Do donors raise their donations when they are aware of decreasing government subsidies? A survey experiment Arjen de Wit & René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crafting The Memory A brief look at estate planning… Welcome to Dave’s presentation on the wise use of your assets later in life Dave Sharp, B.Sc.; CFP;
Advertisements

Homo empathicus: Dissecting the ‘warm glow’ of prosocial behavior 2014 Van der Gaag Symposium 24 June 2014 Introduction1.
By Laura Lamb (2011).  Approximately 1200 CED organizations in Canada (2006)  Federal & Provincial governments have come to recognize importance of.
Mark Moshier, CFRE Team Leader, Council Fund Development Boy Scouts of America, National Council.
1 Field Experiment on Incentive of Communication, Compilation and Evaluation 1. Motivation for the study 2. What is the Field Experiment 3. Framework of.
Successful Development in This Challenging Economic Environment Sheila Alexander, PEJE Program Officer Financial Resource Development Stephanie Bash-Soudry,
Volunteering Applications and methodology Applied Social Psychology VU University Amsterdam January 6, 2015 René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies VU University.
René Bekkers Arjen de Wit Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam 11 th ISTR Conference Münster, Germany July 22, 2014 Look who's crowding-out!
The ‘Crowding-out Effect’: What does the research tell us?
1 When and Why Matches Are More Effective Subsidies Than Rebates Evidence From a Field Experiment with Health Charities in the Netherlands René Bekkers.
Integrating Representative Sample and High Net Worth Survey Data on Giving René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam.
Business Support for Employee Volunteers Presenter ’ s Name Organization Date.
Effective Donor Stewardship Calgary Compass 2012 May 16, 2012 Sally Flintoft, CEO Calgary Health Trust.
Surveying Volunteering: Giving in the Netherlands René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam.
1 Challenges for Comparative Research on Philanthropy in Europe René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
Volunteering Applications and methodology Applied Social Psychology VU University Amsterdam January 21, 2014 René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies VU University.
On the crowding effect of public policies Clara Villegas-Palacio University of Gothenburg Camp resource XVII NC State University June, 2010.
René Bekkers Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Philanthropy and Economic Performance 10 July ISTR Conference, Siena.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Date Public opinion about individual philanthropy Serbia, December 2009.
First European Conference on Citizen Initiatives for Global Solidarity EU PHILANTHROPY 2014; EUROPEAN RESEARCH NETWORK; DUTCH CASES BRUSSELS JANUARY 30TH.
Principle of Care and Giving to Help People in Need René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm Economics/Lilly Family.
Social Capital and Blood Donation in the Netherlands René Bekkers VU University Amsterdam November 17, th Arnova Conference, Toronto Ingrid Veldhuizen.
Estimating The Charitable Impact Of Golf November 2012.
Charitable Fundraising in an Economic Downturn The first annual report on income and fundraising activity in Irish charities Geraldine Prizeman and Siobhán.
THE SOCIAL SIDE OF GIVING TO CHARITIES: THE EFFECT OF ALTRUISTIC AND EGOISTIC MOTIVATIONS ON ANONYMOUS GIVING (WORKING PAPER) Ömer TORLAK & Muhammet Ali.
CFD Basics Started in 1984 Became state law in 2003 Moved to Office of the Secretary of State in 2010 An official part of state business Washington State.
2010 Study of High Net-Worth Philanthropy. The Center on Philanthropy At Indiana University.
Andrey Bykov, Inna F. Deviatko Experimental study of assessment of altruistic actions: effects of the survey mode Web Survey Methodology Research Group.
Key Worker Training. Agenda  Introduction  Key Worker role  Catalog of Caring  Contributions  Pledge Cards  Solicitation  Reporting “There is no.
Do donors raise their donations when they are aware of decreasing government subsidies? A survey experiment Arjen de Wit & René Bekkers 7 th ERNOP Conference.
Survey is a strategy that involves the collection of data from a pre-determined sample.
Religie en het maatschappelijke midden in Nederland René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam May 31, 20131Secularization,
The Future of Fundraising Timothy L. Seiler, Ph.D., CFRE Director, The Fund Raising School April 23, 2014 Indianapolis 2014 The Salvation Army Community.
Public Policy, Philanthropy, and Governance: Conditions for Effective Cooperation Theo Schuyt, René Bekkers, Leo Huberts & Willem Trommel VU University.
Gender Differences in Giving in the Netherlands René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam November 8, 20111Workshop in Multidisciplinary.
The Analysis of Regional Differences in Philanthropy Evidence from the European Social Survey, the Eurobarometer and the Giving in the Netherlands Panel.
Religion and the Civic Core in the Netherlands René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam December 8, UCSIA Workshop Volunteering,
Charitable Giving to Fight Cardiovascular Diseases: Is It Any Different During A Recession? Rene Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam.
What is Philanthropy Good For? René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies Seminar July 13, 2010.
Testing Mechanisms in Charitable giving René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam 3-4 November 2014Behavioral Economics and.
Altruism, Warm Glow and Generosity: A National Experiment René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm Economics/Lilly.
Yu-Hsuan Lin Catholic University of Korea, Korea University of York, U.K. 5 th Congress of EAAERE, Taipei, 06 th – 07 th August 2015.
Charities.
Individual Giving Survey 2010 The Northern Ireland Giving Survey 2010 was carried out between 5 July 2010 and 13 August 2010 Based on telephone interviews.
Motivations of High Net Worth Donors. 2 High Net Worth: Session Focus Motivations of High Net Worth Donors As more high net worth (HNW) donors sign the.
Has the charity law reform made the Dutch cultural sector more entrepreneurial? Prof. dr. René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam.
Ready, Set, Raise! An Overview of Grassroots Fundraising Presented by: The Chicago Foundation for Women Trainer: Sonya Garcia Ulibarri.
Philanthropy in the Low Countries: Opportunities for Universities? René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam CASE LOWLANDS.
Why do people volunteer? A systematic review of the literature
Altruism & Social Pressure
Jonathan Eggleston and Lori Reeder
SPI Conference 2017, September 7, 2017
What are the benefits of volunteering for volunteers?
Vitamine V: Gezondheidseffecten van vrijwilligerswerk
Twenty Years of Generosity in the Netherlands
Claire van Teunenbroek and René Bekkers
Impact of new forms of philanthropy on civic engagement and NGOs
Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study
Look who's crowding-out!
Citizen Perceptions of the Third Sector and Social Innovation
Claire van Teunenbroek and René Bekkers
Giving in Europe How much, by whom, and for which causes?
Why Do People Give? Charitable Giving, Volunteering, and Happiness
René Bekkers, VU Amsterdam Sigrid Hemels, Erasmus University Rotterdam
René Bekkers – Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Values of Philanthropy
Culture change takes time
René Bekkers, VU Amsterdam Sigrid Hemels, Erasmus University Rotterdam
Americans Open Their Wallets Even as They Are Unsure About the Economy
René Bekkers – Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Presentation transcript:

