Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase I and Phase II Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.” Accountability 2.0 and the World’s Best Workforce—What Does it Mean? World’s.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
The Characteristics and Conditions Associated with Exemplary Middle Schools.
Administrative Entry Plan
December 6, Exploring the Role of a PAC By the AB SpEd PAC.
Good Morning! Hugh Gloster, Superintendent of Schools School District No. 23 (Central Okanagan) August 24, 2010 TIMING OF THE RUTLAND AREA GRADE CONFIGURATION.
1 Magnet Program A “school within a school” Magnet Program to include commitment to the planning and implementation that would enhance the learning of.
Magnet Program Audit for Baltimore County Public Schools Presentation of Key Findings and Recommendations November 19, 2013 Marilyn Zlotnik, Vice President.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
1 Welcome to Julius West MS Middle School Reform Phase II:
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Middle School Scheduling Community Feedback Presentation Revised 1.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
North Scott High School Smaller Learning Communities CFDA # L U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
April Our Purpose Create and implement recommendations that will provide consistent direction and focus for middle school education that result.
Strategic Success We are RACING to the Top. Appoquinimink by the Numbers… Total Population: 9,866 Receiving Services: 1, % We ARE growing… Beyond.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Middle Level Review Update October School Board Goal 1 “Determine if and how the middle schools will modify the current model to insure.
1 Duval County Public Schools Summer Learning. Turnaround in Action District tiered model of clustering schools for lower performing schools; Additional.
Stage 1: Planning, Design & Preliminary Tasks Master Scheduling for Academies, Pathways, & Smaller Learning Communities.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Smaller Learning Communities Grant Program 2008 Cohort Nicki Brisson, Director School Choice and Parental Options.
1 District 833 Middle School Transition Committee Spring 2008.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Parent Information Meeting Gifted & Talented Education Pam Cernocky Gifted Education Coordinator Eau Claire Area School District
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase II: Revised Draft Recommendations Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) April 14, 2009.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Mid-Course Adjustments in Learning Results Implementation CAEA Summer Conference Patrick R. Phillips, Deputy Commissioner August 15, 2005.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Middle & High Dept. Chair Meeting 2/14/12 Session Objectives: Common Core/Essential Standards Updates Increase understanding about New Course Codes Development.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
School Improvement Process
Comprehensive K-12 Mathematics Improvement Plan Update May 9, 2013.
Planning for the Future: Superintendent’s Acceleration Agenda Phase II: Strengthening Operations Presentation to the Boston School Committee May 8, 2008.
1 Essential Components of an Effective Educational Program Overview Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
COMPREHENSIVE GIFTED PROGRAM Nathan Hale School Year.
Personalized Learning: HISD’s Path to College and Career Readiness.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Kansas College and Career Readiness Curriculum Sub-Committee Members Dr. David Conrady Carlos Gomez Jody Winfrey Jennifer Siverstein Lynne Ruschill.
Middle School Program Revision Proposal Bristol School Administration October 5, 2011.
Edison K8: Mapping Our Goals for the Year We will be familiar with the priority elements for the year’s work We will know the key levers for improving.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
University Career Services Committee
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Targeted District Review Report
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Year of Instruction 2.0.
AND.
Presentation transcript:

Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase I and Phase II Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) October 2008

Review of MSDT’s Work The Middle School Design Team strongly supported the middle school model as implemented in the Arlington Public Schools, but saw this process as an opportune time to make some improvements. Schools Want and Need Flexibility to Meet ChallengesSchools Want and Need Flexibility to Meet Challenges –Current School Initiatives Targeting Student Needs –Acceleration Opportunities During the School Day for Students Not at Grade Level –Resource Allocation Importance of Professional DevelopmentImportance of Professional Development – – Adolescent learning theory – – Procedurally through Summer Institutes and Small Learning Communities – – Maximizing benefits of flexible scheduling

Review of MSDT’s Work (continued) Identification of Common Themes and Challenges Across GroupsIdentification of Common Themes and Challenges Across Groups –Interest in Alternative Schedules –Liked Focus on Rigor, Relevance and Responsiveness –Recognized Challenges of Accreditation/AYP Systems –Alignment Between School-based Needs and System-wide Initiatives –Recognized Value of Data-driven Decision Making So…

Guiding Principles Provide student/staff teams, that lead to a nurturing, supportive environment for learningProvide student/staff teams, that lead to a nurturing, supportive environment for learning Commit to success for all students through flexible grouping of students in heterogeneous teamsCommit to success for all students through flexible grouping of students in heterogeneous teams Advocate for and support the developmental needs, interests, and talents of all middle school studentsAdvocate for and support the developmental needs, interests, and talents of all middle school students Differentiate learning opportunities for studentsDifferentiate learning opportunities for students Provide flexibility in scheduling to best meet student needs on teams, at grade levels, and in schoolsProvide flexibility in scheduling to best meet student needs on teams, at grade levels, and in schools Engage and educate families and the wider community to actively support middle school studentsEngage and educate families and the wider community to actively support middle school students

Key Components Grade level teamsGrade level teams –Interdisciplinary team configurations –Common planning time Individual teacher planning timeIndividual teacher planning time Interdisciplinary approach to teaching/curriculumInterdisciplinary approach to teaching/curriculum Teacher-student advisory programTeacher-student advisory program A clearly articulated exploratory/electives programA clearly articulated exploratory/electives program A comprehensive after-school activity programA comprehensive after-school activity program Inclusive opportunities for all studentsInclusive opportunities for all students

Charge Building upon the work of the Middle School Design Team Phase I, develop options that will allow the Superintendent to make short and/or long term recommendations concerning the following: Alternative/hybrid schedules Alternative/hybrid schedules –Core –Electives (Encore) –Middle School instructional and activities times Elective course offerings Elective course offerings Extended instruction in core classes in response to student need as revealed through achievement data Extended instruction in core classes in response to student need as revealed through achievement data Teacher/Advisory time and delivery Teacher/Advisory time and delivery Professional development: Professional development: –Adolescent learning theory –Summer Institutes and Small Learning Communities –Maximizing benefits of flexible scheduling

Middle School Design Team Phase II Members represent the interests of their constituent group and report back on a regular basis to their constituent groupsMembers represent the interests of their constituent group and report back on a regular basis to their constituent groups Periodic updates will be providedPeriodic updates will be provided To have broader input, groups of “critical friends” will be created to provide feedback at each stage of the processTo have broader input, groups of “critical friends” will be created to provide feedback at each stage of the process

12 parents/residents12 parents/residents 6 administrators6 administrators 6 Central Office staff6 Central Office staff 12 School-Based staff12 School-Based staff 1 High School teacher1 High School teacher 1 Elementary School teacher1 Elementary School teacher 1 AEA representative1 AEA representative Assistant Superintendent, InstructionAssistant Superintendent, Instruction Staff Liaisons:Staff Liaisons: –Special Projects Coordinator –Special Projects Specialist Membership

Next Steps and Timeline Summary Report of Committee’s Work September 08 Establish Charge for Middle School Design Team Phase II September 08 Form Middle School Design Team Phase II October 08 Report to Superintendent March 09

Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase I and Phase II Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) October 2008