NOW 04 Otranto, September 11-18 2004 M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/1 The HARP experiment at CERN PS Neutrino Oscillation Workshop Conca Specchiulla,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 HARP A fixed-target experiment at the CERN Proton Synchrotron ( ) Hadron Production Experiment (PS214) Neutrino Factory Atmospheric Neutrino.
Advertisements

NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones. SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones Overview of GEn, GMn setup Overview of GEp setup The.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones 1 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAA A.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
1 Particle production vs energy M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini.
BEACH04 Chicago, June 28-July A.Tonazzo - HARP pion yields for neutrino beams/1 Hadron Production Cross-Sections and Secondary Particle Yields from.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = ± 1.0 MeV [a]
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Simulation of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for the Neutrino Factory Malcolm Ellis & Alan Bross Fermilab International Scoping Study Meeting KEK,
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
1 Mariyan Bogomilov CERN,(Switzerland) University of Sofia and INRNE, (Bulgaria) Kiten, Bulgaria THE HARP EXPERIMENT THE HARP EXPERIMENT.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
30 July 2004 Hadron Productions Present knowledge & Future plans M.G.Catanesi INFN –Bari Italy Nufact ’04 Osaka.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Photoproduction of the  (1385) resonance at LEPS K. Hicks & D. Keller, Ohio U. LEPS Collaboration Meeting May 1, 2008.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Hadron Production Measurements presented by Giles Barr, Oxford ICRR-Kashiwa December 2004.
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
L/T separation in the 3 He(e,e’p) reaction at parallel kinematics Freija Descamps Supervisors: Ron Gilman Eric Voutier Co-supervisor: Jean Mougey.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
H A R P A Hadron Production Experiment at the Proton Synchrotron at CERN Motivation for the HARP experiment The HARP Detector MiniBooNE and HARP.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Wine & Cheese November 18 th 2005 Meson Production Results from E910 and Their Relevance to MiniBooNE E910 MiniBooNE.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Claudia Strabel, ETH Zurich SPS Annual Meeting June 21 – 22, 2010 Hadro-production measurements for T2K with NA61/SHINE at the CERN SPS.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
SPSC, 26 March 2002 A. De Min, HARP STATUS REPORT 1 HARP STATUS REPORT A. De Min for the HARP Collaboration SPSC Open Session 26 March 2002.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini Universita’ di Milano-Bicocca
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Status of the OPERA experiment
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Production Studies: the HARP results WP2 December 2008
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Presentation transcript:

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/1 The HARP experiment at CERN PS Neutrino Oscillation Workshop Conca Specchiulla, Otranto, September M.Bonesini INFN, Sezione di Milano, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini, Universita’ di Milano-Bicocca On behalf of the HARP collaboration

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/2 Talk overview The HARP Experiment –Physics goals and motivations –Data taking summary –Experimental setup and program –Detector overview and performance First physics analysis: pion yields for K2K target –Motivations –Results Conclusions and overlook

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/3 Physics goals of HARP Input for prediction of neutrino fluxes for the MiniBooNE and K2K experiments Pion/Kaon yield for the design of the proton driver of neutrino factories and SPL- based super-beams Input for precise calculation of the atmospheric neutrino flux Input for Monte Carlo generators (GEANT4, e.g. for LHC or space applications) Systematic study of hadron production: Beam momentum : GeV/c Target: from hydrogen to lead Acceptance over full solid angle Final state particle identification 2000 – 2001 Installation Data taking

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/4 factory design factory design maximize  + (  - ) production yield as a function of: proton energy target material geometry collection efficiency (p L,p T ) but different simulations show large discrepancies for  production distributions, both in shape and normalization. Experimental knowledge is rather poor (large errors: poor acceptance, few materials studied)  aim: measure p T distribution with high precision ( < 5%) for high Z targets

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/5 beams flux prediction beams flux prediction Energy, composition, geometry of a neutrino beam is determined by the development of the hadron interaction and cascade  needs to know  spectra, K/  ratios Beam MC Beam MC confirmed by Pion Monitor Oscill. MAX E (GeV) K2K : Al target, 12.9 GeV/c Al targets 5%, 50%, 100% (all p beam ), K2K target replica (12.9 GeV/c)  special program with K2K replica target aiming at  (Far/Near)/(Far/Near) < 3% MiniBooNE:Be target 8.9 GeV/c Be targets: 5%, 50%, 100%, MiniBoone target replica Precise p T and p L spectra for extrapolation to far detectors and comparison between near and far detectors

