U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPCC PLAN OVERVIEW - SLIDE 1 OF 45 © Copyright SafetyInstruction 2008 SAFETY TRAINING CORPORATE SAFETY TRAINING © Copyright SafeyInstruction 2008 EPA 40.
Advertisements

Mission: Mission: To protect human health and the environment Primary services: Expertise DEC brings to the ACMP Primary services: Expertise DEC brings.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
40 CFR 300. Overview of the NCP Roles and Responsibilities National Response Priorities General Pattern of Response Relationship with the Area Contingency.
United States Coast Guard Marine Safety, Security, and Stewardship 1 U.S. Coast Guard Regulations “Making a difference” 1 Jeff Lantz Director, Commercial.
Environmental Management System (EMS)
Subpart S - SEMS September 11, 2012 Prepared by: BSEE, Office of Safety Management Author: Jason Mathews.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Spill Response Plans – Why Are They Developed? Alan K. Mayberry.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NW Area Committee Meeting Focus on Pipelines PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS.
Fall “To the extent that a grant is used to train emergency responders, the State or Indian tribe shall provide written certification to the.
Conversation on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and Critical Infrastructure Protection Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Obligations of the Company
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1.2.1 > ISPS Module ISPS Code Responsibilities
Michael Warren Senior Emergency Services Coordinator HMEP GRANT ADMINISTRATOR (916) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAFETY AUDIT. 2.1 Definition of audit. Critical systematic inspection of an organization‘s activities in order to minimize losses due to accidents.
Petrochemicals in harbor areas; safety supervision and emergency response Presented by Captain David Murk U.S. Coast Guard Senior Maritime Advisor to the.
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE TRIPR FLAMMABLE LIQUID UNIT TRAINS 1.0 PRE-INCIDENT PLANNING AND PREPAREDNESS.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Occupational Health and Safety
Company duties under the ISM Code
Oil and Hazardous Materials Incident Annex and ESF #10 Home of NCP/NRP Coordination Procedures.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
National Response Center (NRC)  The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting all.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting Arlington,
Title? 1. 2 National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling Report to the President
Delivering Legal Services Executing the Mission Delivering Legal Services Executing the Mission Tulane Admiralty Law Institute March 11 – 13, 2015 New.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
1 SPCC Administrative Requirements A&WMA SS Conference Callaway Gardens, GA August 2015.
1 State Homeland Security: Priorities and Funding R. Chris McIlroy Homeland Security and Technology Division National Governors Association.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Rhonda Anderson, RHIA, President  …is a PROCESS, not a PROJECT 2.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Approvals and Permits Division Isreal Mallard Transportation Specialist,
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
MMS: Securing Ocean Energy & Economic Value for America Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group January 14, 2010 Galveston, Texas Civil Penalty Program.
NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference, November 19, 2015 TURNING TO THE STATES: WOULD MORE STATE AUTHORITY AND OVERSIGHT IMPROVE SAFETY? A Look at the.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration State Program Action Plan Linda Daugherty – OPS July 12, 2012.
Government-Initiated Unannounced Exercises (GIUE)
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
Authority: Who Does What?. Los Angeles – Long Beach Area Contingency Plan Marine Firefighting and Salvage Plan.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Oil Pollution Act (OPA) Signed into law August 1990 This act amends the Clean Water Act (1972) This act is National Law Matt Vedrani.
ISM Code 2010: Part A - Implementation Malcolm Maclachlan.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention Update and Damage Prevention Rulemaking Sam.
2015 San Diego Area Contingency Plan. San Diego FOSC Zone Orange County/San Diego Line Approx. Interstate 5 US/Mexico Border Out 12 NM.
State Fire Marshal’s Office Washington State Fire Marshal’s Office Deputy State Fire Marshal Scott Lancaster.
Summary of Senate Bill 861 (2014) and the Emergency Regulations Needed to Implement This Bill August 2014.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS May 11, 2016 REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Part 29 CFR 1960 is not Optional Madison, Wisconsin June 9, 2010.
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
DOE Worker Safety and Health Policy
Marine safety Unit Savannah
USCG Roles & Responsibilities During a Ship Fire
Offshore Oil and Gas Environmental Issues
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
OIL POLLUTION ACT.
National Response Center (NRC)
Presented to the Project Certification Committee on November 16, 2011.
Top 10 Security-Related Discrepancies
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval Alan Mayberry July 12, 2012

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What Law Requires Oil Spill Response Plans? Plans are required by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of The Clean Water Act (CWA) –PHMSA reviews oil spill response plans for Onshore Oil Pipelines –U.S. Coast Guard reviews oil spill response plans for vessels and onshore marine facilities –U.S. EPA reviews oil spill response plans for non- transportation-related onshore facilities –U.S. DOI / Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement reviews plans for offshore facilities - 2 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What does the Clean Water Act* Require? CWA assigned several oil spill related activities to the President –Oversight of oil handlers (Storage, transport, or use) –Regulations that establish Spill Plan Requirements –Spill Plan Review and Approval Compliance and Enforcement procedures –Conduct Spill Response Drills, including unannounced –Response Equipment Inspections *Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration How are these requirements of the CWA carried out? The CWA is silent about which agency/ies should perform spill prevention and response duties. Executive Order of 1991 ordered DOT/ PHMSA to: –Promulgate regulations requiring operators to submit response plans –Review and approve (qualified) spill response plans for onshore oil pipelines - 4 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration How are these requirements of the CWA carried out? EO 12777, as amended by EO 13826, assigns the following duties to the Coast Guard: conduct oil spill exercises inspect spill containment booms and removal equipment. coordinate with other Departments and Agencies to minimize the burden on its regulated industry

