PUBLIC POLICY Unit - 1.1 Scope, Criteria & Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DECENTRALIZATION AND FINANCING OF SERVICES Gordana Matković Sofia, July 2007.
Advertisements

Smart regulation communication HLG AB, 7 December 2010
From Research to Advocacy
Promoting Family-Friendly Policies in the Workplace and Government
Public Consultation/Participation in an EIA Process EIA requires that, as much as possible, both technical / scientific and value issues be dealt with.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
C OUNCIL OF E UROPE F ORUM FOR THE F UTURE OF D EMOCRACY Y EREVAN, A RMENIA, O CTOBER 2010 Theme 2: Institutions and Democratic Governance Democracy.
Lecture(2) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
Analysing News Articles. Questions for Analyzing Social Issues 1. What are the social issues associated with a particular IT development? 2. How did.
TAMARA ĆAPETA JEAN MONNET PROFESSOR OF EU LAW UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB, FACULTY OF LAW 2014 New systematization of EU legal instruments in the Lisbon Treaty.
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND ETHICS (THE UGANDA EXPERIENCE) PAPER PRESENTED AT TRAINING WORKSHOP HELD AT DOCKLANDS HOTEL.
HRM Employee Participation Prof R K Singh AIMA CME.
Objective- and Strategic Analysis
Politics, Power, and Government An Economy of Influence.
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
Advocacy CAMS Gathering November 2010 Fiona Caniglia.
25-1 Chapter 1 Legal Heritage and the Digital Age.
Management of assessments and decision making: execution, facilitation, evaluation Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy (THL)
2009, The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved Participatory Budgeting Introduction to Participatory Budgeting.
Writing a Negotiation Proposal Objectives: Objectives:  To learn to write effectively as a group  To learn to write an effective solution proposal 
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
Ethics - 1 Key Definitions  Moral: “relating to principles of right and wrong”  Ethics: “the discipline of dealing with what is good and bad and with.
 Identify and explain ‘task words’  Describe the different stages in the legislative process Learning Objectives 21 February 2012.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
May 27, 2010 The Clear Language Institute Florida Amendment #7 – HJR 7231.
{ Parliament: law- making processes Chapter 4 Overview Monday 11 February 2013.
The Health Policy Process
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
UNIT 3 LAW MAKING CHAPTER 2 LAW MAKING THROUGH PARLIAMENT Part (ii) VCE Legal Studies Peter F Hughes © School 2012.
Chapter Seventeen Policymaking. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved Public Policies and Purposes A public policy is a general.
Policy Development Unit 7. 2 Policy Development l Policy: Authoritative guidelines that direct human behavior toward specific goals l Politics: Use of.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Economic Development Department on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Ahmed Moolla October.
SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST GOVERNANCE SYSTEM POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY INTERPRETATION CHURCH GOVERNANCE SEMINAR PRESENTED BY M GWALA.
Human Society and its Environment K-6 (HSIE) Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education.
PLANNING CYCLE An Overview. CONTENT Expected achievements Expected achievements Why IWRM Planning? Why IWRM Planning? Why a strategic approach? Why a.
Women Inclusion in decision making structures for public sector Tilitonse Thematic call guidance session Fannie Nthakomwa December 2015.
THE SECURITY SECTOR REVIEW PROCESS. ISSUES Understanding: -Scope: What are the elements of a SS Review? -Need: Why review the Security Sector? -Process:
Manager ethics ETHICAL DECISION MAKING MODEL Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
CONFLICT  The term, conflict refers to a situation of friction or mutually exclusive goals between 2 or more parties, such as employees and employers.
Comparative Approaches to Protection of Human Rights.
Doc.JUDr.Soňa Skulová, Ph.D. Principles of Good Governance.
Contrast between public and private purposes More than just efficiency and effectiveness Must pursue democratic values –Individualism – worth of individuals.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 3: Developing the SAP.
American and Texas Government: Policy and Politics, 10/e By Neal Tannahill 2010, 2008, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc.
A Democratic Audit Framework
C. What is a Feasibility report
DEMOCRACY CONCEPT AND ELEMENTS.
Public Policy Process Ghanashyam Bhattarai
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Health Audit outcomes of the health portfolio and health sector for the financial year October 2014.
Rational Perspectives on Decision Making Keys to Decision Making
Mainstreaming Gender in Energy Policy
Understand the principles of effective decision making
ADM 634 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
ADM 634 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
PAD 520 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
ADM 634 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
The Public Policy Process
Public Policy Process Ghanashyam Bhattarai
Participation in Government
Public Policy Management in Nepal: Context and Issues
Public Policy Management in Nepal: Context and Issues
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Defence on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year.
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Department of Correctional Services on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Solly Jiyana.
Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC POLICY Unit Scope, Criteria & Analysis

What is Public Policy? Addressing public problems. Government (representing citizens) decides to do something/or not to do something in response to public problems. Policy: - “Purposive course of action.” - Decision characterized by behavioural consistency… on whose part? Both Government & Public. Contd..

Public Policy encompasses the following: Goals: Ends to be achieved (to promote public welfare) Plans/Proposal: Means for achieving goals. Programs: Authorized means (Parliament, Govt.) Decisions: Choices/specific action to achieve goals. Policy output: Action taken by govt. to achieve goals. Policy outcome : Effects of action on society.

Government Democratic Setup Central/Federal State/Province Local/Municipality Panchayat ….. (village level) (Devolution of powers –financial, constitutional) Government – refers to institutional & political processes – public choice made through these processes. Such level of govt. may have certain institutions through which decisions are taken.

Criteria for Choice of Policy 1.Effectiveness: Technical & administrative feasibility (how expensive/cheap….is the proposal, does it provide clean energy….can it be adequately implemented?) 2. Efficiency: Cost vs. expected benefit to the society. (economic feasibility, affordability) 3. Equity: Is it equitable choice? Inclusive? Who benefits/gains? Who is allowed to participate ? Is the process open/fair? 4. Political Feasibility: How acceptable is it to: govt., opposition, public, different interest groups/stakeholders? 5. Ethically acceptable. Note: Criteria not necessarily exhaustive. Balancing act to be done. All stakeholders may not be equally happy.

6. Decision : Fractured mandate Coalition politics Incremental Policy making – - Small Steps -Slowly -Minor Amendments, if necessary -Gradual extension of a program Decisions affected by - Public opinion - Public perception - “rally ‘ - round –the –flag ‘ effect popular in USA (emphasizing patriotic feelings at the time of national/international crisis.) Any relevant situation in the Indian context?

-Interpreting policy studies -Steps for analysis Purpose of study? Objective?* Who has conducted the study? Is information sought objective? (reference to nature of problem & possible solutions!) Is information valid? (methods of validity?) Arguments put forward – logical? Convincing? All important matters covered? Policy implications laid down ? How clearly/explicitly? How persuasively? *Refer to stigliz (1986) page 94 – objectives may have political rhetoric. Therefore, look at the way how the “programs are designed & implemented than by looking at the stated objectives of the legislation”