Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8523.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
Advertisements

Immune therapy in NSCLC Presentation – 劉惠文 Supervisor – 劉俊煌教授.
Paz-Ares LG et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract CRA7510.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Goede V et al. Proc ASCO 2013;Abstract 7004.
Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation.
Robertson JFR et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(27):
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation 1 Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial (BRIM3) Comparing BRAF Inhibitor.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma O’Day S et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 4. Hodi FS et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
IPILIMUMAB UPDATE. Current Status GLOBAL STUDY –17 COUNTRIES : NORTH AMERICA, EU, AUSTRALIA –Canada 6 sites PATIENTS ENROLLED (as of May 19, :20.
Phase II Presurgical Feasibility Study of Bevacizumab in Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Jonasch E et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Phase I Study of PLX4032: Proof of Concept for V600E BRAF Mutation as a Therapeutic Target in Human Cancer Flaherty K et al. American Society of Clinical.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Cetuximab + Cisplatin in Estrogen Receptor-Negative, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Negative (Triple-Negative) Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Faculty National GI Tumor Board Clinical Investigators Provide Their Perspectives on Current.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation with a Single Dose of 90 Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin ® ) (Z) vs Maintenance with Rituximab (R)
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
A Phase 2 Study of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin for Front- Line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results Yasenchak.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Final Results for the 1703 Phase 1b/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple.
KEYNOTE-021: Pembrolizumab + Ipilimumab Active in Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Combined Inhibition of PD-L1, MEK, and BRAF Active in Advanced Melanoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CheckMate 204: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Pts With Advanced Melanoma and Asymptomatic, Untreated Brain Metastases CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Salles GA et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8004.
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Ipilimumab plus Dacarbazine for Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma1 Phase 3 Randomized Study of Ipilimumab (IPI) plus Dacarbazine (DTIC) vs DTIC.
Presentation transcript:

Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8523.

Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract Introduction Thirty percent of patients who present with melanoma already have brain metastases (mets) and an additional 30% will develop brain lesions within 12 to 24 months (Cancer 2007;110:1329). Whole brain irradiation is the standard of care. –Reported response rates are approximately 10% and median survival is approximately 3 to 6 months (JCO 2004;22:1293). Ipilimumab (Ipi) is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks CTLA-4 and its inhibitory effects on T cell-mediated immunity. Ipi monotherapy has shown anti-tumor activity and high one- and two-year survival rates (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:5591, Ann Oncol 2010;[Epub Feb 10]). Current study objective: –Assess the safety and activity of Ipi for patients with advanced melanoma and brain mets.

Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte- Associated Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) Inhibits Antitumor Activity CTLA-4 is a negative regulator of T-cell activation and proliferation, and anticancer immunity. Antigen presenting cells (APC) present tumor-specific antigens to T-cells, activating them against the tumor. Binding of CTLA-4 on T-cell to B7 receptor on APC promotes inhibition of T-cell activation. Ipi blocks CTLA-4 interaction with B7 and prevents CTLA-4-mediated block of T-cell activation. Although Ipi cannot cross the blood-brain barrier, activated T-cells can.

CA : A Phase II Sequential Two-Arm Study Design Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract F/up = follow-up; W = week; Bs = baseline; * or as clinically indicated; † confirmatory scan of Week 16 response (not PD); Arm B was sequential to Arm A. Screening Melanoma with ≥1 brain mets Ipilimumab dosing: W1 W4 W7 W10 W24W36 W48+ Tumor assessment* Non-CNS lesions: Bs W6W12, 16 W24 Q12W/End of treatment CNS lesions: Bs W6W12, 16, 20 † Q12W/End of treatment InductionMaintenanceF/up Arm A Steroid free Arm B Steroids required at study entry for symptom control 10 mg/kg Q3W x4 10 mg/kg Q12W Ipilimumab W1W12W24W48+

Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Novel patterns of response appear to limit the ability of standard response criteria (mWHO) to fully and accurately characterize anticancer activity in patients on Ipi. –Tumor inflammation (desired outcome of treatment) may be mistaken for tumor progression. Four patterns of response in advanced melanoma are observed: –Shrinkage in baseline lesions, without new lesions –Stable disease, sometime with slow, steady decline in tumor volume –Response in the presence of new lesions –Response after an increase in total tumor volume All patterns listed above are associated with favorable survival. irRC were evolved from mWHO to more comprehensively characterize anticancer activity. Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8523.

