Tier 2 Interventions Kristen N. Salamone, M.Ed. David Rodgers, M.Ed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
Computer Applications for Monitoring Student Outcomes: Behavior Rob Horner University of Oregon
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
Multi-Tier System of Support (MTSS) Objective: By the end of this session, I will demonstrate my understanding of the MTSS system by describing.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Building a Tier II/III School Wide PBS System Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
FAMILY GUIDE TO PBIS POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS 1.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Deb Childs, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier 2/3 Consultant.
Progress Monitoring for Tier 2
Virginia PBIS Conference | June 30, 2011 Building Capacity for Progress Monitoring within School-wide Systems of PBIS Lucille Eber IL PBIS Network
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
ESMS New Teacher Orientation Our Mission is to maximize student learning and personal responsibility through a rigorous standards-based curriculum, a safe.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Positive Behavior Support Lost Lake Elementary. PBS Team PBS Team: –Mrs. Loyko, Mrs. Zamora, Mrs. Marcil, Mrs. Horton, Mrs. Gault, Coach Henry, Mrs. Maldonado.
How to Teach Students Rules and Expectations for Behavior Under Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) Answers to 12 most common questions about.
D62 Response to Intervention
Life After Check In Check Out: Social/Academic Instructional Groups
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Check In/Check Out Overview. What is CICO? CICO= “Check In/Check Out” The CICO program is a school-wide, check-in, check-out prevention program for students.
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports: A Brief Introduction.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
By: Brevard Public School’s “Most Awesome” Certified Behavior Analysts.
Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Advanced Tiers in High Schools Ali Hearn, IL PBIS Network Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Implementation in the “Real World”. Edie Banks, LCSWSarah Gafford, LCSW.
Collaborative Problem Solving… Shifting to a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model  A year of change for us all  We will learn together as a TEAM  The.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
Diversity, Prevention & Intervention Department Broward County Public Schools Data-based Problem Solving in a RtI:B Team Meeting 3.0.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia A. Cave February 2014.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
Integration of SWPBIS and PWPBIS into the Classroom
PBIS Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports
Southwest Junior High School CICO Handbook
Response to Instruction and Intervention
PBIS at College Community
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS VIEW
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Liberty Elementary staff training
Presentation transcript:

Tier 2 Interventions Kristen N. Salamone, M.Ed. David Rodgers, M.Ed.

Learner Outcomes The learner will be able to: 1. Identify Tier 2 Components 2. Determine effective screening components 3. Describe the identification process of students for targeted groups 4. Describe different types of interventions you can do with targeted groups

Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions (Burns, Jimerson & Deno, 2007) Interventions Tier I: Universal screening and progress monitoring with quality core curriculum: All students Tier II: Standardized interventions with small groups in general education: 15% to 20% of students at any time Tier III: Individualized interventions with in-depth problem analysis in general education : 5% of students at any time Problem Solving Tier I – Identify discrepancy between expectation and performance for class or individual. Is it a class wide problem? Tier II – Identify discrepancy for individual. Identify category of problem. Assign small group solution. What is the category of the problem? Tier III – Identify discrepancy for individual. Identify causal variable. Implement individual intervention. What is the causal variable?

Tier 2 Components  Tier 1 Process implemented with fidelity  Multiple methods used to identify students for Tier 2 supports  Consistent, progress-monitoring system is used across Tier 2 supports and interventions

Identification  How do you identify your Tier 2 eligible students?  How do you identify the Tier 2 interventions you need?  Data?  Suspensions  ODRs  SAP Referrals  Tardy

Effective “screening” Processes  Students who exhibit externalizing behaviors  Students who exhibit internalizing behaviors  Students who present many classroom challenges  Students experiencing in-class consequences but do not get a discipline referral  Students in ESE settings who may still need additional behavior supports  Recommendations from faculty, parents or supportive professionals

Data System Requirements  Multiple sources of data  Decision Rules  Monitor the impact of interventions  Monitor/Modify/Discontinue decision making  Assess fidelity and effectiveness of interventions/supports

So… you have the students identified, now what?  What have you done in the past?  What are you trying to do now?

