343+4343+4 PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE MATH Students in Performance Levels 3 + 4 GRADE 4 -3.4% +5.6% +0.2% +14.7% + 1.4% (All.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOARD POLICY GRADES 3, 6, 8. Passing grade on final report card in READING AND MATH Summer school not required, promote to next grade, participate in.
Advertisements

Wisconsin Student Assessment System Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 WSAS Test Proficiency Summary Report Assessment Seminar #2.
BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.
1 RESULTS. 2 60% % % 1986 (first year NYC tracked four-year graduation rate) CITY GRADUATION RATES.
GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS BY: Dalnasia Davidson. In New York City you need credits in order to graduate. 44 credits is exact. Without these credits you.
1 Reform Social Promotion It is critical to ensure students have the skills necessary to succeed, so they are not set up for failure.
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
DISTRICT MCAS RESULTS November 19, Charts by Grade vs. The State Charts by Grade Comparing 2001 through 2007 Longitudinal Comparisons CONTENTS.
Valentine Elementary School San Marino Unified School District Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Spring 2009 California Standards Test.
MCAS OVERVIEW.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
Cambrian School District CST Overview August, 2012 Exploring Infinite Possibilities for Learning.
Understanding Your Child’s FSA Score
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL Alex Anemone, Ed.D. October 6, 2014 NJ Testing Report Spring 2014.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Student Data Toolkit Example August 2006.
Slide 1 1. Profile Summary Report: Presentation Packet 2. Item Response Summary Report 3. Profile Summary Report Three reports to analyze student performance.
NJASK Comparison Scores to Essex Fells, J Districts, & Statewide (Slides 2-9) Tracking NJASK Scores for 3 rd, 4 th,& 5 th Grades (Slides ) Tracking.
Updates on State Assessments Steven Katz Director Office of State Assessment.
Spring 2015 STAAR Update. Spring 2015 STAAR Grades 3-8 will assess revised TEKS Grades 3-8 will receive initial raw score Summer 2015 data from Spring.
SANGER HIGH SCHOOL CALIFORNIA DISTINGUISHED SCHOOL CALSTAT LEADERSHIP SITE FOR COLLABORATION
Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%
Grades 3-8 Assessment Results. English Language Arts.
Assessment Update Wood Acres Elementary February 7, 2006 KPJ 2006.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
BERRY SCHOOL CST RESULTS. BERRY English Language Arts 2012/2013 CST Comparison Percent Proficient – All Students.
School Improvement Plan Review Galloping to Success Minneola Elementary Presented by Mrs. Watts.
York Suburban High School Guidance Office Eighth Grade Parent Orientation Welcome Parents and Students.
North Intermediate SMART GOAL #1 Expect 90% of students in all sub groups to score proficient or advanced in Reading on the OCCT’s.
Millbrae Elementary School District
Smarter Balanced Performance Levels and Scale Scores
PARCC Results Summary Report.
2017 FSA Grade 3 English Language Arts
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Spring 2011 MCAS Results.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 11 Updated May 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 2 Updated May 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 6 Updated May 2017
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
Preliminary PARCC & NJ ask DATA
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Updates on State Assessments
Montgomery County Public Schools MSA July 21, 2009
Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results
Meredith cargilL director of curriculum, instruction, and technology
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 5 Updated November 2017
What Parents Need to Know
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 11 Updated November 2017
Education Services October 3, 2017.
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 4 Updated November 2017
What Parents Need to Know
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 1 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 7 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 8 Updated November 2017
What Parents Need to Know
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 2 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 12 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 9 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 3 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 10 Updated November 2017
Economics of Education Regional Data Region 6 Updated November 2017
PARENT INFORMATIONAL MEETING
2008 MCAS Results Wednesday, September 17, 2008 Burlington, MA.
Presentation transcript:

PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE MATH Students in Performance Levels GRADE % +5.6% +0.2% +14.7% + 1.4% (All Students) + 9.3%

PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE MATH Students in Performance Levels GRADE % +0.5% +7.0% +4.6% +8.0% (All Students) -1.6%

One-Year Gain % NEW YORK STATE MATH Students in Performance Levels Results by Ethnic/Racial Group Grade %73.1%90.0%92.3% % in Levels 3 & 4 in 2005 % in Levels 3 & 4 in %62.9%85.0%87.7% % in Levels 3 & 4 in 2005 % in Levels 3 & 4 in 2004

PERFORMANCE LEVEL ADVANCED PROFICIENT BASIC NOT PROFICIENT Lev %77.4% NEW YORK STATE MATH GRADE 4 Grade 4 Performance of At-Risk Grade 3 Students Who Were Promoted in Summer 2004 Compared to All Grade 4 Students in Lev %94.6% Students Promoted Based on Summer Test(s)* N = 3,973 * Includes only students scoring in Level 1 on Spring 2004 grade 3 tests who were promoted based on Summer 2004 tests and who were still in NYC schools to take the Grade 4 Math test in May ALL GRADE 4 STUDENTS N = 74,885 Meets promotion criterion Does not meet promotion criterion

PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE AND NEW YORK CITY MATH Students in Performance Levels GRADES 3 – % +0.3% + 4.8% (All Students) + 6.2% Grades % + 3.3%

PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE AND NEW YORK CITY ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Students in Performance Levels GRADES % -0.8% +0.1% (All Students) +10.7% Grades 3-8 *Grade 7 test scores were not released in 2002 because they appeared inconsistent with other available information. The 2002 results include grades 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 only. +0.3% +1.7%