Draft-Version #18 9/13/11 1 Preprocessing Steps: These steps can be done prior to the algorithm calculation loop beginning. PS1-Data input from BY CAMD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
{Customer} Divisions Plan {Date} – {Version} Salesforce.com.
Advertisements

Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Energy Service Productivity Management ©2007 ESPM Energy Consultants, L.L.C. All Rights Reserved.
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
ERTAC EGU MACE/MACW Case Study December 10, 2012 DRAFT - DO NOT DISTRIBUTE1.
Bob McConnell, EPA Region 1
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Draft-Version #17 12/20/10 1 Preprocessing Steps: These steps can be done prior to the algorithm calculation loop beginning. PS1-Data input from BY CAMD.
Draft-Version #19 5/15/13 Preprocessing Steps: These steps can be done prior to the algorithm calculation loop beginning. PS1-Data input from BY CAMD Hourly.
Energy and Environmental Economics 1 Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
Profiling Working Group March 13, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 13, 2007.
Energy Calculations Dr. Sam C M Hui
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Rule:
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation.
WMO UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES PROGRAMME WMO UNEP IPCC Good Practice Guidance Simon Eggleston Technical.
Principles of Cost Accounting, 16th Edition, Edward J
ALGORITHMS AND FLOWCHARTS
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
1 Quality Control Review of E3 Calculator Inputs Comparison to DEER Database Brian Horii Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. November 16, 2006.
INSERT BOOK COVER 1Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Exploring Microsoft Office Excel 2010 by Robert Grauer, Keith.
ERTAC EGU Growth Code “Proof of Concept” USEPA Briefing Washington, DC December,
Status of ERTAC EGU Growth Committee September 16 th 2013.
Avoided Costs of Generation
Introduction to Standard Reports. Standard Reports 2 How to get information out of AQS Standard Reports Site / Monitor Metadata Detail Data Reports “
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
ERTAC 1DRAFT - DO NOT DISTRIBUTE. Presentation Overview 1.Process Overview and Timelines 2.Inputs 3.Algorithm Details 4.Results 5.Outstanding issues 2DRAFT.
Did the recession impact recent decreases in observed sulfate concentrations? Shao-Hang Chu, US EPA/OAQPS/AQAD October, 2011.
ERTAC EGU Growth Tool Stakeholder Rollout Lake Michigan Air Directors(LADCO) Rosemont, IL May 20 th,
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
DORIS MCLEOD AIR QUALITY PLANNER VIRGINIA DEQ 804/ ERTAC Tool Logic and Flowcharts.
BI Marketing Analyst input into report marketing Report TitleElectricity in California Report Subtitle State profile of power sector, market trends and.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
OTR Results ERTAC EGU –RESULTS WEBINAR May 16,
PPMS Spring User Group Meeting 5/30/2012 Presented by Susan Engel.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
1 ERCOT LRS Precision Analysis PWG Presentation February 27, 2007.
ERTAC 1. P RESENTATION O VERVIEW 1. Process Overview and Timelines 2. Inputs 3. Algorithm Details 4. Results 5. Outstanding issues 2.
ERTAC Growth Approach - EGUs ERTAC-EGU Development Group - Webinar May 16, 2013 Robert Lopez, WI-DNR - Presenter.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
RTF Update Kevin Smit Kelly Tarp ProCost Version 3.0 Modifications A registered professional engineering corporation with offices in the Seattle,
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation.
1 Memory Management Chapter 7. 2 Memory Management Subdividing memory to accommodate multiple processes Memory needs to be allocated to ensure a reasonable.
1 OTC Regional Attainment Strategy Danny Wong OTC November 2005 Meeting Wilmington, DE.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Calculator Walkthrough Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. April 8, 2005.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
BI Marketing Analyst input into report marketing Report TitleElectricity in Texas Report Subtitle State profile of power sector, market trends and investment.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
NENG-Combined Cycle, New Unit Hierarchy, and Growth Rates.
EMISSIONS INVENTORY UPDATE Briefing for OTC Committees and Stakeholder Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, DC Julie McDill & Susan Wierman 1.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
EGU Forecasting Tool (Data Elements) Office of Air Quality (800) John Welch Senior Environmental Manager IDEM.
2012 Emissions Inventory Workshop 1. 2  The owner or operator of any facility that is a source of air contaminants shall submit a complete emission.
Day in the Life (DITL) Production Operations with Energy Builder Copyright © 2015 EDataViz LLC.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
Forecasting Power System Hourly Load and Emissions for Air Quality Modeling ERTAC-EGU Model Development Group – Webinar & Outreach slides Robert.
EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission.
Algorithm Analysis CSE 2011 Winter September 2018.
CSP Grid Value of Energy Storage and LCOE Implications 26 August 2013
EPA’s Power Sector Projections Use of 2016 Data
ERTAC EGU Overview For the 2016 EGU workgroup
EGU Workgroup: 2016 beta Approach: Status: Next Steps / Milestones:
Patrick Cummins January 30, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Draft-Version #18 9/13/11 1 Preprocessing Steps: These steps can be done prior to the algorithm calculation loop beginning. PS1-Data input from BY CAMD Hourly File PS1.04-Create the 3 hourly hierarchies (hourly, 6-hour, 24- hour) from CAMD generation data for each region and ERTAC Fuel/Unit Type Bin PS3.01-Calculate the non-peak hourly growth rates and the hour specific growth rates as a function of the annual growth factor, the peak growth factor, and the transition hours for each region and ERTAC Fuel/Unit Type Bin and hour of the year PS2.07-Run edit checks on the information in the UAF PS1.02-Run edit checks on the information in the BY CAMD hourly file PS1.07-For each hour of the year in each ERTAC Fuel/Unit Type Bin, calculate the BYGen, BYRetGen, FYGen and FYGrowth PS2.04-For each existing and new unit in the UAF, calculate the hourly Optimal Load Threshold using the percentile of the hourly data as described in the Input Variables worksheet. PS2.05-For each existing and new unit in the UAF, calculate the max_annual_ ERTAC_UF. PS2.03-Determine the max_ERTAC_heat_ input_hourly_summer for each existing and new unit in the UAF. PS1.05-For partial year reporters, create hourly BY records using annual HI data and a default temporal profile for hours not reported to CAMD PS1.03- Create report on units with data outliers PS2.01-For every unit in the UAF, determine the ERTAC Fuel/Unit Type Bin PS2.02-For each existing and new unit in the UAF, calculate the ERTAC Heat Rate (annual average) PS2.06-For new units in the UAF, calculate the hourly proxy generation PS2.09-Output a UAF and hourly proxy listing suitable for import into the algorithm to allow States to review and update UAF information PS1.08-For each ERTAC_region and ERTAC_fuel/unit type bin, determine the unit allocation order. PS2-Data input from the Unit Availability File (UAF) PS3-Data input from the Growth File PS1.01-Remove data for units designated as non- EGUs by States/MJOs ID of non-EGU CAMD units is made thru State database inputs. Data from PS2.01 also needed. Use data in the BY CAMD Hourly File The outputs of this function won’t be put into the UAF. They will be put in a separate, hourly file. Data from UAF or EGrid needed for annual HI. Data also needed from PS3.01 and UAF. UF data and new unit data from the UAF needed. PS1.09-Output a unit allocation file and an hourly hierarchy file suitable for import into the algorithm to allow States to review and update the information PS2.08- Create report on units with data outliers PS1.06-Create report on partial year units. The temporal profile for the unreported months should mimic the full year reporter just above the unit in the allocation order. If no higher unit exists, each hour will receive the same amount of generation.