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/6 Atmospheric flux Primary flux is now considered to be known to better than 10% Most of the uncertainty comes from the lack of data to construct and calibrate a reliable hadron interaction model. Model-dependent extrapolations from the limited set of data lead to about 30% uncertainty in atmospheric fluxes.  need measurements on cryogenic targets (N 2, O 2 ) covering the full kinematic range in a single experiment

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/7 Barton et. al. Atherton et. al. NA56/SPY Serpukov Allaby et. al. Abbott et. al. Eichten et. al. Cho et. al. 1 GeV TeV Parent energy 10 Population of hadron- production phase-space for pA → πX interactions. ν μ flux (represented by boxes) as a function of the parent and daughter energies. Measurements. 1-2 p T points 3-5 p T points >5 p T points 1 GeV TeV 10 Daughter energy Hadron production experiments HARP

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/8 An example from G.Battistoni, NOW 2000 Tuning of Montecarlo generators General problem: little exp. data and large uncertainties in calculations In particular for high Z materials and low primary energy  Thin and thick targets, scan the periodic system and momenta

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/9 Data taking summary K2K: AlMiniBoone: BeLSND: H 2 O 5% 50% 100% Replica 5% 50% 100% Replica 10% 100% GeV/c+8.9 GeV/c+1.5 GeV/c SOLID targets: CRYOGENIC targets: EXP replica target: HARP took data at the CERN PS T9 beamline in Total: 420 M events, ~300 settings

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/10 The HARP detector layout TRACKING + PARTICLE ID at Large angle and Forward

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/11 Detector Performances 1.Beam detectors 2.Large angle detector 3.Forward spectrometer

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/12 1. Beam instrumentation Beam Tof  K Beam cherenkov MBoone target Beam tracking with MWPCs : –96% tracking efficiency using 3 planes out of 4 –Resolution <100 mm 12.9 GeV MWPCs Beam TOF: –separate  /K/p at low energy over 21m flight distance –time resolution 70 ps –proton selection purity >98.7% Beam Cherenkov: –Identify electrons at low energy,  at high energy, K above 12 GeV –~100% eff. in e-  tagging  k p d Corrected TOF (ps) 3 GeV Beam composition and direction TOF-A CKOV-A CKOV-B TOF-B 21.4 m T9 beam MWPCs

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/13 2. Large angle detector: status of TPC  p T /p T dE/dx p  and  Relativistic rise

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/14 Elastic scattering Measure elastic cross-section To normalise the data (elastic cross section is well known) To evaluate the acceptance + efficiency in TPC To check momentum scale Calibration tool for merging forward and large angle analysis oTarget: liquid H 2 (cryogenic target) oTarget length: 18 cm o3 GeV/c beam 1 GeV/c Pa 3GeV/c PcPc PdPd Missing mass: m x 2 = ( p beam + p target – p TPC ) 2

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/15 p p -> p p  p ->  p Red: using dE/dx for PID missing mass for p p  p p and  p   p oSelect p and  by beam TOF oBLUE: Simple selection oOnly 1 pos. track in the TPC coming from the target oRED: Additional cut on dE/dx in TPC (select proton) Missing mass distributions

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/16 3. Forward spectrometer: NDC tracking Reused NOMAD Drift Chambers –12 planes per chamber (in total 60 planes) –wires at 0°,±5° w.r.t. vertical Hit efficiency ~80% (limited by non- flammable gas mixture, it was 95 % in NOMAD) –correctly reproduced in the simulation Alignment with cosmics and beam muons: drift distance resolution ~340  m Plane efficiencies Side modules Plane number Resolution = 340  m TPC NDC1NDC2NDC5 NDC4 NDC3 Dipole Cherenkov TOF-wall EM calorimeter beam reused from NOMAD

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/17 The momentum and angular resolutions are well within the K2K requirements MC data 1 type No vertex constraintincluded MC momentum resolution angular resolution Forward tracking: resolution

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/18 Forward particle identification e+e+ ++ p number of photoelectrons  inefficiency e+e+ h+h  p P (GeV)  e  k TOF CERENKOV CALORIMETER 3 GeV/c beam particles TOF CERENKOV TOF CERENKOV CALORIMETER TOF CERENKOV CAL ++ p data

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/19 Forward PID: TOF Wall TOF time resolution ~160 ps 3  separation:  /p up to 4.5 GeV/c K/  up to 2.4 GeV/c  7  separation of  /p at 3 GeV/c 3 GeV beam particles data  p Separate  /p (K/  ) at low momenta (0–4.5 GeV/c) 42 slabs of fast scintillator read at both ends by PMTs Calibration / equalization –Cosmic ray runs (every 2-3 months) –Laser (continuous: monitor stability) PMT Scintillator

