U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Air and Water Connection of Mercury in Watersheds Presentation for ORSANCO Technical Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Casey J. Lee U.S.
Advertisements

Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection. Natural Sources: Occurs naturally in soils, sediments, and rocks Volcanic eruptions Wildfires Man-Made Sources:
Mercury bioaccumulation in stream ecosystems—Detailed studies, spatial assessments, and trend monitoring Mark E. Brigham U.S. Department of the Interior.
SF Bay Region Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring Funded by: RMP, USEPA w/ services by: NADP/MDN, Contra Costa, San Francisco, San Jose.
An Investigation of Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to Bay Area Storm Runoff: a Pilot Study Sarah Rothenberg, Lester McKee, Don Yee, Alicia Gilbreath, Michelle.
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Hydrologic Theory One of the principal objectives in hydrology is to transform rainfall that has fallen over a watershed area into flows to be expected.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Global Transport of Mercury (Hg) Compounds Noelle Eckley EPS Second Year Symposium September 2003 Photo: AMAP & Geological Museum, Copenhagen.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
Mercury in Fish. Where Does Mercury Come From? Natural Sources: Soils and rocks Wildfires Man-Made Sources: Burning coal and medical waste Manufacturing.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Mercury Deposition Network – Mercury Analytical Laboratory Bob Brunette and David Gay National Atmospheric Deposition Program Mercury Deposition Network.
Mercury Sources to Water and Associated Impacts Chris Piehler.
Use of Multi-Media Monitoring to Develop a Statewide Mercury TMDL Bruce Monson and Howard Markus Environmental Analysis & Outcomes Division Minnesota Pollution.
Potential Effects of Climate Change on New York City Water Supply Quantity and Quality: An Integrated Modeling Approach Donald Pierson, Elliot Schneiderman.
Quantifying the Role of Ecological Uncertainty in a Public Health Policy Decision Annual Meeting American Association for the Advancement of Science Seattle,
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
Modeling the Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury to Lake Champlain (from Anthropogenic Sources in the U.S. and Canada) Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Physical and chemical factors controlling mercury and methylmercury concentrations in stream water Mark E. Brigham and Dennis A. Wentz 5 th National Monitoring.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
1 Methylmercury TMDL & Implementation Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta Estuary 2006 National Monitoring Conference Michelle Wood.
Methylmercury Production in Groundwater Watershed Hg Research Program at SERC Deposition Transport Watershed retention Methylation MDN site MD00 Stream.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Mercury cycling and bioaccumulation in streams in Oregon, Wisconsin, and Florida Mark E. Brigham 5 th National Monitoring Conference San José, California.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
Completing the SF Bay Mercury TMDL Carrie Austin SF Bay Water Board.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Hydrosphere Notes Parts 1 – Rivers. How does a river develop? When precipitation is greater than evapotranspiration Or from a spring where groundwater.
Mercury: What’s going on? Michelle Woolfolk, Modeling Unit Discharger meetings:December 18, 2002 and January 15, 2003.
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection
Ali Fares Associate Professor of Watershed Hydrology
Mercury in Fish.
MOUNTAINS AT RISK.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Biogeochemical Cycle of Mercury (Hg)
Hydrology CIVL341.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
From hemispheric to local scale air pollution: Mercury
From hemispheric to local scale air pollution: Mercury
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Air and Water Connection of Mercury in Watersheds Presentation for ORSANCO Technical Committee Martin Risch Research Hydrologist February 9, 2016

Overview Mercury in the air and water Mercury in the Ohio River Wet and dry deposition of atmospheric Hg Stream Hg loads and yields The air and water connection of mercury in watersheds—a case study from Indiana Hg mass balance for the Ohio River watershed

The Mercury (Hg) Problem Human activities release Hg to air and water. Some inorganic Hg is microbially converted to organic methylmercury (MeHg), which accumulates in aquatic and terrestrial food chains. MeHg enters humans and wildlife through dietary exposure, typically from fish consumption. MeHg is a potent neurotoxin, with potential harm to cardiovascular and endocrine systems. Effects are documented in young and adult humans.  MeHg at very low levels poses a health risk, especially to the young and unborn.

Nearly all fish tissue samples have detectable Hg, assumed to be mostly MeHg. Fish-consumption advisories for Hg affect people who fish -- in Indiana 1 of 6 residents, 1 of 2 adults. Sport fishing, commercial fishing, and subsistence fishing bring freshwater and marine fish MeHg into family diets. Hg water-quality criteria protecting wildlife are frequently exceeded. Fish communities, and aquatic and terrestrial wildlife show adverse effects from MeHg.

Mercury is a Global Issue Biannual International Conference on Hg as a Global Pollutant – scientific consensus on Hg issues Minamata Convention on Hg – global treaty to protect human health & environment, 128 signing nations in 2013, United Nations Env. Program Development of Hg monitoring network in SE Asia USEPA Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule will reduce Hg emissions from power plants; additional rules affect other Hg emissions sources Mix of upward and downward trends in regional Hg wet deposition in US

Hg is a Local Issue-- the Ohio River ORSANCO Historic Hg monitoring site 2010 Hg Recon monitoring site & downstream mile mark USGS and ORSANCO Hg Recon, 2010 Seasonal streamflow-integrated samples for low-level Hg and MeHg at 6 sites

2010 Hg concentrations were low, when compared to historic Hg data from Ohio River and Indiana streams Concentrations (ng/L) Ohio River recon 2010 (n = 18) Indiana streams (n=411) Ohio River (n=90) Hg minimum <1.5 Hg maximum Hg median MeHg minimum<0.04 no data MeHg maximum no data MeHg median no data 1 Risch and others, ORSANCO written commun., 2010; 5 of the 6 sites sampled in 2010 w/o mile 118 site

Ohio River Hg & MeHg mostly particulate, related to streamflow & suspended sediment, such that when streamflow is > 200,000 cfs, suspended sediment is > 200 mg/L, Hg can be > 12 ng/L criteria. Instantaneous stream Hg loads varied by location and season. 45 to 414 kg/hr 1 to 49 kg/hr 0.5 to 5 kg/hr upstreamdownstream

The Hg cycle in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems

The Air- Water- Fish Mercury Connection– a case study from Indiana Watersheds Interpretation of available baseline data from 5-6 yrs of Hg monitoring, using streamflow, precipitation, Hg sources, and land cover Fish Hg Water Hg Air Hg Wastewater Emissions 26 watersheds: spatial and statistical analysis - Hg & MeHg concentrations in water; stream Hg loads; atmospheric Hg loads; Hg in fish - correlations with Hg sources & land cover Land Cover

STREAMS Seasonal sampling 4 times /yr at 26 stream gages/bridges, 5 years Integrated stream-width & stream-depth isokinetic method; trace-metals protocols Mercury Monitoring PRECIPITATION Weekly samples at 5 MDN sites, 6 years Automated collector & raingage Low-level Hg supplies, central laboratory Hg concentration X precipitation = Hg wet deposition

26 Watersheds: 152 to 74,293 km 2 Drain 80% of Indiana 22% area outside IN 5 major river systems 6 sites downstream from dams and lakes Monitoring data: 411 stream samples 2,162 wet-deposition samples from 9 NADP MDN sites 1,731 fish samples rivers, 59 lakes; 83% state locations

Stream Hg Concentrations Statistically: High Hg 90 th percentile high median and maximum High MeHg: 90 th percentile high median and maximum High Fish Hg > 300 ug/kg 90 th percentile high median and maximum

5-year average annual stream Hg yields per watershed range 0.72 to 45.2 ug/m 2 median 4.21 ug/m 2 Annual stream Hg loads calculated with streamflow regression model LOADEST (Runkel and others, 2004) using 5 years of streamflow and Hg concentration data at sites not downstream from reservoirs; Hg load = g/year stream Hg yield = stream Hg load/drainage area Next: the air Hg connection

Atmospheric Mercury Species and Fate

x = Precipitation-weighted average annual Hg concentration map Hg concentration data for 5 Indiana & 4 nearby NADP MDN sites Average annual precipitation map from 151 NWS Coop sites (127 in Indiana) Concentration X Precipitation Hg wet deposition load (mass per area per time)

Comparison: Average annual atmospheric Hg wet deposition loads per watershed range 9.6 to 14.8  g/m 2 ; median 11.3  g/m 2 Average annual stream Hg yields per watershed range 0.72 to 45.2  g/m 2 ; median 4.21  g/m 2 Hg wet-deposition map for 26 watersheds

Concentration from 9 MDN sites Precipitation from 151 NWS Coop sites Mercury wet-deposition map for Indiana, 2006 Effect from area of high precipitation Area of high precipitation Area of high Hg concentration Effect from area of high Hg concentration

Total atmospheric Hg deposition = Atmospheric wet Hg + dry Hg deposition Dry Hg deposition calculations Seasonal median daily air Hg concentrations at monitoring sites in IN (Risch and others, 2007) Reactive gaseous Hg, particulate bound Hg, gaseous elemental Hg (GEM) Vertical deposition velocity for 3 Hg species (Seigneur and others, 2004) with GEM in forest and non-forest Air Hg concentration x vertical deposition velocity x number of days = seasonal dry Hg deposition rate Annual Hg dry deposition = sum of seasonal rates  Added 5.6 to 13.6  g/m 2 per year dry Hg to wet Hg

Ratios of average annual stream Hg yield per watershed to average annual atmospheric Hg wet deposition load – Generally, more atmospheric Hg wet deposition loading than stream Hg yield Urbanized watersheds had more stream Hg yield than could be attributed to atmospheric Hg wet deposition

Three conditions inferred from ratio of stream Hg yield to atmospheric Hg load per watershed 1.Stream Hg yields less than atmospheric Hg loads; excess Hg retained in the landscape or re-emitted to the air; other Hg inputs are minor part of stream Hg yield 2.Stream Hg yields generally equal to atmospheric Hg loads; other Hg inputs offset atmospheric Hg retained in landscape or re-emitted to the air 3.Stream Hg yields greater than atmospheric Hg loads; other Hg inputs (point sources) contribute more Hg than any atmospheric Hg retained in landscape or re-emitted to air Next: Hg sources

Positive statistical correlations of moderate strength (Kendall’s tau 0.4 to 0.5, high is 0.7) where 50% of variation in dependent variable is explained by independent variable Average annual stream Hg load & average annual atmospheric Hg load Average stream Hg concentrations & annual Hg emissions, number emission sources Average stream Hg concentrations & number of outfalls, number of major > 1 MGD facilities Average annual stream Hg yield & percentage of urban land cover Average stream Hg concentrations & percentage of forest land cover

64 POTW’s with Hg in 510 samples 4,144 permitted outfalls, including 1, 044 major facilities (> 1 MGD)

Annual Hg emissions & number of stationary sources per watershed Percentage land cover types per watershed grouped from 20 land cover classes

Hg Mass Balance (Inflow = Outflow) Inflow Hg Atmospheric Hg directly to water + Atmospheric Hg indirectly reaches water + Hg in discharges to the water = Outflow Hg Ohio River Watershed Can be calculated with methods developed by USGS

Wet Hg deposition – National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) Mercury Deposition Network Air Hg concentrations for dry Hg deposition – NADP Atmospheric Mercury Network Inferential model of vertical deposition velocity for each Hg species, by land cover (NADP, 2016; Zhang and others, 2012) Litterfall Hg Deposition – NADP Litterfall Mercury Network Precipitation data – National Weather Service, Midwest Climate Data Center Sources of information for total (wet and dry) atmospheric Hg loads to watersheds and forest landscapes ( )

7-Year Mean Annual Hg Wet Deposition* *Risch et al, Hg- monitoring sites from 3 networks 1,541 precipitation gages in 2 networks

Hydrologic model - Water Availability Tool for Environmental Resources (WATER) Uses topographic and soil properties, with a regionally calibrated hillslope-hydrology model (TOPMODEL) Uses impervious-surface model (TR-55), and climatic model to uniformly estimate streamflow for tributary watersheds Calculate Hg in runoff by hydrologic response units of forested, agricultural, and developed land cover using published release rates Methods to compute release of atmospheric Hg from landscape to streams and watersheds – estimates of stream Hg yield of atmospheric Hg

Annual atmospheric Hg loading by 12-digit hydrologic unit Direct atmospheric Hg deposition to Ohio River Uniform estimates for streamflow by 12-digit hydrologic unit Release of atmospheric Hg to precipitation runoff according to land cover = Hg indirectly reaches tributaries Stream Hg loads/yield of atmospheric Hg Initial interpretations for selected tributary watersheds to show the high-low ranges of Hg deposition, Hg stream yield, streamflow, and landscape factors Interpretations of Hg mass balance for Ohio River watershed and tributaries

Acknowledgments Risch, M.R., Baker, N.T., Fowler, K.K., Egler, A.L., and Lampe, D.C., 2010, Mercury in Indiana watersheds: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality, Office of Water Quality National Atmospheric Deposition Program Thank you!