Draft-Version #18 9/13/11 2 Page 2: This page and Page 3 show the calculation of future generation and how the generation is allocated to each unit. Run by fuel/unit type and region. Order of regions run may be important for future iterations of the model, to try to account for regional energy transfers. 5-Multiply the BY operational input/output of each existing unit by AFYGR 6-Has the max capacity of any unit been reached? 2-Begin at the first/next hour in the hour- of-year hierarchy 4-Is the AFYGR ‹1? 4Y.3- Was this hr 8,760? 9N-Go to next hr (2) 7-Set the utilization of any unit exceeding its capacity back to the maximum allowed 8-Calculate ExGenPool for this hour: Sum the amount of generation for this hour that exceeded the capacity of each unit Y Y N N N Y 3-For the specific hour, calculate: TotalProxy, AFYGrowth, AFYGR 4Y.2.a-Multiply the BY operational input/output of each unit by AFYGR 4Y.1-Raise a blue flag to indicate excess new capacity and document AFYGrowth 4Y.3.Y-Go to Page 3 The comparison in 6 should be made to hourly and annual capacities and utilization fractions (UF). 4Y2-Assign proxy generation to new units not already at their max annual ERTAC UF or annual capacity limit. 4.5-Assign proxy generation to new units not already at their max annual ERTAC UF or annual capacity limit. 3.5-hr = deficit check? 3.5 Y- More gen capacity needed? 3.5Y.1-Add new generic unit(s) N Y Y N 3.5Y.2- Insert generic unit(s) in UAF and calculate unit data, including optimal load threshold, max_annual_ERTAC_UF, & hourly proxy gen. 3.6-Re calculate the unit allocation order with the new generic unit(s) 4Y.3.N-Go to next hr (2) 9- Was this hr 8,760? 9Y-Go to Page 3 N Y Begin at the first hour in the hierarchy

