1 COBRA Magnet Status W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul. 2004 W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul. 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Liquid H 2 Absorber Production Contents (1)MICE Absorber Status (2)MICE Absorber Modification (3)Plan/Schedule (4)Summary MICE CM-23 in HARBIN Shigeru.
Advertisements

COBRA Status W. Ootani MEG Review Meeting Jul. 18th, 2007.
325 MHz RF Cave and SC Spoke Cavity Tests Robyn Madrak – Accelerator Physics Center (APC) for the HINS/Project X Group.
Interaction region design and construction for BEPCII C. H. Yu IHEP Feb.4, 2007.
A polarized solid state target for photon induced double polarization experiments at ELSA H. Dutz TR16 Bommerholz Hartmut Dutz, S. Goertz, A.
COBRA Magnet Test Milestone AssemblyDesignManufactoring DesignAss.TestWinding & Cryo. Deliv. PSI Test Platform Calibration Mapping device.
P.-R. KettleMEG-Review February MEG Beam Line Studies  E5 Z-Branch NOW !!! NOW !!!
G2P Target installation and Beyond. Schedule Pivot before.
Muon g-2 Muon g-2 Experiment Quarterly Report Aria Soha All Experimenter’s Meeting March 2, 2015.
P.-R. KettleMEG Review July MEG Beam Line Studies.
Cryostat and Magnet Status Report UIUC EDM Collaboration Meeting LANL June 20, 2005.
IR Magnets for SuperKEKB KEK, Norihito Ohuchi 1.IR Magnets (ES, QCS, QC1) 2.Interference between Magnet-Cryostats and Belle 3.Summary SuperB.WS05.Hawaii.
1 PSI 27/6/2006 C.Bemporad “THE TAMING OF MEG” News on Calibration Methods Cockcroft-Walton Accelerator  -sources on wire  -lines from neutron capture.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
Detector Systems Update MICO Feb 25, MICE Detector Systems  CKOV u CKOV installation planned during March shutdown u Cable issues resolved. Geneva.
XEC Hardware Status MEG Review Meeting 2010 Liquid Xenon Group.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.
Fringe Field in DH Marco Oriunno (SLAC), January 13, 2015 SID Workshop 2015, SLAC.
Remaining Issues Tests and demsonstration in the 3.5T magnetic field 1 Tests in the 3.5T magnetic field: (1)Engineering studies such as the possible mechanical.
COBRA Magnet Test Milestone AssemblyDesignManufactoring DesignAss.TestWinding & Cryo. Deliv. PSI Test Platform Calibration Mapping device.
M. Bonesini - MICE CM18 RAL 16/06/071 M. Bonesini INFN Milano Updates on TOF project.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
CMS FPIX Reinstallation/Commissioning Lorenzo Uplegger 4/20/091.
Status of COBRA Magnet Wataru OOTANI MEG review meeting July 11 th, 2003 PSI Switzerland.
Status of the COBRA Magnet Wataru OOTANI MEG review meeting Feb. 3, 2003 PSI Switzerland.
Timing Counter Report of Feb. 14 th, 2007 P.W. Cattaneo.
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
MEG DC (report June 04) DC report june_04,J.E. a)Foil stability and quench related problems b)How to get more stability c)Frame design d)Measurement of.
Beam Commissioning Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Engineering Issues.
LDC Meeting Vienna 17. November 2005 Karsten Büßer LDC Machine Detector Interface Update.
Forum March 2003H.Taureg1 Magnetic Fields in ALICE Mapping and Monitoring.
KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Task list for Magnet/Iron yoke Solenoid magnet Iron yoke Experimental hall and other facilities May 11, ’05.
M&O status and program for ATLAS LAr calorimeter R Stroynowski (on vacations)
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
COBRA Magnet Status W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review.
PHENIX Run-13 status Hubert van Hecke for the PHENIX collaboration 1Hubert van Hecke - 05 Feb 13.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
1 CKOV1 at the MICE Experiment CKOV1 to perform mu/pi id w TOF0/TOF1. Progress since CM16 CKOV1 Fabrication and Installation TOF0 CKOV1 TOF1 EMCAL TOF2.
Possible calibration methods for the final LXe calorimeter A. Papa 02/11/
Cryogenic System for Superconducting Final Focus Magnets* at ATF-2
Taikan SUEHARA, IN2P3-KEK collaboration meeting on ATF2, Annecy, 2007/10/15 Shintake Monitor: Installation and Commissioning Schedule Taikan SUEHARA, The.
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
Xenon Detector Installation schedule Satoshi MIHARA.
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
X LCLS SCU NbTi Prototype Schedule Version: February 12, 2015 Update 23JUN2015 X X System complete and ready for test X System complete & tested w/Hall.
1. Introduction 2. Magnetic field design Optimization of yoke configuration in several conf. Boundary conditions -
Xenon Delivery Japan 1 MCHF 575 kCHF granted Additional grant 656 kCHF Last 50l subject to negotiation.
A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
Experimental study on heat transfer through a few layers of multilayer insulation from 300 K to 4.2 K Zhanguo Zong, Norihito Ohuchi, Kiyosumi Tsuchiya,
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
1 Muon g-2 Experiment at BNL Presented by Masahiko Iwasaki (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Akira Yamamoto (KEK) for E821 g-2 Collaboration: Boston, BNL,
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University Dubna, May Barrel integration status May 24, 2005.
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
CLAS12 Forward Tracking: Status and Challenges
Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
CUORE Detector Calibration System
MEG Summary T. Mori for MEG Collaboration February 9, 2005.
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Presentation transcript:

