LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The role of information in water-related decision making.
Advertisements

Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
PHILOTECHNICS Decommissioning Radiological Laboratories in California CCRSO Conference October 5, 2007 Presented by: Jon Dillon, M.S.
1 MARLAP, MARSSIM and RETS- REMP: How is All of this Related…or NOT? Robert Litman, Ph.D. Eric L. Darois, MS, CHP Radiation Safety & Control Services,
Ninth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 pm, Thursday, September 13
Land Use Program Septic System Overview Scott Weldon
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
RETS – REMP Workshop NRC Activities June 25, 2007 Presented by Steve Garry.
NRC LICENSE APPLICATION PROCESS
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
The Role of Health Physicists in Uranium Site Cleanups Alisha Stallard, Environmental Health Physicist Radioactive Materials Division Texas Commission.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
NRC Decommissioning Activities for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Financial Analysis of the Pitney Acquisition INITIAL REPORT.
Tritium: Fleet-Wide Assessment Program Zigmund A. Karpa Director Environmental and Regulatory Affairs.
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
New Decade - New Challenges Annual Conference September 2010 Water Services Training Group 14 th Annual Conference New Decade – New Challenges 9 th September.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
NEI Presentation on Nuclear Decommissioning Trust (NDT) Use Concerns.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
Creating a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan For Construction Activities.
U.S Regulatory Process for Uranium Production Facility Licensing and Operation Daniel M. Gillen.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Product Documentation Chapter 5. Required Medical Device Documentation  Business proposal  Product specification  Design specification  Software.
Groundwater Protection Initiative And Other Issues Of Interest George Oliver RETS/REMP Conference Charlotte, NC June 23, 2008.
1 of 40 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 - Identify the Decisions Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (30 minutes) DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 12.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 – Identify the Decision Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 15 minutes (75 minute Lunch break) DQO Training Course Day.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “ Development of regulatory framework for oversight of decommissioning Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)  All dischargers over 1-acre must develop a SWPPP  6 major portions of every SWPPP Site Evaluation and.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Hydro One Community Liaison Committee Minister’s Conditions Meeting #2 August 19, 2014 Solina Hall.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Peter Lietava Division of Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management State Office for Nuclear.
International Atomic Energy Agency V. Nys Definition and practical application of demonstration of operational and long-term safety for predisposal RWM.
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61
Septic System Overview
-EL ABBARI Younes, FADIL Najib (CNESTEN) -SADIQ Younes (AMSSNuR)
Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 2 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Research Reactor Decommissioning Demonstration Project (R2D2)
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Management of Pollution Risks at Activity Cessation GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-421) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets the HSE requirements for the management.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015

2 PG&E Property Boundary

3 PG&E Property

Radiological Criteria for Unrestricted Use Acceptable for unrestricted use if the residual radioactivity (distinguishable from background) results in a TEDE to an average member of the critical group that does not exceed 25 mrem (0.25 mSv) per year, including that from groundwater sources of drinking water

5 NRC Approval and Public Meeting Submit LTP May 3, 2013 NRC Acceptance Review Public Meeting Aug. 20, 2013 Technical Review LTP Approved Mid-Late days 30 days to Early September 1 year – 18 months LTP Process Approximate Anticipated Timelines

6 License Termination Plan (LTP) 1. General Site Information 2. Site Characterization 3. Remaining Decommissioning Activities 4. Site Remediation Plan 5. Final Status Survey 6. Compliance with Radiological Criteria 7. Financial Status 8. Supplement to the Environmental Report RegGuide Format

7 LTP Chapter 1 General Site Information  Chapter 1 provides information about the site and lays out the licensing notification and approval requirements relating to any deviations from or changes to the LTP.  Addresses historical information about the site as well as summarizing the content of the remaining seven chapters

8 LTP Chapter 2 Site Characterization  Provides information regarding the radiological state of the site using input from the historical site assessment, site spill records and continuing characterization data.  Characterization will continue to take place and the LTP will be updated as necessary as new data becomes available.

9 LTP Chapter 3 Remaining Decommissioning Activities  Describes the methods and sequence of remaining decommissioning work.  Done at a high level, in other words, major activities are identified and an estimated completion date is provided so the NRC can identify any inspections and technical resources that will be needed.  The chapter also includes site dose estimates, waste volumes and radiological effluents for the entire decommissioning.

10 LTP Chapter 4 Site Remediation Plan  Describes the means and methods to accomplish the remaining work scope of remediation to meet the NRC’s release criteria.  Include a detailed description of the techniques that will be employed to remove or remediate surface and subsurface soils, groundwater, and surface water and sediments.

11 LTP Chapter 5 Final Status Survey  The LTP describes the final radiation survey plan for demonstrating that the plant and site will meet the release limits.  The final status survey is the radiation survey performed after an area has been fully characterized, remediation has been completed, and the area is ready to be released.  The purpose of the final status survey is to demonstrate that the area conforms to the radiological criteria for license termination.

12 LTP Chapter 6 Compliance With Radiological Criteria  Most technical of the chapters  Describes the process implemented to develop the site dose models and Derived Concentration Guideline Levels (DCGLs), including input parameter justification and sensitivity analyses.  DCGLs are radionuclide-specific values determined by a software program that correlate to the site release criteria.

13 LTP Chapter 7 Financial Status  Describes the financing of the decommissioning project, with very detailed cost estimates which usually includes some proprietary information related to contractual information.  Funding status for the operation of the temporary spent fuel storage is not included in this chapter, however it is required in the annual financial assurance document sent to the NRC.

14 LTP Chapter 8 Supplement to the Environmental Report  Provides an update to the 1984 environmental report. The goal of this chapter is to demonstrate that the project poses no environmental impacts that would exceed those described in the NRC’s Generic Environmental Impact Statement.  Describes any new information or significant environmental changes associated with the site- specific termination activities from the time the dismantlement and decommissioning activities began until the license is terminated.

15 FSS Program Overview DQO Process Used in the design of survey plans and consists of seven steps: 1.State the Problem 2.Identify the Decision 3.Identify Inputs into the Decision 4.Define the Boundaries of the Decision 5.Develop a Decision Rule 6.Specify Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors 7.Optimize the Design for Obtaining Data Used in the design of survey plans and consists of seven steps:  State the Problem  Identify the Decision  Identify Inputs into the Decision  Define the Boundaries of the Decision  Develop a Decision Rule  Specify Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors  Optimize the Design for Obtaining Data

16 FSS Program Overview Survey Classifications MARSSIM uses a graded approach to the surveys (i.e. the more likely the residual activity is present at the DCGL, the more rigorous the survey). Three Classes:  Class 1  Class 2  Class 3

17 Release Criteria Derived Concentration Guideline Limit (DCGL)  A nuclide-specific release value specified in the LTP  Where multiple nuclides are present each nuclide must be compared to its DCGL  CANNOT have 100% of the DCGL present for each nuclide  Separate DCGL set for soils and building structures

18 Final Status Survey (FSS)  Performed to demonstrate to the NRC that the area meets the release criteria  Is included in a Final Report to the NRC  Performed in accordance with the LTP  Confirmatory surveys may be performed by ORAU (2 trips performed to date)

19 FSS Status Overview Fuel Oil Tank Area King Salmon Ave. U/2 Footprint Hot Machine Shop Deep Trench

20 FSS Status Overview Discharge Canal North Yard Excavation MARSAME Work HBGS

21 FSS Status Overview Monitoring Well Relocation

22 CSM Wall Characterization CSM Wall Installation

Questions/Comments Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015