ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First composition measurements of energetic neutral atoms A. T. Y. Lui et al., GRL, Vol 23, pages: , 1996.
Advertisements

Study of Pi2 pulsations observed from MAGDAS chain in Egypt E. Ghamry 1, 2, A. Mahrous 2, M.N. Yasin 3, A. Fathy 3 and K. Yumoto 4 1- National Research.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
Earth Science Sector Characterization of high latitude GPS sensed ionospheric irregularities: Case studies Reza Ghoddousi-Fard¹, Paul Prikryl², Kjellmar.
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND PROPERTIES OF THE Dst INDEX R.L. McPherron Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles.
Propagation Index and Short Wave Communications Rodney Wolfe N3XG.
Ion Equatorial Distributions from Energetic Neutral Atom Images Obtained From IMAGE during Geomagnetic Storms Zhang, X. X., J. D. Perez, M.-C. Fok D. G.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Identification and Analysis of Magnetic Substorms Patricia Gavin 1, Sandra Brogl 1, Ramon Lopez 2, Hamid Rassoul 1 1. Florida Institute of Technology,
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, substorms, and ramifications for ionospheric convection Steve Milan Adrian Grocott (Leics,
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
PLASMA TRANSPORT ALONG DISCRETE AURORAL ARCS A.Kullen 1, T. Johansson 2, S. Buchert 1, and S. Figueiredo 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
Abstract Since the ionosphere is the interface between the Earth and space environments and impacts radio, television and satellite communication, it is.
Self-Organized Criticality in Magnetic Substorms Understanding The Mechanics of Space Weather.
1 Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Models NASA/GSFC, Code 692 During the early part of April 6, 2000 a large coronal “ejecta” event compressed and interacted with.
M. Menvielle and A. Marchaudon ESWW2 M. Menvielle (1) and A. Marchaudon (2) (1) Centre d’études des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires UMR 8615 IPL/CNRS/UVSQ.
Solar wind-magnetosphere- atmosphere coupling: effects of magnetic storms and substorms in atmospheric electric field variations Kleimenova N., Kozyreva.
1 Saturn Aurora: The ionospheric and magnetospheric fingerprint, and a manifestation of interactions beyond. Saturn Aurora: The ionospheric and magnetospheric.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
The Relations Between Solar Wind Variations and the North Atlantic Oscillation Rasheed Al-Nuaimi and Kais Al-Jumily Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
Effect of Geomagetic Activity on Cosmic Ray Muon Rate Mendon High School Regents Physics Honors Period 9 Class A group of Honors physics students plotted.
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
2009 ILWS Workshop, Ubatuba, October 4-9, 2009 Transverse magnetospheric currents and great geomagnetic storms E.E.Antonova (1,2), M. V. Stepanova (3),
SOLAR EXTREME EVENTS AND GRATE GEOMAGNETIC STORMS E.E. Antonova, M.V. Stepanova Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University, Moscow,
Intense Poynting flux at very high latitudes during magnetic storms: GITM simulation results Yue Deng 1 Cheng Sheng 1, Manqi Shi 1, Yanshi Huang 2, Cheryl.
Identifying the Role of Solar-Wind Number Density in Ring Current Evolution Paul O’Brien and Robert McPherron UCLA/IGPP.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
Adjustable magnetospheric event- oriented magnetic field models N. Yu. Ganushkina (1), M. V. Kubyshkina (2), T. I. Pulkkinen (1) (1) Finnish Meteorological.
WG2 Summary Broke into ring current/plasmasphere and radiation-belt subgroups RING CURRENT Identified events for addressing science questions What is the.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Towards an information theory approach for monitoring the ionospheric convection dynamics Towards an information theory approach for monitoring the ionospheric.
Magnetospheric Current System During Disturbed Times.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
The large scale convection electric field, ring current energization, and plasmasphere erosion in the June 1, 2013 storm Scott Thaller Van Allen Probes.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Thermospheric density variations due to space weather Tiera Laitinen, Juho Iipponen, Ilja Honkonen, Max van de Kamp, Ari Viljanen, Pekka Janhunen Finnish.
Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.
Dynamics of the AMPERE R1 Oval during substorms and SMCs
M.J. Rivas [1,2], C. Cid [1] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INTENSITY OF X-RAY FLARES AND THEIR EFFECTS IN THE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT OF THE.
ESS261, Homework #1 For a day of interest:
Disturbance Dynamo Effects in the Low Latitude Ionosphere
Extremely Intense (SML ≤ nT) Supersubstorms (SSS)
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel MD, USA
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
European Geosciences Union, General Assembly Vienna | Austria | 23–28 April 2017 Seismic zoning (first approximation) using data of the main geomagnetic.
