Funding of Regional Planning Organizations May, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Advertisements

An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Quality Improvement Session for Tribal Air Program QA Project Plans: A Region 8 Perspective Tom Brooks U. S. EPA Region 8 Quality Assurance Program May.
Overview of Ozone and PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Regional Air Quality Workshop November 17, 2004.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
Purpose of the Standards
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
WRAP Status Report EPA/RPO Meeting Durham, NC February 6, 2002.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
WRAP Strategic Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT February 20, 2008.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
IS THERE LIFE AFTER 2007?. WHERE DO TRIBES WANT TO GO WITH THE WRAP?
Tribal Perspective and Engagement: Regional Haze Planning March 2015 Regional Haze Planning Meeting – TEAM.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
WESTAR Strategic Plan 2005 Update WESTAR Staff May 6, 2005 Juneau, Alaska.
State and Regional Approaches to Improving Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Technical Assistance Conference Call Sadie Silcott,
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Summary of WRAP 2004 Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting October 14, 2003 Salt Lake City, UT.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.
CAAAC Air Quality Management Workgroup Update Anna Garcia OTC.
Strategic Planning for an Air Quality Program Ondrea Barber Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Market Trading Forum Update Ira Domsky and Colleen Delaney, Co-chairs.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
Welco EPA TRIBAL PROGRAMS Cathy Villa, EPA Tribal Coordinator EPA’s Tribal Programs leads the effort to protect human health and the environment of federally.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
Air Quality Data User Agencies Draft ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster February, 2005.
WRAP 2002 WORK PLAN Overview and Financial Status Report WRAP Board Meeting November 14, 2001 Salt Lake City, Utah.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
1 Spring Business Meeting Regional Haze SIP Development Survey San Francisco, California April 9, 2003.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Status of WRAP Work Plan Tom Moore, WRAP September 19, 2002 WESTAR Fall Technical Conference.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
Air Managers and State Caucus support  State Caucus – IWG feedback on Questions  Tribal Caucus Liaison WRAP Workgroups-Ad Hoc  Attribution of Haze 
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
WRAP Overview Established in 1997 as successor to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission. Develop technical and policy tools needed by western states.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Department of Air Quality Exceptional Event Streamlining, Standardization & Coordination CDAWG November, 2015 Clark County.
Agencies Active in Air Quality and Management and Science Draft ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster February, 2005.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
EPA Air Policy Priorities
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
WRAP Workplan WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations and Action Items
WESTAR Planning Committee
Training Program Report
WRAP Regional Haze Grant Status, Technical Project Priorities, & Proposed Technical Analysis Forum Tom Moore WRAP Technical Coordinator Attribution.
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
WESTAR Planning Committee
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
WESTAR Planning Committee Report
308 VS. 309 DECISION PROCESS November 2001 WRAP Meeting
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
WRAP FY2006 Grant 1,302,555 WGA Travel and Project Management 522,095 NTEC Travel, Project Management 362,960 New Projects - WGA 265,000 New Projects.
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Funding of Regional Planning Organizations May, 2006

Regional Planning Organizations Authorized by Congress in EPA/Governors recognized 5 existing organizations to serve as RPOs. Responsible for assisting the States in addressing Regional Haze. Performing ozone/PM2.5 planning as a baseline to extend to Regional Haze Regional Haze SIPs due December States need months lead time to complete SIP work and State reviews RPO deliverables due to States December (2006)

Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs)  RPOs were created for the purpose of supporting development of the Regional Haze SIPs  By the end of 2007, EPA will have invested almost $62 million in the Regional Planning Organizations  This investment has resulted in creating a technical and organizational capacity reaching well beyond Regional Haze SIP development.  The majority of EPA’s investment has been in regional data systems for monitoring, modeling and data collection and analyses to provide more detailed information and a better understanding of regional haze.  These capabilities can be further utilized to support States in the development of their PM and ozone attainment strategies –RPOs have demonstrated their abilities to collaborate and facilitate the development of multi-state air quality management plans that prior to the existence of RPOs was difficult, if not impossible to complete. –RPOs are well positioned to move the federal, state and tribal partnership to the next level of collaboration to address a broader set of air quality issues.  There should be savings in PM and Ozone SIP development costs for States because of the RPOs

Future of Air Quality Management  The National Academy of Science’s 2004 report on Air Quality Management in the United States recommended that there be increased collaboration in SIP planning and control-strategy development, utilizing regional approaches to SIP planning.  Regional approaches are critical to making progress on air quality issues that will only get more complicated, and are typically less suited to traditional regulatory approaches and controls. –Regional planning is predicated on multi-state coordination to resolve issues nominally beyond the abilities of independent state action. –Regional planning is a cost effective approach to developing multi-pollutant strategies, multi-state SIPs, and sharing the cost of technical and policy development –Regional planning provides a forum for strategic planning, focusing on federal and state priorities, and coordinating respective roles and activities.

Evolving the RPOs Role  Almost 85% of the PM areas and over a third of the ozone areas that will require additional controls are in the 3 eastern RPOs (MANE-VU, Midwest, VISTAS)  MANE-VU (OTC) and Midwest-RPO (LADCO) have extensive experience addressing ozone  While 18 ozone areas are in the WRAP domain, 15 of these are in California and 1 each in AZ, CO and NV. WRAP is not involved in PM and ozone SIP work  CENRAP is not involved in PM and ozone SIP work

Beyond 2007  All RPOs will need to continue to support Regional Haze implementation work (tracking of progress)  RPOs possess the tools and experience to move into multi-pollutant, multi-state planning –Established a valuable forum for data exchange, analysis and joint planning –Enhanced communication and working relations between States and between RPOs.  Base level funding needed to support a continuing role for the RPOs but allocations need to be reflective of the different levels of regional work required.

Congress set goal of natural air quality conditions in our parks by Regional Haze Rule requires ten-year plans and progress reports every five years. Beginning in 2008, EPA must engage the 50 states and tribes, as well as the federal land managers, in our process to review and act on the Regional Haze SIPs within 18 months of submittal. Once plans are approved, we must continue to make progress towards national goal, updating models, inventories, control strategies. RPOs will continue to facilitate consultation regarding reasonable further progress goals for each Class I area. Regional Haze Support Beyond December 2007 FY07 funding may not be sufficient to address State needs. RPO Funding

PM and Ozone Nonattainment Areas by RPO Domain