Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Advertisements

Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Finite-Frequency Resolution Limits of Traveltime Tomography for Smoothly Varying Velocity Models Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
MULTIPLE PREDICTION & ATTENUATION Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb Feb
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Finite-Frequency Resolution Limits of Traveltime Tomography for Smoothly Varying Velocity Models Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
1 Interferometric Interpolation and Extrapolation of Sparse OBS and SSP Data Shuqian Dong and G.T.Schuster.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Virtual Source Imaging vs Interferometric Imaging Gerard T. Schuster, Andrey Bakulin and Rodney Calvert.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Reverse-Time Migration For 3D SEG/EAGE Salt Model
SOEE2102 – Geophysical Field Trip and Tutorials Malham Tarn (North Yorkshire) October 2009 Refraction Analysis Sebastian Rost University of Leeds 2009.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
COLLUVIAL WEDGE IMAGING USING X-WELL AND CDP TRAVELTIME TOMOGRAPHY MAIKE-L. BUDDENSIEK GERARD T. SCHUSTER RONALD L. BRUHN.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Joint 3D relocation of earthquakes by surface and borehole data
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
A Blind Test of Traveltime and Waveform Inversion Colin A. Zelt 1, R. Gerhard Pratt 2, Andrew Brenders 2, Sara Hanson-Hedgecock 1 and John A. Hole 3 1.
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Cross-line shot interpolation
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Skeletonized Wave-equation Inversion for Q
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah

Interferometry In Phase Out of Phase oil Film

Interferometry

Outline Objective Objective Interferometry Methodology Interferometry Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Refraction Data Refraction Data Crosswell Data Crosswell Data Conclusions Conclusions

Objective Eliminate Shot / Receiver Eliminate Shot / Receiver Static Errors in Seismic Data Static Errors in Seismic Data

Outline Objective Objective Interferometry Methodology Interferometry Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusions Conclusions

Methodology  t ij = (t i - t j ) obs - (t i - t j ) cal - (t i - t j ) cal Standard Tomography Interferometric Tomography Smear residual  t i along raypath t i obs  t i = t i obs - t i cal Smear residual  t ij along raypaths t j obs t i obs

Why Interferometry?  t ij = (t i - t j ) obs - (t i - t j ) cal t i ’ =t i+  t t j ’ =t j+  t tttt Source timing error Eliminate the source timing error

 t ij = (t i - t j ) obs - (t i - t j ) cal t j ’ =t j+  t tttt Receiver-timing error t i ’ =t i+  t Eliminate the receiver timing error

 t =  t 1 +  t 2 +  t 3 = t 11 - t 12 + t 23 - t 21 + t 32 - t 33 t 11 ’ =t 11+  t s1+  t r1  t s1  t r1  t s2  t r3  t r2  t s3  t 1 = t 11 - t 12 +  t r1 -  t r2 t 11 t 12 ’ =t 12+  t s1+  t r2  t 2 = t 23 - t 21 +  t r3 -  t r1  t 3 = t 32 - t 33 +  t r2 -  t r3 “Phase closure“ Theorem Eliminate both the source and receiver timing errors

ITT Can Eliminate source and receiver static errors

Problem with ITT Smear residual  t ij along raypaths  t ij = (t i - t j ) - (t i - t j ) cal tjtjtjtj titititi Lose Resolution

Outline Objective Objective Methodology Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Conclusions Conclusions

Surface-refraction Experiment Synthetic Model Depth (m) km/sec Offset (m) Shot/receiver interval 2 m No. of shots/receivers 251 Master trace

Inversion Results (Refraction Data) b) Standard Method km/sec Offset (m) d) ITT + timing shifts km/sec a) Synthetic model Depth (m) c) Standard + timing shifts Depth (m) Offset (m)

Outline Objective Objective Methodology Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data ConclusionsConclusions

Crosswell Experiment Shot/receiver interval 4 m No. of shots/receivers 301 Synthetic Model Depth (m) km/sec Offset (m) Master trace

Inversion Results (Crosswell Data) a) Synthetic model Depth (m) c) Standard + shifts Depth (m) Offset (m) b) Standard Method km/sec d) ITT + shifts Offset (m) 0500km/sec

Outline Objective Objective Methodology Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Conclusions Conclusions

Recording Geometry Shot / geophone Ground Surface feet feet Shot / geophone interval 1.5 feet No. of shots / geophones 144

Inversion Results a) Standard method Depth (ft) c) Standard + timing shifts Depth (ft) Offset (ft) b) ITT kft/sec 0 d) ITT + timing shifts Offset (ft) kft/sec

Outline Objective Objective Methodology Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Refraction Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Synthetic Crosswell Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Little Cottonwood Field Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Kidd Creek Crosswell Data Conclusions Conclusions

Recording Geometry Y (km) Source Hole Receiver Hole X (km) Z (km)

Inversion Results Offset (m) b) Standard km/sec Ore body km/sec a) ITT Depth (m) Offset (m) Source hole receiver hole 6.0 Ore body

Inversion Results a) Standard ms Depth (m) Offset (m) Source hole receiver hole Ore body b) ITT Offset (m) km/sec

Outline Objective Objective Methodology Methodology Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusions Conclusions

Conclusions ITT is effective and stable in eliminating ITT is effective and stable in eliminating shot-timing shifts, shot-timing shifts, At the cost of reduced model resolution At the cost of reduced model resolution

Future Work Improve slowness resolutionImprove slowness resolution Recover the DC componentRecover the DC component Regularization Methods Regularization Methods Develop ‘Phase Closure’ for CDP Data Eliminate source- and receiver-Eliminate source- and receiver- static errors simultaneously static errors simultaneously

Acknowledgements I am grateful for the financial I am grateful for the financial support from the members of support from the members of the 1999 UTAM consortium. the 1999 UTAM consortium.