Utilizing CESN Data with the Strategic Prevention Framework Presented by Sarah Goan and Tim Diomede Hornby Zeller Associates, Inc. August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Needs Assessment Suzanne Borys, Ed.D. Program Manager Research, Planning and Evaluation Unit NJ Division of Addiction Services.
Advertisements

Substance Abuse Trends in Maine Presented by Tim Diomede March 2012 Hornby Zeller Associates, Inc.
Local Evaluator Meeting June 19, 2012 University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
Township of Ocean Healthy Community-Healthy Youth Initiative 2012 Attitude and Behavior Survey A project of the Township of Ocean Department of Human Services.
Fighting Drug and Alcohol Abuse! Valerie & Grace Fuller Substance Abuse and Mental Heath Services Administration (SAMHSA) “To Serve Everyone, all Indiana.
Developing Rural Epi Outcomes Workgroups- The Oklahoma Experience.
Jane Ungemack, DrPH University of Connecticut Health Center Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth Evaluation Team Needs Assessment Training Session.
Briefing on Youth and Alcohol. Clay County Youth Prevention Coalition Briefing on Youth and Alcohol.
1 Hillsborough County Alcohol and Drug Indicator Profile M. Scott Young, Ph.D. Kathleen Moore, Ph.D. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy Louis de.
Hillsborough County Alcohol and Drug Indicator Profile Kathleen Moore, Ph.D. M. Scott Young, Ph.D. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy Louis de.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Aligning Outcomes with Population Needs
Focus Area 26: Substance Abuse Progress Review October 13, 2004.
Fiscal Year 2014: New Mexico Community Survey Data Presentation Prevention Policy Consortium November 14, 2014.
A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities
Overview of the Guide to Assessing Needs and Resources and Selecting Science-Based Programs One ME Coalition Orientation January 27, 2003 Hornby Zeller.
Developing Surveillance for Alcohol Abuse, Dependence, and Related Consequences in New Mexico Sandra Woerle, MA New Mexico Department of Health Office.
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Center for the Application of Prevention Technologies West Regional Expert Team Mail Stop 279 University of.
Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Building a Regional Public Health System Increased coordination and leadership among partners across emergency preparedness and substance misuse prevention.
Student Drug Use Survey 2014 Regional Findings 1.
Maine Learning Community: Selecting Strategies February 21, 2007
Strategic Prevention Framework Overview Paula Feathers, MA.
Critical Aspects of Vermont ATOD Data John S. Searles, Ph.D. Substance Abuse Research and Policy Analyst.
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)
Evaluation Requirements and South Dakota-PLI Webinar January 5, 2015 BROOKE BLAALID, MSW AND DOUG PIPER, PHD SPF PFS EVALUATION B CONSULTING, LLC 1.
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
PRI Logic Model The following slides demonstrate various displays of the PRI logic model for your reference and use in local presentations. If you need.
Quality of Life Coalition Dickinson County, KS Strategic Prevention Framework.
1 An Introduction to the Minnesota Epidemiological Profile Minnesota State Epidemiological Workgroup and Minnesota Institute of Public Health Fall Forums.
Final Report for East Carolina University
Putting Logic Models to Use Jere Thomas, LCSW, CPSII.
SPF/SIG Made Simple Building Bridges to Form Partnerships in Prevention.
Prioritization - a study of alcohol and drug prevention i Västra Götaland County, Western Sweden, Fredrik Spak, Per Blanck MD, PhD, ass. prof.
Remark Case Study Student Survey Results Prepared by the Evaluation Support Group, Inc. Jerry Bean, PhD.
Presented to: The Cambridge Prevention Coalition Presented by: Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc. 21-C Cambridge Street Burlington, MA
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
The YRBS 2010 Changes in Key Risk Behaviors and Developmental Assets.
Shared Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Creating The Story About Our Data Lincoln County Fall 2015/Spring 2016.
Shared Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Creating The Story About Our Data Oxford County Fall 2015/Spring 2016.
Maine Learning Community: Day 2 Selecting Strategies and Implementation March 26, 2007 Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Northeast Center for Application.
STUDENT DRUG & ALCOHOL SURVEY RESULTS Michael T. Koth Assistant Principal Northern Highlands Regional High School.
1 Strategic Prevention Framework Overview Paula Feathers, MA Presented by Marcus Bouligny.
Shared Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Creating The Story About Our Data Somerset County Fall 2015/Spring 2016.
Summary Report and Recommendations on Prescription Drugs: Misuse, Abuse and Dependency Presentation for the County Alcohol and Drug Program Administrators’
Barnstable County Regional Substance Abuse Council Updated October 2015 Barnstable County Department of Human Services |
Session 4 Agenda 1. Strategic Prevention Framework Sustainability Step 4: Implementation Step 5: Evaluation 2. Bringing It All Together 2.
Welcome IPFS Additional Strategic Plan Guidance March 3, 2016 The webinar will begin shortly.
STRATEGIC PLANNING January 12-13, Where are we in the planning process? Needs assessment data collection and prioritization - Consequence - Consumption.
1.  Since 1999, the County of Chester has conducted a biannual survey of our youth on their behavior, attitudes and knowledge concerning alcohol, tobacco,
South Dakota SEOW Strategic Prevention Framework Partnership for Success (SD SPF-PFS)
Youth at Disproportionate Risk for Substance Use: A look at Delaware Data Presented by The SEOW Funding for this project has been provided by the Department.
Strategic Prevention Framework – Planning
2017 New Mexico Substance Abuse Epidemiology Profile
Partnering with 12 community sectors:
Marijuana Use in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Protective factor in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Alcohol Consumption in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Mental Health in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Opioid Use in Delaware: 2018 State Epidemiological Profile
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning (LGBQ) Youth in Delaware:
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
The Vermont Young Adult Survey: Methods and Some Initial Findings
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Robert J. Illback, PsyD REACH of Louisville, Louisville, KY
Presentation transcript:

Utilizing CESN Data with the Strategic Prevention Framework Presented by Sarah Goan and Tim Diomede Hornby Zeller Associates, Inc. August 2012

Goals of Presentation Review how Community Profiles fit into SPF Provide guidance for using Community Profiles Introduce new supplemental SEOW reference tools

Purpose of the State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup (SEOW) Purpose of the Community Epidemiological Surveillance Network (CESN) Dual Purposes of SEOW/CESN Promote systematic, data- driven decision-making Guide effective and efficient use of prevention resources Identify substance abuse patterns Establish and track substance abuse trends Detect emerging substances

Pinpoint areas of critical concern Identify information gaps Start conversations with key players Make your case to access resources Allocate scarce resources strategically Implement programs that will affect change Monitor indicators for progress and emerging concerns Role of Data in the Strategic Prevention Framework

Reports for eight Maine Public Health Districts (PHDs) – Consumption – Consequences – Contributing Factors – Mental Health – Treatment Characteristics of the Community Profiles

Summary Justification Description 2012 Community Profiles s/osa/data/profiles.htm Community Profile

USING THE COMMUNITY PROFILES

Does the consumption of one substance appear to be more of a problem than others? Does one consequence appear to be more of a problem than others? Is there a pattern of consumption or misuse among certain grades, age groups, or over time that is of particular concern? How does your community compare with the state or other communities? Understanding Community Needs

Example(s) from Profiles Comparing Prevalence Rates and Prioritizing

Example(s) from Profiles Prioritizing Consequences

Example(s) from Profiles Identifying Patterns Among Groups

Informing Strategy/Program Selection What are the common themes across the data sources? – What substances emerge as a high priority? What do the profiles tell you about the factors that contribute to those patterns?

Example(s) from Profiles Contributing Factors

Identify Knowledge Gaps Who is involved in the problem (age, gender, income, race/ethnicity)? Where does the problem occur? When does the problem occur? Why is the problem occurring? Guide to Assessment, Planning and Evaluation

Example: Finding a Gap Who = Youth and young adults (18 to 25 year olds). I don’t know about gender. Where = I don’t know When = I don’t know Why = Perceptions about risk of harm are low

Evaluating Your Work Develop a Logic Model with measurable risk factors and longer-range outcomes Monitor longer-term outcomes over time Establish baselines and targets and see if they were met (Note: Can’t attribute change to specific work, but helps make the case)

Profiles and Logic Models Step: Define Need (Problem Statement)Step: Create Work PlanStep: Identify and Monitor Results Need/ Problem But why? But why here? What are we doing? What steps will we take to implement the strategy? Short-Term Outputs Inter- mediate Long- Term Too Many Youth Engage in Underage Drinking (Middle and High School) Youth do not think they will be caught by Police (Enforcement) Local Police Departments do not work together Enforcement is inconsistent Form an underage drinking task force with all local PDs Implement Model Policy/ Procedures Approach/ recruit PDs Convene group Task force reviews policies and procedures Adjustments made to policies and procedures MOUs/ Agreements Signed Departments are working together Alcohol citations for minors Youth perceptions of getting caught Fewer Youth Engage in Past Month Alcohol Use

Example: Baselines and Targets List of the information and data available to you that “fit” your strategy/intervention Consider those measures along with words like increased, decreased, more or enhanced Determine what percent change is feasible – Percent change equation: Subtract current rate from a target rate and divide by current rate Step 1: 42 (target) - 45 (current) = 3 percentage points Step 2: -3 / 45 = -7% Step 3: Target = 7% decrease

Writing and Applying for Grants Draft a “Statement of Need” Focus on goals and objectives that are data- driven and measurable Demonstrate capacity to monitor/report specific data indicators Summarize sub-state data sources and/or trends using a state-produced source With the exception of MIYHS, PHD is the lowest level you can go and still have reliable estimates.

