New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Waterwise – a general introduction Paul van Walsum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. David Tàbara Institute of Environmental Science and Technology Autonomous University of Barcelona Integrated Climate Governance.
Advertisements

The Energy-Water Nexus Bringing Together Different Perspectives Water Climate change is a key driver of water systems. Current focus is water sufficiency.
Partnership Acknowledgment
Building upon AIACC a 2nd Phase of Capacity Building? Introduction to the E3 parallel session.
The water-food-energy nexus from an energy system modelling perspective Paul Dodds.
Water Quality H. Behrendt, M. Grossmann, H. Gömann, U. Mischke, A. Schöll, J. Steidl GLOWA-Elbe GLOWA Status conference 19 May 2005 Cologne Linkages of.
Fahri BaturOctober 2013 SAP GRC AC ARA Access Risk Analysis Requirements Gathering Workshop.
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
Evaluating Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Surface Water Resource Availability of Upper Awash Sub-basin, Ethiopia rift valley basin. By Mekonnen.
Overview of California’s System Yield Threats, Challenges, and the Need to Augment and Diversify Water Portfolios Robert Shibatani CEO & Principal Hydrologist.
Scientific Advice for the Management of Transboundary Marine Eutrophication.
Framework for Assessing the Impact of Salinity on Productivity Amy Cheung University of New South Wales Workshop: “Policy Choices for Salinity Mitigation:
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Landuse change impact on the carbon balance at highly modified floodplains a systematic approach for combined emission reduction and landuse optimalization.
Climate Change Adaption, a service perspective – the role of Land Use Planning Barry Wyatt, Strategic Head of Development services Stroud DC.
RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies
1 Enviromatics Decision support systems Decision support systems Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ Montana State University.
Environmental Modeling Steven I. Gordon Ohio Supercomputer Center June, 2004.
Developing Climate Change Adaptation Options March 15/2011.
Understanding „the nexus“ in the MENA region Holger Hoff Stockholm Environment Institute Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Beirut, 22 January.
Prof. Jan Rotmans Pieter Valkering Prof. Anne van der Veen Jörg Krywkow De Maaswerken In collaboration with The case study of the Maaswerken A negotiation.
Jaco van der Gaast The Winand Staring Centre, P.O. Box 125, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands 1 Water Management Tools Jaco van der Gaast The Winand.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
SRP: IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR AGRICULTURAL RIVER BASINS - OVERVIEW Vladimir Smakhtin SRP River Basin Workshop Addis, May 28, 2012.
GECAFS Indo-Gangetic Plains. Western Region (1, 2 & 3) high productivity – food surplus high investment in infrastructure major use of fertilisers and.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
Overview of WEAP. Water Evaluation and Planning System WEAP A generic, object-oriented, programmable, integrated water resources management modelling.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Spatial mapping as a tool for mainstreaming biodiversity values Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de.
New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Waterwise – setting up for regional application Paul van Walsum.
LINDA’S INTERVIEWSGAP ANALYSES Task 1: DEVELOP OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS AND INTERFACE ELEMENTS IMPORTANT TO STAKEHOLDERS Drivers, Goals, Barriers Spatial habitat.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Tradeoff Analysis and Minimum-Data Modeling John Antle Jetse Stoorvogel Workshop on Adaptation to Climate Change, Nairobi September
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Comparing different scenarios with the use of DSS.
I.enhance agricultural competitiveness while limiting further environmental degradation. ii.develop food systems which enhance the social security of the.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Deeper Insights from System Dynamics Models Mark Paich Lexidyne Consulting 10/9/08.
FAOCGIARWMO. How will Global Environmental Change affect the vulnerability of food systems in different regions? How might food systems be adapted to.
MEDITATE - Kick-off meeting - Montpellier, 07-08/05/04 IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management EAU/RMD Sandra Lanini.
RD Lasco ICRAF1 TRADEOFF ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION STRATEGIES IN THE PHILIPPINES RD Lasco 1 R.V.O. Cruz 2, J.M. Pulhin 2, F.B. Pulhin 2 1 World Agroforestry.
Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management Centre.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Goal Programming Linear program has multiple objectives, often conflicting in nature Target values or goals can be set for each objective identified Not.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Amir Muhammed, Director Asianics Agro. Dev. International, Islamabad, Pakistan Countries Involved: Pakistan, India, Nepal,
UNFCCC WORKSHOP ON METHODOLOGIES ON CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT AND ADAPTATION back-to-back with UNDP-GEF WORKSHOP FOR DEVELOPING AN ADAPTATION POLICY FRAMEWORK.
GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez Potsdam Horst Gömann, FAL-LR Horst Gömann & Peter Kreins Institute of Rural Studies, Federal Agricultural Research.
Add your Logo in the slide master menu GLOBAQUA Meeting, January 13th-14th, Freising IMPLICATIONS Module Reporting back Implications Module: WP8, WP9,
BASIN SCALE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION CONSIDERING CLIMATE RISK Yasir Kaheil Upmanu Lall C OLUMBIA W ATER C ENTER : Global Water Sustainability.
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
1 januari 2008 RIBASIM input data by Wil N.M. van der Krogt.
Turkey Hydrology Working Group program Mission 2: Model preparation and setup Wil N.M. van der Krogt 12 – 13 November 2014 Denizli The Netherlands The.
AF 42 1 IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE, VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION CAPACITY IN THE LIMPOPO BASIN OF SEMI-ARID LAND SOUTHERN AFRICA: THE CASE OF EASTERN BOTSWANA.
Kristin Gilroy, PhD International Center for Integrated Water Resources Management 24 February 2016 Climate Risk Informed Decision Analysis: Bridging the.
Southern California Water Dialogue September 23, 2015.
AQUASTAT FAO’s global information system on water and agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Module 3 Engagement techniques 3b Running a SP Workshop.
Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Robert J. Nicholls University of Southampton and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, UK.
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Data Analysis and Decision Making (Albrigth, Winston and Zappe)
Interactive Parallel Coordinate Visualization Tools
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Environmental modeling application domains
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
LA06 Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation Measures for the Water Resources Sector Due to Extreme Events Under Climate Change Conditions. REGIONAL PROJECT.
H. Behrendt (IGB), H. Gömann (FAL), C. Sartorius (ISI)
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Presentation transcript:

