Continuous Improvement Priority Schools CIPS. Passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Passage 2001 2014 All Students Meet Standards Adequate Yearly Progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

The No Child Left Behind Act and Title 1 Schools What Parents Should Know and Do.
AYP UPDATE Rachelle Tome Maine Department of Education
Hickman Mills C-1 Parent University: AYP, APR, Accreditation….what does it all mean? Presented by: Casey Klapmeyer.
Events that led to NCLB Allows all children to receive a quality education Gives higher standards and greater accountability Teachers teach things that.
August 25, 2011 Ronald Mackin, Principal Raquel Young, Assistant Principal Nina Kelley, Instructional Facilitator.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
Educational Policies Present Zachary Schrage.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
Educational Psychology by Anita Woolfolk
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
The New York State Assessment System and LEP/ELLs: An Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting OBE-FLS 2007.
No Child Left Behind, Adequate Yearly Progress Update Maine Department of Education Wednesday, October 15, 2003 ATM Session—3:00-4:30 p.m.
CRESST / U C L A Slide 1, Implementing No Child Left Behind: Assessment Issues Joan L. Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
AYP: Are You Perfect? By: Jalynn Speck, Linda Oller, and Jill Polsley.
Using School Climate Surveys to Categorize Schools and Examine Relationships with School Achievement Christine DiStefano, Diane M. Monrad, R.J. May, Patricia.
What ACCESS, the New Virginia Test for LEP Students, Means for School Districts LEP Caucus Presentation July 2008.
No Child Left Behind and School Improvement Ivana Beeman Southern Utah University.
State Initiatives in Bilingual/ESL Education Presenters: Raquel Sinai, Bilingual/ESL Coordinator Lori Ramella, Bilingual/ESL Education Specialist Ericka.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Daniel H. Holloway Senior at Old Dominion University Coordinator of Database Services Gloucester County Public Schools.
WHAT HAPPENS WITH AYP NOW THAT THE GOALS ARE 100% FOR READING AND MATH? Diane Stuehmer, Federal Programs Administrator January 20, 2015.
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Governor Thomas Johnson High School Analysis of 2008 AYP Scores.
Annual Student Performance Report September
School-Wide Improvement Plan John Mendes, Ed.D. Objective Increase student reading performance Increase ISAT test scores Increase student oral reading.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Jill Daignault ED 613 Unit III Assignment.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Homer High School Where are we? Where are we going? When will it be over? Will we make it?
Statewide Networks of Middle Level Education Liaisons and Support Schools Friday, May 19, :30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. The New York State Education Department.
NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Toll Middle School Title I Parent Meeting August 27, 2015.
Child Development COURSE WORK The Child Study The main stages and what happens when.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Stakeholder Input Title I Administrative Meeting: May 19, 2016.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Continuous Improvement Priority Schools CIPS

Passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Passage All Students Meet Standards Adequate Yearly Progress AYP

Based on Performance Data Whole School Performance Sub-Group Performance

CIPS Status Short- Term Long-Term

Short Term Meet the Standard Partially Meet the Standard MEA Scores March 2009 Results in July NECAP – Currently being administered Results in January

Long Term EECS develops a CIPS goal plan in cooperation with assigned state team and MDOE (by December, 2009) Plan is developed by in-school team consisting of administrators, parent(s), teachers –based on relevant data Plan must focus on providing professional development in identified area