Data for Decision-Making Assessing the impact of technology implementation and professional development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Multiple Measures for Teacher Effectiveness
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Foundations for Success Initial Findings and New Directions Jason Snipes Director of Research Council of the Great City Schools Defining the Achievement.
Consistent Teacher judgement
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
Lessons Learned from District Tech Audits Sun Associates
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
The Role of Information in Systems for Learning Paul Nichols Charles DePascale The Center for Assessment.
Evaluating Your Technology Initiative How do you know it’s working? The MassCUE Evaluators Program Let us know you’re here!
Implementation of the Common Core Learning Standards BOE Meeting Presentation May 22, 2012.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING Focus on English.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
School Improvement Leadership: Developing the Action Plan CIA Team Denise Behrends Chad Dumas Beth McCracken February 23, 2012.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING Focus on mathematics.
Evaluating 1:1 Initiatives and Other Technology Initiatives The MassCUE Evaluators Program.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
For Center Grove Community School Corporation Data Component for Indiana Teacher Evaluation System.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
Leadership School Leadership Teams. Leadership Team Planning Objective: At the end of this section, you will have one SMART goal written and start on.
The School Effectiveness Framework
School Development Goal Development “Building a Learning Community”
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
PURPOSES OF CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
State Standards The standards provide a clarity of focus for all students, staff and parents. The clarity of focus will present a picture of a well-educated.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
F.M. Kearns Primary School 5 Year School Improvement Plan
Using Evidence to Refine a Partnership
Presentation transcript:

Data for Decision-Making Assessing the impact of technology implementation and professional development

zShelley Chamberlain yLexington Public Schools -- Coordinator of Technology, K-12 zJoanne Benton yLexington Public Schools -- Director of Elementary Education zJeff Sun yDirector, Sun Associates

Get the Resources zwww.sun-associates.com/resources/massupt yThis presentation ySample rubrics from Lexington’s evaluation projects yTechnology evaluation workbook yOther program evaluation resources

Lexington’s Technology Plan zCurrently in 5th year of 5-Year Plan zSun Associates has worked with the district to evaluate implementation since Year 2 zPrimarily, we have evaluated technology professional development and its impact on K-8 teachers

Plan Staging zYear 1-- Building Infrastructure zYear 2 -- Developing teacher basic skills zYear 3 -- Applying skills to curriculum zYear 4 -- Developing standards and competencies zYear 5 -- Refining and extending

What Have We Evaluated? zAcquisition of teacher skills (Year 2) zEfficacy of professional development models (Years 2 - 5) zTeacher beliefs and attitudes related to technology, curriculum, and change zGathering data on learnings, models, and other developments

What has Lexington Learned? zAccountability zPlanning -- e.g., what models do we want to promote and highlight? zHighlighting areas for continued/renewed attention -- e.g., infrastructure again!

How? zApproach centers on the development of unique indicators for success zReally a subset of formative evaluation strategies developed to assess the value and impact of technology at a district level zEmphasis is on developing indicators that are unique to a district’s technology goals and objectives

Why? zThe point of evaluation -- whether broad or narrowly focused -- is to gather data that promotes reflection on your progress toward meeting your goals zFocused reflection drives clarity of goals and expectations... zwhich must be communicated to your entire community (staff, students, parents,...)

zProducts yGoal refinement -- important for planning yFine-tuning processes yConnecting with community expectations

Connecting with the Bottom Line zWhat are our expectations for technology? zAre we achieving our expectations? zWhat is reasonable to expect? yTest scores? yIsolated effects of technology? yImpact on how teachers think about teaching and learning? zCreating the space to talk about these issues