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Waterwise – a general introduction Paul van Walsum

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Overview  Modelling  Example of results

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Types of models  Simulation models  Optimization models

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Interaction with stakeholders when using a simulation model simulation effects on objectives Stakeholders suggest measures communication

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Interaction with stakeholders when using an optimization model optimization Stakeholders: targets on objectives options for measures measures communication

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Components of an optimization model  Decision variables –Represent possible choices (no/yes variables) –Also used for simplified simulation of effects (using continuous variables)  Constraints: –Describe functioning of the regional system –Also used for implementing stakeholder preferences  Objective functions: –Economy –Ecology –Hydrology

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Multi-level modelling economy ecology hydrology complex reduction simple verification Integrated model

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Input from stakeholders  Providing information about possible options –Land use –Water management –Manuring, fertilization  Providing additional information in the form, e.g. – “no change areas”, –totals of land use types, but not their exact location –and so on  Specifying scenarios for external conditions (e.g. climate)  Specifying targets for objectives

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Example of application

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Beerze and Reusel region in NL

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty What are the objectives?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Objectives of regional management  reduce desiccation of nature areas  reduce flood risk / climate change  reduce nitrogen and phosphorous loading on groundwater & surface water  minimize loss of income from agriculture

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Where are we heading?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Current land use grassland arable land tree nurseries water built-up area nature area

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Regional data in GIS system waterways sub-catchments DTM sewerage systems culverts weirs Land use top10 vector

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Nitrogen concentration (simulated) NO3-N aquifer 2 (mg/l) 470 kg/ha/year

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Where are we heading?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Peak flow

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Expected development of nature & drainage Current Situation Autonomous development

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty What should we focus on?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Which measures are the options?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Options  land use change  water management : flow retardation

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty What is the best strategy?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Strategy 1:desiccation   option for new natural grasslands discouraged dY = M€ /y dN = 64 ha

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Strategy 1b: desiccation   option for new natural grasslands encouraged dY = M€ /y dN = 250 ha

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Strategy 2: peak flow 

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Measures in ditches Measures in streams Strategy 2: measures

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Measures in ditches Measures in streams Measures in ditches Measures in streams 3. flood risk  desiccation  3. flood risk  desiccation  2. flood risk  Strategy 3: combined targets of 1b and 2: dY=-3.3M€/y

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Field drainage 2. flood risk  3. flood risk  desiccation  3. flood risk  desiccation  Strategy 3: drainage measures

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Landuse in strategy 2b 3. flood risk  desiccation  3. flood risk  desiccation  1b. desiccation 

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Implicit conflict: desiccation  and flood risk  StrategydY 1b desiccation  flood risk  -1.2 Total desiccation  + flood risk  -3.3 “Synergy”-1.4

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Strategy 4: Combined strategy  flood risk   desiccation   N-loading SW  dY = M€ /y

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty N-loading on surface water: role of optimization a. “generic measure” b. optimized measures

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty 4a N-loading SW  via generic measure 4a N-loading SW  via generic measure dY = -25 M €/j dY = -17 M € / j 4 N-loading OW  via optimisation 4 N-loading OW  via optimisation

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Example of trade-offs: N-load on surface water N-load on surface water (mg/l) Net Income (M €/yr)

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Example of trade-off curves: wet nature Increase of valuable wet nature (ha) Cost (€/yr)

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Concluding remarks  integrated modelling of hydrology, ecology, and economy  combined use of simulation & optimization  turns the regional system ‘inside-out’  ideas for solutions, gives insight  protocol for interaction with stakeholders should be further developed  …. but what about Adaptive Water Management?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Waterwise & AWM  Shows how system should adapt for –Changed parameters (climate) –Changed external demands (preferences of stakeholders)  More ?

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Waterwise & AWM II  Can help increase the adaptive capacity, by including different scenarios in the model at the same time: - climate -socio-economic conditions (e.g. autonomous land use change) …. this is still to be developed

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Workshop session  See sheet 1 for setting up the software…

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Demo subregion  Area of 115 ha has been extracted from the Beerze and Reusel Region

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Instructions for doing a run (sheet 2)

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Exercises (sheet 2 + spreadsheet)

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Slides with results  8 slides with three maps of Land use, drainage, flood retention, to be shown when people have done the run and the visualisation  Discussion about each run

New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty Synergy  Synergy of two objectives = achieved cost reduction from achieving the two objectives at the same time  In formula: S = dY(1+2) – dY(1) – dY(2)