Environmental conditions during the charging anomaly of the two geosynchronous satellites reported: TELSTAR 401 and Galaxy 15 Elena Saiz, A. Guerrero,
Advances in Ring Current Index Forecasting
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Magnetosphere: Bow Shock Substorm and Storm
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
N. Romanova, V Pilipenko, O. Kozyreva, and N. Yagova
Altai State University, RUSSIA
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Presentation transcript:

ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation of the geomagnetic field on different regions at the Earth's surface. Those magnetic field variations are measured by several indices. In this work, the AE and PCn indices at the auroral regions, the SYM-H and ASY-H indices at low latitudes and the am index to measure the global state of the disturbed magnetosphere, are used in order to obtain a relation between behaviors of the different magnetospheric regions. A comparative study of those indices is carried out for a selected set of storms from 1981 to 2006 using the superposed epoch method ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation of the geomagnetic field on different regions at the Earth's surface. Those magnetic field variations are measured by several indices. In this work, the AE and PCn indices at the auroral regions, the SYM-H and ASY-H indices at low latitudes and the am index to measure the global state of the disturbed magnetosphere, are used in order to obtain a relation between behaviors of the different magnetospheric regions. A comparative study of those indices is carried out for a selected set of storms from 1981 to 2006 using the superposed epoch method THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BEHAVIORS OF THE DIFFERENT MAGNETOSPHERIC REGIONS The study focuses on the intense geomagnetic storms (SYM-H < -100 nT) occurred in the period whose recovery phases do not include substantial injection of energy (107 storms) a) The peak values of different indices have been compared b) A superposed epoch analysis categorizing the storms into five subsets by intensity, has been performed. For every subset and every geomagnetic index the mean storm has been obtained, starting at the time of index peak value, as zero epoch time There is a clear relationship between SYM-H peak and ASY-H peak suggesting that the kinetic energy of the particles for both symmetric and asymmetric ring current are enhanced as a consequence of sharing location, when a significant power input into the magnetosphere takes place A linear dependence exists between the maximum kinetic energy of the ring current particles (represented by the SYM-H peak value) and the average magnetic energy density associated to each magnetospheric current (represented by the integral of the corresponding square index). Therefore, the ring current emerges, not only as the main current system in the magnetosphere during a storm event, but also as the representative of the whole magnetospheric current system There is a high linear correlation between the average magnetic energy density of the different magnetospheric regions and the average magnetic energy density of the symmetric ring current am AE PCn SYM-H ASY-H Natural paths of the particles coming from solar wind Different regions and their magnetospheric currents are linked Several studies suggest that the asymmetric ring current closes the magnetosphere currents circuit through field aligned currents and auroral electrojets. Thus, it suggests a relationship between the indices used as proxies of the symmetric and asymmetric ring current (SYM-H and ASY-H) and auroral region (AE and PCn). r 2 = 0.88 α INDEX ΔBΔB ΔBΔB t = 0 h → index peak t i = -24 h; t f = 6 h t = 0 h → index peak t i = -24 h; t f = 6 h Epoch time interval Mean storm for the subset j α INDEX 2 r 2 = 0.93r 2 = 0.79 r 2 = 0.86r 2 = 0.95 Acknowledgements:This work has been supported by grants: PPII10‐0183‐7802 from the Junta de Comunidades de Castilla‐La Mancha and AYA2009‐08662 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain. Power input in the magnetosphere Peak values of the indices reached almost simultaneously 2.a PEAK VALUES COMPARISON 2. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF VARIOUS INDICES 1. INTRODUCTION 2.b. AVERAGE MAGNETIC ENERGY DENSITY IN EACH REGION FROM EVERY MAGNETOSPHERIC INDEX 3. CONCLUSIONS r 2 = 0.96r 2 = 0.88 r 2 = 0.75r 2 = 0.86r 2 = 0.90 r 2 = 0.64 r 2 = 0.68 r 2 = 0.40 r 2 = 0.24 The higher the maximum kinetic energy of the ring current particles the higher the average magnetic energy density associated to each magnetospheric current The relationship between the average magnetic energy densities for the magnetospheric regions is confirmed RELATED ASY-H peak am peak NON RELATED AE peak PCn peak SYM-H peak Different geomagnetic regions respond to the same disturbance at close time intervals The global state of the disturbed magnetosphere is measured by the am index. Magnetospheric current variation MAGNETIC ENERGY DENSITY VARIATIONS α B 2