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/20 TOF Wall calibration  A good and redundant system is needed for good TOFW timing measurements 1.Cosmic ray calibration ( every 2-3 months ): –Measure the relative time-offset between photomultipliers 2.Laser calibration ( many times a day ): –TOF wall stability check –Good agreement with cosmic ray calibration laser cosmics 70 ps

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/21 Forward PID: Cherenkov Separate  /p at large momenta 31 m 3 filled with C 4 F 10 (n=1.0014) Light collection: mirrors+Winston cones → 38 PMTs in 2 rows LED flashing system for calibration  mass is a free parameter nominal threshold N pe → 21 p (GeV/c) Number of photoelectrons e+e+ ++ 3 GeV beam particles p p ++ 5 GeV beam particles N phel data

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/22 Forward PID: Calorimeter Separate  /e Pb/fibre: 4/1 –EM1: 62 modules, 4 cm thick –EM2: 80 modules, 8 cm thick Total 16 X 0 Reused from CHORUS Calibration with cosmic rays: –Measurement of attenuation length in fibers –Module equalization Energy resolution 23%/sqrt(E) intrinsic resolution 15%/sqrt(E) convoluted with beam spread at detector entrance electrons pions 3 GeV data

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/23 oscillation peak Forward Analysis for K2K target Focuses on the needs of K2K experiment Exploits the forward part of the spectrometer (NDCs, TOFW, CKOV) beam 250 km  (E ) SK = R(E ).  (E ) ND Range of interest: 1 GeV/c < p  < 8 GeV/c  < 250 mrad Beam MC Beam MC confirmed by pion monitor 0.5 < E < 0.75 GeV

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/24 Analysis for K2K: motivations

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/25 pion efficiency (data) pion purity (data) pion yield (raw data) tracking efficiency (data+MC) migration matrix (not computed yet) Acceptance (MC) depend on momentum resolution i = bin of true (p,  ) j = bin of recosntructed (p,  ) The forward unnormalized cross section

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/26 P > 1 GeV K2K interest K2K interest Forward acceptance dipole NDC1 NDC2 B x z A particle is accepted if it reaches the second module of the drift chambers

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/27 Forward tracking dipole magnet NDC1 NDC2 B x z NDC5 beam target Top view 1 2 NDC3 NDC4 Plane segment 3 3 track types depending on the nature of the matching object upstream the dipole  Track-Track  Track-Plane segment  Track-Target/vertex Aim: recover as much efficiency as possible and avoid dependencies on track density in 1st NDC module (hadron model dependent)

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/28 Downstream tracking efficiency ~98% Up-downstream matching efficiency ~75% Tracking efficiency  track is known at the level of 5% Green: type 1 Blue: type 2 Red: type 3 Black: sum of normalized efficiency for each type Total Tracking Efficiency P (GeV/c)  x (mrad) Total tracking efficiency

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/29 tof cerenkov calorimeter momentum distribution Using the Bayes theorem: 1.5 GeV 3 GeV 5 GeV data we use the beam detectors to establish the “true” nature of the particle Forward PID:  efficiency and purity Iterative approach: dependence on the prior removed after few iterations  j  -(t) = N j  -true-obs / N j  -true  j  -(t) = N j  -true-obs / N j  -obs  j  -(t) /  j  -(t)

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/30 To be decoupled from absorption and reinteraction effects we have used a thin target p-e/  misidentification background 5% Al target Raw data (20% of stat) p > 0.2 GeV/c |  y | < 50 mrad 25 < |  x | < 200 mrad Pion yield: K2K thin target

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/31 Pion yield After all corrections 5% Al target p > 0.2 GeV/c |  y | < 50 mrad 25 < |  x | < 200 mrad To do: Correction for resolutions, absolute normalisation, empty target subtraction full statistics

NOW 04 Otranto, September M. Bonesini - The HARP expt at CERN PS/32 Conclusions and overlook Status of HARP detector –Forward region: good tracking and solid PID –Large angle: much recent progress (TPC calibration campaign in 2003) First preliminary results are available: thin (5% ) K2K target (mainly as an example of the many HARP analysis capabilities) –Using forward region of the detector We plan to have a detector paper (incorporating performances of all subdetectors, that are now well understood) and a first physics paper on thin K2K target on a 2 month timescale. A first large-angle analysis (H/Tn targets for -factory study) will be shown at the Villars SPSC meeting