Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Where are you from? (office and role) 3. What do you hope.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Differential Response and Data American Humane 2007 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
1 During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training. You will answer questions based upon information.
Early On System Updates Winter 2011 Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOT&TA)
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
Neglected Adults Eastern Health Community Supports Program.
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
2015/5/161 Against Child Abuse (Hong Kong) Parent-Child Helpline Service Mr. Arkin Lo Service Manager (Remedial Service) Against Child Abuse.
Mapping Perpetrator’s Pattern Practice Tool
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator.
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.
Trauma Informed Care Assisted Living Facility Limited Mental Health Training.
Slough Children’s Service Safeguarding Peer Review.
that keep families strong
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
It’s All About Attitude Presenters: Darleen Shope and Richard Tvaroch The most important thing that changed is what we believe about families… Dave Thompson.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
CPS INVESTIGATIVE ASSESSMENT. Competencies Ability to integrate your investigation and family assessment into one document Ability to document solution.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
ENHANCING FAMILY GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH FAMILIES EXPERIENCING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE April 8, 2010.
WELCOME TO FAMILY TEAM DECISION MAKING MEETINGS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TRAINING IS.... Explain how Family Team Decision-making Meetings (FTDMs) are part.
END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION IN COLLABORATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT & VICTIM SERVICES.
Recruiting and Retaining Good Citizen Review Panel members The South Dakota Perspective.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Department of Human Services
Welcome to the ER/CalWORKs Webinar! You should have a panel on the right of your screen that shows other attendees and has a box at the bottom to write.
Engagement. Ask yourself the hard questions…  How can we better involve families, youth and caregivers in case planning?  How can we better empower.
SCREENING BRIEF INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) 1.
INTRODUCTIONS A TIME FOR SHARING Hello and Welcome back !
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Conducting & Documenting Monthly Health and Safety Visits with Children, and Monthly Visits with Caregivers and Parents.
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
COMMUNITY VISITOR TRAINING Quality Lifestyle Support Enhancing the Lives of Individuals.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.Tell us something others might.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
ACWA Conference 2010 Barnardos Find-a-Family Working Together – Promoting Positive Relationships to Enhance Permanency Lisa Velickovich and Laura Ritchie.
Child Protection Services By: Katrina Schimke. Introduction Please watch video before going through PowerPoint Presentation t. (Right click and then open.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Resolving Foster Parent Concerns
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
Family Preservation Services
SEFTON MASH The Decision Making Process of MASH and how the current restructure will affect MASH.
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
House Human Services Committee
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Presentation transcript:

Family Assessment Response

Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Where are you from? (office and role) 3. What do you hope to get out of the next 2 days?

Agreements You are here. You cannot be in 2 places at once, so make the most of it. Cells phones and other devices off or on mute. We will take breaks. Keep side bar conversations to a minimum. Active listening and participation is appreciated. Keep questions topic focused.

Overview of FAR Training Day 1 and 2: All FAR staff Day 3 and 4: Casework Practice Model (held in regions) FARFA Training: in local offices

LEARNING OBJECTIVES Gain knowledge about FAR Know the similarities and differences between FAR and Investigations Learn specific procedures and work flow of FAR Leave training feeling prepared to do FAR work

FAR: WHAT IS IT? FAR: WHAT IS IT?

FAR is a CPS Response Pathway 7 CPS FAR PATHWAY FAR PATHWAY INVESTIGATIVE PATHWAY INVESTIGATIVE PATHWAY

What is FAR? FAR is an alternative to the traditional Child Protective Services investigation A subject is not identified and a finding of child abuse and neglect is not made Risk and safety assessments are completed and assessing child safety is the focus Services are voluntary and of a short duration – 45 days unless the family agrees to extend the time – 90 days max 8

What is FAR? Focuses less on investigative fact finding and more on assessing families and ensuring child safety Seeks safety through family engagement and collaborative partnerships

CA’s Goals for FAR More children stay safely at home Provide early intervention Child safety through partnering and assessing Increase scope of service delivery Improve family-centered practice and integration of SBC Increase resource identification 10

Commonalities of Investigations & FAR Child safety is at the forefront of both responses Both are needed responses to Child Abuse and Neglect Reports Both maintain CA’s authority to make decisions about child removal Both utilize SBC as the case management model to improve outcomes

Differences between FAR and Investigations We contact parents before seeing the child and making a home visit (in most cases) No findings made No audio recording of interviews No pictures without parental consent 12

Why Implement FAR? 13

Why implement FAR? Not all families who receive a CPS report needs the same response. Families are better able to safely care for their children when they develop and strengthen their connections to natural supports and communities.

Why FAR? We can avoid out of home placements through better engagement with families and communities in child safety efforts. FAR is supported by legislation.

