Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Establishment of the Environment Quality Standard for Water and Strengthening of Regional and District Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu Review of priority substances under the WFD Chemicals and Water Workshop European Environment Agency Copenhagen 6-7 December 2010 Helen.
Advertisements

Page 1 Warsaw, Poland January 18-20, 2006 Dana Lapešová BCRC Bratislava, Slovakia BASEL CONVENTION REGIONAL CENTRE BRATISLAVA, SLOVAK REPUBLIC Difficulties.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
Industrial Pollution Control - Harmonization and Implementation in Bulgaria Slavitza Dobreva Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria Final Seminar.
Law approximation and implementation in Hungary Ministry for Environment Department of Integrated Pollution Control Nicosia, May 2001 Andrea Nám, desk.
RVF - The Swedish Association of Waste Management Gunnel Klingberg, RVF 2004 Waste Management Legislation In EU Gunnel Klingberg legal adviser RVF.
Nanotechnology: an integrated product policy approach Rosalind Malcolm Professor of Law School of Law University of Surrey UK.
Italian Committee of United Cities (CICU) PHARE - twinning Project SK02/IB/EN01 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute PRP as a tool for: Reduce overall.
Visual Summary of the Core Courses in Env Resource Management & Pollution Prevention (ERM&P2) Env Studies Dept, DeAnza College ERM: Efficient & sustainable.
Experience of the Slovak Republic European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation.
Market Surveillance in Republic of Turkey on Medical Devices Meral YILMAZ – Osman ARSLAN Ministry of Health Directorate General for Curative Services.
GLP & Quality Assurance
Presentation 4: How can I know if nanomaterials are used in my workplace?
Commission’s Communication A renewed vision for the pharmaceutical sector Peter Korytár European Commission – DG Environment Uppsala, 11 November 2009.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
Activities of MARS WP.6 UNECE. Activities of the UNECE „MARS“ Group by Mr. Arpád Gonda President of SOSMT, Bratislava Geneva, 24 – 26 October 2005.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
1 Permitting of industrial facilities in Croatia.
Italian Committee of United Cities (CICU) PHARE - twinning Project SK02/IB/EN01 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Dr. Piero Carlo Frigerio FinPiemonte.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
1 ASPECTS REGARDING PLANNING AND REPORTING RELATED TO RECOMMENDATION 331/2001/EC ON MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
Office of the President Office of the Chief of Staff Secretariat of Environment and Sustainable Development.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
Water Quality and Training P.Lauriola St tem Epidemiologia Ambientale Arpa Emilia-Romagna.
Strengths and weaknesses of the permitting system and enforcement process in RIEW – Veliko Turnovo Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water - Veliko.
Twinning project ENEA – ENforcing Environmental Acquis Skopje, 19 th of November, 2015.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
Participants Q.1: Which of these categories describes your work best? 1.Work on sustainable development regarding pharmaceuticals mainly at national level.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Italian Committee of United Cities (CICU) PHARE - twinning Project SK02/IB/EN01 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Amendment of Pollution Reduction Programme.
Environmental Aspects Focal Area Summary Second Meeting of the Global Alliance to Eliminate Lead Paint Bangkok, Thailand, 9-11 July 2012.
1. Outline 2 “Pre-Harmonization” Groundwater Management Perspectives EU’s DirectivesWhy Are the New Approaches Needed? Turkey’s Institutional Structure:
1. Outline 2 Earlier Groundwater Management Approaches of Turkey European Union: An Example for Groundwater Management Turkey Current Situation and Distances.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
Organized under UNESCO-IHP International Initiative on Water Quality (IIWQ) Hosted by Federal Institute of Hydrology, Germany International Centre for.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
TAIEX Workshop on Agricultural Advisory Services in the EU Kiev, Ukraine February 2016 Peculiarities of legal regulation of the advisory service.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Participatory Environmental Governance : Role of Communities in Europe and Asia Jona Razzaque Reader in Law Bristol Law School, UWE, Bristol, UK Bristol.
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
ROMANIA THE TRANSPOSED U.E. LEGISLATION ON GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
Angeliki Tsatsou Dritsa Chemist, Key Expert 2 Zagreb June 2011
66 items – 70% of circulated products
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Groundwater legislative framework
Stefan Berggren Marine and Water director, Sweden
EU REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CONTAMINATED LAND
The EU WATER POLICY.
Review of the WFD priority substances list
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Bruxelles 17 october-2007 WG E Meeting
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Stefan Berggren Marine and Water director, Sweden
Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit
Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
Part I.
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
Presentation transcript:

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Establishment of the Environment Quality Standard for Water and Strengthening of Regional and District Environment Offices for Implementation of water controls and monitoring Environmental Quality Standards for dangerous substances relevant for the Slovak Republic Bruno Pennelli, Supreme Health Istitution– Rome (IT)

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Situation in the end of the previous twinning project SK02/IB/EN/01 UNIVERSE OF CHEMICALS: 652 SUBSTANCES (307 chemicals and 345 pesticides) Assessment of relevance for chemicals 12 relevant pesticides 47 relevant chemicals (of which, 20 without point source assessed) 80 industrial sites involved Assessment of relevance for pesticides

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Relevant hazardous substances, without EQS ButylhydroxytoluenDesmedipham BenzensulfonamidDibutylphthalate benzo(b)fluoratenDiphenylamin BenztiazoleEthofumesate benzo(g,h,i)pyrelenFenantren difenyl (fenylbenzen)Glyposate bisphenol AMPCA ClopyralidPendimethalin Styren

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Recent EU-Developments: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC Implementation of Dir. 2000/60 EC, in consideration of pollution prevention and control with regard to chemicals in surface waters; Definition of 41 EQS: from that 33 priority substances plus further 8 substances (13 “priority hazardous substances” are included); These 41 EQS derive from Risk Assessment and their reference values are to be respected until 2015.

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Resulting situation : 15 EQS lacking ButylhydroxytoluenDesmedipham BenzensulfonamidDibutylphthalate benzo(b)fluoratenDiphenylamin BenztiazoleEthofumesate benzo(g,h,i)pyrelenFenantren difenyl (fenylbenzen)Glyposate bisphenol AMPCA ClopyralidPendimethalin Styren Verification of compliance with regard to EQS established Slovak Republic

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Operative program 1.Search for EQS 2.Search for ecotoxicological data 3.Analysis

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Operative program: Search for EQS Do there exist EQS set by EU Member States with reference to 15 substances relevant to Slovak Republic? Do these EQS derive „through“ a Risk Assessment, in line with Dir. 93/67/EEC and/or 91/414/EEC? Does there exist compliance with requirements of Dir. 2000/60 EC? Insert into database

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Operative program: search for ecotoxicological data Do there exist ecotoxicological studies regarding the substances stil lacking EQS? Are the analysis within GPL? Are these tests in line with relevant framework directive (OECD, USEPA, ISO)? Is this quantity of information sufficient in order to establish the EQS in line with Dir. 2000/60 EC? Insert into database

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Operative program: analysis - tender Economic aspects The number of EQS which shall derive from analysis; Level of analysis: acqute (low cost) or cronical toxicity (ecological significance)?

Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Operative program: analysis - tender Technical aspects Ecotoxicological analysis shall be done in accreditated laboratories GPL in order to get their applicability in the frame of legal norms and to be in line with OECD Directive and/or equivalent regulations; research in the market focused on tecnical products containing hazardous substances to be analyzed; Does there exist analytical methods to verify nominal/measured values? If methods missing, then the radioisotopic labeling and determination of radioactivity will be necessary.