Aquarius Level 0-to-1A Processing Rule #1: save everything from the Level 0 data. Rule #2: never forget Rule #1! The objective is to ensure that the Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rosetta Magnetic Field PDS Review B. J. Anderson.
Advertisements

Aquarius Status Salinity Retrieval and Applications D. M. Le Vine NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD E. P. Dinnat, G. Lagerloef, P. de Matthaeis, H. Kao, F.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Non-Toolkit Applications April 2012.
Cold Sky Calibration Aquarius: D. M. Le Vine MWR: J. C. Gallo.
Scatterometer Algorithm Simon Yueh, Alex Fore, Adam Freedman, Julian Chaubell Aquarius Scatterometer Algorithm Team July 19, 2010 Seattle.
Report on Intrusion Detection and Data Fusion By Ganesh Godavari.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Collaboration Meeting at UCI, April 7-9, 2005 ANITA Navigation and Orientation Kurt Liewer.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Error Validation and Early Orbit Corrections Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Spaceborne Weather Radar
EECS 823 MACHARIA.  Four-frequency, linearly-polarized, passive microwave radiometric system which measures atmospheric, ocean and terrain microwave.
1ESDIS HDF-EOS Workshop IV Landover, Maryland, September 20, 2000 The Landsat 7 Processing System ( LPS ) Level Zero-R Science Products Michael R. Reid.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
Erich Franz Stocker * and Yimin Ji + * NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, + Wyle Inc/PPS The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission: GPM Near-realtime.
Different Coverage Patterns for a Single Satellite and Constellation of Satellites in Real Time with the STK Pedro A. Capó-Lugo Graduate Student Dr. Peter.
MODIS Land and HDF-EOS HDF-EOS Workshop Presentation September 20, 2000 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC Code 922, Raytheon ITSS MODIS Land Science Team Support.
Aquarius Project Status 7 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team Meeting 11 April 2012.
Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.
Yimin Ji - Page 1 October 5, 2010 Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Precipitation Processing System (PPS) Yimin Ji NASA/GSFC,
International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team Meeting, Annapolis, May 2011 ASCAT backscatter processing status Julia Figa-Saldaña, Craig Anderson, Hans.
Seminar ON SMART SENSOR Submitted by : SUBIR KUMAR GHOSH Roll No. IN-14/04 Electrical & Instrumentation Deptt. B.E 7th Semester JORHAT ENGINEERING COLLEGE,
Report on Intrusion Detection and Data Fusion By Ganesh Godavari.
10. Satellite Communication & Radar Sensors
SCIENCE PROCESSING OVERVIEW David Le Vine Aquarius Deputy PI 07 July 2009.
7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 AMIRAS campaign Fernando Martin-Porqueras.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
Purpose and objectives: AVHRR LAC expert meeting Bojan R. Bojkov Head, Sensor Performance, Products and Algorithms Directorate for Earth Observation ESA/ESRIN.
Event Data History David Adams BNL Atlas Software Week December 2001.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.
An Intercalibrated Microwave Radiance Product for Use in Rainfall Estimation Level 1C Christian Kummerow, Wes Berg, G. Elsaesser Dept. of Atmospheric Science.
Aquarius Algorithm Workshop Santa Rosa, CA 9 March 2010 College of Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences Chris Ruf University.
Validating Requirements Determining Completeness and Correctness of Requirements Using the System Reference Model IV&V Workshop 16 September 2009.
SuperDARN operations Pasha Ponomarenko.
22 March 2007 Science Simulator Overview and Status ICDS Susie Kennison.
Workshop Agenda: Day One 9:30 IntroductionLagerloef / Le Vine 9:45 Workshop objectivesG. Feldman 10:00 Overview of the Aquarius Data Processing System:G.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission SECCHI Calibration Activities Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Scientist Naval Research Laboratory.
COS PIPELINE CDR Jim Rose July 23, 2001OPUS Science Data Processing Space Telescope Science Institute 1 of 12 Science Data Processing
SDR 7 Jun Associated Electronics Package (AEP) Curtis Ingraham.
Mission Operations Review February 8-10, 2010 Cordoba, ARGENTINA SECTION 16.x Aquarius Science Commissioning and Acceptance Draft 2 Prepared by: Gary Lagerloef,
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
PQDIF PQDIF: A Technical Overview Prepared by: Erich Gunther, Bill Dabbs, and Rob Scott Electrotek Concepts, Inc. NEW! IMPROVED!
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
MISR Geo-registration Overview Brian E. Rheingans Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology AMS Short Course on Exploring and Using.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Aquarius Simulation Studies Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Algorithm Workshop 9-11 March 2010.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
ADPS Science Software Development Bryan Franz NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Aquarius Data Processing Workshop, NASA/GSFC, March 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Orbital Analysis for Inter-Calibration Dave Mac Donnell Brooke Anderson Bruce Wielicki Don Garber NASA Langley Research Center Solar Workshop January 30,
Categories of Satellites
SMOS Science Meeting September 2011 Arles, FR Simulating Aquarius by Resampling SMOS Gary Lagerloef, Yann Kerr & Eric Anterrieu and Initial Results.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
Metadata for the SKA - Niruj Mohan Ramanujam, NCRA.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Astronomer Workshop Feb. 29, 2008 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California Mission Design & Observation.
Station Metadata: What do I Need?
Generic Remote Interface Unit (RIU) Interface Control Document (ICD)
Do-more Technical Training
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
CoSMIR Performance during OLYMPEX
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
LRO Mission Baseline Ephemeris v10.0
An Update on the Activities of the Precipitation Measurement Missions (i.e. TRMM/GPM) XCAL Team PMM XCAL Team Wesley Berg, Rachael Kroodsma, Faisal Alquaeid,
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Overview of Control System
Product self-assessment to CARD4L Normalised Radar Backscatter
Presentation transcript:

Aquarius Level 0-to-1A Processing Rule #1: save everything from the Level 0 data. Rule #2: never forget Rule #1! The objective is to ensure that the Level 0-to-1A conversion is fully reversible.

Level-0 File Overview A single copy of the contents Aquarius memory at the time of the downlink, in time order, as generated by the Aquarius preprocessor. Data consist of binary science blocks spanning a period of ~14 hours (110 Mbytes).

Science Block Structure

Radiometer Block

Scatterometer Block

Level-1A Product Overview Level-1A data consists of unpacked, unconverted science data and instrument housekeeping telemetry, with navigation and required spacecraft telemetry. Each file contains 1 orbit (starting at South Pole crossing) plus 10 minutes at each end. Level-1A products are formatted using HDF5: –Machine-independent, hierarchical, self describing format –Attributes contain descriptive information about the entire file or individual objects within the file –Groups provide logical association and hierarchy –Data objects are multidimensional arrays of standards types

Level-1A Product Elements Product metadata, i.e., descriptive information about the entire file (e.g., sensor, time, quality) Data characteristics (number of blocks, etc.) Science block metadata (time and quality) Raw sensor data: –Block header elements –Housekeeping telemetry by subsystem –Radiometer and scatterometer science data, Navigation data (original sampling rate) –Orbit vectors from predicted or definitive ephemeris –Attitude data from SAC-D telemetry Unpacked and converted Aquarius housekeeping telemetry SAC-D housekeeping telemetry (selected fields converted)

Level 0-to-1A Mapping Time tag offset GPS time tag Synch word Antenna telemetry ICDS processing status ICDS engineering telemetry APDU telemetry Mechanical telemetry ATC telemetry Scatterometer HKT Scatterometer science dataRadiometer NRT HKT Radiometer RT HKT Radiometer science data Checksum Synch and Time Tag A quarius Raw Telemetry Scatterometer science data Header Power Loopback DC Radiometer science data Header Short Accumulations Long Accumulations

Level-1A Ancillary Data Orbit ephemeris data provided by CONAE: –Predictive ephemeris for near-real-time processing –Definitive ephemeris for refined processing –GPS data from SAC-D as backup Attitude data from SAC-D housekeeping telemetry Additional SAC-D housekeeping telemetry provided by CONAE from downlink data

Calibration and Orbit Adjust Data Cold sky calibration and orbit adjust periods will be identified during Level-1A processing, either from the command schedule or the spacecraft housekeeping telemetry. Data from these periods (plus additional data as needed for stabilization, TBD) will be written to separate files and excluded from downstream processing. Calibration files will be provided for offline analysis.

Level-1A Format Examples 3.1 Mission and Documentation Product Name (character): the name of the product file (without path). Title (character): "Aquarius Level ‑ 1A Data". Data Center (character): "NASA/GSFC Aquarius Data Processing Center". Mission (character): "SAC-D Aquarius". Mission Characteristics (character): "Nominal orbit: inclination = 98.0 (Sun-synchronous); node = 6 PM (ascending); eccentricity = <0.002; altitude = 650 km; ground speed = km/sec". Sensor (character): "Aquarius". Data Type (character): "SCI”, “CAL” or “DMP”. Software ID (character): identifies version of the operational software used to create this product. Processing Time (character): local time of generation of this product; concatenated digits for year, day-of-year, hours, minutes, seconds, and fraction of seconds in the format of YYYYDDDHHMMSSFFF. Input Files (character): the name of the Level ‑ 0 file(s) (without path) from which the current product was created. This information is stored in the product as part of its processing history. Processing Control (character): all input and processing control parameters used by the calling program to generate the product. Vertical bars or carriage return characters serve as parameter information delimiters. This information is stored in the product as part of its processing history.

Level-1A Format Examples (cont.) Raw Radiometer Science Data radiom_header (2 ‑ byte integer, array size Number of Blocks): long_name = ”Radiometer block header"; this header specifies the packet type (standard or memory dump) and the housekeeping telemetry packet number (0 through 3). radiom_savg (2 ‑ byte integer, array size Number of Blocks x Radiometer Subcycles x Radiometer Short Accumulations x Radiometer Channels): long_name = “Radiometer Short Accumulations”; radiometer data accumulated and averaged within a subcycle. radiom_lavg (2 ‑ byte integer, array size Number of Blocks x Radiometer Long Accumulations x Radiometer Channels): long_name = “Radiometer Long Accumulations”; radiometer data accumulated and averaged over multiple subcycles within a block Raw Scatterometer Science Data scatter_headers (byte, array size Number of Blocks x Scatterometer Subcycles): long_name = “Scatterometer subcycle headers”; headers for each scatterometer subcycle within a block. scatter_pwr (2 ‑ byte integer, array size Number of Blocks x Scatterometer Subcycles x Scatterometer Channels): long_name = “Scatterometer Power”; raw scatterometer power data for each subcycle within a block. scatter_loop (2 ‑ byte integer, array size Number of Blocks x Scatterometer Channels): long_name = “Scatterometer Loopback Measurements”; scatterometer loopback data average over the subcycles within a block. scatter_dc (2 ‑ byte integer, array size Number of Blocks x 2): long_name = “Scatterometer DC data”; raw scatterometer DC data averaged over the subcycles within a block.

Aquarius Telemetry Example

Aquarius Level-1A Merge Multiple versions of Level-1A products will be generated for each orbit from overlapping periods in successive Level-0 files. Level-1A merge processing will consolidate these into a single product by selecting the best quality data for each science block using TBD metrics.

Aquarius Level-1B Products Separate files for radiometer and scatterometer. Formatted using HDF5 Product-level metadata is essentially the same as for Level 1A. Calibrated science data, processing information and quality indicators as defined for each data type, per beam and polarization. Navigation and geolocation data at block or subcycle times.

Radiometer Level-1B Science Data Calibrated brightness temperatures (per subcycle) Noise temperatures (per block) Voltage offsets (per block) Gains (per block) RFI flags (per subcycle) Brightness temperatures RMS (per subcycle)

Scatterometer Level-1B Science Data Sigma 0 (backscatter) K PC (normalized standard deviation) Signal-to-noise ratio Noise value All fields generated per subcycle

Level-1B Navigation Data Orbit position and velocity (per block) Attitude roll, pitch and yaw angles (per block) Beam center latitude/longitude (per beam and subcycle) Beam edge latitude/longitude (ellipse major and minor axes) (per beam and block) Incidence and azimuth angles (per beam and block) Polarization roll (per beam and block) Doppler shift (per beam and block)

Pointing Knowledge Assessment Pointing knowledge requirement is 0.1 degree 3 sigma, driven primarily by the radiometer sensitivity to the incidence angle. This is equivalent to about 2 km of location accuracy at the surface. Verifying this level of accuracy could be challenging with the Aquarius beam size. Overlap with land surfaces should be useful, but approach needs to be developed. This will most likely be performed as a separate processing step after Level-1B processing.

Pointing Knowledge Assessment (cont.) What is the expected sensitivity of the radiometer signal to land vs. ocean surface? How does this vary with surface type? Is surface elevation a factor? How is polarization affected? Will the sensitivity and coverage be sufficient to characterize systematic as well as static errors? How can the method be designed to process a reasonable minimum subset of the radiometer data (60,000 blocks, 720,000 subcycles) per day? Does the scatterometer provide an independent assessment?