Do donors raise their donations when they are aware of decreasing government subsidies? A survey experiment Arjen de Wit & René Bekkers Philanthropic Studies, VU Amsterdam 44 th ARNOVA Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, November 19, 2015

In a theory of purely altruistic motivation for charitable giving... …people value certain public goods in society… …see where others spend their money on… and respond to needs: they donate to public goods that are not yet funded by others.

However...

pure altruism What participants in economic experiments do: -.64 What donors to actual nonprofit organizations do: +.06

It may be... That people outside the lab simply do not know how much subsidies an organization receives, and whether this increased or decreased; Or that they simply do not change their donations even if they know how subsidies changed. (Horne et al. 2005)

The current project What if people knew about actual subsidy cuts? Let’s tell them. In a survey experiment. And then see what they think (believe) and what they do.

The data Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey 2014, random and High Net Worth (HNW) sample. Respondents in the random sample are from a pool of people who registered for participating in surveys; HNW sample is invited through postal mail N=2,458; response rates: 80% / 12% (HNW)

Experimental design (1) After filling out the survey, respondents receive a reward in the form of token points. The number of points depends on the time it took them to complete the questionnaire. Average earnings worth € 3,23. Token points can be exchanged for vouchers, Air Miles or donations to one out of four preselected charitable organizations

Experimental design (2) Charity: KWF Kankerbestrijding, Dutch Cancer Society Funds cancer research and helps cancer patients One of the most popular fundraising organizations in the Netherlands

Experimental design (3) Base line appeal: 'The Dutch charities are in need of your support.‘ + Information on lost subsidies: 'The Dutch charities are in need of your support. KWF Kankerbestrijding for example received € 361,000 on government subsidies in 2011 but received no subsidies in 2012.'

Manipulation check: beliefs Perceived subsidy change: 'What do you think, did KWF Kankerbestrijding receive more, an equal amount of, or less government subsidies in 2012 compared with 2011?‘

Scenario question After the participants made their choices, we asked them the following hypothetical question: 'Imagine that you would have heard that KWF Kankerbestrijding received [more/an equal amount of/less] government subsidies in 2012 compared with 2011, what would you have done with your reward?'

People who believe subsidies decreased are more likely to donate

Providing information further increases the number of donors

No significant differences for amount donated

Moderators of the information effect

Most people do not change their giving with different information Stopped donating Did not change decision Started donating Control group first, then in scenario: “Imagine that subsidies decreased” Information first, then in scenario: “Imagine that subsidies increased / did not change”

...but 3% does! Stopped donating Did not change decision Started donating Control group first, then in scenario: “Imagine that subsidies decreased” Information first, then in scenario: “Imagine that subsidies increased / did not change”

Most people do not change their giving with different information Stopped donating Did not change decision Started donating Control group first, then in scenario: “Imagine that subsidies decreased” Information first, then in scenario: “Imagine that subsidies increased / did not change”

Conclusions People who are aware of subsidy cuts are more likely to donate Providing information about subsidy cuts increases share of donors from 9% to 11%, that is a relative increase of 22% Awareness of need is important in explaining people's reactions to government policies

Conclusions People who are aware of subsidy cuts are more likely to donate Providing information about subsidy cuts increases share of donors from 9% to 11%, that is a relative increase of 22% Awareness of need is important in explaining people's reactions to government policies

Thank you. Arjen de René