Utilizes U.S. Funds? Design Executing Agent? Const. Executing Agent? USACE is responsible for executing VE. USACE responsible for including VE clauses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers Budgeting Process
Recent Changes to USACE s Continuing Contract Authority U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Dredging Meeting June 13, 2007.
Washington Headquarters Services Executive Services Directorate Information Management Division OMB Collection Number Paperwork Reduction Act – DoD Public.
St. Joseph Harbor FY 2014 Dredging. St. Joseph Harbor Entrance to the Channel (Prior to Dredging) Areas to be dredged 53,000 Cubic Yards to be removed.
Standards Aligned Systems MANDATE WAIVER PROGRAM 2008.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Vertical Team Roles & Responsibilities Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Dam Safety Modification Studies Robert Taylor, P.E. Dam Safety Program Manager Great Lakes and Ohio River Division.
ACA Directorate of Contracting, Fort Bragg RECAP OF COR FUNDAMENTALS BY ADMINISTRATION DIVISION 15 February 2007.
In-sourcing Guidelines and Procedures By Dr. John Anderson. PDASA, FMMR, OASA(M&RA)
ClosingExecuting/ Controlling ControllingPlanningInitiatingOpportunityAssessment Client AcceptancePlanning ApprovalInitiating ApprovalOpportunity Assessment.
NPR C NASA Real Property Management
Engineer Circular Requests to Alter USACE Projects
Work Plan Development Steve Robinson Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
March 5,  Purpose  How it Works  Review Topics  Review Findings  Tips 2.
Office of Business Development Training
Module 23 STEPS 15 & 16 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) and Other Decision Documents Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Presenter Name Presenter Title.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Department of Economic Opportunity WelcomeTo Contract Review Form Training.
1 Army Policy and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Ed Cornett Procurement Policy and Support July 13 & 19, 2005 Presented to: Army Requiring.
Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration Review Processes Module 22 STEPS 11, 12, 13 & 14 Washington Level and Administration.
Project Management Process Overview
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
United States Department of Agriculture Office of Procurement & Property Management Charge Card Service Center USDA Purchase Card Coordinators Procedures.
Work Plan Development Aschalew Aberra Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT November 20, 2013.
CDG – Voice & SMS - Test Plan Task Force Kickoff Meeting 2 Conf Call Meetings: October 29, :00pm e.t. : October 29, :00pm e.t. Ann Munno, Sr.
Tammy Shelton Acting Associate Staff Chief, HROD ORD Manager’s Meeting January 24, 2006 The Competitive Sourcing Challenge.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Safety Risk Assessment/ Acceptance Air Force Materiel Command Chuck Dorney, P.E., C.S.P. Chief, HQ AFMC/SES DSN I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i.
THE AFMC MOASP Air Force Materiel Command D. Brian Morris HQ AFMC/PKV (937) I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x.
2010 W EST V IRGINIA GIS C ONFERENCE Wednesday, June 9, 2010.
Kashif Rasheed Manager Finance. Office of inspector General (OIG) Global Fund Secretariat Country Coordination Mechanism (CCM ) Principal Recipients (PR)
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Model Certification Jodi Staebell Operational Director, Ecosystem Restoration Planning Center of Expertise.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Products & Milestones Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
United States Department of Agriculture Office of Procurement & Property Management Charge Card Service Center USDA Purchase Card Coordinators Policy Training.
LETTER OF INTENT FOR INDUSTRY SPONSORED RESEARCH Signe Denmark, SCTR Research Opportunities & Collaborations Ryan Mulligan, SCTR Grants & Contracts Navigator.
Energy Policy Act - BLM Cadastral Support Strategy 1 CADASTRAL PLANNING CADASTRAL SERVICES Consultation for Effective and Efficient Land Management: National.
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Integration of Value Engineering (VE) and the Five-Year Planning Process.
CIVILIAN HIRING REFORM Future Army Hiring Process – The Future Is Here! Civilian Human Resources Agency 1.
Validate Scope What we have: Requirement Traceability Matrix Verified Deliverables What we do: Inspection What we get: Accepted Deliverables.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mr. Daniel Carrasco Chief, Contracting Division USACE – LA District 13 OCT 2015.
Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Grant Multi – Year Award Process Matthew R. Jones Sr. Grants Management Specialist Grants and Registration Branch.
1 DELEGATIONS & PROCESSING  Delegations  Processing  Common Issues – Problems  Unique Situations / Future Attractions Steve Cone (CECW-PC) SAD Water.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Defense Standardization Program Policy Updates Steve Lowell Deputy Director Defense Standardization Program Office.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® BUILDING STRONG SM The Louisville Engineer District CORPS 101 Brandon R. Brummett, P.E., PMP Outreach Coordinator.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Sealed Bids Unit 5.
Management Performance Assessment Tool (MPAT) Briefing the Portfolio Committee 05 November 2014.
Technical Assistance Drive- In February 17, 2016.
FIELD TRAINING SESSION 2 (OPENING/CLOSING/RECONFIGURING SCHOOLS) 9:05-9:30 Ethan Taylor Dept. of Administration and Finance Coordinator of Budgets and.
Successfully Managing Customer Expectations Change is expected to occur during the life of any project, but this change must be controlled and managed.
Utilizes U.S. Funds? Design Executing Agent? USACE is responsible for executing VE per their policy and include Const. clauses. Non DoD Agency is responsible.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
National Hydrology Project
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Cost of Service Analysis & Rate Design
SQA01 Guidance Material: FAI Review
Bid Waiver Process April 2018.
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works

TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project

Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Presentation transcript:

Utilizes U.S. Funds? Design Executing Agent? Const. Executing Agent? USACE is responsible for executing VE. USACE responsible for including VE clauses. Customer is responsible for executing VE. Customer responsible for including VE clauses. VE Required Authority: USACE - VE Sr. Mgmt Official Customer Performs VE as Required USACE VE Policy Applicable Customer VE Policy Applicable VE Not Req’d REFERENCES: A.Pub. L. 111–350, §3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat ; 41 USC Value engineering ; B.Pub. L , Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 911 ; 33 U.S.C. § 2288, Review of cost effectiveness of design ; Conference Report C.Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-131 (21 MAY 1993) D.DODI , DoD Value Engineering (VE) Program E.OSD-ATL Letter, Value Engineering (VE) and Obtaining Greater Efficiency and Productivity in Defense Spending (06 DEC 2011) F.ER (Change 1), Army Value Engineering (01 JAN 2011) G.COMMANDER’S INTENT: Greater Efficiency and Productivity through Value Engineering (VE) (25 APR 2012) H.Lower Limit Threshold (LLT) revised to $2M by Chief, OVE, 13 Feb 2013 NO YES USACE CUSTOMER Ref. A & C Ref. C, D & F Ref. D Ref. F Ref. C, D & F VE Required Document VE Study or Low Opportunity in VMP DETERMINING VE REQUIRED WORKLOAD / ANNUAL PLAN VE Mandatory VE Not Req’d MP Waiver Authority: HQ, Chief OVE Optional if grouping of projects is possible for greater ROI -or- VEO determines there is an opportunity PROJECTSPROGRAMSPROCUREMENTS WHAT REQUIRES VE & WHO HAS AUTHORITY ON VE? Screening Tool (Initial Screen) Screening Tool <$2M $2M - $10M >$10M KEY NOTES/CONSTRAINTS Strategy Selection  Consider grouping like projects into program-wide studies.  District VEO works with Program Managers to develop the Annual Plan.  PM must schedule & resource VE studies, document Low Opportunity ($2-$10M) or pursue Waiver (> $10M MP only).  Value Management Plans (VMPs) are developed by the PDT based on the VE Screening tool prepared by the VEO.  Waivers must be submitted and approved no later than 35% or Waiver will not be considered.  Waivers are not allowed on CW projects >$10M.  Decision to request waiver shall be made prior to approved VMP/PMP and justification included therein.  AVS (or equivalent) may facilitate if <$10M, but must follow VM standards and have results validated by QA.  CVS (or Equivalent) shall facilitate if >$10M.  COS and Programmatic Studies must be updated every 3-5 years.  VE required on functional & operational requirements of Standard Designs (CoS).  Standard Design Studies do not negate the requirement for individual Project studies by Geographic District.  Programmatic studies (or Bundling), ie., Dredging, require MSC VE PgM approval PRIOR to performing.  MSC VE PgM’s with COS/CX responsibilities within their AOR, must ensure COS studies are performed, and COS collects (at least annually) ALL studies performed USACE-wide that are based on their Standard.  Services (IT, Furnishings, Office, Supplies, etc…) require VE and must be coordinated with MSC VE PgM. Version Document VE Study or Waiver in VMP Ref. H Delegated Waiver Authority: MSC Value Program Manager USACE to verify Customer performed VE prior to advertising