Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Pseudo-Dynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on Geometrically Complex Faults Daniel Trugman, July 2013.
Advertisements

Earthquake recurrence models Are earthquakes random in space and time? We know where the faults are based on the geology and geomorphology Segmentation.
(Introduction to) Earthquake Energy Balance
An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
New Mapping of Creeping Faults Bartlett Springs Fault & northern Green Valley Fault
Lithospheric flexure at the Hawaiian Islands and its implications for mantle rheology Perspective view (to the NW) of the satellite-derived free-air gravity.
Predictive Modeling of Seismicity Sequences in Southern California Julia Clark David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton.
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 2 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside.
Tsunami hazard in New Zealand due to South American earthquakes William Power, Gaye Downes, Mark Stirling Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences.
Lecture 7. Few points about earthquakes Some basic facts and questions Great Chilean earthquake /Valdivia earthquake / of 1960 (Mw=9.5) and recent Tahoku.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop Terry Tullis Steve Ward John RundleJim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger Fred Pollitz Generic Description of Earthquake.
Recurrence Intervals Frequency – Average time between past seismic events – aka “recurrence interval” Recurrence Interval = Average slip per major rupture.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Numerical simulation of seismic cycles at a subduction zone with a laboratory-derived friction law Naoyuki Kato (1), Kazuro Hirahara (2), and Mikio Iizuka.
Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, 2002–2031 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 2002 Chapters 1 & 2.
Assimilating Data into Earthquake Simulations Michael Sachs, J.B. Rundle, D.L. Turcotte University of California, Davis Andrea Donnellan Jet Propulsion.
Extreme Earthquakes: Thoughts on Statistics and Physics Max Werner 29 April 2008 Extremes Meeting Lausanne.
The seismic cycle The elastic rebound theory.
Chapter 4: The SFBR Earthquake Source Model: Magnitude and Long-Term Rates Ahyi Kim 2/23/07 EQW.
Chapter 5: Calculating Earthquake Probabilities for the SFBR Mei Xue EQW March 16.
Observing an Earthquake Cycle Within a Decade
Ge277-Experimental Rock Friction implication for seismic faulting Some other references: Byerlee, 1978; Dieterich, 1979; Ruina, 1983; Tse and Rice, 1986;
UseIT Tutorial # 3 Earthquakes in the Southern California Fault System Tom Jordan June 16, 2011.
Aftershocks tend to fall preferentially in area of static Coulomb stress increase but there are also earthquakes in area of decrease Coulomb stress Aftershocks.
NA-Pa Plate Boundary Wilson [1960] USGS Prof. Paper 1515.
Earthquake nucleation How do they begin? Are large and small ones begin similarly? Are the initial phases geodetically or seismically detectable? Related.
Earthquake scaling and statistics
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Data Assimilation and the Development of the Virtual_California Model Paul B. Rundle Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA Presented at the GEM/ACES Workshop,
The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.
Intraplate Seismicity Finite element modeling. Introduction Spatial patterns (Fig. 1) –Randomly scattered (Australia) –Isolated “seismic zones” (CEUS)
Southern California Earthquake Center Triggering Models vs. Smoothed Seismicity PG = 1.35/eqk PG = 10/eqk Information gain per earthquake Reference forecast.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
Constraints on Seismogenesis of Small Earthquakes from the Natural Earthquake Laboratory in South African Mines (NELSAM) Margaret S. Boettcher (USGS Mendenhall.
Fig Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards. 3 Seismic waves allow us to look inside the Earth.
March 2006 WGCEP Workshop Ruth A. Harris U.S. Geological Survey.
Inherent Mechanism Determining Scaling Properties of Fault Constitutive Laws Mitsuhiro Matsu’ura Department of Earth and Planetary Science Graduate School.
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence Jim Dieterich, UC Riverside.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop ALLCAL Steven N. Ward University of California Santa Cruz.
California Project Seismicity in the oil and gas fields Tayeb A. Tafti University of Southern California July 2, 2013.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Evaluation.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US.
Data Mining Using Eigenpattern Analysis in Simulations and Observed Data Woodblock Print, from “Thirty-Six Views of Mt. Fuji”, by K. Hokusai, ca
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Geodetic Deformation, Seismicity and Fault Friction Ge Sensitivity of seismicity to stress perturbations, implications for earthquakes nucleation.
1994 Bolivian Earthquake Eric Kiser Bolivian Earthquake Moment Magnitude (Mw): 8.3 Epicenter: 13.84°S and °W Depth: 631km.
Aseismic deformation transients in subduction zone and the role of fault dilatancy -- Numerical simulation in the framework of rate and state friction.
112/16/2010AGU Annual Fall Meeting - NG44a-08 Terry Tullis Michael Barall Steve Ward John Rundle Don Turcotte Louise Kellogg Burak Yikilmaz Eric Heien.
Does the Scaling of Strain Energy Release with Event Size Control the Temporal Evolution of Seismicity? Steven C. Jaumé Department of Geology And Environmental.
Evaluation of simulation results: Aftershocks in space Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
The rupture process of great subduction earthquakes: the concept of the barrier and asperity models Yoshihiro Kaneko (Presentation based on Aki, 1984;
Fault Segmentation: User Perspective Norm Abrahamson PG&E March 16, 2006.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
On constraining dynamic parameters from finite-source rupture models of past earthquakes Mathieu Causse (ISTerre) Luis Dalguer (ETHZ) and Martin Mai (KAUST)
What is characteristic about a characteristic earthquake? Implications from multi-scale studies of the relative earthquake size distribution Stefan Wiemer.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop ViscoSim Fred Pollitz USGS, Menlo Park.
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
Comments on physical simulator models
Deep Earthquakes.
Presented by Chris Rollins and Voonhui Lai Ge 277 Winter 2016
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Some issues/limitations with current UCERF approach
Viscoelastic-coupling model for the earthquake cycle driven from below
SAN ANDREAS FAULT San Francisco Bay Area North American plate
Southern California Earthquake Center
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward

Ward (2000)

Rundle et al. (2008)

Capabilities of this simulator

Inherently discrete fault zone Inherently discrete fault zone (Ben-Zion and Rice model) (Ben-Zion and Rice model) Homogeneous, planar faults Homogeneous, planar faults Viscoelasticity of lower crust/upper mantle Viscoelasticity of lower crust/upper mantle --> loading through backslip in the --> loading through backslip in the fully relaxed limit fully relaxed limit

Fault network and slip rates courtesy of Steve Ward (June, 2009) Original set of ~4 x 3 km 2 patches are re-grouped and subdivided into set of smoothly-connected, non-overlapping ~1 x 1 km 2 patches fault patches

Stress history on a single fault patch Static frictional stress Dynamic frictional stress Arrest stress Dynamic overshoot parameter: Stress reduction parameter:  =  s -  a D =  s -  a )/(  s -  d )

Simulator parameters Dynamic overshoot parameter: Stress reduction parameter:  =  s -  a D =  s -  a )/(  s -  d ) Shape of slip-weakening curve Mantle viscosity  m

Twenty consecutive M>6.7 ruptures M6.9

M7.2

M7.0

M7.6

M6.7

M7.5

M7.6

M7.2

M6.7

M7.7

M7.3

M7.5

M7.3

M7.2

M6.7

M7.2

M7.3

M7.5

mean recurrence interval (for given magnitude threshold) magnitude-frequency statistics, e.g. b-value coefficient of variation conditional rupture probability Simulator results

Hanks and Bakun (2007 )

Magnitude-frequency statistics

magnitude log 10 [earthquake production rate (yr -1 )] With slip weakening D=1.25  m = 1.2 x Pa s

With slip weakening D=1.25  m = 1.2 x Pa s

Low Mantle Viscosity

High Mantle Viscosity

magnitude log 10 [earthquake production rate (yr -1 )]

Fault system behavior is sensitive to simple parameters Simulations capture Gutenberg-Richter and characteristic-earthquake behavior Comparison of slip maps for the southern SAF suggests that the ‘slip barrier’ nature of a segment boundary depends substantially on mantle viscosity Characteristic magnitude and mean recurrence interval may exhibit a systematic dependence on mantle viscosity Conclusions