Best Overall Response by irRC Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract Arm A: Steroid free (n = 51)* Arm B: Steroids required at study entry for symptom control (n = 21)* GlobalBrainNon-CNSGlobalBrainNon-CNS CR PR9.8%15.7%13.7%4.8% SD15.7%9.8%19.6%4.8% BORR9.8%15.7%13.7%4.8% DCR25.5% 33.3%9.5% * Follow-up scans unavailable for some patients (may include patients who died or had disease progression prior to second scan) CR = complete response; PR = partial response; SD = stable disease; BORR = best overall response (CR + PR); DCR = disease control rate (CR + PR +SD).

Survival and Duration of Response (by irRC) Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract Clinical Parameter Arm A: Steroid free (n = 51) Arm B: Steroids required at study entry for symptom control (n = 21) irRCmWHOirRCmWHO Median overall survival (mos) Median progression-free survival (mos) Time to onset of responses (mos)1.2 Median duration of stable disease (mos)* — Median duration of response (mos)* 15.3 NE * Duration from week 12; NE = not evaluated.

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAE)* Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract Adverse Event Arm A : Steroid free (n = 51) Arm B: Steroids required at study entry for symptom control (n = 21) Any GradeGrade 3Any GradeGrade 3 Any irAE66.7%21.6%61.9%9.5% Diarrhea41.2%11.8%28.6%4.8% Rash33.3%2.0%28.6%4.8% Pruritus31.4%0%23.8%0% Colitis11.8%2.0%9.5%0% Exfoliative rash2.0% 0% Increased ALT3.9%0%14.3%9.5% Increased AST3.9%0%19.0%9.5% * AEs occurring in >5% of pts in either arm or of Grade 3 severity

Conclusions Ipilimumab therapy can be effective for patients with advanced melanoma who have active, stable brain mets. –Patients on corticosteroids for symptom control may also benefit from ipilimumab treatment. Ipilimumab therapy is well tolerated without unique toxicities in patients with advanced melanoma who have brain mets. Durable responses can occur in brain mets following early evidence of progressive disease (data not shown). The optimal dose of ipilimumab and sequencing with surgery and radiation therapy have yet to be determined. Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8523; Koon HB. Proc ASCO 2010; Discussant.

Investigator comments on ipilimumab for melanoma with brain metastases We actually saw some patients who had complete responses in the brain, which is unheard of with other agents. For example, IL-2 is almost never administered to patients with brain metastases because it worsens edema. The responses with ipilimumab appear to be durable — at least for the short time since the trial. So this works in a group of folks you’d expect would have exceedingly poor prognoses with a median survival of several months. In terms of why this agent caused responses in the brain, the thought is that T cells enter the brain from the systemic circulation. You might ask whether the blood-brain barrier is broken down in these patients, but my sense is that the reason we talk about the blood-brain barrier may be that we simply had poor therapies and now that we have more active agents, these drugs can either get to the brain directly, as was observed with the selective B-raf inhibitor data also presented at ASCO, and/or transmit their effect into the brain, in this case through activated T cells crossing that barrier. Interview with David F McDermott, MD, June 25, 2010

Investigator comments on ipilimumab for melanoma with brain metastases Clearly a cohort of patients in this Phase II study had durable brain responses, and even in the presence of steroids — which you might think would nullify it — objective responses occurred in the brain. This is encouraging and supports our clinical impressions that ipilimumab has some activity in the brain. No new side effects emerged in this study. It’s certainly not a home run, but I believe it has important implications for why this drug may be working as well as it is in the group of patients that it benefits. That was reassuring. Interview with Steven J O’Day, MD, June 25, 2010

Investigator comments on ipilimumab for melanoma with brain metastases This Phase II trial demonstrated that a subset of patients with melanoma experience regression of untreated brain metastases with ipilimumab. This is important because the brain has always been considered a sanctuary site for this disease. This trial used the 10-mg/kg dose with maintenance therapy, whereas the Phase III trial presented by O’Day used the 3-mg/kg dose for induction alone, which reflected what was considered to be the optimal dose and schedule in 2004 when the pivotal trial launched. We recently completed a randomized study published in Lancet Oncology in February 2010 comparing the two doses, and 10 mg may now be considered optimal. So the O‘Day results may actually have been a bit better if 10 mg/kg were administered with maintenance therapy, but obviously we won’t ever be able to know that for sure. More immune-related adverse events occur with 10 mg, but these are not different in the types of side effects. We simply saw a few more with 10 mg, but we found no difference in our ability to control them with the available algorithms. Interview with Jedd D Wolchok, MD, PhD, June 16, 2010