Break for Questions How do you interpret the data correctly? What information should I share with my Public Health District? Not all schools in my county participate in MIYHS -- how valid is the data for us? Other Questions?

NEW SUPPLEMENTAL TOOLS

Community Data Overview Presentation 4. Comparing Communities

Includes indicators for: Consumption ● Consequences ● Contributing Factors Targets areas of concern/high priority – Underage drinking among year olds – Prescription drug misuse among year olds – Marijuana use among year olds Two year snapshot of data Quick reference guide can be found by copying and pasting the following link Introduction of Quick Reference Guide

Underage Drinking (12-20 year olds) Public Health Districts PopulationSourceTypeIndicatorYear(s) Aroos- took Central Cumber- land Down- east Mid- coast PenquisWesternYorkMaine 7th - 8th grade Past 30 day alcohol use (any) % 9%8%10% 9%10% 20115%7%6%7%9%6% 9th-12th High School Students MIYHS Consump tion Past 30 day alcohol use (any) %31%32% 35%31%30%32% %26%29%24%30% 27%29%28% Past 30 day binge (5 or more drinks on at least one occasion) drinking % 22%21%18% 19% % 17%15%18%19%16%17% Risk and Protector Factors Students who thought they would you be caught by their parents for drinking? %43%42%43%42% 40%42% %45%43%45%41%43%44%42%43% Students who thought they would you be caught by the police for drinking? %15%16%13%14%13%15%13%14% %16%17%16%14% 16%14%15% Percieved harm from binge drinking once or twice a week %71%76%67%73%70%72%76%73% %78%80%77% 78%80%78% Students who percieved it to be asy to access alcohol %66%69%68%67%68%67%71%68% % 69%65%68% 65%69%67% Students who reported feeling so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that you stopped doing some usual activities? %22%20%23% 22% 23%22% %22%21%23%25%22%24% 23% Conseque nce Students who reported drinking and driving 20096% 8% 7% 20116%4%5%4%5%6%5% Students who reported riding with a driver who was under the influence of drugs or alcohol %22% 24%23%22%23%25%22% %20%23%18%23%22%21%24%22% significant improvement (5+ point change) some improvement little to no change setback significant setback (5+ point change) cannot trend Data unavailable

Underage Drinking (12-20 year olds) continued Public Health Districts PopulationSourceTypeIndicatorYear(s) Aroos- took Central Cumber- land Down- east Mid- coast PenquisWesternYorkMaine 12 to 20 year olds NSDUH Consump tion Past 30 day alcohol use (any) % % Past 30 day binge (5 or more drinks on at least one occasion) drinking % % Past 30 day alcohol use (any) %*24%31%29%*28%32%29%30%29% Past 30 day binge (5 or more drinks on at least one occasion) drinking %*15%22%20%*18%23%17%20% All AgesUCR Consequ ence Alcohol-related crime rate per 10,000 residents MHDO Outpatient hospital visits due to alcohol per 10,000 residents TDS Percent of primary treatment admission due to alcohol %44% 41%42%40%49%54%45% %37%36%34%39%32%40%51%39% MDOT Alcohol/Drug related crash rate per 10,000 residents year olds Number of annual alcohol and/or drug related car crashes among Maine’s year olds significant improvement (5+ point change) some improvement little to no change setback significant setback (5+ point change) cannot trend Data unavailable *Due to small sample sizes, Aroostook and Downeast Public Health District (which consists of Washington County and Hancock County) were combined to produce this estimate.

Reminder The tools have snapshot comparisons across districts The profiles have the detailed definitions/ language for each indicator as well as graphics These three tools compliment each other and should be used all together Best Approach: use along with Guide to Assessment, Planning and Evaluation!

Resources Maine CESN Webpage (Maine OSA site > Data > Community Epi Surveillance Network) Community Profiles “Community Profile Data Overview” (presentation only) otes.pdf “Community Data Overview” (recorded webinar ) view2012.wmv CESN Quick Reference Tool Guide to Assessment, Planning and Evaluation MIYHS 2011 Public Health District Summary Reports

Questions/Comments? Timothy Diomede SEOW Coordinator/Data Analyst Office of Substance Abuse/Hornby Zeller Associates Sara Goan Manager/Data Analyst Hornby Zeller Associates