Water Monitoring Programs of EPA and its Clean Water Act Partners.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.

Advertisements

Clean Water Act Draft Year: 1977 Amendment Years: 1981, 1987 National Adam Tuetken period 6.

PENNSYLVANIAS STATEWIDE SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM: A Strategy For Evaluating Surface Water Quality Throughout The Commonwealth.

1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.

Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.

Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.

Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.

1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.

Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.

Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.

Union County Conservation District Rain Barrel Workshop.

Our project is designed to prevent many kind of pollutant that can contaminate our drinking water sources, reduce oxygen levels can kill fish and other.

Chase Fanning Period 3 AP Environmental Science. Clean Water Acts Clean Water Act of 1977: Officially Amended in National amendment that did the.

Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.

Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.

The Importance of Coastal Waters - Recent Reports National Coastal Condition Report National Coastal Condition Report Heinz Center’s State of the Nation’s.

Bay Barometer: A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2009 Factors Impacting Health Factors Impacting Bay.

Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.

Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.

Defining Water Quality The Standard-Setting Process

EPA NOAA DoI ACOE DHHS NASA DoE DOD NSF DoS -FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP RESPONSE – (Priority Area Coordination) CEQ USDA DoT Near-TermProjectConcepts(Proposed)

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.

National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.

ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition

Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.

Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.

Environmental Quality Service Council IDEM Great Lakes Issues September 29, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of.

Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.

Mississippi River Water Quality: Implications for Freshwater Diversions Coastal Wetland Planning, Preservation, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Outreach Committee.

Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program

SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.

Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.

Advancing Environmental Protection Through PBEPs How Do You Demonstrate the Value of Your PBEP in Meeting Agency Goals? PBEPs P.

Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.

1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.

Water Pollution. Types and Sources of Water Pollution  #1 problem - Eroded soils  Organic wastes, disease-causing agents  Chemicals, nutrients  Radioactive.

Coastal Management Issues and Strategies: State and Municipal

Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.

EPA and Ecosystem-Based Management: Success of the Watershed Approach Michael H. Shapiro Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water, US EPA Capitol Hill.

Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.

An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.

Section 319 Funding  EPA provides funds to the state and state administers.  All projects have a 25% match requirement.  Centennial grant funds are.

MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,

Mission Objectives & Drivers Business Services & Operations Program Budget (FY08, $M) Application Portfolio & Funding Request (FY08, $M) Core Data & Partners.

BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.

San Francisco Estuary Partnership PCBs in Caulk Project Overview PCBs in Caulk Project Overview October 26, 2010.

Michigan’s Nonpoint Source Program Pass Through Grant Funding Past, Present, and Future Outlook Bob Sweet Past Aquatic Biologist, Present Administrative.

1 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation Review.

San Francisco Estuary Project. Partners & Organizational Structure THE BAY INSTITUTE Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge.

The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers

Jessica Williams. History/ Basic Information The CWA was formerly known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which was made in 1948 and was the.

National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Inventory Activities.

The Water Quality Act of 1987 Molly Murphy Period 2.

Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.

ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)

The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.

The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.

Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,

GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.

Chapter 92a Fee Amendments Proposed Rulemaking Water Resources Advisory Committee Harrisburg, PA March 24, 2016 Tom Wolf, GovernorJohn Quigley, Secretary.

Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.

Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment

Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section

Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria

Can kill fish and other wildlife

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois

Watershed Literacy & Engagement

The Clean Water aaact of 1977

Presentation transcript:

Water Monitoring Programs of EPA and its Clean Water Act Partners

Program Categories: 1. Status and Process Monitoring 2.Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs 3.Monitoring to Guide the Management of Geographic Programs

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program ( EMAP) Media Studied: Surface Waters, Landscapes, Wetlands Agroecosystems, Forests, Rangelands Waters Studied: Western EPA Regions, Mid-Atlantic, Estuaries Category 1: Status and Process Monitoring

Water Pollution Control Program Monitoring Planning, Assessment, Compliance The Section 319 Nonpoint Source Controls National Monitoring Program Category 2: Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs

Major grant programs cover many activities Funding shown is Federal grant only Monitoring is only a portion of these funds Category 2: Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs

What we know: Monitoring By States Covers Establishing Standards Basin Planning Identifying Problems TMDL Development Setting Permit Limits Assessing NPS Controls Beach/Bed Closures Trending/Indexing Public Education Federal funding is about 1/3 of the total state programs Monitoring consumes $112 to about $180 million annually Category 2: Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs

Source: ASIWPCA

Water Pollution Control Program National Study of Chemical Residues in Lake Fish Tissue EPA - Marine Debris Monitoring and Abatement Pesticides in Selected Water-Supply Reservoirs and Finished Drinking Water, Beach Program National Estuary Program (NEP): National Coastal Assessment Intensive Sampling Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Category 2: Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs

Beaches and Other Monitoring Category 2: Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs

The Florida Keys$ 1.7 Chesapeake Bay18.1 Great Lakes25.2 Gulf of Mexico 1.8 $55 Million Category3. Monitoring to Guide the Management of Geographic Programs

Program Categories: 1. Status and Process Monitoring $43.3 M Annually 2.Monitoring to Guide the Management of National Programs $ M Annually 3.Monitoring to Guide the Management of Geographic Programs $5 M Annually