Recent progress in large THGEM production On behalf of Trieste group and Rui de Oliveira (CERN) S. Levorato RD51 mini week1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parallel Ionization Multiplier (PIM) : a multi-stage device using micromeshes for tracking particles MPGD’s Workshop at NIKHEF April 16th2008 April 16th.
Advertisements

Recent achievements and projects in Large MPGDs Rui de Oliveira 21/01/2009 RD51 WG1 workshop.
Machine Tools And Devices For Special Technologies Plasma machining Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
1 First observations on CsI -coated ThGEM in Trieste presented by Gabriele Giacomini phone meeting 06/08/2008.
ACTFEL Alternating Current Thin Film Electroluminescent Lamps.
Status of simulation studies of IBF for GEMs
Read-out boards Rui de Oliveira 16/02/2009 RD51 WG1 workshop Geneva.
1 Production issues of THGEMS at ELTOS The production procedure Quality checks - visual inspection - electrical tests Problems we faced Conclusions Fulvio.
01/07/08I. Ravinovich1 HBD Update Ilia Ravinovich DC Meeting, January 9, 2008.
Rate and Gain Measurements of the 1-m long GEM detector Aiwu Zhang EIC tracking R&D weekly meeting.
Progress in THGEM technology at PNPI Progress in THGEM technology at PNPI Leonid Kudin, Elena Chernishova, Boris Komkov, PNPI, CBM meeting, Dubna,
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO RD51 meeting, Paris, 14/10/2008 THGEM production at ELTOS Production of THGEM at ELTOS S.p.A. Company profile Production procedures.
Status of PNPI R&D for choice of the MUCH tracking base detector (this work is supported by INTAS) ■ Introduction ■ MICROMEGAS ■ GEM ■ MICROMEGAS+GEM ■
WG1 summary P. Colas, S. Duarte Pinto RD51 Collaboration meeting in Bari October 7-10, 2010.
HBD Meeting 3/14/06 B. Azmoun BNL Testing and Preparation of HBD Full Scale Prototype for Upcoming Engineering Run Puzzling Behavior of GEM’s To Do List.
New Developments in Large Area THGEMs & APV Exercise INFN – Sezione di Trieste Carlos Alexandre Fernandes dos Santos 11/December/2014.
20/04/2012Rui De Oliveira1 20/04/2012. Rui De Oliveira2 30 cm x 30 cm example.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 23/04/ Contribution from Trieste UPDATE ON TRIESTE LAB. ACTIVITY The set-up to measure currents THGEM prototypes from ELTOS.
1 First observations on CsI -coated ThGEM in Trieste presented by Gabriele Giacomini phone meeting 06/08/2008.
CERN Rui de OliveiraTS-DEM Rui de Oliveira TS-DEM Large size detectors CERN TS-DEM-PMT Capabilities.
15/07/2010Rui De Oliveira1 Update on large size GEM manufacturing Rui de Oliveira.
Test Beam the μ-RWELL Test Beam the μ-RWELL G. Bencivenni (a), R. de Oliveira (b), M. Gatta (a), G. Felici (a), G. Morello (a), M. Poli Lener (a) (a),
1 NA58 RICH Test Beam T10 sept.2014 Fulvio Tessarotto – Stefano Levorato Partecipants: Alessandria, Aveiro, Budapest, Calcutta, Freiburg, Liberec, Prague,
Bakelite surface vs Gap production Evaluation of First samples sent back from Korea Tests and QC of panels presently in GT Evaluation of second set of.
DEVELOPMENT OF A THGEM-BASED PHOTON DETECTOR FOR CHERENKOV IMAGING APPLICATIONS Silvia Dalla Torre INFN - Trieste On behalf of an Alessandria-CERN-Freiburg-Liberec-Prague-Torino-TriesteCollaboration.
Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) Lab tests of Thick GEMs (THGEM) S. Dalla Torre, Elena Rocco, L. Ropelewski, F. Tessarotto May – August 2007.
1 IBF in aligned, misaligned and FLOWER THGEMs The IBF problem Standard THGEM configuration COBRA and extra electrode Misaligned holes FLOWER THGEM solution.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO GDD meeting, CERN, 01/10/2008 Trieste THGEM news First indications from electrostatic simulation exercise Goals of the simulation Parameters.
THGEM-process Rui De Oliveira RD51 22/11/2011 WG6 WG6 22/11/20111Rui De Oliveira.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
