Clinical Effectiveness Journal Club Template Topic: Presenter(s):

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization.
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
CHAPTER 2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS. 1. Selection of topic  2. Reviewing the literature  3. Development of theoretical and conceptual frameworks  4.
Critiquing Research Articles For important and highly relevant articles: 1. Introduce the study, say how it exemplifies the point you are discussing 2.
Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research
Grant Proposal Preparation Topic Hypotheses Subject Organization Evaluation Searching for articles.
Critique of Research Outlines: 1. Research Problem. 2. Literature Review. 3. Theoretical Framework. 4. Variables. 5. Hypotheses. 6. Design. 7. Sample.
Left click or use the forward arrows to advance through the PowerPoint Upon clicking, each section of the article will be highlighted one by one Read.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
Formulating a Research Proposal
General Presentation Guidelines The object is to interest and inform, not to entertain. Time: Too hurried a pace will not allow your audience to digest.
ADV RESEARCH DESIGN AND ANALYSIS LAB Reading Scientific Articles.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Anatomy of an Article P152 Week 4. Three types of articles Reports of empirical studies Literature reviews/meta-analyses –Statistical reviewing procedure.
Systematic Reviews.
Title Name Institute. Background -1 (Main problem)
Evidence-Based Journal Article Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department.
General Presentation Guidelines The object is to interest and inform, not to entertain. Time: Too hurried a pace will not allow your audience to digest.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
When 4 th Tuesday Core Conference of R1 Ortho Rotation.
Title of the Paper Your Name Critical Care Medicine School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh.
IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN ALBANIA IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL.
Type Your Title Here Author’s First Name Last Name, degree,…. Mentor’s First Name Last Name, degree Dept. Name here, NYU Lutheran Medical Center, Brooklyn,
Abstract Title of Poster Authors Department / Division, Advocate Children’s Hospital Title of Poster Authors Department / Division, Advocate Children’s.
How to Read a Journal Article. Basics Always question: – Does this apply to my clinical practice? – Will this change how I treat patients? – How could.
Math Studies IA Criteria B Period 4 -Andrea Goldstein -Nicole DeLuque -Ellora Balmaceda -Jose Zuleta -Alec Ramirez.
Case Name Student’s name Literature Review Provide a basic overview of the research and/or conceptual literature related to this case. Specifically, describe.
 Exemplary Care  Cutting-edge Research  World-class Education  Title of the paper Your name Critical Care Medicine School of Medicine University of.
OT 460 Week One Fall  Evaluation Process:  What client wants and needs to do  Determination of what the client can do and has done  Identify.
A1 & A2 The aim: (separate) Critique a Qualitative study on “Telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.” Critique a Quantitative.
Remove this white box to use the template
Sample Journal Club Your Name Here.
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
The Research Design Continuum
PRESENTER NAME Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit Journal Club
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger.
Criteria For Critiquing A Research Report
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Remove this white box to use the template
The Anatomy of a Scientific Article: IMRAD format
HCS 542 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
HCS 542 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Remove this white box to use the template
Remove this white box to use the template
Remove this white box to use the template
Insert Title Here Keep it Concise
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
CLINICAL RESEARCH: An Introduction
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
Reading Research Papers
Case Name Background Policy Diversity, Social Justice and Ethics
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
Clinical Effectiveness Journal Club Template
Why read articles? To convert information requirement into answerable questions (formulate the problem) Acquire best source of information with least efforts.
Insert Title Here Keep it Concise
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
Year 10 Research Action Plan
Insert Title Here Keep it Concise
Understanding Standards
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization
Project Title Subtitle: make sure you specify it is a research project
PUT TITLE HERE Put Co-Author Listing Here
Insert Title Here Keep it Concise
Michael Putman, MD Rheumatology Fellow RWCS 2019
Week 5: Literature Reviews and Methodologies
Activity 2: Research Question Milestone
TRIAL NAME Presenter NAME Article Reference.
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Effectiveness Journal Club Template Topic: Presenter(s):

Why did you choose the article you are presenting? It should be: Novel in some way (either the topic discussed or approach used) Current (in some cases, a seminal article that is older will be appropriate) Impactful – it should influence how we think about and/or do things Please provide your proposed article to Heather Limper at least 2 weeks before you are scheduled at Journal Club. Please provide your slide deck to Heather Limper at least 2 days before you are scheduled to present at Journal Club. 2References Here | Choosing an Article

Each journal club will be kicked-off with a “Methods Minute” where we discuss a new methodological approach that is either used in the article presented or is relevant to the article being discussed 3References Here| Methods Minute Heather

Who are the authors? What is the purpose of the article? Any relevant context we should know about the article? Magnitude of the topic being addressed (ex: # of articles on topic in PubMed, new financial incentives about the topic) 4References Here| Intro to the article

What is the issue the authors set out to address? Provide some background about the issue at a larger level (nationally, regionally) Is this a problem at UCM? 5References Here| The problem

What is the primary outcome being assessed in the study? What are the secondary outcomes? What is the independent variable (exposure/intervention/process measure)? Are these measures appropriate for quantifying change in the problem being addressed? Why or why not? 6References Here| The measures

Who are the subjects/participants of the study? At what level is this study being measured? (Individual, cohort, hospital, state, etc.) Why was this population chosen for the study? Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Is this population appropriate for addressing the problem being addressed? Why or why not? 7References Here| The population

What was done in this study? Describe the major points that are presented How was it done? Research methodology (case-control, randomized control trial) Quality Improvement Tools used (PDSA, Lean methodology) Do the authors describe why they chose this intervention or approach? 8References Here| The Intervention

How did the authors use the data they collected to quantify the impact of their intervention? Discuss any approaches you’d like more clarity on for group discussion 9References Here| The Analysis

Did the intervention impact the primary outcome? The secondary outcome? How can we tell? Discuss the highlights of any tables presented Interpret any figures in the article What would be a logical conclusion of the impact of this intervention on the problem? 10References Here| The Results

What conclusions do the authors come to from the results of this study? In the context of the article only, do you agree with the conclusions made? What are the overall strengths of this study/article? What are the overall weaknesses of this study/ article? 11References Here| Discussion

What impact does this study have in the context of approaching the problem addressed at a larger level (regionally, nationally)? What can we learn from this study for improving practices here at UCM? 12References Here| Conclusions