Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 Chicago, IL March 6 th, 2007 Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection HITSP Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection Date:
Advertisements

Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All ETSI Standardization Activities on M2M communications Joachim Koss, ETSI Board Member Document No:
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP
CURRENT STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES – ONEM2M GSC-18 Meeting, July 2014, Sophia Antipolis, France Document No: GSC(14)18_012 Source: ETSI Contact:
NIST BIG DATA WG Reference Architecture Subgroup Meeting Agenda Co-chairs: Orit Levin (Microsoft) James Ketner (AT&T) Don Krapohl (Augmented Intelligence)
OneM2M Draft proposal for slide set. This is not intended to be a oneM2M presentation. It is a collection of source material slides which can be used.
Method of Converting Resource definitions into XSD Group Name: WG3 (PRO) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting Date:
Progressing the Work on the MAS TR-0006, TR-0007 Group Name: Management Abstraction and Semantics Source: Tim Carey, ALU,
Discussions for oneM2M Semantics Standardization Group Name: WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 ASN/MN-CSE.
Report of Methods and Procedures Subcommittee Group Name: Steering Committee Source: Laurent Laporte, Sprint, Meeting Date:
Report of co-conveners WG1/WG2 meetings between TP1 and TP2 Group Name: Technical Plenary #2 Source: Omar Elloumi, Alcatel-Lucent,
Development of Management Information System for the Forestry Sector in Viet Nam F O R M I S II Implementation of PSC’s conclusion during the 2 nd meeting.
OneM2M-REQ R03 Proposed simple guidelines for writing use cases and requirements Group Name: oneM2M WG1 / WG2 Source: Joerg Swetina (NEC), Ataru.
IEEE /r3 Submission September 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
HGI activities transfer to oneM2M Group Name: MAS Source: Patricia MARTIGNE (Orange), Deutsche Telekom, Telecom Italia Meeting Date: Agenda.
Work Programme Management Ad hoc Group Report Group Name: one M2M TP9 Source: Convenor WPM Joachim Koss, Gemalto M2M,
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 05 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: ETSI.
An operator’s perspective on support for different M2M deployment scenarios AT&T Group Name: TP Source: Farooq Bari, Jianrong Wang; AT&T;
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission February 2010 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Process Considerations Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
WG 2 Progress Report at TP #8 Group Name: oneM2M TP #8 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: /13 Agenda Item: WG Reports.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: GPP Requirements ad hoc Report Date Submitted: September,
Work Group / Work Item Proposal Slide 1 © 2012 oneM2M Partners oneM2M-TP oneM2M_Work_Group_Work_Item_Proposal Group name: Technical Plenary Source:
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #9 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang, Chair, Meeting.
WG 3 Progress Report at TP #7 Group Name: oneM2M TP #7 Source: Raymond Forbes, LM Ericsson, Meeting Date: /18 Agenda.
Doc.: IEEE /0748r2 Submission May 2011 Tom Siep, CSRSlide 1 Process for Creating TGai Draft Date: Authors:
SeON WG (GISFI #8) Agenda GISFI # 08, Mar 26-28, 2012, Patna Chair: Parag Pruthi, NIKSUN Chair-Delegate: Ashutosh Dutta, NIKSUN Vice-Chair: Debabrata Nayak,
Data Segmentation for Privacy November 16 th, 2011.
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#17 closing Group Name: WPM (TP adhoc) Source: convener WPM Roland Hechwartner, Meeting Date:
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Steve Barclay, ATIS] [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M-Cons#4, 28 Mar 2012.
TP WG1 status report to TP#16 Group Name: oneM2M TP16 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#16,
TST WG Progress Report at TP 19 Group Name: TP Source: TST WG Chair, JaeSeung Song (KETI) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP19, Item.
WG 2 Progress Report at TP#9 Group Name: oneM2M TP #9 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: /21 Agenda Item: WG Reports.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Telecon 22 January 2008 Trine Hansen.
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
ARC ordinary F2F meeting Seoul, June 2013 WG2 MEETING NOTES.
WG-2 - ARC TP #18 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #18 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 14 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: [ETSI]
Recent Results of JCA-NID and TSAG Byoung Nam LEE HyoungJun KIM ETRI, Korea.
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,
WG5 – MAS#19 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
WG1 status report to TP#21 Group Name: oneM2M TP21 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#21, Item 10.4,
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Call for input from WGs on things to test Group Name: TST Source: Jiaxin Yin, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Meeting Date:
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #8 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang, Chair, Meeting.
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,
WG5 – MAS#22 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Tim Carey(Alcatel-Lucent, WG5 Vice Chair) Meeting Date:
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#20 Group Name: WPM (TP adhoc) Source: convener WPM Roland Hechwartner, Meeting Date:
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
Proposed Process for Forming the oneM2M Baseline  Group name: TP#1  Source: Laurent Laporte, Sprint,
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions Group Name: TP #18 Source: Rejesh Bhalla, ZTE Corporation, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
WG5 – MAS#24 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
WG2 - ARC TP#29 Status Report
3GPP interworking in R3 Group Name: ARC
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#24
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#25
ETSI Standardization Activities on M2M communications
Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation CEOS SIT-33
Standards Development: An Overview
Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation CEOS SIT-33
Preparing for NCPDP Joint Technical Work Group Meetings
IMT-Advanced Closing Report
Current standardization activities – oneM2m
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
CCSA Considerations on M2M Consolidation
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: n.a.

Proposed Objectives Requirements Analysis and comparison of existing requirements documents in the document pool as well as allowing for requirements derived from member contributions Tentative harmonization of requirements Architecture Familiarization of different architectures Because of translation issues, we propose that short presentations of the architectures are prepared Short report providing a summary of the different architecture frameworks

Proposed Meeting Rotation US PacificUS EasternEurope CETChinaAustralia 14:00 GMT06:0009:0015:0022:0001:00 05:00 GMT21:0000:0006:0013:0016:00 23:00 GMT15:0018:0000:0006:0009:00

Meeting Schedule DatesUS PacificUS EastCETBeijingSeoulSydney 9 & 11 Oct21:0000:0006:0012:0013:0015:00 16 & 18 Oct06:0009:0015:0021:0022:0000:00 23 & 25 oct15:0018:0000:0006:0007:0009:00 30-Oct06:0009:0014:0021:0022:0000:00 06-Nov21:0000:0006:0013:0014:0016:00 08-Nov06:0009:0015:0022:0023:0001:00 13 & 15 Nov21:0000:0006:0013:0014:0016:00 20-Nov06:0009:0015:0022:0023:0001:00 27 & 29 Nov14:0017:0023:0006:0007:0009:00

Proposed Activities Develop Requirements input template Develop initial set of requirements for TP#2 Approval can only take place at TP level Develop initial description/analysis of architecture framework Propose liaisons to industry segment SDO’s as needed To request feedback To inform of results

Responsibility Identify and document use cases that are relevant for oneM2M – Use cases describe the interactions between actors and the system/subsystem using a sequence of steps to achieve a goal. – Use cases shall be described in an architecture neutral manner. Identify and specify service and system requirements that are relevant for oneM2M scope, including interworking aspects to other systems Gather M2M service requirements specific to the vertical ecosystem contexts obtained from vertical industry groups and fora Conduct studies leading to deliverables pertaining the aggregation and analysis of requirements necessary for development of the M2M system according to the scope of oneM2M. Topics include (but are not limited to): Service and system Requirements – can belong to either service support or service deployment including aspects regarding deployments Ecosystem context –how the M2M system is expected to fit together with selected vertical eco- systems, including all non-M2M system components required to deploy a complete solution. Proposed ToR WG1

Responsibility Specify architecture for M2M system according to oneM2M scope Develop specifications that meet requirements and choose whether to reuse/reference existing standards and specifications or parts thereof. Coordinate M2M architecture activity with that of other oneM2M WGs as well as other specification groups and fora. Conduct studies leading to deliverables pertaining to the evolution of the M2M system. Topics include (but not limited to): Architecture – functional entities, reference points, and related message flows Interworking aspects (e.g. leveraging network capabilities as and when applicable) Evolution guidelines – to describe architectural steps that M2M systems follow in order to migrate towards using oneM2M components. Guidelines pertaining to the application of oneM2M standards in specific verticals Proposed ToR WG2

Proposal for the co-convener activities between TP1 and TP2 Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: n.a.

Introduction This section is prepared by the WG1/WG2 co- convener to initiate the discussion on how to structure the work between TP1 and TP2 It is only an initial proposal that will be adjusted based on member feedback during the calls or by to the co-conveners and the rapporteurs Slide 1 to 7 are the same slides as contribution 48 presented during TP1

8 ->15->22->29->5->12->19->26-> -Use case template -Requirements methodology -Benefits doc. calls week tasks OctoberNovember Kick-off Call Use case/ Req Use case collection/consolidation/distilling Requirements consolidation Contributions for architecture review submitted Benefits doc development Use case collection/consolidation/distilling Requirements Consolidation Architecture review Benefits doc development Comment Ad hoc meetings Technical input is to be contributed to TP2 for consideration and approval WG1/WG2 co-convened conference call structure NOTE: Use case, benefits and requirements is an ongoing TP process Tentative allocation of meeting time (will be adjusted based on feedback, contributions, and progress made). Begin architecture review discussions

8 ->15->22->29->5->12->19->26-> calls week OctoberNovember Use Case Proposed schedule for WG1/2 between TP#1 and TP#2 Reqmnt Draft TR for TP#2 consideration Arch Part 1 Benefits Doc Draft TR for TP#2 consideration Draft for TP#2 consideration These items are required outputs per oneM2M-TP R01 and -0050R01 Review for submittal to Requirements WI stream Use case and requirements contributions to TP#2 may occur throughout the period prior to Draft ready date

WG1 - TR - oneM2M Use cases collection Required for presentation to TP2 for draft approval Can still be worked on until TP3 WG1 - TS - M2M Requirements Should not be started before TP2 WG1 - TR - Benefits of oneM2M technology Required for presentation to TP2 for final approval of version 1 of the TR WG2 - TR - 1. Analysis of the architectures proposed for transfer to oneM2M Required for presentation to TP2 for final approval of this part of the TR WG2 - TR - 2. Study for the merging of architectures proposed for transfer (…) Should not be started before TP2 WG2 - TS - M2M Architecture Should not be started before TP3 Documents priorities for presentation to TP2 (per oneM2M-TP R01 and -0050R01) Legend: Priority A - Priority B - Priority C - Priority D