- Regional Architecture Group meetings via teleconference

ACCOMPLISHMENTS TO DATE Terms of Reference Work plan Initial scoping Preliminary scan of current technology initiatives at the border

STEP 1: Getting Started Identify Need Define Region (US/Canada Land Borders) Identify Stakeholders Identify Champions STEP 2: Gather Data Inventory Systems Determine Needs and Services Develop Operational Concept Define Functional Requirements STEP 3: Define Interfaces Identify Interconnects Define Information Flows SHORT TERM (0 – 12 months)

STEP 4 : Implementation MID TERM to LONG TERM 12 months and Beyond Encourage Implementation/Seek candidates planning Implementation to demonstrate architecture Solicit Participating Agencies and Develop Agreements Identify Standards STEP 6: Maintain the Architecture STEP 5: Use of the Architecture

NEXT STEPS Steering Committee Selection Selection of an Initiative(s) to Build on FHWA some FY04 Funding to commit to the effort Continue to meet via teleconference

Points of Contact Transport Canada –Susan Spencer –Madeleine Betts –Jonathan Sabean FHWA –Michael Onder –Crystal Jones