Stray Light or Spectral Out-of-Band in MOS/MOBY Steve Brown & Carol Johnson (NIST) Michael Feinholz & Stephanie Flora (MLML) Jim Mueller (CHORS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray INPHORA
Advertisements

22 March 2011: GSICS GRWG & GDWG Meeting Daejeon, Korea Tim Hewison SEVIRI-IASI Inter-calibration Uncertainty Evaluation.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Radiometry and the Radiometer
Face Recognition in Hyperspectral Images Z. Pan, G. Healey, M. Prasad and B. Tromberg University of California Published at IEEE Trans. on PAMI Vol 25,
Retrieval of smoke aerosol loading from remote sensing data Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trends Analysis Washington.
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
Calibration and Status of MOBY Dennis Clark, NOAA/NESDIS Carol Johnson, NIST Steve Brown, NIST Mark Yarbrough, MLML Stephanie Flora, MLML Mike Feinholz,
Digital Cameras CCD (Monochrome) RGB Color Filter Array.
ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.
Interference and Diffraction
Deterministic Modeling of the MOS Background Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting Mallorca 1-3 February.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
CXC CUC September SDS Page 1 CUC Sep 2007 Science Data Systems – Jonathan McDowell.
Are you getting the concept? Calculate D a, D l, R d and s g for 1 st order diffraction under optimal conditions for the indicated 0.5 m grating with 100.
NOAA Research and Operations Marine Optical Buoy Design Review July 18-19, 2006 Summary Carol Johnson NIST.
NOAA Research and Operations Marine Optical Buoy Design Review July 18-19, 2006 Plan for calibration and maintenance of AHAB Uncertainty Budget: Laboratory.
Extraction of optical parameters in SNO+ with an in-situ optical calibration system Dr. Kalpana Singh On behalf of the SNO+ Collaboration CAP Congress.
Eusoballoon optics characterisation Camille Catalano and the Toulouse team Test configuration Calibration of the beam Exploration of the focal plan.
Sergey Mekhontsev National Institute of Standards and Technology Optical Technology Division, Gaithersburg, MD Infrared Spectral Radiance Scale.
Characterterization of Stray Light Effects on Actinic Flux Measurements And Calculated Ozone Photolysis National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),
Motivation Measurements of Radiant Flux  Physical Properties of Complex Systems Required Scientific Accuracy  State of the Art Measurements International,
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
”MOBY-Net, an ocean color vicarious calibration system” PI: Kenneth Voss, Physics Dept., Univ of Miami Co-I’s: Carol Johnson (NIST), Mark Yarbrough (MLML),
High Resolution Echelle Spectrograph for Chinese Weihai 1m Telescope. Leiwang, Yongtian Zhu, Zhongwen Hu Nanjing institute of Astronomical Optics Technology.
Standard DEM: Consider a imaging instrument with M EUV filters (for the EUVI Fe bands M = 3). The measured intensity in one image pixel is given by DEM.
Slide 1 Implementation of algorithmic correction of stray light in a pushbroom hyperspectral sensor > Karim Lenhard > Implementation of algorithmic.
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
DECam Daily Flatfield Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
Preliminary Characterization Results: Fiber-Coupled, Multi-channel, Hyperspectral Spectrographs Carol Johnson, NIST MODIS-VIIRS Team Meeting January 26-28,
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
Steven Meyers, Marwan Mokhtar, Peter Armstrong, Matteo Chiesa
Lab 9: Reflection and Refraction –Law of Reflection –Law of Refraction (Snell’s Law) 1.Index of Refraction 2.The Critical Angle 3.Total Internal Reflection.
Evaluation of OMPS sensor and EV SDR performance Conclusions: Sensors are performing well Calibrations are very good; no sign of degradation Comparisons.
A processing package for atmospheric correction of compact airborne spectrographic imager (casi) imagery over water including a novel sunglint correction.
CALCON September B. Carol Johnson, Steven W. Brown and Howard W. Yoon National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD Radiometric.
Multiple Light Source Optical Flow Multiple Light Source Optical Flow Robert J. Woodham ICCV’90.
Recent Solar Irradiance Data From SBUV/2 and OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) SOLID WP-2 Workshop.
Demosaicking for Multispectral Filter Array (MSFA)
COMPUTER GRAPHICS CS 482 – FALL 2015 OCTOBER 6, 2015 IMAGE MANIPULATION COMPRESSION COMPOSITING.
Photo-realistic Rendering and Global Illumination in Computer Graphics Spring 2012 Stochastic Path Tracing Algorithms K. H. Ko School of Mechatronics Gwangju.
Radiometry and Uncertainties from SORTIE (Spectral Ocean Radiance Transfer Investigation and Experiment) Kenneth Voss and Howard Gordon, Univ. of Miami.
SeaWiFS Calibration & Validation Strategy & Results Charles R. McClain SeaWiFS Project Scientist NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center February 11, 2004.
Research Questions Confirm Resonon stability – On-board LEDs (integrate Y. Zong’s with 2” sphere w SMA output port) – Calibrate Es and compare to Mike.
Status of MOBY and Future Plans Dennis Clark Carol Johnson, NIST Steve Brown, NIST Mark Yarbrough, MLML Stephanie Flora, MLML Mike Feinholz, MLML.
IBB Calibration Update J. Rufus GIST21 Meeting Boulder, CO. 31 st March – 2 nd April 2004 © Imperial College London.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Building an Integrated Ocean Color Sensor Web at the Land-Sea Interface UCSC UARC/ARC Ames GSFC BSI SARP.
Distributed Ray Tracing. Can you get this with ray tracing?
Kevin Stevenson AST 4762/5765. What is MCMC?  Random sampling algorithm  Estimates model parameters and their uncertainty  Only samples regions of.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
Multi-channel, Hyperspectral Spectrograph System using a Volume Phase Holographic Transmission Grating for In-Water Radiometry B. Carol Johnson, 1 Steven.
Building an Integrated Ocean Color Sensor Web at the Land-Sea Interface UCSC UARC/ARC Ames GSFC BSI SARP.
Satlantic HyperPro II Freefalling hyperspectral radiometer Can be deployed in “floater” mode 16 bit ADC at 12 Hz (maximum) 0 - ~100 m depth rating, descent.
NCSLI 2002 August 4-8, Improving Temperature Accuracy for Rapid Thermal Processing at NIST August 4-8, 2002 NCSL International Annual Workshop.
1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.
Binomial Distribution Possion Distribution Gaussian Distribution Lorentzian Distribution Error Analysis.
U.A. Dyudina, A.P. Ingersoll, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, Objectives We study lightning on Jupiter using spatially resolved.
SOLIS-VSM Magnetic Synoptic Maps
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
Radiometric Preprocessing: Atmospheric Correction
Reverse-Projection Method for Measuring Camera MTF
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
R&O Buoy Spectrograph System
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Solving an estimation problem
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

