Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Britain Southwick Nicole Anguiano March 29, 2014

Advertisements

20,000 GENES IN HUMAN GENOME; WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF ALL THESE GENES WERE EXPRESSED IN EVERY CELL IN YOUR BODY? WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THEY WERE EXPRESSED.

ANOVA WTdZAP1 p < /6189 (31.42%)2264/6189 (36.58%) p < /6189 (24.67%)1445/6189 (23.35%) p < /6189 (13.90%)792/6189 (12.80%) p

Modeling the Gene Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δcin5 Under Cold Shock Conditions Kevin McKay Laura Terada Department of Biology Loyola Marymount.

Determining the Identity and Dynamics of the Gene Regulatory Network Controlling the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae June 24, 2015.

Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S. cerevisiae regulatory network in cold shock KARA DISMUKE AND KRISTEN HORSTMANN MAY.

A COMPREHENSIVE GENE REGULATORY NETWORK FOR THE DIAUXIC SHIFT IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE GEISTLINGER, L., CSABA, G., DIRMEIER, S., KÜFFNER, R., AND ZIMMER,

GRNmap Testing Analysis Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 10, 2015.

Open Source Projects for Undergraduate Research Experiences

SURP 2015 Presentation draft 15 minutes. Wt, initial weight 1 run.

Changes in Gene Regulation in Δ Zap1 Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to Cold Shock Jim McDonald and Paul Magnano.

Chapter 11 Overview of Changing Criterion Design.

GRNmap and GRNsight June 24, Systems Biology Workflow DNA microarray data: wet lab-generated or published Generate gene regulatory network Modeling.

Data Analysis and GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 24, 2015.

Creating a Gene Regulatory Network Comparing a Wild Type Strain with a Mutant ΔGLN3 Deletion in S. cerevisiae Showed that ΔGLN3 Exhibits No Meaningful.

Index Slide 2-5: Statistical testing results 6-14: Clustering results 15-17: GRNsight visualization of YEASTRACT results 18-20: GRNmap output visualization.

GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 17, 2015.

Comparing the Dynamics of the Cold Shock Gene Regulatory Network in Yeast with a Random Network K. Grace Johnson 1, Natalie E. Williams 2, Kam D. Dahlquist.

Within Strain ANOVA WTdHAP4 p < (38.4%)2387 (38.6%) p < (24.7%)1489 (24.1 %) p < (13.8%)679 (11.0%) p < (7.25%)240.

Individual Gene Analysis, Categorized on Validity of Inputs.

Outline S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote known for cold-shock adaption, used in cold-shock experiments Deletion strand HMO1 and the comparison of microarray.

Comparison of wild type S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Natalie Williams and Karina Alvarez.

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Systems modeling and statistical analysis allows comparison in the response to cold shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae between Δhap4-derived and randomly.

Supplementary figure 5.

Alignment table: group 4

Departments of Biology and Mathematics

Eddie Azinge, John Lopez, and Corinne Wong

Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,

Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.

Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,

Budding yeast has a small genome of approximately 6000 genes.

Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 18, 5100–5112, December 2007

Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S

Cold Adaptation in Budding Yeast

Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05

Modeling Nitrogen Metabolism in Yeast

Biomathematical Modeling: The Deletion of HMO1 and its Effect on Cold Shock Reaction in S. cerevisiae Lauren Magee & Lucia Ramirez Department of Mathematics.

ANOVA Within Strain P-values

dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3

Loyola Marymount University

Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains

Significance Table from Anova Test

GRNmap Testing and Results

Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.

Week 11 Assignment Figures

Jason X Cheng, Julian Nevado, Zhen Lu, Mark Ptashne Current Biology

Tai LT, Daran-Lapujade P, Walsh MC, Pronk JT, Daran JM

dCIN5 and Wildtype Transcription Factor Mapping in Cold Shock

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3

Loyola Marymount Unviersity

ANOVA Within Strain P-values

Percentages of specific p-value data

Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,

Within-strain ANOVA for dCIN5

(Within-Strain ANOVA)

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3

Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 18, 5100–5112, December 2007

Gene expression profiling in the remnant kidney model of wild type and kinin B1 and B2 receptor knockout mice J.P. Schanstra, M. Bachvarova, E. Neau,

BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,

Bar plot representation of the transcriptomic changes in Δsaci_ptp and Δsaci_pp2a. Bar plot representation of the transcriptomic changes in Δsaci_ptp and.

ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Zvi Tamari, Naama Barkai Cell Reports

Percentages of specific p-value data

Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected

Loyola Marymount University

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams

The WT of S. cerevisiae shows a higher percentage of significance with all p-values in the NSR1 gene than in S. paradoxus’. S. cerevisiaeS. paradoxus p < %36.55% p < %22.62% p < %11.05% p < % B-H p < %24.25% Bonferroni p < %2.343%

Results of stem show 6 different profiles, signifying that S. par has a collection of genes that reacts to cold shock.

Profile #45 contains genes that are activated during cold shock and then are repressed during the recovery phase. S. paradoxus

Profile #9 shows genes that are generally repressed throughout the cold shock and gradually reach activation later in the recovery phase. S. paradoxus

Profile #22 shows genes that do not have a significant level of expression during cold shock, but in the recovery phase, they are highly activated. S. paradoxus

Profile #28 shows genes that are activated and then reach a level of steady expression close to 0 or no expression. S. paradoxus

Profile #48 shows fewer genes than previous profiles and that those genes are activated before reaching decreased expression levels. S. paradoxus

Profile #2 shows genes that are decreased initially in cold shock and during recovery phase are activated. S. paradoxus

Restrictions/SettingsNodesEdges DNA binding plus expression ONLY DNA binding38*102* DNA binding and expression 20*23* * Amounts before alterations were done to see the visualized GRN in GRNSight The amount of transcription factors responsible for gene regulation decreases with the varying criteria for the test.

Original GRNSight visualization of the GRN resulting from the Only DNA binding evidence

Modified GRN from Only DNA binding evidence with a few strains deleted from the Original visualization. Deleted: -SRB8 -RLM1 -SPT20 -MIG1 -CST6 -MET31 -SPT2 -SNF5 -PIB2 -SNF6 -SNF2 -CBF1 -SSN2 -SKO1 -YAP6

GRN visualized from the DNA binding evidence and expression data.

GRN visualized from the modified DNA binding evidence and expression data. Deleted: -HAP1 -RLM1 -SNF2

Restrictions/SettingsNodesEdges DNA binding plus expression* ONLY DNA binding2958 DNA binding and expression 1721 The altered table that depicts the amount of transcription factors responsible for gene regulation. * A visualization was not able to be produced due to the number of nodes and edges.