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA Spill Response Plan Activity History In the first years of plan review, two Federal employee managers managed contractors, who performed: –Technical Plan Review- ensuring plans contained all required elements –Spill drill design and evaluation After 2005, contractors were no longer used –PHMSA FTEs undertook plan review, approval, and record keeping functions –PHMSA decided to discontinue discretionary spill drills - 6 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What must be in a Spill Response Plan? The plan must: –Certify consistency with requirements of the National and Area Contingency Plans, –Identify the qualified individual (QI) with full authority to implement remove actions, and require communications between the QI and appropriate Federal official, –Identify and ensure the availability of private personnel and equipment necessary to remove a worst case discharge, and to mitigate a substantial threat of such a discharge, - 7 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What must be in a Spill Response Plan? The plan must describe: training, equipment testing, periodic unannounced drills, and response actions of facility personnel to mitigate or prevent the discharge, or the substantial threat of a discharge. The plan must: –Be updated periodically, and resubmitted after each significant change

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What review does PHMSA perform? Plans for facilities that could leak oil and cause significant and substantial harm to the environment must be submitted for review For plans submitted by onshore oil pipeline operators, PHMSA will: –Review these plans promptly, –Require amendments to any plan that does not meet the requirements, –Review each plan when resubmitted for review

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration The CWA and Part 194 do not provide discretion for plan approval. The CWA states that the approving official, “shall... approve any plan that meets the requirements” of 33 USC (Requirements identified in slides 7 and 8.) 49 CFR § (d) states, “… OPS will approve the response plan if OPS determines that the response plan meets all requirements of this part.” If required elements are not present, PHMSA cannot approve the plan. 49 CFR § (b). Once PHMSA identifies each required element, PHMSA must approve the plan

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Facilities must await PHMSA plan approval prior to beginning operations An oil handling facility that could cause significant and substantial harm to the environment: –May not handle, store, or transport oil unless its plan has been reviewed and approved, –Must operate in compliance with the plan. An operator may operate a pipeline while awaiting approval of a submitted response plan for up to 2 years IF the operator certifies the availability of private personnel and equipment necessary to respond to a worst case discharge or a substantial threat of such a discharge. 49 CFR §§ and (e)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What else does the CWA require to prevent releases of oil into U.S. waters? Periodic inspection of containment booms, skimmers, and equipment to remove discharges Periodic drills of removal capability, without prior notice Executive Orders and assigned these duties to the Secretary of DHS (U.S. Coast Guard)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA has cooperated with other Agencies to reduce burden These efforts have aligned all of the agency requirements, and minimized the burden for operators under more than one agency’s regulations –Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Common Operator oil spill response exercise requirements Credit granted across agencies when drills or real spills are managed and properly documented –The “One-Plan” Integrated Plan Common formatting and content across all agencies

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Lessons Learned Marshall, MI Incident demonstrated the need for –Enhanced interagency coordination and communications –Improvement of PHMSA’s plan review process and procedures Differences among agencies requirements may have affected some aspects of incident management Need better means to share plan information with responders during incidents

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Actions Taken Since Marshall PHMSA: –More staff now designated for plan-review activities –Initiated An Internal Audit of plan-review activities (requested last year and commenced last month) –Designed and conducted a high-level table top oil spill drill involving the Office of the Secretary –Participating in an interagency revision of the PREP Guidelines

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Actions Taken Since Marshall PHMSA: –Developed secure, electronic means to pass Plan Content to FOSC and incident personnel –Met with Senior USCG officials and established an interagency coordination group –Joined a USCG / DOI BOEMRE* workgroup to improve plan content review and utility * Workgroup dealt with interagency plan issues

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA is changing its review process Recognized need for more resources in 2010 –Requested addition eight inspectors (FY12) for oil-spill related duties –Not approved by Congress PHMSA wishes to integrate spill response plan review with the other inspection activities performed by regions Reassessed all existing plans

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA is changing its review process PHMSA issued an Advisory Bulletin to operators to ensure response resources during the Deepwater Horizon incident. Many operators responded with revised plans. PHMSA has revised its plan review criteria and procedures. PHMSA is integrating operator’s compliance officials into the plan review process in addition to the plan preparer. PHMSA now considers an operator’s incident and accident history in context with that plan review, PHMSA is doubling its participation in Operator drills and will incorporate findings into the plan review process

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Path Forward PHMSA will: –Examine NTSB response plan findings and recommendations. –Continue improvement of plan review practices. –Consider if better alignment with EPA and USCG plan standards is needed. –Better integrate oil spill plan responsibilities and Pipeline Safety Inspection Program