Selection of Interventions  Continuously Available  Quickly and Easily Accessible  Minimal Time Commitment required from Classroom Teachers  Required Skill sets classroom teachers need can be easily learned  Aligned with school-wide expectations  All staff/faculty are aware of intervention(s) and their roles in the process  Consistently implemented with most students, but with flexibility  Program selected is matched to the function of the student’s behavior

Our Favorite Interventions…  Check In/Check Out  Social/Academic Instructional Groups  Social Skills Groups  Relationship Groups  Grief Groups  Relaxation Skill Groups  Conflict Resolution Groups  Problem Solving Groups  Pro-Social Groups  Academic Groups

Check in Check out  Relatively easy and quick to implement for up to 10-15% of all students.  Each adult volunteer checks in and out with multiple youth (up to 10 students)  All youth get same intervention  Same check in and out time  Same school-wide behavioral expectations as goals  Same number of opportunities for behavioral feedback (ratings)  Same Daily Progress Report (DPR)  Data to assess Impact of Intervention: Reduction in ODRs, points earned on Daily Progress Report (DPR), grades, attendance, etc.  Data Example: After 6 weeks, 28 of the 33 students on CICO (85%) of students earned 80% or more of Daily Progress Report (DPR) points, and there has been a 50% overall reduction in total ODRs for these 33 students.

Social/Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG)  Youth are supported in a small group for direct instruction of replacement behaviors, structured practice and feedback.  Examples:  Problem-Solving: To learn replacement behaviors for fighting, arguing, etc.  Pro-social Skills: To learn replacement behaviors for avoidance, withdrawal, etc.  Academic Behaviors: To learn replacement behaviors for getting out of seat, calling out during instruction, poor studying habits, etc.  Data to assess Impact of Intervention: Reduction in ODRs, percentage of points on Daily Progress Report (DPR), grades, attendance, behavior surveys, etc.  Data Example: After 4-6 weeks of the social skills instructional group, 7 of the 8 students have earned 80% or more of their Daily Progress Report (DPR) points and there has been a 50% reduction in total ODRs for these 8 students.

Common Areas for Social Skills Instruction  Hygiene  Manners  Listening  Being polite  Being considerate  Being respectful  Sharing  Taking turns  Appropriate words  Appropriate touch  How to behave in the halls, lunchroom, during instruction, etc.

Conflict Resolution Groups  Youth are supported in a small group to acquire basic skills necessary for solving and resolving daily conflicts with other students, adults, authority figures, etc.  Examples:  Physical Aggression: To learn replacement behaviors for fighting, arguing, etc.  Problem Solving: To learn replacement behaviors for bickering, arguing, fighting, etc.  Data to assess Impact of Intervention: Reduction in ODRs, percentage of points on Daily Progress Report (DPR), grades, attendance, behavior surveys, etc.  Data Example: After 4-6 weeks of the conflict resolution instructional group, 7 of the 8 students have earned 80% or more of their Daily Progress Report (DPR) points and there has been a 50% reduction in total ODRs for these 8 students.

How About You?  Please identify any other interventions you have used that have been successful!

Group Activity with Share Out  Pick a targeted behavior posted around the room and go to that area  If the group you pick has more than 10 people, please move along  As a group, discuss and describe the identification process of students for targeted groups  What data will you use?  What process will you use?  How will kids move in and out?  As a group, discuss and describe different types of interventions you can do with targeted groups  How will you monitor progress of interventions?  How will you differentiate interventions by need?

References Tier 2/Tier 3 Intervention Definitions ( ). Tier 2 Interventions (2016). Burns, Dino and Jimerson (2007). Multi-Tiered Academic Interventions.

Contact Information  Dave Rodgers  TaC Consultant BVIU  ext   Kristen Salamone  TaC Consultant BVIU  ext  To obtain a copy of today’s materials, please visit: