COMMUNICATING PERFORMANCE TO VDOT Sanhita Lahiri, P.E., PTOE 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Traffic Management Center (TMC) of the Future.
Advertisements

JUSTIFY. Methodology for Measuring NaviGAtor ITS Performance ITS Georgia Annual Meeting 2010 Presented By: Prasoon Sinha, P.E, PTOE Department Manager,
Using INRIX-supplied Time-varying Speed Data to Validate a Wide-area Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model Daniel Morgan Zheng Wei Caliper Corporation 14.
2013 AASHTO TRANSCOMM SKILLS CONTEST Division No. 1) Excel Category No. 1a) With a Consultant Entry Title: VDOT Interstate 95 Bridge Restorations Organization:
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project 1 The Validation Process I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project AASHTO SSOM -
Missouri’s Smart Roadside Program Michelle Teel, P.E., PTOE MoDOT’s mission to provide a world-class transportation experience that delights our customers.
Chapter 4.
North Carolina’s Integration of 511 and Workzone Information Jo Ann Oerter State Technology Implementation and Maintenance Engineer North Carolina Department.
Rick Via Statewide Incident Management Program Manager Office: Leveraging Technology & ITS to Enhance Traffic.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
Pulsar Advertising Southeastern Institute of Research 1 VDOT Omnibus Study Wave I: December 2004 Pulsar Advertising G January 6, 2005 Southeastern Institute.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Highway Capacity Software (HCS) – Part II
Princeton University Prospect Eleven Dec. 6, 2005 Towards Real-Time MinETA Routing Tuesday, December 6, 2005 RPI, Troy, NY Alain L. Kornhauser Professor,
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
MAINTENANCE & TRAFFIC OPERATION INCIDENT MANAGEMENT.
The Dutchess County Fair Traffic Plan Talking Operations Web Seminar April 26, 2006.
USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.
Rural Application of the Colorado Transportation Management System Presented at ITS America, June 2007, Palm Springs, CA By Raj Chaudhuri and Ken DePinto.
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Keeping Wisconsin Moving: An Overview of WisDOT’s DMS Travel Times Kelly Langer, WisDOT, Freeway Operations Supervisor.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
The Science of Prediction Location Intelligence Conference April 4, 2006 How Next Generation Traffic Services Will Impact Business Dr. Oliver Downs, Chief.
Accuracy in Real-Time Estimation of Travel Times Galen McGill, Kristin Tufte, Josh Crain, Priya Chavan, Enas Fayed 15 th World Congress on Intelligent.
NATMEC June 5, 2006 Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research.
Presented By The Pulsar Team Pulsar Advertising and The Marketing Source December 2003 Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia State Police Virginia.
Efficient Traffic Flow:
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
June 5, Georgia Travel Info Brought to you by.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Travel Time and Reliability: Is Data Quality a Showstopper? The Georgia Navigator Experience Angshuman Guin URS Corporation
Robert L. Bertini Sirisha M. Kothuri Kristin A. Tufte Portland State University Soyoung Ahn Arizona State University 9th International IEEE Conference.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Ch 11 Driving on Expressways Characteristics of Expressway Driving.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Excel-(1d) Under $50,000 Without a Consultant Iway Project: I-95 South to I-195 East Rhode Island Department of Transportation – Office of Communications.
Cellular Probes Kansas City Evaluation Cellular Probe Feasibility Study Cellular Probe Feasibility Study.
Tennessee DOT SmartWay Update Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006 Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
1 Using Archived ITS Data to Automatically Identify Freeway Bottlenecks in Portland, Oregon Robert L. Bertini, Rafael J. Fernández-Moctezuma, Jerzy Wieczorek,
DRIVE Net: A Large-Scale Online Data Platform for Performance Analysis and Decision Support Yinhai Wang PacTrans STAR Lab University of Washington
July 13, 2005ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute Austin Chamber of Commerce December 2015.
HCM 2010: FREEWAY FACILITIES PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
Characterizing Interstate Crash Rates Based on Traffic Congestion Using Probe Vehicle Data Michelle M. Mekker, Stephen M. Remias, Margaret L. McNamara,
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Introduction to Vehicle Trajectory Processing Tools.
Bus Stop Optimization Plan SMTD System Efficiency and Improvement Project July 2015 Click on the slide or use your right arrow key to advance.
Lessons learned from Metro Vancouver
Nevada Next Generation 511 System 9 months to design, test and deploy
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Intelligent Transportation Society of Virginia: The Next Generation VDOT’s New 511 Traffic Information Program Transportation Video & Data (TVD) Status.
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
SERPM 8 NPMRDS SPEED DATA
Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages CTS Transportation Seminar Series, January.
Macroscopic Speed Characteristics
NEVADA TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE March , 2011 Reno, Nevada
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Operations Performance Measures
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Welcome to the New Smart City by TrafficCast…
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Comparison and Analysis of Big Data for a Regional Freeway Study in Washington State Amanda Deering, DKS Associates.
Presentation transcript:

COMMUNICATING PERFORMANCE TO VDOT Sanhita Lahiri, P.E., PTOE 1

Holiday Travel Trend  Before Probe Data  Using Probe Data −Methodology −Challenges & Opportunities Real Time Traveler Information Questions 2 OUTLINE

3 Used Data from ~300 Continuous Count Stations -Between interchanges -Coverage limitations -Large temporal aggregations -10 pages to show all Interstates Before Probe Data H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND

4 3 years of Probe Data 30 minute intervals One page to view all data Using Probe Data H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND

 Prepare Data for Averaging – Standard deviations (STDV) of speeds over latest 3 years are calculated and a threshold STDV is chosen based on the full data set 5 Data Analysis Methodology H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND

 Prepare Data for Averaging – The threshold STDV is compared to STDV of each data set and SD that exceeds the threshold are identified as outliers. Data could be Outlier for several reasons including, weather conditions, Incidents, Work Zone, Special Events Process of elimination is used for the outlier data 6 Data Analysis Methodology H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND

7 Interstates Speed LimitThresholdCongestion Level Urban (60 mph or 55 mph) 55 mph or aboveLittle to No Congestion between 45 and 54 mphModerate Congestion less than 45 mphHeavy Congestion Rural (65 mph or 70 mph) 63 mph or aboveLittle to No Congestion between 45 and 62 mphModerate Congestion less than 45 mphHeavy Congestion Limited Access Arterials Speed >= 85% of FFSLittle to No Congestion 85% of FFS > Speed >= 60% of FFSModerate Congestion 60% of FFS > SpeedHeavy Congestion Data Analysis Methodology  Determine Congestion Threshold – Based on experience, speeds (Posted Limits for Interstates and Reference for Arterials), rural or urban area, roadway gradient, speed thresholds were assigned to different levels of congestion.

 Elimination of Outlier Data – Remaining outlier data was ready to be averaged if o All three individual yearly speeds had same Congestion Level o Only one of three possible yearly pairs had STDV below threshold. The outlier speed was eliminated and speeds from the other two years were used. o The outlier speed was matched with only one incident. The speed from incident year was eliminated.  Assign Congestion Level based on pre-determined Speed Threshold 8 Data Analysis Methodology H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND

9 Data Analysis Methodology H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND Congestion Level Little to No Congestion Moderate Congestion Heavy Congestion Outliers Outlier Smoothing – Remaining outliers were eliminated based on an iterative process based on values from their neighbors.

10 Outlier Statistics H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND Percent outliers at the end of each data processing step Holiday (using data from Previous 3 yrs) STDV Threshold STDV > Thresh old Diff. Cgst. Levels Elim. Outlier Speed Event(incdt, weather) Mapping Outlier Elim Alg. T’giving, mph 12.1% 10.0% 2.9% 2.8% 0% Mem Day mph 10.5% 7.2% 2.3% 2.2% 0% T’giving mph 11.7% 8.6% 2.6% 2.5% 0% Mem Day mph (mainlines) 7 mph (ramps) 9.3% 7.2% 2.5% 2.4% 0% Labor Day mph (mainlines) 7 mph (ramps) 9.3% 6.5% 1.9% 1.8% 0% T’giving mph (mainlines) 7 mph (ramps) 8.7% 5.1% 1.2% 1.1% 0%

Local Feedback - Manual Adjustments based on comments and special conditions  RHOV lanes  I-495 Express Lane Construction  I-564 connecting I-64 to the Norfolk Naval Base  I-581 in Roanoke  I-264 Downtown Tunnel  I-77 (Mountainous area)  I-81 (Near Roanoke, Truck Climbing Lns, Bridge Rehabilitation Projects)  Downtown Tunnel in Hampton Roads with Flashing Variable Speed Limits  George Washington Pkwy 11 H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND Fine Tune Projections

12 Holiday Travel Trends

H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND 13 Outreach: Press Release Marketing Spots 511 Banner and link Media Interviews Links to/from other states Communications

14 H OLIDAY T RAVEL T REND Challenges and Opportunities  Data Analysis Challenges –  Inadequate Ramp Data  Adjusting Map based on Field Validation  Influence of truck speed on TMC speed on mountains  INRIX data quality, availability and coverage  Understanding Drivers Expectations amidst various travel information available  Visualization Challenges –  Website coding : time-awareness, new interstate shield layer, KML selection by zoom level, custom code for map coloring  Shapefiles for each level of zoom created from basic, undistorted shapefile  Design of Mobile friendly GUI function  Cross mobile devices compatibility – compatibility across various screen resolutions

15 Travel Time on DMS  VDOT began posting real time travel time messages on I-66 in August 2011 as a pilot  Currently VDOT provides travel time on major interstate commuting routes INRIX probe data was used to produce the travel time R EAL T IME

Website  VDOT began posting real time travel time messages on I-66 in August 2011 as a pilot  Currently VDOT provides travel time on major interstate commuting routes INRIX probe data was used to produce the travel time R EAL T IME

17 Mobile Sharing R EAL T IME

Acknowledgements: Mena Lockwood, P.E. Virginia Department of Transportation Simona Babiceanu University of Virginia ITERIS Team 18

19