IEEE C802.20-03/87. Status of 802.20 Evaluation Criteria IEEE 802.20 Evaluation Criteria CG IEEE 802.20 Interim Meeting September 15-19, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Congestion Control and Fairness Models Nick Feamster CS 4251 Computer Networking II Spring 2008.
Advertisements

Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Status Update Farooq Khan IEEE Plenary Meeting Portland, Oregon, USA July 12-16, 2004.
Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Status Update Farooq Khan IEEE Interim Meeting Berlin, Germany September 12-17, 2004.
Traffic Models: Status/Discussion July 22, 2003 N. K. Shankaranarayanan (Shankar) AT&T Labs-Research IEEE C /73.
Università degli Studi di Firenze 08 July 2004 COST th MCM - Budapest, Hungary 1 Cross-layer design for Multiple access techniques in wireless communications.
Opportunistic Scheduling Algorithms for Wireless Networks
Objective and Overview To explain the set of definitions, assumptions, and a general platform for simulating 1xEV-DV and to synchronize simulation results.
Doc.: IEEE /0604r1 Submission May 2014 Slide 1 Modeling and Evaluating Variable Bit rate Video Steaming for ax Date: Authors:
2005/12/06OPLAB, Dept. of IM, NTU1 Optimizing the ARQ Performance in Downlink Packet Data Systems With Scheduling Haitao Zheng, Member, IEEE Harish Viswanathan,
CS 408 Computer Networks Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Introduction Future wireless systems will be characterized by their heterogeneity - availability of multiple access systems in the same physical space.
Ncue-csie1 A QoS Guaranteed Multipolling Scheme for Voice Traffic in IEEE Wireless LANs Der-Jiunn Deng 、 Chong-Shuo Fan 、 Chao-Yang Lin Speaker:
CDMA X RTT Overview. Global 3G Evolution.
Lin Yingpei (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0874r0 Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Unified Traffic Model on Enterprise Scenario Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Supervisor: Prof. Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M.Sc Zhong Zheng A part of NETS2020 project Ying Yang
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation WiMAX Campus deployment Status & measurements Thanasis Korakis Polytechnic Institute of NYU July 27, 2011.
COGNITIVE RADIO FOR NEXT-GENERATION WIRELESS NETWORKS: AN APPROACH TO OPPORTUNISTIC CHANNEL SELECTION IN IEEE BASED WIRELESS MESH Dusit Niyato,
C r2. 2 Conference call summaries Major open issues  Open issues in Traffic models  Other open issues addressed by contributions  Other.
Doc.: IEEE /096 Submission May 2000 Gunnar Rydnell, Ericsson Slide 1 HIPERLAN type 2 – Data transport Date:May 8, 2000 Author:Gunnar Rydnell Ericsson.
Discussion on IEEE metrics guidelines Document Number: IEEE R0 Date Submitted: Source: Antonio BovoVoice:
Fen Hou and Pin-Han Ho Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Wireless Communications and Mobile.
Adaptation Techniques in Wireless Packet Data Services Speaker: Chih-Wei Wang Advisor: Li-Chun Wang.
A 4G System Proposal Based on Adaptive OFDM Mikael Sternad.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Data Transmission Over Wireless Links Fan Yang
November 4, 2003APOC 2003 Wuhan, China 1/14 Demand Based Bandwidth Assignment MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs Presented by Ruibiao Qiu Department of Computer.
Demand Based Bandwidth Assignment MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs K.Murugan, B.Dushyanth, E.Gunasekaran S.Arivuthokai, RS.Bhuvaneswaran, S.Shanmugavel.
Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Update Farooq Khan IEEE Plenary Meeting Orlando, FL, USA March 15-19, 2004.
Covilhã, 30 June Atílio Gameiro Page 1 The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is.
Unicast transmission assisted HARQ for enhanced MBS Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08_1140 Date Submitted: Source: Xiaolong ZHU, Hongwei YANG,
Doc.: IEEE /342r0 Submission March 2014 Naveen Kakani, CSRSlide 1 Short Packet Optimizations Date: Authors:
Requirements Topics and Proposals as discussed at Session #4 of IEEE /16r1.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Uplink Power Control Recommendations for IEEE m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/666 Date Submitted: Source: Ali Taha Koc, Shilpa Talwar,
SenProbe: Path Capacity Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks Tony Sun, Ling-Jyh Chen, Guang Yang M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla.
C r3a2 Issues Discussed in Conference Call - Dec 7 Reviewed list of open issues Evaluation Criteria Status Report from the Plenary updated.
Issues in Evaluation Criteria Document November 15, 2006.
IEEE Session # 3 Closing Plenary Mark Klerer, Jerry Upton Vice-Chairs 24 July 2004 IEEE /13r1.
C xx2 Summary of Conference Call – Feb 8 Reviewed contribution C r3 to recap the status of evaluation criteria document Sections in.
Section 6 Wideband CDMA Radio Network Planning. Radio Network Planning A radio network planning consists of three phases: 1.Network Dimensioning (using.
May 16, 2005Chair, IEEE May 16, 2005Chair, IEEE Next Steps & Action Items from March 2005 Plenary Status Review - - May 2005 Interim.
Spectral Efficiency Ad-hoc March 18, Status and Continuation The ad-hoc group will meet again Thursday, March 19, 2004 at 7:00 am In preparation.
3GPP2 A xxx TITLE: TITLE: Simulation Results for HRPD SCML with feedback sharingSOURCE Satish Kanugovi, Alcatel-Lucent,
Performance Evaluation of the IEEE MAC for QoS Claudio Cicconetti, Alessandro Erta, Luciano Lenzini, and Enzo Mingozzi IEEE Transactions On Mobile.
Doc.: IEEE /00144r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Dialog with FCC Nada.
A New MAC Protocol for Wi-Fi Mesh Networks Tzu-Jane Tsai, Hsueh-Wen Tseng, and Ai-Chun Pang IEEE AINA’06.
Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Status Update Farooq Khan IEEE Interim Meeting Garden Grove, CA, USA May 10-13, 2004.
Access Link Capacity Monitoring with TFRC Probe Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, Dan Xu, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla Computer Science Department, University of.
Supervisors:Dr. Yehuda Ben-Shimol Mr. Itzik Kitroser Alon Tzulang &Tseela Matsry Present:
Wireless Networks Spring 2007 WiMAX: Broadband Wireless Access.
Technology training (Session 6)
Evaluation Criteria and Traffic Models Status Update
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access
Congestion Control, Internet transport protocols: udp
Howard Huang, Sivarama Venkatesan, and Harish Viswanathan
Analysis and Evaluation of a New MAC Protocol
WiMAX: Broadband Wireless Access
doc.: n Jeff Gilbert Atheros Communications
doc.: n Jeff Gilbert Atheros Communications
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Congestion Control (from Chapter 05)
Modeling and Evaluating Variable Bit rate Video Steaming for ax
Summary of Conference Call – Feb 8
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