National Perspective of FAR The circumstances and needs of families differ and so should the response The majority of reports do not need an investigatory approach or court-ordered interventions Absent an investigation: – child safety will not be jeopardized – services can be in place more quickly – families will be more motivated to use services 16

Findings from other states Child safety was not compromised Families reported more involvement in decision-making More use of concrete services Families reported services “really helped” Higher family satisfaction with worker More worker visits and contact with families and providers LESS subsequent reports LESS out of home placements and removals Cost- slightly more expensive, but potential to reduce long- term costs Higher job satisfaction for workers

Research on Differential Response The research on differential response from other states is available at the following websites: /medicalschool/departments/pediatrics/subs/ can/QIC-DR/Pages/QIC-DR.aspx /medicalschool/departments/pediatrics/subs/ can/QIC-DR/Pages/QIC-DR.aspx /children/differential-response/pc-dr-ohio- section2-final-evaluation-report-1.pdf /children/differential-response/pc-dr-ohio- section2-final-evaluation-report-1.pdf

Evaluation of FAR IV-E waiver requires an evaluation of FAR implementation by an external evaluator. TriWest Group: contracted evaluator What is involved in the evaluation of FAR? Opportunities for staff input Parent survey 19

HOW FAR OPERATES: FROM INTAKE TO CASE CLOSURE

Intake Does the family meet the criteria for FAR? Yes Does the Intake meet the definition of CA/N? ON Screen out and document in FamLink

Most neglect cases will screen to FAR, except for emergent neglect Families with chronicity, some with prior dependency actions Risk factors such as drug and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness What types of intakes will you see in FAR? 22

Third party/kid on kid sexual abuse (negligent treatment) Low to moderate physical abuse What types of intakes will you see in FAR?

The beginning is the most important part of the work. 24

Transparency: What does this mean? 25

What are my first steps? Call the referrer back. Review any history in famlink. Make active efforts to contact the parent(s) by phone. Provide basic information to parent on phone to include some information about FAR. Engage parent in scheduling a time to meet with them and to complete your initial face to face (IFF) contact with the child. 26

Next steps The IFF can be completed at the initial home visit so long as you are able to meet the 72 hour policy timeframe. Be upfront with parents regarding timelines. When needed we may see children at schools, daycares, etc. During the initial home visit discuss the FAR pathway with the family. Review the FAR agreement and seek their signature. 27

Initial Face to Face contact with child victims An IFF includes the following: Observation of the child(ren); Observation of the child(ren)'s circumstances; Interview(s) with the child(ren) who have the capacity to communicate. The initial interview(s) should be sufficient to help the worker gather pertinent information towards the completion of the Safety Assessment and take any steps necessary for child safety; and Completion of the present danger assessment 28

Child Interviews At times you will not be able to conduct a thorough interview of the child during your initial IFF contact. Per policy, an interview must occur within 10 calendar days of the intake date. We must gather information from the child to properly assess child safety and understand what happened to the child.. 29

Does the Family Agree to the FAR Assessment? NO Transfer to Investigations Is the child in present danger? NO Yes Take Protective Action

Does the Family Agree to FAR? YES Work with Family to complete Family Assessment

Information Gathering in FAR More of a collaborative approach than in investigations. Normalize our need to gather information with the family. Ask them who they suggest we talk with to get more information about their family. Consider what collateral contacts are needed in each case. These vary based on the allegations, age of child, etc. Normalize your need to have both group and individual conversations with family members. 32

What is involved in completing the Family Assessment? Collateral contacts Assessing all adults and other children in home Gathering questions Safety assessment CANS tool SDM (structured decision making tool) 33

Having Difficult Conversations How comfortable are you with having difficult conversations? Why are they important in our engagement work with families? How do we prepare for these conversations? 34

Does the family need services? YES Work with Family to identify appropriate services and supports NO Close Case

Identifying Needs, Resources, and Services Co-develop case plan with family Connect family with community, services, and other resources Implement and monitor the plan Case closure

Does the Family Agree to Participate in all identified services? ON Is the Child Safe? YES Implement case plan with the Family

Is the Child Safe? NO Conduct an FTDM If the Family Refuses Services Does the family agree to services identified in FTDM? NO Take action to keep child safe, transfer to CFWS If the Family Refuses Services

Is the Child Safe? NO Conduct an FTDM If the Family Refuses Services Does the family agree to safety plan and services identified in FTDM? Yes Implement case plan with the family If the Family Refuses Services

FAR Timeframes Initial face-to-face contact : 72 hours including weekends and holidays Safety assessment: 30 days from date of intake FARFA (FAR family assessment): 45 days from date of intake unless parents agree to extend longer and services are being provided Case management and closure: 90 days max

Should I close the case? Have you addressed all of the allegations in the intake? Have all safety concerns been addressed? Is the family connected to community resources or support networks? Have you discussed what the family will do if a similar situation arises again in the future? Have you discussed case closure with the family?

Community Engagement The success of FAR depends on community involvement Communities want their families and children to be safe Families are better able to care for their children when they have strong connections to their community 42

LEARNING OBJECTIVES Gain knowledge about FAR Know the similarities and differences between FAR and Investigations Learn specific procedures and work flow of FAR. Leave training feeling prepared to do FAR work.

We want to support you: Site visits to your offices to staff cases, answer questions, etc. Monthly facilitated video case consultations Follow up practice discussions Opportunities to provide feedback Use your Regional and Office Leads 44

Who You Gonna Call? Children’s Administration Headquarters Leads: Dawn Cooper: Karolyn Smith:

Who You Gonna Call? REGIONAL FAR LEADS: Region 1: Julie Ellis Region 2: Kara Rozeboom Region 3: Anita Teeter