DPS 201 Add Date Here DESIGNING FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ADD LOCATION HERE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Care Case Management System. Welcome to CCMS Training.
Advertisements

0-1 Welcome!! Safe and Effective Use of Law Enforcement Personnel in Work Zones Welcome!! Safe and Effective Use of Law Enforcement Personnel in Work Zones.
New Pedestrian Crossing Devices for California Wayne Henley Caltrans Division of Traffic Operations Beth Thomas District 4 Pedestrian Coordinator.
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
2008 Mid-States Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference May 20, 2008 David Peterson.
NCDOT Usage of CMF Clearinghouse for CRF’s Shawn A. Troy, PE December 13, 2012.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
FHWA Report on MUTCD Activities Chung Eng, FHWA Office of Transportation Operations NCUTCD Meeting – June 26, 2014.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Engineering Measures for Improved Pedestrian Safety Tamara Redmon FHWA Office of Safety April 29, 2008.
Pedestrian Safety Master Plan. This Presentation Similarities and Differences with Other Areas No Magic Bullet Site, Corridor Specific Multiple, Complementary.
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
Barriers to Use of Fixed Route Transit Services Janet M. Barlow Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist Accessible Design for the Blind NCAMPO conference.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #7.
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
HAWK Evaluation NE/SE 41 st Ave & E Burnside St Sirisha Kothuri William Farley Kimber Miller Aaron Rieck Civil & Environmental Engineering.
T RIBAL S AFETY C HAMPIONS W ORKSHOP December 2 – 3, 2014 Embassy Suites Hotel & Conference Center Norman, Oklahoma Proven Safety Countermeasures Huy A.
0-1 Safe and Effective Use of Connecticut Law Enforcement Personnel in Work Zones Safe and Effective Use of Connecticut Law Enforcement Personnel in Work.
Evaluation of Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures—Summary of Results, Conclusions and Lessons Learned Peyton McLeod Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. Kelley Klaver.
Tender Packages (Consistency with Current Design Bulletins) Basic Knowledge for Roadway and Bridge Projects Seminar for CEA Members Edmonton February 12,
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Selecting Countermeasures 1 Module 5 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse Karen Scurry – FHWA Office of Safety Daniel Carter – UNC HSRC Shawn Troy – NCDOT CMF Clearinghouse Webinar,
Safety Analysis in a Data-Limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, 2013 Boise, Idaho PILOT WORKSHOP AT NLTAPA Annual Meeting Train the Trainers 1.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
1-1 Road Safety 365: A Safety Workshop for Local Governments Module 1: Course Introduction 1-1.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
RAILROAD-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING HANDBOOK AUGUST 2007 REVISION PRESENTED BY KURT ANDERSON 2008 Mid-States Highway Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference.
The Challenge The intersection of State Highway 13 and County Road 2 in Scott County, Minnesota, was the site of 2 fatal crashes and 50 injury crashes.
Overview of FHWA’s Work Zone Safety Grants (2006 and 2011) Overview of FHWA’s Work Zone Safety Grants (2006 and 2011)
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Public Safety Committee September 28, 2015 David O. Brown Chief Of Police Pedestrian Safety.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Small Cost – Big Impact: Lessons in Low-Cost Safety Improvements Gustave Scheerbaum, PE Complete Streets Safety Engineer ARLE Grant Programs Manager City.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
Presentation Overview
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Chapter 6: Intersections
Module 1 Introduction Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users.
SHSP INTERSECTION EMPHASIS AREA. Emphasis Area Definition  The term intersection crash is defined as a crash which occurs just before, just after or.
New INDOT Traffic Safety Initiatives 97 th Annual Purdue road school March 8, 2011 John Nagle Traffic Safety Management Engineer
ROUNDABOUTS: HOW THEY WORK FOR PEDESTRIANS Module Golden CO.
Indiana MUTCD: for Operations & Maintenance Issues/Solutions – Part II.
Bicycle Safety Countermeasures Module 4.
Our Mission: We drive quality transportation for all Ada County…Anytime, Anywhere! Committed to Service Information Briefing Matt Edmond, AICP, Sr. Transportation.
What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?
Saving the King Street Bicycle Boulevard
Impact of Intersection Angle on Safety
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
Beachside Traffic/Crosswalk Update
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Safety Effects of Marked vs
State Road 72 Safety Improvements
Application of Demographic Analysis to Pedestrian Safety
FHWA Support for HSM Implementation
First and last name D E P T O F L First and last name A B R Y M
Subtitle Presenter Date
Infrastructure Strategy 1: Implement roadway improvements that compensate for impacts of aging on safe driving Strategy 2: Implement improvements to.
Walkable Streets Are The Way of The Future
Timeline of Events.
Presentation transcript:

DPS 201 Add Date Here DESIGNING FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ADD LOCATION HERE

 Restrooms  Emergency Evacuation  Cell phones  Lunch  Breaks  Other? LOGISTICS

FHWA  Name  Title   Phone Consultant  Name  Title   Phone INSTRUCTORS

 Saving Lives  Provide in greater detail than the DPS 101 workshop the standards, guidance and best practices of the pedestrian safety countermeasures OBJECTIVE OF WORKSHOP

 Find someone you don’t know (if possible)  You will introduce that person  Write down the following information  Name  Agency  Title  1 fact  (hopefully interesting) INTRODUCTIONS

1.Marked Xwalks and Enhancements (1.5) 2.Crossing Islands/ Raised Medians (1.5) 3.Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) (1.5) 4.Road Diet (1.5) 5.Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon (RRFB) (1) 6.Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) (1) 7.Roundabouts (1) 8.Curb Extensions/ Bulb outs (0.5) 9.Interchanges (1.5) 10.Transit Stop Improvements (1.5) 11.Lighting (1.5) RESULTS OF VOTING (~X.X HR)

 Crash Modification Factor (CMF):  Factor to compute expected number of crashes after implementing countermeasure  Crash Reduction Factor (CRF):  Percent fewer crashes expected given countermeasure than on similar road without countermeasure  Relationship between CMF and CRF:  CMF = 1 - (CRF/100)  CRF = 100*(1 – CMF)  CMF/CFR Clearinghouse:  CMF/CRF REVIEW

 May apply to all crashes, or crash specific subsets  (e.g., run-off-road, night, wet weather, multi-vehicle, etc.)  Same treatment in different contexts or highway types may have different effects and different CMF values  Reference the research and studies on CMF clearinghouse website CMF/CRF IMPORTANT POINT

 National Standard  Agencies may have supplements  Experimental Process  Remember to copy Division office  Interim Approvals  Official Interpretations  MUTCD

QUESTIONS