Stray Light or Spectral Out-of-Band in MOS/MOBY Steve Brown & Carol Johnson (NIST) Michael Feinholz & Stephanie Flora (MLML) Jim Mueller (CHORS)

MOBY Workshop November MOBY Instruments  MOS –MOS 202 MOS Profiler and MOS ROV –MOS 204 Even MOBY deployments –MOS205 Odd MOBY deployments  Other instruments –SIS –FOS –MD5

MOBY Workshop November Marine Optical System (MOS) Blue SpectrographRed Spectrograph

MOBY Workshop November Imaging in Spectrographs Broad-band sources Narrow-band Sources

MOBY Workshop November MOS Imaging Specular Haze Diffuse Incident Ray Surface

MOBY Workshop November MOS Profiler—Measurements on SIRCUS Blue Spectrograph G CCD SM Slit Interreflection of second order causes side lobe (MOS designed to operate in first order) Spatial profile across the CCD MOS Spectral Characterization Complicated by presence of ‘reflection peaks’

MOBY Workshop November Manifestation of Stray Light in MOBY  Circled Region: L u ( ) derived using the two spectrographs in MOBY or the MOS Profiler disagree in their region of overlap; degree of discrepancy is depth- dependent  “Stray light” was suspected (a typical issue with single grating spectrographs used with sources of different spectral shapes) Red Spectrograph Blue Spectrograph

MOBY Workshop November Spectral Out-of-Band SeaWiFS Band 5

MOBY Workshop November MOS Stray light parameters Tuning the laser in small steps gives the single pixel in-band profile In-band Area Haze, Diffuse and Reflection Peak components In-Band Area

MOBY Workshop November Modeled stray light parameters Haze Component y=m 1 *exp(-2*abs(m-m 0 )/m 2 )+m 3

MOBY Workshop November Modeled stray light parameters Reflection peak component Corrected Uncorrected

MOBY Workshop November Modeled stray light parameters Reflection peak component

MOBY Workshop November Modeled stray light parameters BSG Movie

MOBY Workshop November Modeled stray light parameters Rsg movie

MOBY Workshop November MOS Images v Single Pixel Responsivity (Obs) (FSOB)