Update on THGEMs and Micromegas production for RICH-1 COMPASS Upgrade on behalf of THGEM Trieste group INFN - Sezione di Trieste S . Levorato S. Levorato.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 20/03/ GDD Meeting - Contribution from Trieste FIRST LOOK AT THGEM IN TRIESTE LAB. The set-up to measure currents THGEM.
Resistive protections Rui de Oliveira 09/12/15
Plans for MPGD Radiation hardness tests for full detectors and components Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci, Elena Rocco, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski.
Production Readiness Review at PNPI Chamber assembling: Main production and quality control steps 30 January 2004 – G.Alkhazov 1.Input components control.
Large THGEMs, uniformity and gain largely based on the paper for MPGD13 and some recently obtained results S. Levorato THGEM meeting CERN 13 Nov
1 GEM R&D Activity in USTC Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
CERN, LIU-SPS ZS Review, 20/02/ Brief review on electron cloud simulations for the SPS electrostatic septum (ZS) G. Rumolo and G. Iadarola in LIU-SPS.
GEM Foil Development at ECIL
CERN Rui de OliveiraTS-DEM Rui de Oliveira TS-DEM Large size detectors practical limits based on present knowledge.
Quality control for large volume production GEM detectors Christopher Armaingaud On behalf of the collaboration GEMs for CMS.
Study of heat and chemical treatments effects on the surface of ultra-precision machined discs for CLIC X-band Accelerating Structure Review (24 Nov. 2014)
Zaragoza, 5 Julyl Construction of and experience with a 2.4 x 1 m² micromegas chambers Givi Sekhniaidze On behalf of the Micromegas community.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO THGEM discussion, 02/11/2009 THGEM production at ELTOS Production of THGEM at ELTOS S.p.A. Company profile Production procedures Small.
 Large GEM  CMS RE1-1  Kloe  Ns2 ( No stretch No stress)  Large Micromegas  Atlas MAMA project  Large THGEM  Double phase pure argon project 
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 13/11/ COMPASS THGEM meeting Construction of the large size Hybrid Prototype The bulk Micromegas technology Examples of.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO GDD meeting, CERN, 01/10/2008 Trieste THGEM news New THGEM test in the COMPASS hall New THGEM test in the COMPASS hall Preparation.
Update on THGEM project for RICH application Elena Rocco University of Eastern Piedmont & INFN Torino On behalf of an Alessandria-CERN-Freiburg-Liberec-
10-Jun-16S.Movchan Straw manufacturing and QC1 Straw manufacturing conditions and QC tape and straw parameters specification conditions of straw production.
Large size MPGD production: -GEM update -read out board infos Rui De Oliveira CERN 28/04/2009.
Systematic studies for microbulk detectors E. Ferrer Ribas, A. Giganon, Y. Giomataris, FJ Iguaz, T. Papaevangelou (Saclay) A. Gris, R. de Oliveira (CERN)
QC Procedures of Gaps for RE4 RPCs in Upscope K. S. Lee, S.
1 Fulvio TESSAROTTO CERN, 13/02/ GDD Meeting - Contribution from Trieste THGEM: TRIESTE LAB. EQUIPMENT AND CONTACTS WITH POSSIBLE PRODUCER Introduction.
A High Eta Forward Muon Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS A High Eta Forward Muon Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS Archana Sharma For CMS High Eta.
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
New MPGDs at CERN PCB Workshop
Quality Control Chamber Production
Single GEM Measurement
Hybrid MPGD based photon detector, R&D update.
An improved design of R-MSGC
THGEM: Introduction to discussion on UV-detector parameters for RICH
Investigation on tray MID 063 Back
Same geometry, but different size of the rim
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Antirust Properties of Petroleum Products by NACE Corrosion
WP 15.2 Progress and critical aspects
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
THGEM report – january, 22nd 2009
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Progress of DLC Resistive Electrode
Presentation transcript:

Recent progress in large THGEM production On behalf of Trieste group and Rui de Oliveira (CERN) S. Levorato RD51 mini week1

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performances: considerations Small THGEM prototypes 30x30 mm 2 have superior performances than our large prototypes:  stopping point to cover large surfaces ?  Stick to one geometry 0.4 mm thickness 0.4 mm holes diameter 0.4 mm pitch For small prototypes max stable gain achievable with 55 Fe source (single THGEM) Ar/CO mixture ~ 1K (Pieces received from Eltos) (no rim THGEMs) Same setup but with large prototypes Gain ranging (Pieces received from Eltos) S. Levorato RD51 mini week2

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check Asked help of Rui,  elaborated a chain of mechanical and chemical treatments + conditioning that improved the THGEM performances High pressure water cleaning, desmearing, etching, polishing, drying, PU coating… how to judge on the piece quality  We adopted the same “reference” test used by Rui to judge the THGEM quality: discharge voltage value compared with the Paschen limit, our sequence:  The test is performed in air, in a dedicated box  Biasing of the electrode: using a CAEN N471A I max =100nA  the maximum delta V : maximum voltage at which the sector doesn’t trip for at least 30s. S. Levorato RD51 mini week3

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check Asked help of Rui,  elaborated a chain of mechanical and chemical treatments + conditioning that improved the THGEM performances ( High pressure water cleaning, desmearing, etching, polishing, drying)  We adopted the same “reference” test used by Rui to judge the THGEM quality: discharge voltage value compared with the Paschen limit, our sequence:  The test is performed in air, in a dedicated box  Biasing of the electrode: using a CAEN N471A I max =100nA  the maximum delta V : maximum voltage at which the sector doesn’t trip for at least 30s. S. Levorato RD51 mini week4 Sector Under Test

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Paschen S. Levorato RD51 mini week55

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check Paschen limit is related to thickness:  if it varies along one sector ( see Fulvio’s presentation at last miniweek): i.e. it is less than the nominal value, the Pashen voltage value is decreased : 20  m variation in thickness ~ 100 V difference !  New set of RAW FR4 pieces sent to ELTOS after selection from Rui’s LAB: thickness variation is ~2% (± 10  m) over 400  m  After production at Eltos sent to RUI for cleaning procedure but for this last batch the max standing voltage measured by Rui after his treatment resulted in 1.6kV, We repeated the measurement in Trieste to check the consistency of our method obtaining 1.6kV ( identical result ) well below the Paschen limit.. WHY? S. Levorato RD51 mini week6

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check We asked ELTOS several pieces: S. Levorato RD51 mini week7 3 standard sector (50mm x300mm) of 300x300mm 2 3 standard 30x30mm 2 On ISOLA FR4 instead of Panasonic material effect / surface effect Reference with our small prototypes 3 standard sector of 300x300mm half sectors of 300x300mm 2 On ISOLA FR4 instead of Panasonic Material effect / surface effect

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check After testing with the Vmax Test -> Check the maximum gain with 55Fe source and try to correlate Vmax results (faster) with Max gain result S. Levorato RD51 mini week8 Sec 1Sec 2Sec 3Sec 4Sec 5Sec THGEM #12, Thickness = 0.4mm,  = 0.4 mm, Pitch = 0.8 mm Just take out from the package Remider for small 30x30 mm prototypes isola Vmax ~ V We decided to inspect the THGEM surface

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check S. Levorato RD51 mini week9 Irregularities are located on one side of the hole, irregular hole edge, correlated with brushing by Eltos (too strong ?) These “problems” are not there for small prototypes (30mmx30mm)

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality check S. Levorato RD51 mini week10 Irregularities are gone after Rui treatment but still the THGEM can not stand more than 1600 V Can its electrical properties improved? Taking inspiration from Rui’s procedure A similar procedure was elaborated on the simple idea better shaped edges, better field uniformity, and no high field values for sharp edges

