Multistate models UF 2015. Outline  Description of the model  Data structure and types of analyses  Multistate with 2 and 3 states  Assumptions 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multilevel Event History Modelling of Birth Intervals
Advertisements

MARK RECAPTURE Lab 10 Fall Why?  We have 4 goals as managers of wildlife  Increase a population  Decrease a population  Maintain a population.
Part II – TIME SERIES ANALYSIS C3 Exponential Smoothing Methods © Angel A. Juan & Carles Serrat - UPC 2007/2008.
The Problem with Parameter Redundancy Diana Cole, University of Kent.
Parameter Redundancy and Identifiability in Ecological Models Diana Cole, University of Kent.
Detecting Parameter Redundancy in Complex Ecological Models Diana Cole and Byron Morgan University of Kent.
Maximum likelihood estimates What are they and why do we care? Relationship to AIC and other model selection criteria.
Species interaction models. Goal Determine whether a site is occupied by two different species and if they affect each others' detection and occupancy.
Resampling techniques Why resampling? Jacknife Cross-validation Bootstrap Examples of application of bootstrap.
Exact Computation of Coalescent Likelihood under the Infinite Sites Model Yufeng Wu University of Connecticut ISBRA
Lecture 5: Learning models using EM
Chapter 4 Multiple Regression.
Age and Stage Structure
Clustering.
Hui-Hua Lee 1, Kevin R. Piner 1, Mark N. Maunder 2 Evaluation of traditional versus conditional fitting of von Bertalanffy growth functions 1 NOAA Fisheries,
OPEN CAPTURE-RECAPTURE
CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE
Inferences in Regression and Correlation Analysis Ayona Chatterjee Spring 2008 Math 4803/5803.
Adding individual random effects results in models that are no longer parameter redundant Diana Cole, University of Kent Rémi Choquet, Centre d'Ecologie.
Closed Vs. Open Population Models Mark L. Taper Department of Ecology Montana State University.
Chapter 4 analysis of variance (ANOVA). Section 1 the basic idea and condition of application.
Danila Filipponi Simonetta Cozzi ISTAT, Italy Outlier Identification Procedures for Contingency Tables in Longitudinal Data Roma,8-11 July 2008.
Dependencies Complex Data in Meta-analysis. Common Dependencies Independent subgroups within a study (nested in lab?) Multiple outcomes on the same people.
Integrating archival tag data into stock assessment models.
BRIEF REVIEW OF STATISTICAL CONCEPTS AND METHODS.
Methods for Estimating Defects Catherine V. Stringfellow Mathematics and Computer Science Department New Mexico Highlands University October 20, 2000.
Adjusting Radio-Telemetry Detection Data for Premature Tag-Failure L. Cowen and C.J. Schwarz Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser.
Another look at Adjusting Radio-Telemetry Data for Tag-Failure L. Cowen and C.J. Schwarz Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University,
BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO ROBUST DESIGN CAPTURE-RECAPTURE.
Learning Sequence Motifs Using Expectation Maximization (EM) and Gibbs Sampling BMI/CS 776 Mark Craven
Population dynamics of aquatic top predators: effects of harvesting regimes and environmental factors Project leader: Professor Nils Chr. Stenseth Post-doc:
Markov Decision Process (MDP)
Matrix Models for Population Management & Conservation March 2014 Lecture 10 Uncertainty, Process Variance, and Retrospective Perturbation Analysis.
Estimation of Animal Abundance and Density Miscellaneous Observation- Based Estimation Methods 5.2.
Estimation of Vital Rates: Use of Index Statistics? Relevance of Detection Probability.
Capture-recapture Models for Open Populations “Single-age Models” 6.13 UF-2015.
Chapter 8 Estimating Population Size: Capture-Recapture Model Examples: Estimating number of blue whales Estimating number of fish in a lake Estimating.
Pollock’s Robust Design: Model Extensions. Estimation of Temporary Emigration Temporary Emigration: = individual emigrated from study area, but only temporarily.
 1 Species Richness 5.19 UF Community-level Studies Many community-level studies collect occupancy-type data (species lists). Imperfect detection.
Pollock’s Robust Design: Extensions II. Quick overview 1.Separation of Recruitment Components in a single patch context (Source-Sink) 2.Separation of.
Spatially Explicit Capture-recapture Models for Density Estimation 5.11 UF-2015.
Hypothesis Testing. Statistical Inference – dealing with parameter and model uncertainty  Confidence Intervals (credible intervals)  Hypothesis Tests.
Nonparametric Statistics
K-Sample Closed Capture-recapture Models UF 2015.
Additional multistate model applications. Unobservable States single observable state, single unobservable state.
Single Season Occupancy Modeling 5.13 UF Occupancy Modeling State variable is proportion of patches that is occupied by a species of interest.
1 Occupancy models extension: Species Co-occurrence.
 Multi-state Occupancy. Multiple Occupancy States Rather than just presence/absence of the species at a sampling unit, ‘occupancy’ could be categorized.
Capture-recapture Models for Open Populations Multiple Ages.
Review. Common probability distributions Discrete: binomial, Poisson, negative binomial, multinomial Continuous: normal, lognormal, beta, gamma, (negative.
Closed Capture-Recapture Models 2 Sample Model Outline: Model description/ data structure Encounter history Estimators Assumptions and study design.
Single Season Study Design. 2 Points for consideration Don’t forget; why, what and how. A well designed study will:  highlight gaps in current knowledge.
Exposure Prediction and Measurement Error in Air Pollution and Health Studies Lianne Sheppard Adam A. Szpiro, Sun-Young Kim University of Washington CMAS.
 Occupancy Model Extensions. Number of Patches or Sample Units Unknown, Single Season So far have assumed the number of sampling units in the population.
Multi-state Occupancy. Multiple Occupancy States Rather than just presence/absence of the species at a sampling unit, ‘occupancy’ could be categorized.
Comparing survival estimates from a radio-tag mark-recapture study. L. Cowen and C.J. Schwarz Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Simon Fraser.
Prediction and Missing Data. Summarising Distributions ● Models are often large and complex ● Often only interested in some parameters – e.g. not so interested.
Capture-recapture Models for Open Populations Abundance, Recruitment and Growth Rate Modeling 6.15 UF-2015.
Unsupervised Learning Part 2. Topics How to determine the K in K-means? Hierarchical clustering Soft clustering with Gaussian mixture models Expectation-Maximization.
Nonparametric Statistics
If we can reduce our desire,
Classification of unlabeled data:
Nonparametric Statistics
Multistate models Lecture 10.
Unsupervised Learning II: Soft Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Models
Estimating mean abundance from repeated presence-absence surveys
If we can reduce our desire,
Wildlife Population Analysis
Wildlife Population Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Multistate models UF 2015

