Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A110007. However,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Family Engagement Tool Orientation The Family Engagement Tool is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute.
Advertisements

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems Don Kincaid, University of South Florida Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Setting the Pace to Graduate Date1 Parent Mentor Partnership September 2013.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.
BoQ Critical Element: Evaluation. 49. Students and staff are surveyed about PBIS 50. Students and staff can identify expectations and rules 51. Staff.
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Linking Implementation Data to the SPDG’s PD Worksheet The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education,
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
School-wide Facilitator Training September 15, 2010 School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Cyndi Boezio, PhD, SPDG Project Director Dan Jorgensen, Evaluation & Research Coordinator Colorado Department of Education Learning Supports Office SPDG.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
BoQ Critical Element: Faculty Commitment. Critical Element: Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus (regular data sharing)
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Chair: Steven M. Ross, Center for Research in Educational Policy; Center on Innovation & Improvement Collaborating Researchers: Jen Harmon, Center on Innovation.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Creating Alternative Pathways for Students to Achieve Academic Credit in School The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US.
Participant Handouts Tier 1 Assessment/Data Systems Tier 1 Grade Level/Department Data Teams For External Coaches The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
SAPSI-S PEP Overview I-RtI Network December, 2012
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Facilitated/Presented by:
Establishing District Level Support for PBIS Implementation
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Jennifer Coffey.

Poll Question #1 Where are you in the selection process? Planning Phase Conducted one round of selection Conducted multiple rounds of selection

2011 Oklahoma State Personnel Development Grant (OK SPDG II) Objective 1.1: After attending cross training, at least 30 sites currently implementing either Response to Intervention (RtI) or Positive Behavioral Interventions or Supports (PBIS) will adopt and implement the Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS).

TRAIN Training in Response to Assessment and Instructional Needs (TRAIN) is the support system developed and funded by the Oklahoma SPDG II to provide training and support to selected sites interested in implementing OTISS. Training and support are provided in multiple forms and across several different levels of intensity depending on where the site is in current implementation of a tiered system of support.

TRAIN Services to Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) Sites LEVEL I (UNIVERSAL) Designed to Assist: Schools not currently implementing a tiered system of academic and behavioral supports, but interested in Oklahoma’s model, the Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) Schools currently implementing a tiered system of either academic and behavioral supports, but lacking one or more of the specific components necessary for OTISS. Expected Clients: ALL SITES INTERESTED IN IMPLEMENTING OTISS HAVE ACCESS TO LEVEL I (UNIVERSAL) SUPPORT. Services: Sites that apply for support through the OK SPDG II and are not selected to receive LEVEL II or Level III services are automatically added as a Level I OTISS Site. In addition, sites can be added as a Level I OTISS Site at any time by contacting the OK SPDG II staff at the Oklahoma State Department of Education. Level I OTISS Sites will be provided information via on trainings, resources, and documents regarding implementing OTISS as they become available. The OTISS Web site is currently being revamped to support sites in implementing OTISS.

TRAIN Services to Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) Sites LEVEL II (Intensive) LEVEL III (Targeted) Designed to Assist: Schools implementing a tiered system of either academic and behavioral supports, but lacking one or more of the specific components necessary for implementing Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) Designed to Assist: Schools implementing a tiered system of academic and behavioral supports and ready to scale up to full implementation with fidelity of Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) Expected Clients: OTISS Level I Sites implementing most areas assessed on the OTISS Fidelity Checklist at a high level of fidelity, but needing additional support to achieve full fidelity PBIS Model Sites implementing at a high level of fidelity RtI Pilot Sites implementing at a high level of fidelity Expected Clients: Any OTISS Level II Site Services: Any Level I activity that is appropriate Highly-focused technical assistance and coaching Incudes minimum of one site visit a month from external coach Note: Approximately 10 sites selected through the application process could be served with available resources at this level. Services: Any Level II activity that is appropriate Technical assistance/coaching and training activities based on consultation to identify needs for implementing a blended model of academic and behavioral supports Includes on-site visits by an external coach as needed to address targeted concerns Note: Approximately five sites selected through the application process could be served with available resources at this level.

TRAIN Services to Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) Sites MAINTENANCE SITE SUPPORT Designed to Assist: Schools which have achieved fidelity of implementation of Oklahoma Tiered Intervention System of Support (OTISS) based upon the OTISS Fidelity Checklist with an overall fidelity of 80% or above. Expected Clients: Any former OTISS Level III Site Services: Quarterly visits by an external coach and/or SPDG II Staff Technical assistance as needed Feedback on the site’s current level of OTISS implementation based upon the OTISS Fidelity Assessment which will be conducted at least twice during the school year

Selection Process: OTISS Informational Meeting Annual OTISS Kick-Off Meeting includes presentations on: OTISS; TRAIN Services; OTISS Tools and Documents; Site-Based Examples of the Support Provided through TRAIN (OTISS In Action); and The OTISS Application and Selection Process.

Poll Question #2 Who is involved in the selection process? SPDG core staff only SPDG core staff plus partners and/or consultants SPDG core staff plus partners and/or consultants, and district and/or site based personnel

Selection Process: OTISS Application The OTISS Application includes: Basic Information and School Demographics; Key Personnel and OTISS Team Members; Questions pertaining to Site Readiness and Site Commitment; and Superintendent’s and Principal’s Signatures.

OTISS Application Rating Checklist

Selection Process: OTISS On-Site Visit Form (New Sites) The sites that receive the highest scores on their applications receive an on-site visit by SPDG II staff prior to the selection of sites. An on-site visit form with rating scale is utilized to determine where the site is currently performing in implementing Response to Intervention (RtI) and/or Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). If the site participated as a previous Level II or Level III OTISS Site, the OSDE will already have implementation documentation for the site; therefore, an additional visit may not be required.

OTISS On-Site Visit Form with Rating Scale

Selection Process: OTISS Fidelity Assessment (Previous OTISS Sites)

Selection Process: Letter of Agreement from Selected Sites

Poll Question #3 Do you have a process/criteria in place for discontinuing support/services? Yes No

Questions/Comments

Oklahoma State Department of Education, State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) Christa Knight, Project Director, SPDG (405) Cheryl Huffman, SPDG External Evaluator (405)