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality procedure S. Levorato RD51 mini week11 First step mechanical brushing using pumice stone plus water 3 types are used I 0-40  m II  m III (coarse) Hinrichs Pumice Powder, Coarse

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality procedure S. Levorato RD51 mini week12

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality procedure S. Levorato RD51 mini week13 Cleaning with high pressure water to remove all pumice residuals a/o other materials, Result after first polishing, reduced irregularities, smoothened borders, still scratches Ultrasonic C in Sonica pcb solution, long bath ~1h or more ( check every 20 min) extremely mild chemical attack Sonica PCB is alkaline pH11 ultrasonic cleaning solution

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality procedure S. Levorato RD51 mini week14 After washing with demineralized water plus oven at 180 C for 24 h

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Quality procedure S. Levorato RD51 mini week15 After washing with demineralized water plus oven at 180 C for 24 h

S. Levorato RD51 miniweek16

S. Levorato RD51 miniweek X 300 Single Sector #1 (before treatment) 300 X 300 Single Sector #1 (After treatment) 6399 % of Calculated breakdown voltage obtained 300 X 300 Single Sector #1 (before treatment) 300 X 300 Single Sector #1 (After treatment) Paschen limit expected = V

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Results Vmax S. Levorato RD51 mini week18 Sec 1Sec 2Sec 3Sec 4Sec 5Sec For the THGEM #12, Thickness = 0.4mm,  = 0.4 mm, Pitch = 0.8 mm Sec 1Sec 2Sec 3Sec 4Sec 5Sec Sec 1Sec 2Sec 3Sec 4Sec 5Sec Just take out from the package After first full Treatment After second full Treatment NO PU coating is applied here

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Gain max Ar/CO % S. Levorato RD51 mini week19 Turn on the Chamber with 500V bottom (over 2.5 mm), 1050V top, and 3500 volt for drift (~10mm). Rising one sector at a time keeping all the others at 1050V. Maximum delta V as the maximum voltage where the sector doesn't trip for at least 30s. Then we go down 100V and put the source on the sector and repeat the procedure. At the maximum standing voltage with source we collect spectra.

S. Levorato RD51 miniweek20 ABC (1540) (1610) (1570) (1410) 1470 (1410) 1470 (1410) (1490) 1510 (1500) (1580) 1590 (1550) 1590 (1500) 20 ABC TABLE I: Maximum ∆V scan with & without source Without source (With Source) TABLE II: Gain highest ∆V of the sectors Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: Gain max results Ar/CO %

S. Levorato RD51 mini week21 ABC TABLE III: Gain highest ∆V which all sector stand Sector 5A: Gain ~ 372 with calibration = 11.8 ch/fC. Gas Used Ar:CO 2 70:30, source used Fe 55, Threshold 25ch. Sector 6B: Gain ~ 406 with calibration = 11.8 ch/fC. Gas Used Ar:CO 2 70:30, source used Fe 55, Threshold 25ch. Sector 4C: Gain ~ 585 with calibration = 11.8 ch/fC. Gas Used Ar:CO 2 70:30, source used Fe 55, Threshold 25ch. Pre-Amplifier stage Cremat CR110 (spark protection circuit installed)+Ortec Amplifier + MCA

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) performance: V max S. Levorato RD51 mini week22 out of the box After first treatment After second treatment 24/ Sectror 6 ∆V = 1550; EFFECTIVE GAIN = 579;

Large THGEM (300x300 mm 2 ) Preliminary conclusion: S. Levorato RD51 mini week23 At first sight no difference between ISOLA and PANASONIC material concerning electrical behavior Selection of PCB with uniform thickness  good gain uniformity Cleaning Procedure on the tested pieces improves the electrical characteristics of the Large THGEMs, the max gain is a factor 2-3 less than the small prototypes and no longer a factor The rounding of the hole edges: important aspect for THGEM behavior The Delta V max tests in air shows a discrete correlation with Gain max results No PU coating has been applied yet, there is maybe still room for improvement for the large prototypes Thanks!