1 COBRA Magnet Status W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul. 2004

2 COBRA Excitation at π E5 Apr.13 COBRA installation Apr Cryostat evacuation Apr Cooling Apr Excitation Excitation test (Superconducting Magnet(SC) and Compensation Coils(NC)) Fringing field measurements and test of active shielding in π M3 PMT test for Timing counter inside COBRA PMT test for LXe calorimeter near COBRA Apr.29 Beam is back Apr.13 COBRA installation Apr Cryostat evacuation Apr Cooling Apr Excitation Excitation test (Superconducting Magnet(SC) and Compensation Coils(NC)) Fringing field measurements and test of active shielding in π M3 PMT test for Timing counter inside COBRA PMT test for LXe calorimeter near COBRA Apr.29 Beam is back

3 COBRA Installation in π E5 COBRA placed at almost right place on beam line without platform.

4 Excitation at π E5 Only 4days for cooling thanks to LN2 pre-cooling. Both SC and NC successfully tested at full operating current. (The first time to fully test NC.) COBRA provided perfectly stabilized field ( Δ B/B<0.05%) for PMT tests. Only 4days for cooling thanks to LN2 pre-cooling. Both SC and NC successfully tested at full operating current. (The first time to fully test NC.) COBRA provided perfectly stabilized field ( Δ B/B<0.05%) for PMT tests.

Fringing field measured at π E5 [Gauss] Fringing Field Measurements

Fringing field measured outside area π E5 [Gauss] Fringing Field Measurements

7 π E3 μ Lan < 1G μ Cap < 1G π M33 LTF < 20mG π M32 GPS < 20mG ECRIT < ?G π M3 beam line Kicker < ?G Septum < ?G RequirementMeasured 2-4G 1-2G 1.8G 0.3G 3.3G 4.8G μ E1 < 20mG 0.5G π E5 Neighboring area

8 Fringing Field Measurements Fringing field was measured as predicted (unfortunately). The problems are being fixed for most places. Fringing field was successfully compensated in μ SR facilities at π M3 using compensating coils. Control system has to be implemented. Fringing field at π E3 seems possible to be reduced < 1G by passive shielding. Detector at ECRIT did not work when COBRA was ON. Effect on kicker and septum in π M3 beam line has to be checked. Fringing field was measured as predicted (unfortunately). The problems are being fixed for most places. Fringing field was successfully compensated in μ SR facilities at π M3 using compensating coils. Control system has to be implemented. Fringing field at π E3 seems possible to be reduced < 1G by passive shielding. Detector at ECRIT did not work when COBRA was ON. Effect on kicker and septum in π M3 beam line has to be checked.

9 Possible Solution in π E3 Installation of active shielding in the detector ( μ LAN, μ CAP) is difficult because of limited space and cost(?). Passive shielding Shielding box built with 5mm-thick soft iron plates (5m-D, 4m-W, 3m-H) No front wall for minimizing influence on beam optics Roof might not be necessary. (For good accessibility) Installation of active shielding in the detector ( μ LAN, μ CAP) is difficult because of limited space and cost(?). Passive shielding Shielding box built with 5mm-thick soft iron plates (5m-D, 4m-W, 3m-H) No front wall for minimizing influence on beam optics Roof might not be necessary. (For good accessibility) With roof Without roof Beam

10 Summary COBRA magnet was installed in π E5 and totally tested. PMT tests were carried out by using COBRA field. Δ B/B<0.05% Stray field around LXe detector region is successfully canceled. Fringing field was measured in the neighboring beam line and problems are being fixed. It was found that active shielding is able to compensate COBRA field very well. Calibration of field mapping machine will be made this year. System alignment Calibration of Hall sensors Investigate possibility to use NMR Field map reconstruction Final field measurement is supposed to be carried out during shutdown period in 2006 after beam line commissioning is finished. COBRA magnet was installed in π E5 and totally tested. PMT tests were carried out by using COBRA field. Δ B/B<0.05% Stray field around LXe detector region is successfully canceled. Fringing field was measured in the neighboring beam line and problems are being fixed. It was found that active shielding is able to compensate COBRA field very well. Calibration of field mapping machine will be made this year. System alignment Calibration of Hall sensors Investigate possibility to use NMR Field map reconstruction Final field measurement is supposed to be carried out during shutdown period in 2006 after beam line commissioning is finished.

11 Schedule Feb Jul. 2004