Proposal to introduce Grouping Criteria for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies for L-category vehicles in UN Regulation No. 90 submitted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNECE Regulation 13 (braking) Proposed amendment to extend Annex 19 and Annex 20 to cover motor vehicles, especially a vehicle stability function Sheet.
Advertisements

T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n New Snow Test Method for Tyre Class C2 Agenda 1.Scope 2.Requirements.
EU Tire Label. April 2011 Tire Performance Label: A Global TrendTrend 2 EU World wide introduction of a tire label EU-Label for the performance in Rolling.
MOTORCYCLE HELMETS: CONSUMER SAFETY INFORMATION SHARP World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations 145th session June 2008 UK Department for Transport.
T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n UNECE Regulation No 117 Testing method for measuring the wet grip index.
UNECE Regulation No 106 Proposed amendments
to introduce requirements for the approval
GRRF Request: Include a cross reference to R10 in R78 Purpose: Ensure Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) does not affect electronic brake modules in a.
Analysis of the influence of aiming, on visibility distance and glare Poland 65 GRE, 29 March 2011 Dr EngTomasz Targosinski Informal document No. GRE
THE EUROPEAN TYRE AND RIM TECHNICAL ORGANISATION AT tyres: What are they? tyres inflated at very low inflation pressures (
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
Proposal to introduce requirements for the approval of replacement brake discs for L-category vehicles in UN Regulation No. 90 Submitted by ITALY (Revision.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) General information Participants/Address list A provisional address list has been prepared: please check.
GRRF 56 September Wet Grip Regulation Ad hoc GRRF conclusions Informal document No. GRRF (56th GRRF, September 2004, agenda item 6.2.)
Carbon – Ceramic Brake Discs UNECE R90:02 Presentation to 81st GRRF February 2016 Geoffrey A Ross - CLEPA 1.
Regulation 13-H Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/16 Prepared by the ad hoc group on Transitional Provisions.
Emergency Stopping Signal 80th GRRF session Submitted by the experts from IMMA Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, Agenda item.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Tyre GTR # 16 IWG session 15 January 23th 2017 Agenda item 4
Document TYREGTR (Geneva, 23 January 2017)
ETRTO POSITION 41st GRB Meeting Geneva 22/02/2005 GRB- 22/02/05
IWVTA: UN-Regulation No.0 IWVTA Inf. G Technical Secretary
Tyre GTR # 16 IWG session 16 Moscow, June progress report IWG
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO
43rd Session GRB 21 February 2006 Geneva, Switzerland
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Underlying Principles of Approval Marking for the LSD Regulation
SUMMARY OF INITIAL AIMING AND LEVELLING TOLERANCE ISSUE
Submitted by the expert from OICA
Underlying Principles of Approval Marking for the LSD Regulation
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comments on IWG R55 proposal to GRRF
Submitted by the experts of OICA
test limits for correction coefficient determination
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
ETRTO answer to Contracting Party question from GRB 68th session
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Amendment to regulation UN 117 Introduction of worn tyre performances
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Document TYREGTR Agenda item 4
Inflation Pressure Markings
Reg 85: Measurement of Net Power
Document TYREGTR Agenda item 4.4
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
Additional prescriptions to regulation UN 117
Informal document GRRF-78-41
Editorial proposal on Definitions
Request of clarification on
IWG TYREGTR 17th Meeting* Brussels, ETRTO Office, 2-3 November 2017
Additional discussion points from the gearshift issues task force
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Document TYREGTR Tyre GTR # 16 IWG session 17 Brussels, Nov progress report IWG.
Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles
UN R13 and Electro Mechanical Brakes
Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE FREE FORM MIRRORS IN REG. ECE 46.06
Presentation transcript:

Proposal to introduce Grouping Criteria for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies for L-category vehicles in UN Regulation No. 90 submitted by ITALY (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/18) 81st GRRF 3 February Informal document GRRF st GRRF, 1-5 February 2016 Agenda item 6

The proposal presented today at 81° GRRF session (doc ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/18) is aimed at including in UN-R 90 a criteria of Grouping for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies only for L-category vehicles: 2 Preamble

