 School Grade: First 800 points – FCAT  High Standards  Learning Gains  L25%  HS Bonus Points  AYP  FY11 Targets  Graduation Rate criteria.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Advertisements

Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Test Chairpersons Meeting September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
Assessment and Accountability Update CAO September
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Bonus Points Calculation for FY th and 12 th Grade FCAT Retakes.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
A & S March 9,  Secondary  Isolated to one district  Elementary  All schools received both calibration and non-calibration tests forms  Non-calibration.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Department of EDW, Accountability, and School Improvement , PX47521.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
The School District of Palm Beach County Sailing: August 2009 Presented by: Jeffrey J. Hernandez Chief Academic Officer The School District of Palm Beach.
Rule Development Workshop: School Accountability for Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Center Schools Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August.
Rule Development Workshop: School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
1 Assessment Overview Ohio Department of Education Center for Curriculum & Assessment.
1 Putting It All Together Training August 18, 2009 School Name (and motto or theme) ODMS PD SIP.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
 Curriculum Areas ◦ Transition from NGSSS to Common Core ◦ Promotion/Graduation requirements at all levels  Standard Assessments that are.
FCAT 2.0 and End-of-Course Assessments 1 Kris Ellington Deputy Commissioner Division of Accountability, Research and Measurement 850/
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Top-performing urban school district in Florida State Assessment & Accountability.
Keys to Closing the Gap in Florida: Accountability, Technical Assistance, and Targeted Resources Presentation to the National Governors’ Association John.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
A & S Meeting January 11, Agenda AYP FY11 and FY12 for NCLB EDW usage Aligning instruction with FY11 FLDOE testing programs.
2007 FCAT Writing+ and Grade 03 FCAT-Sunshine State Standards Results The School District of Osceola County, Florida.
Assessment & EMIS Update November 13, 2003 Office of Assessment Nancy Haefeli.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
January 28, 2011 Elementary Science Coaches. Engage Science CRISS Strategies Carousel Activity Strategy Check the back of your agenda for your color coded.
Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support.
1.  Non-FCAT Components  Review FCAT Components 2.
FY12 Winter Diagnostic Reports DRE. Families>Test Results and Other Assessment Information >Diagnostics New Levels 4 Ways Reports –Reading –Math –Science.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Welcome and Introductions H.O.B. – Helping Our students “BE” successful!
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
New Improvement Rating for Alternative School Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Instructional Specialist, Department of Assessment, , PX47521.
A & S December 14, 2010 DRE Graduation Rates High School Grades.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
1 School Grades and AYP for New Accountability Coordinators.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Creating Your School Improvement Plan in ASSIST. Click on the “Goals & Plans” Tab.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Fall Conference 2013 Lake Mary, Florida November 14, 2013.
Elmer is not C2 Ready… R U?. R U C2 Ready? 2012 FCAT/School Grade Data The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
Dr. N.E. Roberts Elementary School. Background The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test® (FCAT) is the state mandated test used to evaluate student and.
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
1 Status on the Proposed Changes to School Grades and the ESE and ELL Task Force A-1.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
ACSP Presents FSA Night Welcome!
2017 State Assessment Highlights
Bonus Points Calculation for FY11
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
Understanding Achievement Level Descriptions (ALDs)
FY12 Accountability Updates
What’s new in assessment and accountability
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
Presentation transcript:

 School Grade: First 800 points – FCAT  High Standards  Learning Gains  L25%  HS Bonus Points  AYP  FY11 Targets  Graduation Rate criteria

1. High standard calculations include eligible students in surveys 2 and 3 who are present during the first day of testing. 2. A score of 4 or higher on FCAT Writing is now required for high standards. 3. Florida Alternate Assessment (FAA) students are included in Learning Gains. 4. Lowest 25% students do not include FAA students. 5. The proficiency target for AYP Reading is 79%.

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points % Making Learning Gains 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points Low 25% % Making Learning Gains 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points HS Retake Bonus Points 10 Additional Points GradePoints A525+ B C D F0-394

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points Who is included in High Standards calculation? Eligible Students Surveys 2 & 3 Enrolled 1st day of testing Standard Curriculum Students: (includes ELL students >2 years in ESOL) and ESE (Gifted, Hospital/Homebound, Speech Impaired)

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points Who is included in Learning Gains calculation? Eligible Students Surveys 2 & 3 Enrolled 1st day testing Current/prior FCAT scores Current /prior FAA scores Students referred to Alternative School receiving School Improvement Rating

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points HS Retake Bonus Points Who is included in Lowest 25% calculation? Eligible Students Surveys 2 & 3 Enrolled 1st day testing Current/prior FCAT scores Lowest Quartile Does not include Levels 4 and 5 FAA students Alt. School students

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points 10 Additional Points Who is included in Bonus Points calculation? Standard curriculum students Grades 11 or 12 Surveys 2 & 3 in current/prior year Current year: enrolled 1 st day of testing FCAT graduation requirement not met in March 2010

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points % Making Learning Gains 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points Low 25% % Making Learning Gains 100 Possible Points 100 Possible Points HS Retake Bonus Points 10 Additional Points GradePoints A525+ B C D F0-394

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points FCAT 2.0 (Grades 3-10)

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points

Sample Benchmark Comparisons Old (1996) Standards vs. NGSSS

Solution: 1 step Student identifies operation. Solution: 2 steps Student converts fractions and mixed number, then adds. SSS NGSSS Grade 5 Mathematics

SSS NGSSS Grade 8 Mathematics Solution: 2 steps 5.75 x 12 = 69 inches 69 ÷ 10 = 6.9 inches Solution: 4 steps 7 x12 = = 94 inches 24 x 2 = 48 inches = 86 inches 94 – 86 = 8 inches

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points FCAT (Gr. 4, 8, 10)

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points 135

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points 18 3

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points 36 5

85%

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points FCAT (Gr. 5, 8, 11)

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points FCAT 2.0 (Grades 3-10) FAA

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points FCAT 2.0 (Grades 3-10)

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards % Making Learning Gains Low 25% % Making Learning Gains HS Retake Bonus Points

ReadingMathematicsWritingScience % Meeting High Standards FCAT 2.0 (Gr. 3-10)FCAT (Gr. 4, 8, 10)FCAT (Gr. 5, 8, 11) % Making Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 (Gr. 3-10) FAA Low 25% % Making Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 (Gr. 3-10) Retake Bonus Points Legend FCAT 2.0 NGSSS FCATSSS FAA Florida Alternate Assessment PBT (Oct) Paper-based test Fall Administration GradeABCDF Points

FY11 Reading and Mathematics Proficiency Targets ReadingMathematics 7980

Graduation rate goal = 85% or Show annual improvement of at least 2%

assessment/SchoolGrade.asp assessment/SchoolGrade.asp

Practices

* The average gain in percentile points of the average student in the experimental group compared to the average student in the control group. Marzano, R., 2000; Borman, G.D.; Hewes, G.M. et al., 2000 School Factors Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum: Opportunity to Learn Percentile Gain* OTL affects student achievement more than double any other school factors.

Learning Village: Scope & Sequence I Can Statements FCAT/FCAT 2.0 Test Item Specifications FAA Test Designs, Blueprints and Item Specifications Learning Team Meetings: Unpacking the Standards

Teacher-developed or -selected assessments Learning Village: Comprehension Checks Leading Indicator System: Diagnostics and Palm Beach Writes EDW Learning Team Meetings: Data Feedback Strategy

Learning Village: Lesson Plans Leading Indicator System: Diagnostics and Palm Beach Writes EDW Learning Team Meetings: Standards in Practice