Proposed framework for charges for generators connected to the Distribution network Please note that the contents of this presentation are proposals at.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Load Management System with Intermittent Power on the Grid Ruth Kemsley CEng MIMechE MIEE Econnect Ventures Ltd.
Advertisements

July 2003 Structure of Electricity Distribution Charges Update and Proposals Martin Crouch Director, Distribution.
CE Electric UK – Potential developments in long-term charging arrangements and IDNO charging methodologies 1 April 9, 2008 Potential developments in long-term.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
A DNO Perspective by Stephen Parker for Structure of Charges Workshop 15 July 2003.
TNSP Outputs for Use in Economic Benchmarking AER Economic Benchmarking Workshop #2 14 March 2013 Denis Lawrence and John Kain.
2015/16 changes to the winter time-of-use peak periods and tariff charge name changes.
Structure of Distribution Charges A User’s perspective David Tolley Innogy & Npower.
Licence lite – a new route to market for smaller electricity generators / suppliers Robert Tudway Decentralised Energy Project Delivery Unit Greater London.
Mexico’s initiatives with respect to Renewable Energies World Bank February 2012 Washington D.C. Alejandro Peraza-García Director General of Electricity.
THE STATUS OF POWER SECTOR REGULATION IN NEPAL THE ELECTRICITY TARIFF FIXATION COMMISSION FORMED IN 1994 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ELECTRICITY ACT OF 1993.
Retail Energy Forum Andrew Neves Central Networks - CMG Chair 2 March | Energy Networks Association.
EIUG – Wheeling Methodologies
Recent Trends in Energy Regulation IEA-FTS of Russia Workshop on Global Energy Market Scenarios Paris, 28 May 2009 Kieran McNamara Country Studies Division.
GENFLEX TARIFF AND INCOPORATION OF THE MEC INTO THE NMD RULES
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Personal budgets Care Act Outline of content  Introduction Introduction  Elements of the personal budget Elements of the personal budget  Calculating.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
About the Energy Retailers Association Peak body representing electricity and gas retailers in the national energy markets Members are.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Grid Access Unit Small and Micro Generator frame-work key focus areas Date : 18 April 2013.
Viticulture– Electricity procurement Site / company name and logo here This is an AgriFood Skills Australia Ltd project developed in partnership with Energetics.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
1 United States Agency for International Development (USAID) National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) Sponsored.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
1 27 March 2013 MYPD3 Briefing Session – Portfolio Committee on Energy.
RENEWABLE ENERY & BIOMASS COGENERATION TRAINING – KENYA BY LEWIS B. MHANGO.
G3 Update to DCMF 22nd November Significant progress made Consultation on common methodology - May Stakeholder workshop - June Summary of responses.
NETWORK TARIFFS IN LITHUANIA AISTIJA ZUBAVICIUTE National Control Commission for Prices and Energy 3 July 2006, Riga Baltic Electricity Market Mini-Forum.
1 Cost of Service A Tariff Overview A presentation by Eskom April 2010.
19 March 2010 energynetworks.org 1 PRESENTED BY Nigel Turvey Workshop on Distributed Generation Connected pre April March 2010.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
1 Bilateral Interconnection Agreement Model Presented to HAPUA Working Group 5 (ESI Services), Project 6 By Power Purchase Agreement Division Electricity.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
1 Electricity Industry – Municipal Tariff Issues and NERSA Approval Processes Compiled by Nhlanhla Ngidi.
“ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF REDUCED LOSS TRANSFORMERS: Experiences in Spain" 14 th May 2003 J.Frau Spain Session 5 – Block 1.2.
Commission For Energy Regulation Padraig Fleming Manager, Distribution & Retail 22 nd July 2004.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Presentation to Select Committee on Economic Development
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Modeling the Market Process: A Review of the Basics Chapter 2 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,
Wheeling Challenges Presentation To AMEU Tariff Committee Utility Services/Electricity Services/ 11 November 2015.
Transmission arrangements for distributed generation DCMF 9 April 2008 Pre consultation document.
Electricity Sector April Electricity sector in perspective Electrification of households is one of Government’s priority programmes The country.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
5-1 Topic 3 Revenue recognition and substance over form IAS 18 Revenue recognition Revenue is defined as the gross inflow of economic benefits (cash, receivables,
BIDDER’S CONFERENCE: Eskom Grid Connection Process and related matters Date: 16 August 2012.
Here Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Programme Bidder’s Conference 16 August 2012 Andrew Etzinger Senior General Manager Eskom.
Electricity Power Market: Competitive and Non-competitive Markets Ito Diejomaoh.
Guidelines on Transmission Tarification ERGEG Public Hearing 30. June 2005.
Transmission Pricing Webinar 12 October Agenda for Webinar Introductions Purpose Potential Areas of Change – Overview –Revenue Proposal –Business.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
New Customer Contributions for the Water Sector: Workshop 4 August 2004.
1 The Eskom price adjustment Effective 1 July 2009.
Renewables IPP frameworks for successful PPAs Dr Muriel Watt Head, Energy Policy & PV.
NERSA presentation at the PPC meeting held on 24 May 2006
Eskom presentation – Select Committee on Communications and Public Enterprises 14 June 2017 Briefing by Eskom on its tariff increase for and.
Generator tariffs and charges overview
PRESENTATION TO WHOLESALE ENERGY PROCUREMENT POSITION PAPER
Network Contracting with Generators (incl
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
Progress on the Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme
Presentation transcript:

Proposed framework for charges for generators connected to the Distribution network Please note that the contents of this presentation are proposals at this stage and are not yet approved Eskom stances

Introduction Generators and loads are both customers of the network provider Loads pay published and approved charges for the use of the network These may be explicit unbundled charges or not! There is currently no regulated framework for use-of-system charges for embedded generators (generators connected to the Distribution network) This presentation sets out a proposed framework for use of system charges

Background Some generators may sell to Eskom through approved power purchase agreements, whilst others may wish to wheel energy to third parties Eskom will allow wheeling BUT the wheeling arrangement is subject to the generator receiving its approvals to generate and trade Generators that wish to wheel energy face challenges related to the use-of- system charges. Use-of-system charges for generators selling to the Eskom have no risk associated with use-of-system charges but generators that want to wheel energy are exposed to the risk of the level and structure of these charges. There is urgent need to address these issues and propose a framework for use of system charges The proposed framework together with the Eskom wheeling policy aims to reduce barriers to entry and risk for non-Eskom generators In particular for generators that wish to wheel energy

Transactions with generators The generator will contract with the network provider to provide network services. The network provider will raise charges for these services. The generator will contract with the entity purchasing the energy through a PPA and this may be with Eskom, a third party or for own generation. If the energy is sold to a third party, the electricity bill must be adjusted for the wheeled energy through a supplementary contract. The customer will pay the standard tariffs associated with the cost of delivering the energy. All of the above transactions are separate contracts and deal with different issues. The proposed framework with deals the generator use of system charges Use of system charges for Generators Use of system charges for Generators PPA between generator and buyer PPA between generator and buyer Use of system charges for Loads Use of system charges for Loads

Wheeling charges Generators are liable for charges for the use of the network Loads are liable for charges for the use of the network The 2 are NOT linked. Generators, whether they sell energy to Eskom or wheel energy to third parties will pay equitable use-of-system charges Loads that receive wheeled energy from a non-Eskom generator or energy from Eskom will pay the equitable use of system charges A wheeling transaction is a financial adjustment for the energy not supplied by Eskom. The service provided with regard to the use of the network is independent from who owns the energy Any use-of-system benefit or cost associated with a generator’s location accrues to that generator and not to the purchaser of the energy.

Allocation of network charges between loads and generators Buys (non-Eskom) energy Meter 100 kWh 1000 kWh Loads will pay equitably for the network usage Load B Load A Generator A Generator B Meter Generators will pay equitably for the network usage Sum of all load and generator network charges = Distribution revenue requirement  Generator R/kVA network charge  Generator R/kVA network charge  Load R/kVA network charge  Load R/kVA network charge Load  R/kVA network charge

Use of system charges for embedded generators It is significantly more complex to determine network charges for generators connected to a distribution network and this is a challenge for distributors everywhere in the world. What needs to be resolved is how to make the situation fair, transparent and predictable. A framework must be developed on use-of-system charges for all embedded generators Level the playing field for generators selling energy to Eskom and generators selling energy to third parties without resorting to special pricing arrangements. As there are not sufficient generators connected to the Distribution network on which to calculate network charges, a theoretical, practical and simple to apply approach is proposed. Based on the research and inputs from stakeholders, the following are considered potential options regarding network charges (all would require NERSA framework and approval):

