2012 Adequate Yearly Progress Preliminary Answers & other Important Information…

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress. TEA-USDE Flexibility Agreement

Advertisements

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Texas Assessment Conference December 1-3, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency TI ESC Meeting September 18, AYP Update.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN November 17, 2011 Shannon Housson TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN April 23, 2009 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN November 18, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011 Orange Grove Elementary Accountability Report.

Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.

1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.

Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

© 2011 Region XIII System Support Team Bolding Blasting… into the future … STAAR.

STAAR & Accountability 2012 End of Course AYP Grades 3-8 Performance Standards State Accountability.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP). AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS  Reading/ELA  Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate  Participation: 95% Participating.

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.

1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Region 7 September 16, Region 7 State TEKS PD June 1 to August 31, 2010 Copyright 2009 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.

Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.

ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE State and Federal Systems TSNAP Not-So-New Coordinator’s Academy September 24, 2008 Sandra Poth, Northside ISD.

AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.

State & AYP Accountability Ratings Highlights District Ratings by Rating Category (including Charter Operators) ACCOUNTABILITY RATING 2009 CountPercent.

2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.

Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.

HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.

What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

10/21/20151 STATE ASSESSMENTS UPDATE Goose Creek CISD Principal Academy August 6, 2012.

Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.

Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.

Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)

School Year Assessment Updates State Assessment Updates Coordinator Training November

NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December

Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”

Federal Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Meeting | March 5, 2012 Texas.

Accountability Update Ty

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.

1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.

Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Texas State Accountability

2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results

STAAR 3-8 Regional Performance

T = Texas A = Academic P = Performance R = Report

Presentation transcript:

2012 Adequate Yearly Progress Preliminary Answers & other Important Information…

Public release of 2012 Preliminary AYP/SIP Statuses Appeals & Federal Cap Exceptions Deadline Final AYP Status Release TAKS to STAAR Bridge Study Campus Priority List Deadline AYP 2012: Timeline August 8th September 7th December 2012 June/July 2012

AYP: Performance Standards % Proficient Math Reading % TAKSSTAAR BRIDGE

2012 AYP: The Bridge Study, What? Enrolled GradesAssessment Performance Standard Planned for AYP Calculations Grades 3-8 STAAR (English & Spanish) reading and mathematics* Bridged to TAKS Met Standard STAAR Modified reading and mathematics Bridged to TAKS-Modified Met Standard STAAR Alternate reading and mathematics Bridged to TAKS-Alt Met Standard STAAR EOC English I reading and Algebra I* Bridged to TAKS Met Standard for grade 9 reading and mathematics STAAR Modified EOC English I reading and Algebra I No Standard Available – performance results not included in AYP. Students counted as participants only. STAAR EOC English II reading, Geometry and Algebra II* STAAR Phase-in Standard** STAAR Modified EOC English II reading and Geometry Not operational / results not included in AYP

2012 AYP: Yep, High Schools have a “Bridge” too… Enrolled GradesAssessment Performance Standard Planned for AYP Calculations Grade 10 TAKS and TAKS (Accommodated) ELA and mathematics* TAKS Met Standard TAKS-Modified ELA and mathematics* TAKS-Modified Met Standard STAAR Alternate EOC English I and Algebra I Bridged to TAKS-Alt Met Standard for grade 9 reading and mathematics STAAR Alternate EOC English II and Geometry Bridged to TAKS-Alt Met Standard for grade 10 reading and mathematics

AYP 2012: Other Standards  Elementary/Middle/Junior High Schools: 95% Participation Rate 90% Attendance Rate (All Students only)  Secondary Schools: 95% Participation Rate 75% Graduation Rate

2012 Preliminary Math Performance Across our Region 87% All St 75% 82% 79% 72% 93% 79% HispAfr AmWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP

Math Performance– Across our Region 85% All Students 86% 87% A 3 year look…

Math Performance– Across our Region 74% African American 74% 75% A 3 year look…

Math Performance– Across our Region 79% Hispanic 81% 82% A 3 year look…

Math Performance– Across our Region 92% White 93% A 3 year look…

Math Performance– Across our Region 77% Economically disadvantaged 78% 79% A 3 year look…

Math Performance– Across our Region 63% Special Education 63% 72% A 3 year look…

Math Performance– Across our Region 74% Limited English Proficient 78% 79% A 3 year look…

90% All St 84% 86% 84% 78% 96% 79% HispAfr AmWhiteEco DisSp EdLEP 2012 Preliminary Reading Performance Across our Region

Reading Performance– Across our Region 89% All Students 89% 90% A 3 year look…

Reading Performance– Across our Region 83% African American 81% 84% A 3 year look…

Reading Performance– Across our Region 83% Hispanic 84% 86% A 3 year look…

Reading Performance– Across our Region 95% White 95% 96% A 3 year look…

Reading Performance– Across our Region 81% Economically disadvantaged 82% 84% A 3 year look…

Reading Performance– Across our Region 68% Special Education 67% 78% A 3 year look…

Reading Performance– Across our Region 74% Limited English Proficient 76% 79% A 3 year look…

Regional Performance Workbooks: Where can you find them?

On a slightly different note: 2012 AEIS Reports  Will only report TAKs information in Section I  Campuses without TAKS information will receive Section II only

Accountability Feedback: Here’s your chance!

Questions? More Information? Kimberly Berry System Support Team, Region XIII