Faculty Evaluation and Development Informational Faculty Forums Aug. 30, 31, & Sept. 1, 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reappointment, Promotion & Continuous Appointment (Tenure) Process and Issues.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee Patrick O. Smith, PhD, ABPP Associate.
Continuous Improvement and Planning Team (CIPT) October 24, 2011 Faith Hensrud, CIPT Chair and Interim Provost.
Post Tenure Review Handbook-Master.pdfhttp:// Handbook-Master.pdf.
 UAFT *Collective Bargaining Agreement – Article 5  UNAC * Collective Bargaining Agreement – Article 9 Can access through Faculty Services website at:
Everything you Need to know about the StFX Integrated Dietetic Internship Program Laura Reid, MEd, PDt, CDE – IDI Coordinator September 2012.
WELCOME TO THE FACULTY FORUM ON THE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM Thank you for coming! November 2002.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Teaching Focused Faculty Positions James Hanson, Ph.D., P.E. Civil Engineering Department Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Adapted from a presentation.
Faculty Performance Evaluation (FPE) Plan
A Proud Past. A Strong Future Strategic Planning University of Nebraska at Omaha Planning Committee Board of Regents - July 16, 1999.
First Meeting of 2012! January 24, Agenda Icebreaker & Question of the Day Market Overview Portfolio Overview What is USIT all about? New Structure.
Youth Band Goals Sustainability Growth Spirituality Masses (1 st Priority)
FACULTY EVALUATION ANNUAL AND COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS Janet Dukerich, Senior Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs August 18, 2014.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
New Annual Faculty Assessment... after the Beta.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
SLU School of Medicine: Introduction to the Promotion and Tenure Process Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics Chair, SOM Credential’s Committee.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.
Promotion and Tenure Philip Ganderton Senior Associate Dean College of Arts and Sciences.
How (and Why) To Complete the Faculty Annual Report Marilyn E. Demorest Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs December 5, 2007.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Jeff Waddoups Chair, Sabbatical Leave Committee Department of Economics
Retention, Tenure and Promotion College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics.
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12 th by F.A.Neto Semester Conversion Director 3/12/20141FAN.
Sabbatical Workshop Sabbatical Workshop Friday, April 13, :30 – 4:45 p.m. Room N28 Dr. Wallace Smith, VPAA Dr. Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Chair, Faculty.
MERLOT Overview Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching Carlotta Eaton, IST Bruce Brown, Business.
Sabbatical Workshop Sabbatical Workshop Friday, April 21, :00 – 4:30 p.m. Dr. Wallace Smith, VPAA Prof. Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, chair, sabbatical.
Scheduling and Staffing System: How to Set-Up a New Academic Year As of 12/05/2003.
Chairperson’s Evaluation of Faculty Training Session April 11, 2006 (The YSU/YSU-OEA Agreement is the definitive source on the chairperson’s evaluation.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
The OFA Journey Timeline and The Selection Process.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
Professional Development Plans Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.
Category II Faculty Evaluation Implementation Sheila Rucki, Chair, FSWC Joice Gibson, CAT II Interim Representative Ashby Butnor, CAT II Representative.
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
 Chabot College Accreditation Meeting April 29, :00-1:30 PM Pres Presented by: Jim Mathews Dr. Stacy Thompson.
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
Department of Medicine Faculty Development
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Assessment and Campus-Wide Engagement: Incorporating a Center for Teaching and Learning Jelena Ozegovic, Ph.D., Co-Coordinator of Academic Assessment and.
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Tenure Procedure Northwest Vista College
Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Curriculum Development Updates
Teacher Education Progression at Cumberland
Distinguished Teacher Award
Preparing for your Departmental Assessment Workshop
UW CES Extended Term and Promotion
5 Year Program Planning Process for year
Objectives What is the P & T process?
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Streamlining the Program Review Process
Program Review Timeline (as of 2019)
Streamlining the Program Review Process
Unit/Title configurations (A) October 2008
Promotion & Tenure workshop
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12th by F. A
Professional Learning Activities Funding Requests
Instructional Planning Council October 5, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Evaluation and Development Informational Faculty Forums Aug. 30, 31, & Sept. 1,

FEAD task force members  Dr. James Bowen  Dr. Mike Knedler  Dr. Jim Yates  Ms. Tammy Brown  Dr. Dean Scarbrough  Ms. Jennifer Bays  Dr. Marcia Fear  Dr. Cindy Pfiefer-Hill  Mr. Tim Maharry

Faculty Evaluation Overview Tenured faculty will be evaluated every three years in conjunction with tenure review. Tenured faculty will submit a portfolio and have student evaluations in their fall classes. Dr. Lohmann will notify tenured faculty when they are up for tenure review. Non-Tenured faculty will be evaluated every fall semester and the evaluation will be based on the previous academic year. Non-tenured faculty will have student evaluations done in their fall classes and will submit a portfolio to the department chair. (1st year faculty are exempt from submitting a portfolio, but will have student evaluations done)

Areas of Evaluation (1) Teaching/Instruction, 40 – 75% (2) Professional Development, 5 – 25% (3) Scholarly Activity, 5 – 25% (4) Institutional Involvement, 5 – 25% (5) Community Service, 0 – 15% Category weights are set by the faculty member.

Faculty will be evaluated by: Department/Division Chair Peers Students (via student evaluations)

Faculty Evaluation Timeline – Fall 2004 October 11 : portfolios and peer selections due to dept/div chairs (including category wts) Oct. 11 – Nov. 5: dept/div chairs and peers review portfolios and fill out evaluation forms (coordinated by dept/div chairs) December: Academic deans compile information and add in student evaluation scores January 2005: Dept/Div chairs meet with faculty to return portfolios and review evaluations