3GPP SCEF Interworking Discussions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A global Service layer platform for M2M communications
Advertisements

CMDH Refinement Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0397
Is a Node or not Node? ARC Node_resolution Group Name: ARC Source: Barbara Pareglio, NEC, Meeting Date: ARC#9.1 Agenda.
IoT in ODL Lionel Florit, Principal Engineer, ODL ID lflorit
Service Layer Session Management Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP16 Agenda Item:
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP From: Omar Elloumi (ALU) Source: Alcatel-Lucent (ATIS) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Discussion oneM2M WG2 contributions to address Network Optimization Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC,
On a Device Information Model for devices in oneM2M
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
OneM2M-ARC BRequest_Resource Architecture Proposal to address Broadcasting/Multicasting Requirements Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC,
RoA and SoA Integration for Message Brokers Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: ALU Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Mechanism to support establishment of charging policies Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: InterDigital Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
2-levels Access control for HTTP binding Group Name: WG4 (& WG2/WG3 for information) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting.
Discussions for oneM2M Semantics Standardization Group Name: WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 ASN/MN-CSE.
Optimized M2M interworking with mobile networks Group Name: oneM2M REQ Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC, Meeting Date: Agenda.
An Operators Input for oneM2M Baseline  Group name: TP#2/WG1  Source: DTAG, Vodafone Group  Meeting Date:  Agenda Item: WG1 agenda item.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
PRO R01-URI_mapping_discussion Discussion on URI mapping in protocol context Group Name: PRO and ARC Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU,
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Management of CMDH Policies Group Name: WG5-MAS Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Qualcomm, Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Management.
An operator’s perspective on support for different M2M deployment scenarios AT&T Group Name: TP Source: Farooq Bari, Jianrong Wang; AT&T;
Usage Scenarios for CSE Group Name: WG2(ARC-WG) Source: Shingo Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Message.
WG 2 Progress Report at TP #8 Group Name: oneM2M TP #8 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: /13 Agenda Item: WG Reports.
Architectural Principles for Services Group Name: WG2- ARC Source: Tim Carey, ALU, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Step by step approach Group Name: WG2 Source: Michael hs. Yang, LG uplus, Jaeseung Song, NEC Europe, Meeting.
An introduction to oneM2M
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
3GPP SCEF Interworking Call Flows
LWM2M Interworking Group Name: Architecture
M2M Service Session Management (SSM) CSF
Routing Problem of the Current Architecture Group Name: ARC Source: Hongbeom Ahn, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: Agenda.
Realizing Ms Interface with OMA DM Group Name: MAS WG Source: Seungkyu Park, LG Meeting Date:
SE abstraction scenarios Group Name: SEC Source: Claus Dietze, Giesecke & Devrient Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI SE abstraction.
ARC R02 Modelling operations – problem statement and proposal Group Name: ARC#19.3 Source: Joerg Swetina, NEC,
Discussion about RESTful Admin API Group Name: SEC & ARC Source: FUJITSU Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Device Configuration.
Security API discussion Group Name: SEC Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Security API.
Streaming Session Support in oneM2M Framework Group Name: WG2 Source: George Foti, Ericsson Meeting Date: Work Item :WI GPP_Rel13_IWK.
M2M Service Session Management (SSM) CSF Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
Authorization Architecture Discussion Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 28 MAY, 2014 Agenda.
CMDH and Policies Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0603
Issues about management Group Name: MAS9.2 Source: Jiaxin Yin, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Consideration Security Issues on Registration Group Name: WG4 (SEC) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting Date:
Reasons for CSF Clean-up (Issues & Next Steps) Group Name: WG2 Source: Syed Husain – NTT DOCOMO Meeting Date: (ARC_9.3) Agenda Item: 6 DOC#:
Discussion on oneM2M and OSGi Interworking Group Name: ARC Source: Jessie, Huawei, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Directions for Release 3 Group Name: SEC Source: NEC Europe Ltd. Meeting Date: SEC22, Agenda Item: Discuss directions.
Introduction to Service Session Management Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
Possible options of using DDS in oneM2M Group Name: ARC Source: KETI, Huawei, Hitachi, China Unicom Meeting Date: Agenda Item: DDS binding.
Specifying the Address of Management Client of Managed Entity Group Name: ARC Source: Hongbeom Ahn, SK Telecom, Meeting Date: TP#21 Agenda.
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions Group Name: TP #18 Source: Rejesh Bhalla, ZTE Corporation, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Background Data Transfer
3GPP R13 Small Data Delivery
SCEF northbound API Analysis
3GPP interworking in R3 Group Name: ARC
Possible options of using DDS in oneM2M
NIDD Discussion Points
Proposed design principles for modelling interworked devices
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
OneM2M-ARC BRequest_Resource Architecture Proposal to address Broadcasting/Multicasting Requirements Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai,
3GPP Interworking Abstraction
ARC Proposed design principles for modelling services, datapoints and operations Group Name: ARC Source: Joerg Swetina, NEC
Considering issues regarding handling token
An introduction to oneM2M
3GPP V2X Interworking Potential Impact
3GPP Interworking and use of <schedule> resource
Presentation transcript:

3GPP SCEF Interworking Discussions Group Name: TP 19.3 Source: InterDigital: Paul Russell, Jr., Paul.Russell@Interdigital.com; Mike Starsinic, Mike.Starsinic@InterDigital.com NEC Corporation: Norio Uchida, n-uchida@cq.jp.nec.com Ataru Kobayashi, a-kobayashi@df.jp.nec.com NEC Europe LTd.: Joerg Swetina, Joerg.Swetina@neclab.eu Meeting Date: October 20th, 2015 Agenda Item: 3GPP R13 Interworking

Background Information At TP18 3GPP SCEF Interworking options were discussed for oneM2M Work Item # 0037: 3GPP_Rel13 Interworking ARC-2015-2038R03 ARC-2015-2157 ARC-2015-2089 Two Architecture options were discussed Option #1 – IN-CSE provides SCEF functionality and interfaces directly with the 3GPP network Option #2 – IN-CSE interfaces with the SCEF using OMA defined APIs The goal of this contribution is to continue discussions on how to support SCEF in oneM2M architecture and to clarify terminology a bit to help reduce confusion.

Background - Option 1 Ref. ARC-2015-2157 NSSE: Network Service Exposure, Service Execution and Triggering

Background - Option 2 Ref. ARC-2015-2157 NSSE: Network Service Exposure, Service Execution and Triggering

Existing oneM2M Terms TS-0001 defines 3 main terms for interworking with underlying networks The Network Service Exposure, Service Execution and Triggering (NSSE) CSF manages communications with the Underlying Networks for accessing network service functions over the Mcn reference point. The NSSE CSF uses the available/supported methods for service "requests" on behalf of AEs. The NSSE CSF shields other CSFs and AEs from the specific technologies and mechanisms supported by the Underlying Networks. The network service functions provided by the Underlying Network include service functions such as, but not limited to, device triggering, small data transmission, location notification, policy rules setting, location queries, IMS services, device management. Such services do not include the general transport services. Underlying Network Services Entity (NSE): A Network Services Entity provides services from the underlying network to the CSEs. Examples of such services include device management, location services and device triggering. No particular organization of the NSEs is assumed. Mcn Reference Point - Communication flows between a Common Services Entity (CSE) and the Network Services Entity (NSE) cross the Mcn reference point. These flows enable a CSE to use the supported services (other than transport and connectivity services) provided by the NSE.

Confusion Per TS 23.682 : The SCEF is always part of the Trust Domain. The AS/SCS (IN-CSE) may, or may not, be part of the trust domain. Depending on the Deployment Model, the oneM2M Interworking Terms do not consistently Map to the 3GPP Interworking Architecture The oneM2M Architecture is good, but the definition of some terms (NSSE, NSE and Mcn) should be modified or clarified based on SCEF deployment model to avoid confusion.

Clarifications to Option #1 In this case, a single company operates both the NSE and IN-CSE (3GPP SCS). The company is a trusted business partner (in 3GPP TS23.682) which provides SCEF functionality. Operator Trust Domain NSE MN-CSE 3GPP NW CSE Mcc Network Entities (HSS, MME, MTC-IWF, PCRF) IN-CSE (SCS) NSSE CSF SCEF API Mca IN-AE Some functions in the 3GPP NW are NSEs. SCEF is deployed as the oneM2M NSSE CSF within the IN-CSE SCEF northbound interface (API) is made available to the rest of the IN-CSE. The IN-CSE may make some or all API’s available to other CSE’s and AE’s. SCEF southbound interfaces is oneM2M Mcn reference point and is bound to 3GPP defined interfaces (e.g. Rx, Tsp, etc.)

Clarifications to Option #2 Operator Trust Domain NSSE CSF functionality defined by oneM2M SCEF southbound Interface made up of 3GPP defined interfaces (e.g. Rx, Tsp, etc.) are out of scope for oneM2M NSE CSE IN-CSE (SCS) IN-AE Mcn 3GPP NW API NSSE CSF Multiple IN-CSEs could interface to a single SCEF Network Entities (HSS, MME, MTC-IWF, PCRF) SCEF IN-CSE (SCS) CSE IN-AE NSEE CSF API Mcn The SCEF may be deployed in a standalone manner. In this type of deployment the SCEF may be operated by the Mobile Network Operator or a trusted party. The trusted party may be a third party other than the IN-CSE operator. From the CSE’s point of view, the SCEF and the network entities that it connects to can collectively be considered an NSE. SCEF northbound interface API (e.g. OMA APIs) is bound to oneM2M Mcn reference point.