Draft-Version #18 9/13/ For first unit in allocation listing, allocate utilization of that unit from the ExGenPool 12-Has the unit optimal threshold or any annual capacity of that unit been reached? 13-Go to next unit on allocation hierarchy 14-Any units left? 14Y.1-Allot utilization to the next unit on the allocation listing 14Y.2-Has the unit optimal threshold or any annual capacity limit of the unit been reached? 14Y.3-Has hr 8,760 been reached? 14Y.3N - Go to next hr (10.5) 12N.2 -Go to next hr (10.5) N Y N N N N Y Y Y Y Page 3: This routine is done for hours where there is an ExGenPool. Continues the generation allocation to units. If the option is included to estimate energy transfer between regions, this would be done for primary and secondary consuming regions. 14Y.3Y-Go to Page 4 15-For first unit in allocation listing, allocate utilization of that unit from the ExGenPool 16-Has any max capacity of that unit been reached? 16N. 2-Go to next hr Go to next unit on allocation hierarchy 18-Any units left? 18Y.1-Allot utilization to the next unit on the allocation listing N 12N- Has hr 8,760 been reached ? 12N.1- Go to Page 4 16N.1- Has hr 8,760 been rchd? 16N.1Y- Go to Page 4 N Y N Y Y The current setup distributes the ExGenPool in 2 passes. Future iterations may want to distribute the ExGenPool in up to 5 passes. 10-Page Begin at the first/next hour in the hour-of-year hierarchy

Draft-Version #18 9/13/11 4 Page 4: This page checks to ensure that spinning reserve requirements for each region of the system are met. This portion of the work is performed after pages 2 and 3 for the generation calculation and allocations have been performed for all three fuels (coal, oil, natural gas). Spinning reserve for any hour can be satisfied by any extra capacity in any fuel type. The amount needed is calculated by finding the maximum capacity of the largest single unit running in any hour using any fuel and multiplying by 100%. 19- Page 4 20-For each hour, determine the capacity of the largest unit operating 21-The required reserve capacity equals 100% of the capacity of the largest unit operating 23-Does enough reserve capacity exist in that hour? 22-Beginning at the first hour in the hour of year hierarchy, compare the required reserve capacity to the amount of generation in the system not being used. 23Y- Has hr 8,760 been reached ? 24-Go to next hour (23) Y N N Y 25-Go to Page 5 23N-Send up a red flag for more capacity needed 23Y1-Print out a useful report detailing all reserve capacity needed. 23.5Y1-Output a database of hourly generation/heat input data for each unit as well as a summary table of unit generation/heat input (base yr versus future yr) 19.5-Print out a useful generation report by unit for stakeholder review 19.1-If any hour showed a demand generation deficit, print out a useful report showing where, when, how much, and for new generic unit creation, data on those units.

Draft-Version #18 9/13/11 5 Page 5: This part of the work checks to see if the expected controls, new generation, future year generation, and other system changes allow the universe of units to meet the various environmental caps. 25- Page 5 26-For each hour of the year, for each unit, calculate emissions of NOx, SO2, and CO2(e). 27-For units subject to the Transport Rule, are all caps met? 29-For units subject to the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord, are all caps met? 30-For units subject to the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, are all caps met? 27.5B-Send up a flag that more control was needed and print out a useful report detailing generic controls 30N-Send up a flag for more EE or control needed and print out a useful report 29N-Send up a flag for more EE or control needed and print out a useful report 31-Stop and print out a useful report for those interested showing compliance/noncompliance with the climate change caps N N N Y Y Y 26.5-Apply unit level controls for units where future retrofits are expected to occur, based on information provided by States in the Controls and Emissions file 28-Print out a useful report for the SIPs and output a database (ORL, NIF, or similar) that can be used for AQ modeling purposes. Reports need significant detail to allow review of the results from application of transport and other state caps Assign generic controls as described in the narrative to meet caps in the future year The processes of decision #27 are described on page 6.

Draft-Version #18 9/13/11 6 Page 6: This section checks to see if the emissions from the universe of EGUs may comply with the Transport Rule and other requ’ts. If state designated controls are not sufficient to demonstrate compliance with any particular cap, 27.5 assigns specific controls until rule requirements are met at state and/or group levels. 27.1a- For each state, calculate annual NOx, annual SO2, and ozone season NOx in the future year. 27.1b-Compare each state’s future year emissions totals to the totals for OS NOx, Annual NOx, and Annual SO2 listed in the State Total Listing. State totals could be assurance levels, budget levels from CSAPR, or other appropriate state budget; only for states subject to CSAPR or state cap requirement. 27.5B-Send up a flag that more control was needed and print out a useful report detailing generic controls N 27.5 Assign generic controls in the state(s) with excess emissions as described in the narrative to meet caps in the future year 27.1d-Is the regional group’s future emissions of SO2, annual NOx, and OS NOx less than or equal to the group cap? (multiple potential groups to check) 27.1c-Is each state’s future emissions of SO2, annual NOx, and OS NOx less than or equal to the state cap? 27.2a-Compare each group of state’s future year emissions totals to the applicable totals for that year for OS NOx, Annual NOx, and Annual SO2 listed in the Group Total Listing. There are as many groups as need to be defined for each pollutant: annual SO2 and NOx, OS NOx. The listing must delineate both the group total emissions for each pollutant and the states included in each group Assign generic controls in the regional group with excess emissions as described in the narrative to meet caps in the future year 27.5B-Send up a flag that more control was needed and print out a useful report detailing generic controls 28- Page 5 Y N Y