IEEE C /87

Status of Evaluation Criteria IEEE Evaluation Criteria CG IEEE Interim Meeting September 15-19, 2003

-3- C /87 Evaluation Criteria Status Two conference calls since the July plenary Consensus reached on several issues: –Cell layout, Full-duplex simulations, TCP model, backhaul network delay and loss models Version 05 of the Evaluation criteria document available (C /78). Open issues: –Sectorization, mobility modeling, higher layers protocol models, control signaling models, definition of spectral efficiency, fairness criteria and performance metrics etc. Three conference calls scheduled between the September interim and November plenary

-4- C /87 Cell Layout Decision to use 19-cells Wrap-around technique for system simulations. Statistics collected from all the cells.

-5- C /87 Fully-duplex Simulations Decision to include both UL and the DL in a fully duplex fashion in the same simulation run. Allow to accurately model the traffic, physical and MAC layer dependencies between the uplink and the downlink. This issue can be revisited later on as more details on the evaluation methodology, channel models, traffic models and proposals become available.

-6- C /87 TCP Model Decision to use a simplified TCP model: –connection establishment phase –slow start phase –connection release phase Other details of TCP such as congestion avoidance are not modeled. The details of the model are specified in in the Evaluation criteria document.

-7- C /87 Network delay/loss model Decided not to model any packet loss in the Internet (lossless packet transmission) Decision to model the one-way Internet packet delay using a shifted Gamma distribution: –The delay is independent from packet to packet.

-8- C /87 Sectorization The question is what should be the number of sectors per cell modeled? The issue is also related to modeling of the multiple antenna techniques Should there be a single mandatory baseline configuration e.g. omni-cell, 3-sector cell etc?

-9- C /87 Spectral efficiency How to define the spectral efficiency in the context of multi-sector and/or multiple- antenna cells? –B/s/Hz/cell ? –b/s/Hz/sector ? –b/s/Hz/antenna ? Need to arrive on a acceptable definition of spectral efficiency so that different proposals can be compared on a fair basis.

-10- C /87 Mobility model The CG decided not to model the actually moving mobiles in the simulations Mobility at the physical layer is taken care of by modeling fast fading corresponding to the mobile speed. However, some mobility model is still needed e.g. in order to analyze the handoff schemes etc.

-11- C /87 Higher Layer Protocols Need input from requirements and the traffic modeling CG on the types of applications supported. Models for higher layer protocols such as HTTP, RTSP and RTP etc. as applicable can then be specified.

-12- C /87 Control signaling modeling Examples of control signaling are scheduling grants transmission, channel quality feedback, and ARQ ACK/NACK Feedback etc. MAC states and signaling to enable state transitions modeled explicitly in the system simulations. Inputs needed

-13- C /87 Performance Metrics List of performance metrics is incomplete. Input needed from the traffic modeling CG on the list of applications supported before the application specific performance metrics can be defined.

-14- C /87 Fairness criteria A fairness criteria needed in order to guarantee minimal level of throughput to all users in the system. A fairness criteria can be defined as a constraint on the user throughput CDF –For example, normalized throughput CDF should lie to the right of the Fairness criteria curve. Input needed