MOBY Workshop November Stray light characterizations possible  Even buoys, each deployment –Es (1), Ed (3), Lu (3), LuMos (1)  Odd buoys, each deployment –Es (1), Ed (3), Lu (3), LuMos (1)  MOS Profiler  MOS ROV Stray light characterizations needed  Each MOS –MOS202, MOS204, MOS205 –Fibered and un-fibered configurations

MOBY Workshop November Stray Light Correction Algorithm  V.1 Iterative Approach –using first order characterization  V.2 Iterative Approach –More detailed characterization  V.3 Iterative Approach –Generated Obs Lookup Table –Allows width to refl pk  V.4 Matrix-based Approach –Allows width to in-band area –No separation of ‘in-band’ and ‘out-of-band’ regions

MOBY Workshop November Iterative SLC Algorithm Slit scatter function Relative spectral responsivity Separate into IB and OOB components

MOBY Workshop November Iterative SLC Algorithm In-band area of a pixel or column Slit scatter function 1.In-band area all in one pixel; usually +/- 10 pixels around center 2.Assume the ccd spectral responsivity spatially uniform (across the array) 3.Convergence to stable solution in 3 to 4 iterations usually Changes less than 0.1 % V.2 – put reflection peak area into single pixel Use discrete nature of spectrographs

MOBY Workshop November V.2 SLC Application Responsivity MOBY L u Top Better agreement in overlap Increase in UV

MOBY Workshop November V.2 SLC Algorithm

MOBY Workshop November Stray Light Correction to MOBY L w ’s 7.8 % 2.7 % 1.3 % 0.8 % -2.5 %

MOBY Workshop November Stray Light Correction to MOBY L w ’s Different Fiber

MOBY Workshop November Stray Light Correction Algorithm V.2 Validation and Uncertainties Lamp-ill. ISS ISS Stray light corrected Comparison with SIRCUS SIRCUS

MOBY Workshop November Algorithm Validation using Colored Sources Optronic Source with Colored Filters BG28 (blue) PER (green)

MOBY Workshop November Evaluation of the uncertainties Uncertainty in SLC for in-water upwelling radiance L u There are a number of parameters that go into the model; each has an uncertainty We doubled the uncertainty in the fits to those parameters to account for drift, etc. Then ran a Monte Carlo simulation: for each component we used a Gaussian probability distribution. Simulations run a minimum of 100 times & uncertainties calculated.

MOBY Workshop November V.3 Stray Light Correction Algorithm Change the way the SSF (RSR) is derived –Model obs for each pixel, combine into rsr Allow width to reflection peak –Generate lookup tables (faster data reduction)

MOBY Workshop November V.4 Stray light correction algorithm 512 equations and 512 unknowns (or 1024 by 1024) –Suggests straight forward application of matrix-based approaches – MATLAB is very well suite for. –No longer separate in-band and out-of-band; –Simpler, faster application; –May be more applicable for the general community. Change the algorithm Need to keep track of spatial v. spectral in

MOBY Workshop November Remaining Issues  Finalize MOS ROV: 1 day  L u MOS Parameters: ?  Standardize (clean up) parameters used in V. 2 algorithm – consistent application of parameters  Finish application of V.3 algorithm –Re-fit reflection peaks: 1 day per MOS  Finish development of V.4 Algorithm –Develop Matlab program: ½ day –Compare with V. 2, V. 3 algorithms: ½ day –Evaluate robustness, uncertainties –Off-ccd terms?  Documentation  New ‘blue’ calibration source to reduce radiometric uncertainties (incl. stray light) in the blue

MOBY Workshop November Blue LED Calibration Source  OL420, 425 suffer from low flux below 400 nm –Uncertainties in the repeatability grow rapidly – To 5 % below 380 nm (my memory – Mike?)  Stray light correction in L u –Up to 40 % below 380 nm –While the uncertainty in the magnitude of the SL correction increases to 10 %  Can we develop a stable source with increased flux in the blue that is a closer match to what MOBY measures – so the magnitude of the stray light correction is significantly reduced?

MOBY Workshop November Gamma Scientific LED Source RS-5 OL420 MOS In the MOBY tent along with OL420

MOBY Workshop November Gamma Scientific LED Source

MOBY Workshop November OL 420 v RS

MOBY Workshop November Use MOBY LEDs? Can we fill in the blue?