Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Advertisements

VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Secondary beam analysis – PS and SPS Started May 22, 2012.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Far Detector Timing Calibration Andy Blake Cambridge University November 2004.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
N. Anfimov (JINR) on behalf of the ECAL0 team.  Introduction  Installation and commissioning  Calibration  Data taking  Preliminary result  Plans.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Kelli Hardy Compton Study from Experimental Data.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Calibration of the MINOS Detectors Using Stopping Muons Jeff Hartnell University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory IoP Particle Physics 2004 Tuesday.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
D. Jason Koskinen UCL 1 st year presentation 6/2005 Temp Work and other MINOS projects.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab1 Study of the QIE Response & Calibration (Current Injection CalDet & Development of diagnostic tools for NearDet N.Saoulidou,
DREAM Coll. Meeting, Rome 2009F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa Template Analysis of DRS Data  Motivations  Preliminary results F. Bedeschi, R. Carosi, M. Incagli,
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
Mark Dorman – UCL/RAL – Calibration Workshop Talk Update on ND Strip-to-Strip Calibration Work Mark Dorman Calibration Workshop Fermilab, September 7-9.
Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
An update on ECAL simulations
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
MINOS and Me D. Jason Koskinen
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
Status of the TOF Detector
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
Far Detector Performance and Calibration
Status report Minjung Kim
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response with Temperature Time Off Beam Energy Muons Alignment

Track Finder Track each plane orientation separately Follow track through each plane of detector by looking for hit strips within a user specified range No more than 2 hits in any plane on the track

Event Display - Muon

Event Display - Pion

Event Display - Electron

ADC Corrections Drift Points Drift points taken every 20 mins during runs Correct all ADC values back to a reference point for each strip end to remove gain drift Correction hidden from end user – procedure fully “framework-ized” at CalDet

Path Length Correction Average path length for finite strip width:  ds  = (ds/dz). [4.05/( dT/dz)] Calculate path length from local track angles

Attenuation – Uncorrected ADC Versus Position along Strip

Attenuation – Characterization (Ryan Nichol)

Attenuation – Corrected ADC Versus Position along Strip

Strip-to-Strip Calibration Currently only apply Drift and Path Length Corrections to Track Hits (Attenuation to come…) Histogram Double Ended Hits and Find 90% Truncated Means per Strip End Write Strip-to-Strip Normalisation Factors to Database: Users can obtain charge in Normalised “CalDet” ADC units Typically enough muons to update strip-to-strip corrections each run (to remove temperature variations in strip light output) CandDigit::Reco slow - not feasible so far

Results using Cosmic Muons Angular Distributions of non-beam runs clearly show contribution from PS muons 20 o Vertical Angle Cut  Cosmic muon sample

Results using Cosmic Muons Light output in NPEs at 23 o C: Green: 3.6 pes Clear: 4.5 pes Light output variations: Green: 13.0% Clear: 16.4%

Aside: Gains Gains Green: 75 ADCs Clear: 75 ADCs Width Green: 10% Clear: 10%

Calibration Check: Muons Apply Strip-to-Strip Calibration to All Muon Hits Expect RMS/Mean to decrease by: [(Gain Spread) 2 + (Light Output Spread) 2 ] 0.5 ~ 25% Green 25% Clear

Calibration Check: Electrons Apply Strip-to-Strip Calibration to All Electron Hits Summed Corrected ADC Dist for electron events narrows slightly <1% Corrections “washed out” by summing

Scintillator Strip Response Short Term Variations Now have Temperature probe at CalDet! (UTexas) Measure Fractional Changes in Light Output with Time Compare with Shifts expected due to Temperature

Scintillator Strip Response Long Term Variations Using Temperature Measurements from HARP experiment (also in PS East Hall) can compare light output from 6 month old cosmic runs with recent runs Light output appears to be stable on this timescale

Off Beam Energy Muons Looking at Track Range for 2 GeV run: Expect a peak at plane ~55 … Instead seem to get a spread of energies + many higher energy muons Not useful for understanding MC/T11 Range differences

Off Beam Energy Muons Look at distribution of vertical strip hit in first plane vs horizonal angle for through-going muons Can see that…

Use high energy, straight muons to measure plane alignment Fix hit in first plane of detector (for each orientation), fit straight line to rest of track  alignment wrt first plane Plot (expected hit strip – actual hit strip) for each plane: Alignment

Offsets w.r.t. first plane ================= Even: Mean ~ 0.1cms RMS ~ 0.2 cms Odd: Mean ~ cms RMS ~ 0.4 cms

Summary & Future CalDet Calibration running within Framework Scintillator Light Output Variations Understood T7 running unable to shed light on MC/T11 Range differences Add Attenuation Corrections Compare Alignment Measurements with Offline Package – use misalignment info during track reconstruction/path length & attenuation corrections