LIGO-G030079-00-00-Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions - 2003.3.18K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
Advertisements

LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
LIGO-G W Lessons Learned From E7 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G Z Camp orientation / overview K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction and Overview Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO Data Quality Monitoring Keith Riles University of Michigan.
LIGO-G Z Camp orientation / overview K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Orientation and Overview Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 The LSC Role in Detector Characterization Keith Riles.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
LIGO-G E ITR 2003 DMT Sub-Project John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Argonne, May 10, 2004.
Report From Joint Run Planning Committee R. Passaquieti & F. Raab - LSC / VIRGO Collaboration Meeting rd July 2007 – LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Activities Keith.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Software Tools Keith.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LSC at LHO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Data Analysis Summary Alan Wiseman G040xxxx-zz.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
1 Proposed Control Room Figures of Merit for Pulsar Sensitivity Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Livingston.
G R LSC UL 13 Aug 011 Detector Characterization; Triggers, code infrastructure; Followup Analysis for the UL groups Nelson Christensen, Szabi.
LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
LIGO-G Z LIGO at the start of continuous observation Prospects and Challenges Albert Lazzarini LIGO Scientific Collaboration Presentation at NSF.
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Jan 12, 2009LIGO-G Z1 DMT and NDS2 John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Ligo PAC, Caltech, Jan 12, 2009.
A Data/Detector Characterization Pipeline (What is it and why we need one) Soumya D. Mohanty AEI January 18, 2001 Outline of the talk Functions of a Pipeline.
LIGO-G Z Instrum. Lines and Blind CW Search K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on Instrumental Line Catalog and Blind.
1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.
LSC Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software and Other Things Alan Wiseman University of Wisconsin.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 SixtyHertzMon Update Junyi Zhang & Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Issues -- S2 Analysis & S3 Planning.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Inspiral Upper Limits Detector Characterization Nelson Christensen Carleton College August 15, 2001.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LSC Z000.0 LSC at LLO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software Coordinator Report Alan Wiseman University.
1 InspiralMon Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology LIGO-G Z.
Gravitational Wave Data Analysis  GW detectors  Signal processing: preparation  Noise spectral density  Matched filtering  Probability and statistics.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
S2 Inspiral Hardware Injections
Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Daniel Sigg (LIGO–LHO) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory March 18, 2003

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 2 Recent Progress Tremendous progress in last year on all fronts: –DMT infrastructure much enhanced (thanks to John, Szabi, Daniel, Masahiro) –Many DMT monitors reaching maturity (thanks to DaveC, Ed, Masahiro, Szabi, Sergey, Rauha, PatrickS, John) –New DMT monitors in the pipeline (thanks to TimO, AdrianO, BrianS, Natalia)

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 3 Recent Progress Tremendous progress in last year on all fronts: (cont.) –Data run operations much improved, after E7 / S1 troubles: Clearer (and more useful) scimon instructions Figures of merit More automation More projectors (thanks, Fred & Mark!) (thanks to many authors, testers, & scimons; M1, M2, E9 runs well worth the effort!) –Particularly impressive improvements in procedures for Calibrations (thanks to Gaby, Mike, Brian, Rana, PatrickS) Signal Injections (thanks to PeterSh, Szabi, Isabel, Sukanta)

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 4 Recent Progress Tremendous progress in last year on all fronts: (cont.) –Online diagnostics for DAQ / CDS state / LDAS (thanks to DaveB, Chethan, PeterSh, Greg, Igor) –Coupling of online calibration with astrophysical analysis (thanks to PatrickB, Jolien, Duncan) –Online feedback from astrophysical searches (thanks to Duncan, AlanWe, Laura) –Pool of scimon experts expanded dramatically in S2

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 5 Worries… Despite this progress, there are long-term worries: S2 Investigators, upper limits analysts, and commissioners need to do better in closing the loop:S2 Investigators S2 Investigation Teams Upper Limits Analysts Commissioners DMT Authors

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 6 Worries… Closing the loop: Need more systematic studies of artifacts: Compilation  Cataloguing  Identification Most important artifacts: Frequent Glitches & Strong Lines Biggest problem: Manpower (no shortage of tools to use!) Unambiguous glitch identification would help justify a priori vetoing of epochs in burst and inspiral searches Glitch and line identification would aid commissioners in reducing noise and aid DMT authors in devising / refining monitors

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 7 Worries… Closing the loop: Commissioners should look at data-run figures of merit between runs (like the inspiral range!) DMT authors should talk to commissioners to learn how to make monitors more useful during / between runs, and commissioners should talk to authors! Upper limits analysts should tell commissioners what instrumental troubles limit them most, including noise floor (e.g., stochastic figures of merit for different Ώ(f) shapes)

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 8 Worries… Related worry: More scientists needed at the site: »Still more than an order of magnitude to go to reach design, and progress is getting harder »Postdocs & graduate students in residence could help enormously both in creating software tools for commissioning and in improvement of data characterization  DMT potential has only begun to be tapped! »Unauthorized advertisement: The DMT is a user-friendly environment for algorithm development on real data. An observatory is a good place to meet the experts who know what all those auxiliary channels mean…

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 9 Worries… Another worry: Must (eventually) enter a continuous-data-taking mode »Detchar and Upper Limit groups must respond accordingly:  Ongoing characterization and analysis, in time to allow intervention, if needed  More automation needed in many places  But also more scientists looking at results »Scimon shifts more burdensome: 24/7 scimon staffing impractical(?)  Start relying on single-shift / day monitoring? Remote shifts?  Demands better alarms, better instructions, more knowledge than we have now  Demands more stable interferometers (H1 in S2 may be a good model to study)

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 10 This meeting Lots of activity: 38 presentations (detchar, detchar/asis) Looking forward to interesting reports!