Basically: it is a matter of making UN R 90 really applicable (from an economic sustainability viewpoint) for the type approval of replacement brake lining assemblies !!! For vehicles belonging to L-categories, there is a great number of different types of replacement brake lining assemblies in the market. For each type, the quantity of parts marketed is very low. As an average, a medium size manufacturer: -producing around 600 types of brake lining assemblies -referring to different applications with 4 different materials, -needs to proceed with requests of type approval (as a minimum) -with an overall sales of around 3 Million of sets, it means an average of sets/for each homologation. The Grouping is therefore needed to steadily reduce the burden for approval sustained by the manufacturer. The average manufacturer would carry out only 12 type approval tests, making the application of Reg. 90 really sustainable and feasible ( sets/each homologation) 3 Rationale

4 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/18 Add new paragraph “ In the case of brake lining assemblies for vehicles of category L, the list of brake lining assemblies belonging to the same group defined according to Annex 7a. This list shall indicate for each brake lining assembly: name of brake lining assembly manufacturer, the brake lining assembly manufacturer’s code, the friction material area (cm2).

5 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/ In the case of brake lining assemblies for vehicles of category L, brake lining assemblies belonging to the same group defined according to the criteria of Annex 7a, shall be assigned the same approval number of the one assigned to the representative brake lining assembly. Add new paragraph 4.2.4

6 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/ Replacement brake lining assemblies for vehicles of category L It is allowed the verification of a brake lining assembly deemed to be representative of a group of brake lining assemblies, grouped according to the criteria defined in Annex 7a. The representative brake lining assembly is deemed to identify the most severe application. Results obtained with that representative brake lining assembly are considered valid for all the brake lining assemblies belonging to the same group defined according to the grouping criteria as from Annex 7a. At least one set of the chosen replacement brake lining assemblies, representing the type of lining to be approved, shall be installed and tested in at least one vehicle which is representative of the vehicle type for which approval is sought, according to the prescriptions of Annex 7 and shall satisfy the requirements stated in this annex. The representative vehicle(s) shall be selected from among the application range using a worst case analysis4. Amend paragraph

7 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/18 Add a new ANNEX 7a: Criteria to define groups of brake lining assembly for vehicles of category L The Grouping is made according to the following approach: a. According to the individual friction material of the brake lining (i.e. Organic, Sintered) b. Depending on the area of the friction material area of the brake lining assembly operated by the piston/pistons of only one side of the brake caliper GroupBrake lining area [cm 2 ] A≤15 B> 15 ≤ 22 C> 22 Group including mainly the pads of 2 opposed pistons calipers or 1 piston floating calipers Group including mainly the pads of 4 opposed pistons calipers or 2 piston floating calipers Group including mainly pads of big calipers (custom motorcycles, CBS system, etc.) Slots and chamfers are not taken into account: their presence is provisional due to wear. The total area is used to simplify the calculation, inevitable with so many different applications and initial shapes.

8 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/18 Add a new ANNEX 7a: The brake lining assembly to be approved is defined, according to the following criteria : a.Choice of friction material to be approved b.Verification of the applications where the chosen friction material is applied c.Definition of the area of the selected brake lining assemblies according to Table 1, and classification into groups A – B – C ; d.For each group, selection of the most severe application, according to the highest value of the index Ep (kinetic energy by brake lining area), as follows: E p = ½*M*p*(V*c) 2 / (S*q p )

9 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/18 Add a new ANNEX 7a: Ep (kinetic energy index) is proposed as criteria to select the most severe application, because it is the most relevant data to evaluate the stress applied to the brake lining assembly. E p = ½*M*p*(V*c) 2 / (S*q p ) Where: Ep = kinetic energy index [kJ/cm2] M = gross vehicle weight of the vehicle [kg] p = allocation percentage of the vehicle weight: - for front braking system: 75% in case of 1 brake disc 37.5% in case of 2 brake discs - for rear braking system: 50% V = vehicle maximum speed [m/s] c = correction coefficient of speed: - for front braking system = for rear braking system: variable according to the brake disc diameter: 0.5 for Ø ≤ 245 [mm] 0.6 per Ø > 245 < 280 [mm] 0.75 per Ø ≥ 280 [mm] S = brake lining area as defined in Table 1 [cm 2 ]. qp = number of pads in 1 caliper «p» corresponds to the % of vehicle total mass which is braked by the lining. Conventional values obtained through real testing on OEM brake discs «c» is a max speed reduction factor, used as easier alternative to the vehicle initial and final speed.. Conventional values obtained through real testing on OEM brake discs