Carpe Diem Phase II Making the Case. Jot down 3 questions that you have related to Phase II (the one’s that you carried into the room today)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Investing in the future Michael Bright Senior Science Manager RESEARCH METHODS PROGRAMME.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research RII Track-3: Building Diverse Communities May 21, 2013 Jeanne Small & Uma Venkateswaran 1.
Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.
Research Assessment Exercise 2006 University Grants Committee.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
First in the World 2015 Grant Competition Introductory Webinar April
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Distributed Intelligence, Lifelong Learning, & Innovative Media: Foundations for Graduate Education Sharon Derry, University of Wisconsin-Madison Gerhard.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR) EHR Core Research Program (ECR) Program Announcement: NSF
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
Welcome CE21 PI and STEM-C Partnerships Community Meeting Day 2 Orlando, FL.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
National Science Foundation 1 The New CCLI Program, and other Funding Opportunities for Undergraduate Geoscience Education Jeffrey Ryan Program Director.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Enhancements University of Manitoba February 14, 2012.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
FY Division of Human Resources Development Combined COV COV PRESENTATION TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 7, 2014.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Agenda Setting Input and Status Agenda Setting Input and Status.
CBR 101 An Introduction to Community Based Research.
National Science Foundation ADVANCE Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Program Overview (NSF ) Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:
The Common Core State Standards Initiative Alisa Chapman, University of North Carolina October 24, 2013.
Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
KATEWINTEREVALUATION.com Education Research 101 A Beginner’s Guide for S STEM Principal Investigators.
Introduction of the Curriculum for Prospective NHTI Faculty NHTI Coordinating Committee Association of College & University Housing Officers – International.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
GEO-AGEP webinar, August 2, 2012 Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort in K-16 Teaching and Learning James E. Hamos Directorate for Education & Human.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Jody Chase, Tribal Colleges and Universities Program Sylvia James, Innovative Technology Experiences.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
NSF Broadening Participation in Computing Alliances (BPC-A) Introduction to Common Core Indicators of Breadth and Depth of Participation Daryl E. Chubin,
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Building Bridges: Embedding outcome evaluation in national and state TA delivery Ella Taylor Diane Haynes John Killoran Sarah Beaird August 1, 2006.
S L I D E 0 An Introduction to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and its Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) Program.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Writing More Effective IUSE-EHR Proposals Jeff Ryan, University of South Florida Jill Singer, SUNY Buffalo State Earth Educators’ Rendezvous July 14, 2015.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
NSF INCLUDES “NSF should implement a bold new initiative, focused on broadening participation of underrepresented groups in STEM, similar in concept.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Using Friendly Controversy
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
XXXX Partnership Kickoff Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Carpe Diem Phase II Making the Case

Jot down 3 questions that you have related to Phase II (the one’s that you carried into the room today)

What is a Phase II Project?

The long version… Phase II Partnerships will concentrate on analysis, adaptation, dissemination and use of existing innovative practices developed through prior MSP support. A Phase II Partnership proposal will describe in detail why the investment of additional resources and time will result in significant progress towards long lasting improvement in K-12 mathematics and/or science education. Proposals will provide documented evidence-based outcomes demonstrating the successes and results produced through prior MSP support. In the proposal for Phase II support, an existing Partnership must describe how it will both deepen and/or extend project impact by focusing its efforts in one or a limited number of areas of emphasis carried out during the original award. Of particular interest are focused efforts that take successful innovative approaches and bring them to scale while maintaining quality and impact. The intent is that focused efforts carry out the necessary research and evaluation to advance knowledge and understanding of both the factors that contribute to success and the context in which the particular strategy is successful. A viable plan to disseminate evidence-based findings must be incorporated.

…continued All proposals for Phase II Partnerships must present one or more research questions, in conjunction with appropriate research methodologies, to be carried out in the course of the new award. In addition, all Phase II proposals must include a detailed Evaluation Plan with benchmarks and objective measures that will demonstrate results of the various components of the project. These proposals must include plans to continue longitudinal analyses on aspects of the prior work and must continue to contribute data to the MSP Management Information System. As Phase II Partnership projects are, by definition, designed to narrow and intensify the focus of the original work, the members that comprise the ongoing Partnership may change. However, the partners in Phase II must include some, but not necessarily all, of the original partners and the rationale for the new Partnership should be articulated. As with all MSP Partnerships, STEM disciplinary faculty must be substantively involved in Phase II work in mathematics and/or science. In addition, as a means of dissemination and broadening participation, Phase II Partnerships are encouraged to include community colleges and/or minority-serving institutions as new higher education partners.

What Makes for a Competitive Phase II Proposal?

Fill in the blanks With a question or comment each phrase raises for you

Research Agenda & Design Rigorous Research Component State Research Questions – Allow for warranted claims – Project activities contribute to measured outcomes Specify Methodology Name Researchers In addition to Evaluation Design – beyond documentation of implementation to the further generation of evidence.

Innovation? Write your definition

Innovation The introduction of something new A new idea, method, or device Ideas applied successfully in practice that bring about a desired change Unique Ground-breaking Not a start/stop process but an evolving process that needs constant attention ???

Innovation? Make the Case!

Scaling-Up? Write your definition

Scaling-Up Transition from what is idiosyncratic to broad, effective implementation across a large and diverse system Transferring into many settings an intervention successful in another place or setting while maintaining quality and effectiveness The ability to maintain performance, usefulness, or usability regardless of expansion from concentration in a local area to a more distributed setting The ability to enhance the system by adding new functionality at minimal effort ???

Scaling-Up? Make the Case!

Are you Making the Case?

NO HOLDS BARRED — WHAT QUESTIONS DID YOU WALK IN THE ROOM WITH THAT WE HAVE NOT ADDRESSED?

Please Join Us for Refreshments DO—Enjoy refreshments DON’T—Enjoy Program Officers They’re supposed to be meeting with NEW projects