Options considered/recommended

Proposed framework for Generator use of system charges (GUoS) The use-of-system charges will comprise, network charges, network charge rebate, reliability services charges (same as criteria for loads) and service and administration charges (same as criteria for loads). The network charge will comprise A HV R/kVA tariff network charge (>66kV < 132 KV) using the average cost- reflective distribution network costs as currently calculated determined for loads, based on the maximum export capacity. This charge will increase at a given indexed value. The HV network charges are rebated Based on energy produced based on the standard tariff loss factors, per transmission zone and voltage at the base WEPS/Megaflex energy rates (the rate excluding losses and reliability services), Not rebated beyond extinction. For medium voltage (<66 KV – mainly 11 and 22 kV) connected generators, no network charges to be raised The rebate scheme to be revaluated in the future, but it is proposed that all generators that connect in the next 5 years will remain on the rebate scheme until termination.

Network charge rebate The rebate is based on the reduction of (technical) losses to Eskom The generator’s network charge is reduced by a c/kWh rebate based on the amount of energy produced by the generator. Justified by assumed reduction of cost of losses on the Distribution network. Cost of losses is costs calculated as c/kWh energy rates at standard tariff loss factors The rebate incentivises generators: That have higher load factors That are located in areas with high loss factors While the rebate approach provides a signal for the losses benefit - it is not cost reflective, therefore The rebate should be never be beyond extinction. The rebate should not be applied to the service, administration and reliability service charges. Network charge rebate =  {Delivered energy t x (distribution loss factor V x transmission loss factor Z -1) x P t } Where: V = at the relevant voltage level Z= transmission zone and t = the appropriate peak, standard or off peak time period and P t = Megaflex energy price excluding losses and reliability services for each PSO time period.

Cost reflective network charges Urban network charge Indicative cost reflective network cost per KVA

Example

Based on peak, standard and off-peak generation profile Based on peak, standard and off-peak generation profile The higher the load factor, the greater the rebate. At a load factor of 60%, the network charge is fully rebated.

Connection Charges Generators will pay the cost of dedicated incremental costs associated with the connection as an upfront connection charge. Where there are upstream costs, these will not be charged directly to the customer, but a signal for actual upstream cost will be given by raising an early termination guarantee equal to the value of an appropriate share of upstream costs.

Proposed framework continued When the Distribution network is unavailable, due to Eskom-induced supply interruptions, Eskom's forced outages (unplanned load shedding events) and Force Majeure a demand exemption will be given on the network charge for the period of unavailability. An indicative forward price curve is provided to enable better estimation of use-of-system charges and rebates. For co-generators (both importer and exporter of energy), the network use-of-system charges are based on the higher of import (load) or export (generator) network charges

Summary of proposed framework 1.Generators use-of-system charges will comprise, connection charges, network charges, network charge rebate, reliability services charges (same as criteria for loads) and service and administration charges (same as criteria for loads). 2.Connection charges: a.Generators will pay the cost of dedicated incremental costs associated with the connection as an upfront connection charge. Where there are upstream costs, these will not be charged directly to the customer, but to mitigate the risk of stranded assets in the event of early termination, a signal for actual upstream cost will be given by raising an early termination guarantee equal to the value of an appropriate share of upstream costs. 3.Network charges a.A R/kVA tariff network charge will be raised for generators connected at high voltage (>66kV <132 KV) using the average cost-reflective distribution network costs as currently calculated determined for loads, based on the maximum export capacity. This charge will increase at a given indexed value. b.The HV network charges will be rebated on energy produced based on the standard tariff loss factors, per transmission zone and voltage at the Megaflex energy rates[1] excluding losses and reliability services, but not beyond extinction.[1] c.The rebate scheme to be revaluated in the future, but it is proposed that all generators that connect in the next 5 years will remain on the rebate scheme until termination. d.For medium voltage (11 and 22 kV) connected generators, no network charges to be raised. 4.General: a.When the Distribution network is unavailable, due to Eskom-induced supply interruptions, Eskom's forced outages (unplanned load shedding events) and Force Majeure a demand exemption will be given on the network charge for the period of unavailability. b.An indicative forward price curve is provided to enable better estimation of use-of-system charges and rebates. c.For co-generators (both importer and exporter of energy), the network use-of-system charges are based on the higher of import (load) or export (generator) network charges.

Conclusion Framework will be submitted to NERSA once approved within Eskom The eventual framework implemented will be that finalised and approved by NERSA Once approved, Eskom will calculate and submit rates for approval