Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project AQ 3 – Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report – 2008 March 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Middle Fork American River Project AQ 2 – Fish Population Technical Study Report Overview March 3, 2009.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) February 3, 2009.
General Permits Schedule Update Water Quality Partnership Meeting May 19, 2005 Dewey Weaver.
May Middle Fork Project Project Operations Overview May 2006 PCWA MAY 16, 2006 HANDOUT #4.
Fish Mercury Project Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency DEVELOPING SAFE EATING GUIDELINES.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Update on Proposed Project.
Spokane Tribal Hatchery Sherman Creek Hatchery Lake Roosevelt Volunteer Net Pens Monitoring by Lake Roosevelt Fisheries.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting July 21, 2008.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting March 6, 2008.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Claytor Hydroelectric Project Water Quality Study Mark Hutchins, Project Manager January 25, 2007.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting February 19, 2008.
1 Potential Project Betterments to be studied further during Relicensing June 20, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 8, 2010.
Aquatic Life Selenium Standards Cottonwood Creek Drainage Cherry Creek Segment 4b Regulation 38 June 9, 2015.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
MIG 2 - Water Quality and Quantity Study Plan Review April 2, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting June 1, 2009 Handout #2.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
Pend Oreille Nonnative Fish Suppression Project Todd Andersen Jason Connor Kalispel Tribe of Indians Project Number January 18, 2012.
Middle Fork Project TERR 6 - Special-Status Bat Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 3, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Existing Resource Information Reports July 18, 2006.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Completing the SF Bay Mercury TMDL Carrie Austin SF Bay Water Board.
Initial fish tissue sampling in PA Resulted in first consumption “advisory” 1976 –79 – Additional special studies Resulted in first Do Not Eat advice.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
TEMPORAL VISUALIZATION OF DATA FROM THE FRENCH SENTINEL NETWORK.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 1: Vegetation Communities and Wildlife.
Middle Fork American River Project Recreation Resources Technical Working Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Brown Trout Growth: Growing, Growing, or Gone
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Water Quality Control Commission Hearing June 8, 2015
Middle Fork Project Entrainment Direct Sampling Approach (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Baseline Food Web Interactions in Lake Kachess: Seasonal Predation by Northern Pikeminnow and Burbot on Prey Important for Bull Trout Adam Hansen, Jenny.
Albeni Falls Dam Operations
Middle Fork Project Project Description and Operations Maps
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
SW/MW guidance Milestones
Chemical Monitoring mandate
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Fisheries Adventure Learning—Boise Watershed Luke Kolar and Lee Brown.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
O&G GHG Project Planning & Scheduling
WFD and Hydro-morphology
Middle Fork Project TERR 3 – Noxious Weed Technical Study Report Overview February 17, 2009.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting October 5, 2010.
Pacific Northwest Fish Screening and Passage Workshop 2013
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
We’re Moving Sydney August edition Read online now.
Presentation transcript:

Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008

1Introduction Implemented AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study in Spring and Fall 2007 Implemented AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study in Spring and Fall 2007  Characterized water quality conditions upstream and downstream from Project facilities.  Included screening level of methylmercury concentrations in sport fish tissue muscle.  Numerous samples exceeded the OEHHA screening guidelines (0.08 ppm).

2Introduction A Contingency Study Process was Specified in the AQ 11 - TSP A Contingency Study Process was Specified in the AQ 11 - TSP  If methylmercury in fish tissue exceeds the OEHHA guidelines of 0.08 ppm (Cal EPA 2005; Klasing and Brodberg 2006) during the initial sampling, the Aquatic TWG will be consulted concerning the need for additional sampling. If additional sampling is deemed appropriate, a sampling protocol will be developed. Aquatic TWG discussed study results during TWG Meetings and determined that additional fish tissue methylmercury sampling is warranted. Aquatic TWG discussed study results during TWG Meetings and determined that additional fish tissue methylmercury sampling is warranted.

3 Collect and sample additional methylmercury concentrations in sport fish muscle tissue following OEHHA guidelines that could be used to develop safe eating guidelines for the locations within the study area. Collect and sample additional methylmercury concentrations in sport fish muscle tissue following OEHHA guidelines that could be used to develop safe eating guidelines for the locations within the study area. Study Objective

4 Characterize Project Facilities 2008 Methylmercury Fish Sampling Locations French Meadows Reservoir Hellhole Reservoir Ralston Afterbay Middle Fork Interbay Middle Fork American River at Otter Creek

5 Study Approach Collect and Sample Methylmercury From a Total of 9 to 12 Edible Sized Fish of Each Target Species Collect and Sample Methylmercury From a Total of 9 to 12 Edible Sized Fish of Each Target Species Sampling Location Species No. Analyzed in Minimum No. Needed in French Meadows Reservoir Brown Trout 27 Rainbow Trout 36 Hell Hole Reservoir Brown Trout 63 Lake Trout 18 Kokanee 09 Rainbow Trout Crayfish 09 Middle Fork Interbay Brown Trout 63 Rainbow Trout 45 Ralston Afterbay Brown Trout 45 Rainbow Trout Middle Fork American River at Otter Creek Brown Trout Rainbow Trout 90 1 See Table AQ 11-2 for legal and/or edible size limits. 2 Low abundance of this species at the sampling location may make it difficult to collect the target number of individuals; a good-faith effort will be made to collect the target number of individuals.

6 Study Approach Table AQ Legal and/or Edible Size Limits for Target Species. Table AQ Legal and/or Edible Size Limits for Target Species. Legal/edible Size Limits Minimum Size (mm) Brown Trout200 Rainbow Trout200 Lake Trout350 Kokanee200 Crayfish30

7 Study Approach Catch fish using a combination of methods. Catch fish using a combination of methods.  Gill nets, electrofishing, and hook-and-line Notify and discuss with Aquatic TWG if the target number of individuals are not collected. Notify and discuss with Aquatic TWG if the target number of individuals are not collected. Submit fish to Brooks Rand Laboratory for individual fish muscle tissue analysis (minimum of 79 fish). Submit fish to Brooks Rand Laboratory for individual fish muscle tissue analysis (minimum of 79 fish).

8 Contingency Study Schedule DateActivity September through November 2008 Collect fish samples November 2008 through March 2009 Analyses and develop report April 2009 Submit draft report to the Aquatic TWG May through June 2009 Aquatic TWG 60 day review and comment period July 2009 Resolve comments and prepare final report August 2009 Submit final report to the Aquatic TWG and Plenary