Outline  Description of the model  Data structure and types of analyses  Multistate with 2 and 3 states  Assumptions  GOF

Multistate Models  First developed by Arnason (1972, 1973) and almost completely ignored  Developed independently by Hestbeck et al. (1991)  Modern development: Brownie et al. (1993), Schwarz et al. (1993) Reviews by Lebreton et al. (2002, J. Appl. Stat), Kendall and Nichols (2004, Condor), Kendall (2004, Animal Biodiversity & Conservation)

Multistate Models: Data Structure  Open capture-recapture study  At each capture, animals are categorized by “state” Location (Hestbeck et al. 1991) Size class (Nichols et al. 1992) Breeding state (Nichols et al. 1994) Disease state (Jennelle et al., 2007)  State of an animal may change from 1 period to the next

Multistate Models: Capture History Data  Capture history: no longer adequate to use just 1’s and 0’s  0 still denotes no capture  Assign a positive number or letter to each state e.g., with 3 states: 1, 2, 3  Example: 3-site system Possible histories: 10310, 00201

Multistate Models: Notation   t rs = probability that animal in state r at sample period t is alive in state s at sample period t+1  p t r = probability that animal in state r at sample period t is captured

Multistate Models 3 states

Multistate Models: Capture History Expectations AAB:

Multistate Models: Capture History Expectations

Multistate Models: Decomposition of  t rs  Sometimes reasonable and desirable to decompose  t rs into survival and movement components:  S t r = probability that animal in state r at period t survives until period t+1   t rs = probability that animal in state r at period t and alive at period t+1, is in state s at t+1

Multistate Models 3 states

Parameter Estimation  Data: numbers of new releases each period and number of animals with each capture history  Model: probability structure for each capture history  Maximum likelihood (e.g., programs MARK, MSSURVIV, MSURGE)

Metapopulation model

Evaluation of hypotheses

No diseaseDisease S i N  i ND S i D  i DN Disease States

Capture Histories (k = 3 years)  NNN  0BN  Survival depends on where you start.  Transition “ “ “ “ “  Capture depends on where you end up

B N History B0B (2 possibilities) 1 2 B N 1 2

Capture Histories (k = 3 years) NNN 0BN B0B

Multistate model assumptions  Transition from a given state must sum to 1

Multinomial logit transformation for 3 states  What about 2 states?

Multistate model assumptions  Within state, age, sex, etc., all animals equally likely to survive, move to given location, be detected  Marks do not affect survival or movement, are not lost, are recorded correctly  Each animal acts independently with respect to survival, movement, detection  Each state observable  State is correctly assigned each time

Multistate model assumptions   t rs = probability that animal in state r at period t and alive at period t+1, is in state s at t+1, given that alive at t+1. In other words if in state A at t, ind. survive at rate S A (e.g., not S B ). Then (move or stay) at t+1 to another state (e.g., B, or the same [A]): “survive and then move” “Move and then survive”

Multistate model assumptions  Transition probabilities do not depend on previous state S at t does not depend on S at t-1  Nichols et al. developed a “memory model” that relaxes this assumption S at t depends on S at t-1  MS-Surviv

Multistate models: why bother?  Transitions might be interesting biologically  Reduces heterogeneity in survival or capture probability by partitioning animals.

Multi-site model tools  MSSURVIV (J. Hines) Includes memory model Can define which movement probability by subtraction Can choose between estimating survival and transition separately or together  MARK (G. White) Can define which movement probability by subtraction Multinomial logit transformation Can include individual and group covariates (e.g., weight, age, climatological)  MSURGE (Choquet et al.) GOF test (UCARE) Powerful model specification feature

GOF testing  UCARE  Median c-hat

Local minima  Starting values  Simple models  Simulated annealing  MCMC: R-hat

MCMC

What you should know…  Parameters of interest  Assumptions  Example of applications  GOF